The Universal Credit Bill is now certain to become law, after being subject to some very significant amendments which removed all matters relating to personal independence payment (PIP).

However, this is just the start of years of proposed welfare reforms by the Labour government.

We’ve set out some of the major planned changes below.  Over the summer we will be creating a more detailed summary.

Autumn 2025:  Timms PIP assessment review begins work

At this point there is no certainty over whether Timms review of the PIP assessment relates to current claimants or only to new claimants, once the new assessment comes into force.

According to the terms of reference, the review will include will include consideration of:

  • The role of the PIP assessment.
  • The assessment criteria – including activities, descriptors and associated points. The review will consider both the Daily Living and Mobility elements of the PIP assessment.
  • Whether any other evidence should be considered alongside the functional assessment to fairly reflect the impact of living with a long-term health condition or disability, including related to an individual’s personal circumstances and environment.
  • How the PIP assessment could provide fair access to the right support at the right level across the benefits system.
  • What role the assessment could and should play in unlocking wider support

Timms says that he will “engage widely over the summer to design the process for the work of the review, including to ensure that expertise from a range of different perspectives is drawn upon.”

The actual work of the review will begin in the Autumn of 2025. At this stage we have no idea whether the review will share information about its work as it goes along or whether it will be kept confidential until its findings are handed over to the secretary of state in Autumn 2026.

Date TBC:  Pathways To Work  White Paper to be published. 

We don’t have a date for the white paper  yet.  It could be as early as Autumn 2025.  The white paper follows the Green Paper Pathways To Work consultation and should include proposals on:

  • Removing barriers to trying work
  • Supporting people who lose entitlement to PIP
  • Proposed Unemployment Insurance contributory benefit
  • Delaying access to the UC health element until age 22
  • Raising the age at which people can claim PIP to 18

Timms has said in his terms of reference for the review of the PIP assessment that the abolition of the WCA will also be in the white paper.

April 2026:  Universal Credit Act comes into force

The Universal Credit Act will introduce the cuts to the UC health element for new claims, the increases to the UC standard rate and the introduction of the severe conditions criteria as a means of deciding who gets the higher rate of the UC health element.

Autumn 2026: Timms review of the PIP assessment given to the secretary of state

The government has said they want to introduce changes as quickly as possible after the Timms review is completed.  How soon they happen will depend on whether they require primary or secondary legislation or no legislation at all.  But some changes could come in as early as Spring 2027.

2027/28:  Delaying access to the UC health element until age 22

This is one of the issues that was consulted on in the Pathways To Work Green Paper.  We should have more details, including whether Labour intend to go ahead with the proposal, when the White Paper is published.

2028/29:  Abolition of the WCA

The work capability assessment (WCA) is the current test which gives access to the limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA) element of universal credit.

The LCWRA element of UC will be replaced for new claimants from April 2026 by the UC health element.

Then, from 2028/29, the WCA will be axed and eligibility for the UC health element will depend upon being in receipt of the daily living component of PIP.

There is currently no certainty about whether current LCWRA claimants who do not receive PIP daily living will be affected by the change.

2028/29: PIP/UC single assessment

At the same time as the WCA is abolished, the new PIP assessment that is created by the Timms review will be introduced if it has not been introduced earlier. This single assessment will give access to both PIP and the health element of UC.

2028/29: New Unemployment Insurance contributory benefit

The Green Paper gave sketchy details of a proposal to replace New Style Employment and Support Allowance (NS ESA) and New Style Jobseeker’s Allowance (NS JSA) with one new Unemployment Insurance benefit. 

We should know more when the White Paper is published.

There is no certainty about how this proposal might affect current claimants.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    The government is now trialling Pathways to Work support and will have a national rollout in April 2026.

    All new claimants affected by the reduction to the UC health element will be offered support, provided by a dedicated Pathways to Work adviser. Additional work coach support to provide one-to-one personalised support to disabled customers and those with health conditions to help them move towards, and into, work. Pathways to Work Advisers will support claimants on Universal Credit (UC) who are awaiting their Work Capability Assessment and those who have been found to have ‘limited capability for work’ or ‘limited capability for work and work-related activity’ who want, or could benefit from, more help to move into work.

    A conversation about their needs, goals and aspirations; offered one-to-one follow-on support, and given help to access additional work, health and skills support that can meet their needs. This will include:

    Access to specialist local Supported Employment provision across England and Wales for individuals that are disabled, have health conditions or other complex barriers to employment through Connect to Work. Support through local Trailblazers and the WorkWell initiative, which will be available in around half of England and parts of Wales. In other areas, we will work to draw on health, skills and wider services and to put in place additional provision where this is needed.

    Connect to Work
    Offers tailored, one-to-one help from Employment Specialists and Employment Support Officers
    Connects employment with health and skills support
    Gains access to training, upskilling opportunities, and local services that boost your confidence and employability.
    Is shaped around your community’s needs.

    WorkWell
    It is anticipated (but not required) that WorkWell services will particularly work with individuals with mental health (MH) and musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions, reflecting that these are two of the key drivers of ill-health-related economic inactivity, and a focus of the major conditions strategy. We expect work and health coaches will be able to provide:
    an initial assessment of barriers to employment
    return-to-work/thrive-in-work planning, with clear objectives that address physical, psychological and social needs
    employer liaison. If the participant consents, the employer can be contacted to share the work plan and provide advice
    advice on workplace adjustments
    personalised work and health support with follow-up as required, including ongoing support in the form of locally determined, low intensity appointments to take stock of progress and recommend further actions and activities
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @John Pathways to Work report to be published by committee

      The Work and Pensions Committee will publish its Pathways to Work report examining the Government’s welfare reforms intended to get people on benefits into work at 00.01 on Tuesday 29 July.

      This report follows a 4-month inquiry into the subject and is the first of the Committee’s workstream scrutinizing the Government’s plan to reform employment and welfare outlined in its Get Britain Working white paper.

      Embargoed copies will be available from the morning of Monday 28 July.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    Just to add to my long previous post the pip notes said that they have made there decision based on my recent UC assement but I thought they could not do that as it is not been brought in till next year. Plus my WCA is totally different to pip assement so why would they use that to help decide my pip award?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    All this is very confusing they said there was no change to pip assessment for people already claiming so does this timms review mean that that has now changed. I just had my pip reviewed and got paperwork today I dont know weather to challenge it as they have clearly not looked at any new evidence provided but instead just marked it excately the same as last time. I called to challenge tge pounts last time and had a lady call me weeks later to bully me they told me that I was on tge higher rate so would only be wasting mine and their time and to make sure I put a letter in on my next review to advise they need to look at all paperwork closely and make sure points are correct I did this and they again have definitely not looked at paperwork. I get enhanced again and will be 64 when they review me again in 2028 although award is to 2029 they said they have given me a longer award but that is not true either. Sorry for the long post but could use some advice. Do I challenge or not is the pip changes that they said would not affect old claimants still in place or do we all have to go on any new rules and is it true that they reassess you when you are 63 or 64 any help would be appreciated.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Dr Jay Watts, Consultant Clinical Psychologist and Activitist
    Twitter: @Shrink_at_Large
    Date: Jul 18
    LORDS REVIEW UC BILL ON TUESDAY
    Lords can't stop UC Bill BUT every speech in our support builds legal case and hopefully will encourage support for Baroness Bennett's fab 'motion to regret'.
    Please email the template or your version to speaking Lords (Email template and contact emails provided here - Scroll down in article to what you can do section to find):

    https://thepsychopoliticalbody.substack.com/p/how-labour-is-gutting-substantial
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Fiona Nobody is taking away or changing sunstantial risk. Im not saying that won't change after Timms review, but nothing has changed on that criteria under the current bill passing through Parliament 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @Anon 25 Im confused.

      Remember, when Timms said in the PIP Bill third reading in parliament, that 'severe conditions' would not be affected?

      PIP bill third reading

      17.59 parliament tv Stephen Timms, DWP disability minister on the severe conditions criteria

      "The severe conditions criteria in the bill exactly reflects how the functional tests are applied at present. That is in guidance. It’s being moved in this bill into legislation. It does take account of Parkinson’s. It does take account of MS. Because people need to meet the descriptors reliably, safely, repeatedly and in a reasonable time frame. And so I can give a very firm assurance to those who are concerned about how the severe conditions criteria will work for those on fluctuating conditions.
      The word constantly here refers, as I said in my intervention earlier, to the functional criteria needing to apply at all times, not to somebody’s symptoms."


      There seems to be a dichotomy, between the excerpt above and an excerpt from the article you have linked:

      Timms has said, that ….reliably, safely, repeatedly, in a reasonable timeframe……will still be taken into account……severe conditions criteria will still work for those on fluctuating conditions…….but the article below states ……'with no fluctuation'………


      Can you explain the disparity, between Timms saying, one thing, and Dr Jay Watts saying the opposite thing?!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Anon 25 Wow!!!!!!! Just read anon25 post I cannot believe they are taking away substantial risk away they've stripped it bare. even voters who hate disability benefits they all say they don't want the vulnerable to suffer by stripping the substantial risk.Is doing that and Timms told parliament it was the same and the mp,s took his word for it. it was slight of hand or basic lies he should not be allowed to never not answer the question in parliament without giving a true answer. they all do it it's making a farce out of parliament don't they realise that.If any law needs passing it's that all questions in parliament should be answered with a true and honest answer they should not take this government's word for anything we didn't vote for lies, the same as the last lot and that manefesto is smoke and mirrors this is not what we voted for it was a waste of ink. It's evil it's a disgrace
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    I see the government is going to have schools teach children that depression and anxiety are part of the normal ups and downs of everyday life. Teach and promote resilience, so children learn to cope with and overcome depression and anxiety. Teach children to not self-diagnose themselves as having any mental health conditions.

    Schools will have staff trained (which takes a few weeks) in psychological first aid. And a trained (which takes 1 year) education mental health practitioner. Who will advise on managing sleep, problem-solving, panic attacks, anxiety, depression and emotional health. Enabling children to overcome such problems.

    The stated aim of this policy is to reduce future worklessness. Reduce the number of adults taking time off sick or claiming incapacity/disability benefits for mental health conditions.

    The government appears to think most people taking time off sick or on incapacity/disability benefits for mental health conditions lack character. That they need to stop thinking of themselves as unwell and need to learn to cope, pull themselves together and get on with life like everyone else. The government appears to be coming from a place of utter ignorance and prejudice about what causes mental health conditions and how they are effectively treated. And how difficult incapacity/disability benefits are to claim and the severity of some mental health conditions.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @John They have no idea not all mental illness is depression..... it will just cause late diagnosis and will cause more issues and why do we have psychiatrists when a teaching assistant can tell you your fine.... do they still believe the world is round this sounds like Trump and Autism they have no idea stick to politics there not medical professionals



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @HL Bridget Philipson the Education Secretary talking to the Sunday Telegraph. What the aim is of the policy, what they will teach children. 

      Looked it up online and Labour has a policy commitment to a national roll out of mental health support teams in schools to reach full national coverage by 2029/2030. So the policy exists. And looked up what training staff are required to have and what that training is intended to enable them to do. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @John Hi John - do you have a source for this? Thanks.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    I just pray, the rest don't sell themselves out to keep starmer happy, so much for serving your constituents who voted you in. It's just the keir party and his motley crew with kendle sat up front on her broomstick with timms in the sidecar, so much for a democratically for working-class people.As soon as your sick or disabled they forget you worked most of your life. Some of these front benchers should realise things can change really fast,they often forget who got them there. Hopefully the rest keep there nerves for the timms report.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    The thing that is a worry that unless there is a party we can vote for that will support the disabled and poor in uk we are stuck with worse. The Tories as it stands wanted more cuts to disability and reform maybe the same, the Liberals leader spoke up against the cuts though.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Hilde @Hilde I’m watching 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Hilde Jeremy Corbyn is the only true Socialist who stands for ordinary people as far as I can see.  Labour no longer means Socialist and hasn't for a long time.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @tinytim Watch out for Jeremy Corbyn..
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago
    ‘They had each received a call from the prime minister's political director Claire Reynolds, who, as it happens, is married to the Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds.

    And can anyone else detect a ‘tone’ in the last sentence of this following paragraph? 🤣

    ‘Sir Keir Starmer has to hope this splash of discipline helps soothe and calm his party, rather than relitigating these recent rows.
    Let's see how that turns out.’


    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cedg44wj47go



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @Gingin Oh my god I cant believe Claire is now working there too! They have both sold their souls to the devil.
      Im hoping we do get a new left party, and the 16 year olds eligible to vote soon, will do so for Zarah, Corbyn and all (please good Labourites: Burgon, RH etc and all those who voted against cuts leave and join with them ). Tories and Reform  will be even worse. This is a terrible and scary time to be disabled... especially for the young, and those who dont even yet know they will become disabled in the next few years
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Gingin
      "Sir Keir Starmer has to hope this splash of discipline helps soothe and calm his party"

      Backbenchers had been saying for months that the government refused to listen to their concerns and was aloof and intolerant. The government has responded by saying, "oh, so they're saying we're intolerant, are they? Well, we'll soon crack down on that!". I'm not entirely convinced that response is likely to "soothe and calm his party".
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Gingin This intermarriage of the politicians with the civil servants and other politicians and police and armed forces is in fact the very definition of an oligarchy! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Dear Sir Starmer,

    Thank you for making your MPs your enemy. 

    Kind Regards,
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Doesn't suspend all the rebels because he'd lose too many votes in the house so just makes an example of some. Plain mean, like a useless headmaster who's lost control of the class.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Have you noticed the 1 subject never up for discussion is mp,s expenses I firmly believe if Rachel Reeves needs some money from down the back of the settee. I wonder if the expenses were stopped how much would be saved(a lot)
    they should ban them golden tickets.....
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    The twitter disability commentator @LurgeeLife has today posted a huge amount of tibbits of liz Kendall at today’s dwp committee but also official dwp stats on those who didn’t transfer over to uc successfully and dla to pip 

    I recommend reading (far too much to post and I can’t post video clips)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    You never learn do you Free Gear Keir. A spiteful authoritarian move by suspending heroic MPS.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    I am glad Starmer has made his move as he has now exposed himself as a right wing authoritarian leader who will not tolerate any opposition to his draconian measures against the poor and the weak. It will only help galvanise the new progressive movement that is being spearheaded by Jeremy Corbyn and it is my hope that many will leave the labour party and join the more progressive movement to stand up for real social justice. Starmer is finished and he will end up with a small stub of the labour movement who will leave him in droves. The unions too are going to support the new progressives and the momentum can only grow in the coming days
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @James There are many who expose themselves, with just a simple statement.... There should be no left there should be just be the right (way) ..... Iv lived through old proper labour that will never be again... There is too bigger world stage for egos... Unions hold to ransom........ I trust in one greater than me, and that keeps me grounded and eyes wide open..... Starmer could never represent Labour so right with that, take care James ... I pray every day for a softening and compassion and strength in those who are fighting for us ☺
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @James I so hope you're right!!  I will never vote for the Labour party again.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @James Yeah, I'm not sure that's going to happen, or even that the party will get off the ground.  Splinter groups don't have a good track record in the UK.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Maskell has had whip removed 😯
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @James Corbyn who lost two elections.   I understand why people are excited by the new party, but I don't see it progressing very far, no matter how much we (or anyone else) might want it to.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @godgivemestrength I'll bet that hurt when I they pulled it out 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @godgivemestrength No surprise. This Starmer fraud has no principles, no integrity & no tolerance for strong disagreement. For a supposed Labour Party PM, the betrayal of so many traditional Labour principles couldn't get much worse. Labour really need to replace him well before the next GE or else face another long-term out of power. That's the simple reality. Get rid of the fraud, or face huge electoral damage. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @godgivemestrength I said this would end up happening and in a way I am glad as it will show the other labour mps that they must vote with their feet and join Corbyn's new party and form a strong voice against this right wing government
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @godgivemestrength What a bully Starmer is!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Just seen in the BBC that four (or more) Labour MP's have had the whip removed due rebelling against disability cuts. Starmer is a control freak!

    With regards to work, I in the middle of going through Occupational Health (again) because employer not happy about productivity etc. I have already gone through data subject Access request (which the management are aware of, and far from happy about). Also, bullying at work is an issue (not openly, but the childish 'Sir, Matt has done this etc' to team leaders).


    Basically those with disabilities, both obvious and hidden, are not wanted. Whilst the school I attended was very good, it did come with very serious drawbacks: societal isolation. It was even worse for those who had to board - I was a day child, thank God 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Matt It's nice of starmer to potentially donate some MPs to corbyns new party 🤣
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @D Wow, utterly damning - and from the hallowed OBR, no less!

      #They'vegottogo
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Rachael Maskell has also now been suspended.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Pixelmum Sad for the mp,s losing the whip but he,s vindictive, but they have the morael high ground of standing up for what's right and they have a line that decent folks, know not to cross. it shows a lot about a society of how they protect and help their vulnerable. maybe the front benches should try and remember that, as they've lost so many future voters because of all this.They all harp on about caring for there disabled relatives but a leopard doesn't change it's spots
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    My M.P. is one of the suspended M.P.s. I have just sent him an email of support. My energy levels are very low today, but hopefully tomorrow I will be sending a lengthy email to Keir Starmer expressing my disappointment and frustration with the Labour Party. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.