The Conservatives have launched a renewed campaign against disabled claimants, echoing Labour policies. Kemi Badenoch claimed yesterday that it was time to “draw a line on what health issues the state can support people with”, particularly targeting “low level mental health issues”, such as  “being diagnosed with anxiety which can be worth more than £20,000 to some families.” 

Badenoch set the tone in the opening remarks of her speech, arguing that “Rachel Reeves hiked taxes by £26 billion to pay for a welfare splurge, penalising people who work hard and making them pay for those who don't work at all.”

She went on to claim:  “Labour’s Budget was for Benefits Street.

“They send a very clear message.

“If you work hard, and do the right thing, you will get less.

“And if you are on benefits, you will get more.

“Right now, in Britain there are more than 6 million working-age people claiming benefits instead of working.

“That’s more than the entire population of Norway.

“Who we are paying to sit at home.”

The figure of over 6 million can only be reached by including all those universal credit claimants who have been found to be unable to work or prepare for work.

The Conservative leader went on to say that she, Mel Stride, Andrew Griffith and Helen Whately would spend the next year figuring out how to get more people into work and cut the benefits bill.

“We will undertake a full review of the level and operation of the Household Benefit cap, which currently acts more like a sieve than a cap because most people on benefits avoid it through one exemption or another.

“Exemptions like being diagnosed with anxiety which can be worth more than £20,000 to some families.”

They will also “review which conditions the state treats as disabilities when it comes to benefits.

“All of us will have physical and mental challenges at some point in our lives.

“But in an age in which one in four people now self-report as disabled, it’s clear that we are now going to have to draw a line on what health issues the state can support people with.”

Badenoch claimed that her team had already identified £23 billion in savings by measuring such as restricting benefits to British citizens and “Reducing eligibility for low level mental health issues.”

At present, the possibility of the Conservatives winning power at the next election seems remote.  But a minority Reform UK government propped up by a much reduced Tory party may be real possibility.

However, the most immediate danger is the fact that Labour, the Conservatives and Reform UK are increasingly coming together in arguing that mental health issues, in particular, are being overdiagnosed and that benefits should not be given to those with “low level” conditions. 

It is an argument which, if won, could easily be extended to many physical health conditions, ushering in a new four-point PIP system by the back door.

With Streeting’s rushed review into overdiagnosis of mental health and neurodivergent conditions due to report in the summer, we hope this is a battle that disability charities are already preparing to fight.

You can read the full text of Badenoch’s speech here

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I see "Max" and his fellow travellers have got Motability to set up a "Special Investigations Unit" of 80 people, who will be checking up on Motability customers. As I said before, "Max" will not stop until Motability is shut down.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    We  cannot escape the reality that for many people who go to work  
    Plenty of them hate it and so have no time for other people who on disability/motability are having a  similar lifestyle domestically than they are but without  working
     What is  cruel is the narrative that all  that is required is conditionality and effort and a  great  future awaits  most people.  As if  people who  run businesses are really keen to  hire a  few million long term  sick  claimants.  The fact is reducing the payments to most claimants is a disaster to them and arguably  their communities.  Labour MPs  did the maths earlier this year.   In many  cases their majorities was  smaller  than the claimant vote.   The  Government do not really  intend to transform the work world into truly   accessible.   Its about appeasing the right and not about being progressive  

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @AB But it is a false narrative as most people on disability benefits do not have a similar lifestyle domestically to those working.

      According to research by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation. For adults receiving the UC health element. 75% are in material deprivation, 48% are in food insecurity, 34% could not afford to keep their home warm last winter, 24% had to use a foodbank in the last year, 19% are in arrears on household bills.

      And the government's knowing this cut UC health element by £206.01 a month for new claimants. On the basis it is a perverse incentive to be too disabled to work and overly generous unfair on hard working taxpayers. And they managed to do this because the public believe the false narratives spun by the media and politicians about disability benefits. And people on disability benefits have been successfully demonized and scapegoated. Which can also be seen in the rising disability hate crime figures.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    these demonising attacks are completely out of control on the helpless folk.
    these demons should look at themselves  in the mirror. 
    there the ones living off the taxpayers, getting minimum 90+k, plus expenses no normal person would ever get.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John
      By the way, how this post got a down vote I have no idea.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John
      I am convinced that many MPs (of whichever party) and media pundits who engage in attacks like this would be diagnosed as psychopaths or sociopaths if they were subjected to psychological testing. THe hypocrisy, lack of empathy and willingness to inflict harm on others (always people at the bottom of the pile of course) are off the charts.

      "these demons should look at themselves in the mirror. "

      That would require a conscience and a capacity for self-reflection. People who engage in these attacks seem to be entirely lacking in both.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    My goodness they already cut the health element amount in half for new claimants and are reviewing how to change the PIP system, what more do they want from us?! They are relentless, they are never satisfied, they just continue to attack us, day after day, its never enough for them. If it was any other vulnerable group of people this rhetoric would not be allowed, but the government and mainstream media seem to think its fine to attack the sick and disabled every single day. They may as well just ship us all off to camps and get it over with.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    “The Conservative leader went on to say that she, Mel Stride, Andrew Griffith and Helen Whately would spend the next year figuring out how to get more people into work and cut the benefits bill.”

    You have decades to think about it before you ever get the chance to act on it as I doubt you will see the inside of Downing Street for a very long time. Certainly not as Prime Minister.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    It's weird I've never met anyone, myself included who wants to claim anything more than the bare minimum to live on mainly because the idea of having to deal more with the DWP is deeply traumatic. I don't know if I could qualify for pip or not but since I can just about manage with lcwra I'm not even gonna look! Often when I get the yearly letter about the inflation rate level increase in money I think I'd rather they kept the money and didn't give me the utter terror of having to open an envelope from them
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John Well said, I particularly find it infuriating how the government often bleats on about saving for old age yet we cant, how many of us on lcwra and are likely to be for the foreseeable future aren't going to be able to cope when we hit pension age? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Sara Some people used to be given financial security and left alone to get on with their lives.
      For example
      Severe Disablement Allowance(80%+ disabled) in effect never reassessed, awarded for life and left alone.
      Disability Living Allowance lifetime awards, never reassessed and are left alone by the DWP.
      Both uprated every year inline with CPI inflation.

      It used to be the norm that such promises would be kept regardless of changes in government. That legacy benefit awards for life would be honoured. And you could even use them as income for things like 25 year duration mortgage applications. The income was viewed as secure for life.

      Then the Conservative/LibDem Coalition government got elected.
      And they broke the promises and took that away.
      And ever since Coalition, Conservative, Labour it has been moving goal posts on eligibility, benefit amounts and engagement with the DWP. Even for those disabled for life, including those blatantly incapable of working, and the most severely disabled.

      It is cruel. People with for life health conditions are not magically going to get better. Making them poorer, making the have to reapply, making them have to engage with the DWP, is pointless cruelty that causes needless stress and distress. If politicians had empathy they would tell them they will be supported give them financial certainty and tell them to have the best life they can and leave them alone. At most the DWP should just be offering them voluntary help in the yearly uprating letter, that the DWP is here to help if you would feel able to and would like some help towards working. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Labour, the Tories and Reform are increasingly indistinguishable. The severity of the rhetoric may vary, but you don't have to read between the lines much to see that in terms of policy all three parties are converging on the same toxic agenda. A vote for any of these parties is now unthinkable. We need the Greens and other parties to the left of Labour to do as well as possible in the May elections.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Kemi Badenoch's speech also:

    Dog whistled nationalists. Saying due to benefits and taxation other nations will overtake the UK.

    Dog whistled racists. Singling out Hackney an area where White British are only 36% of the population. As having lots of large families who benefit from removing the two child benefit cap. And that 300,000 hard working taxpayers across the UK are having to pay just for the large families in Hackney. And that hard working taxpayers are unable to afford to have children. Then going on about multigenerational worklessness, the rising number of workless household, and worrying about what the UK will look like in four years. In a different part of her speech repeated Tory policy of removing benefit eligibility from non UK nationals.

    One issue Benefits and Works News seems to not mention much is the targeting of non UK nationals, including those with indefinite leave to remain. It is now Reform and Tory policy to remove benefit eligibility from them, and Labour are looking at doing the same. Those who are EU immigrants with settled status under the Brexit treaty should be unaffected due to the terms of the treaty and wanting to maintain good relations with the EU. And those whose only benefit is state pension might be unaffected due to media backlash as least if the pensioners are living in the UK. But they are all still talking about a cut of billions of pounds of benefits spending.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Kemi Badenoch get Britain working speech.

    Used the misleading stat of a increase of a million people claiming UC without mentioning that it is due in part to people being transferred from other benefits to UC not just new claims.

    Went on about people should not get benefits for anxiety. And how overly generous benefits are. Went on about too many people being diagnosed with mental and physical health conditions. To audience laughter and cries of here, here.

    Wants to look at all health conditions and make many no longer considered disabilities/illnesses in regards to benefits eligibility.

    Want most disabled/ill people to get help into work rather than cash disability/incapacity benefits.

    Wants to look at time limiting disability benefits. On the basis they should get a job.

    Wants to reform the household benefit cap so less households with disabilities are exempt.
    Wants to look at all cases where households on benefits get more than workers.

    Wants to change how poverty is measured so it does not use relative income.

    So in effect wants to extend what Labour wants to do with ADHD, Autism and mental health conditions to all health conditions. And in addition to removing eligibility for some health conditions, wants to time limit disability/incapacity benefits for some more (as previously done with LCW), and look at reducing benefits for most of the rest (as previously done with abolishing low rate care component when DLA was replaced with PIP, abolishing the independent living fund, abolishing the severe disability premium when income based ESA was replaced by UC, abolishing the LCW premium, cutting LCWRA premium for new claimants). While also changing how poverty is measured. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @John
      It's just the latest iteration of the Tories' social Darwinism. They drove thousands of sick and disabled people into early graves with the cuts they inflicted when in office and they were never held accountable for it - god knows most of our fearless media has no interest in doing so - and that has just encouraged them to go further. 

      It's no surprise with someone like Badenoch as leader - she is every bit as loathsome as Farage, is staggeringy arrogant, and has a superiority complex which is singularly ill-justified. This is a woman who thinks she knows what it's like to be working class because she once did a shift at McDonald's. She is both clueless and simultaneously convinced she's completely right about everything, which is a dangerous combination. She'll probably be gone after the May elections but she'll just be replaced with another hard right lunatic like Honest Bob Jenrick.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    As much as I hate this new Labour after what they did  at least they have sympathetic back benches to vote all this down won’t get that with a reform Tory coalition not with Lee Anderson in charge of dwp if that was the case then so called mild anxiety will definitely be gone i reckon the Green Party is going to do well your party has potential but they seem to keep arguing 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Brian The Green Party have pledged to Abolish all private Landlords
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @D
      "What I don’t know is how many of the public will see further push of disability cuts and reforms on the back of the removal of the 2 child cap as disabled claimants unfairly being thrown under the bus or if they don’t care which claimants gets thrown under the bus as long as someone is!"

      The PIP cuts they were trying to push through in the summer did not poll well, despite the vitriolic campaign against claimants. That campaign has been ramped up again, so we'll have to see what happens, but the belief that savage benefit cuts are a certain vote winner is not necessarily true. It was probably more true in the 2010s when Osborne was spewing his bile, but austerity has since come to be seen as a failure.

      "I’m going to say the thing that will get me massively downvoted and pickaxes thrown in my direction - I agreed with the 2 child limit and thought it was fair for the most part, and think people need to take responsibility"

      But what if the third child arrives when the family's financial situation appears to be strong, only to be hit by an unexpected change in circumstances, such as a redundancy that comes out of the blue? People's circumstances can change for all manner of reasons beyond their control. If we immediately start talking about people taking responsibility then we're allowing the right to set the narrative of feckless poor people having too many kids and setting one group of ordinary people against another.

      "(Got to say it does puzzle me why so many in the disabled community are supportive of the 2 child cap being removed as it was pretty obvious that if that was lifted this Labour gov would go after the disabled as easy targets/collateral damage to cover the £3-4billion bill hole removing the 2 child cap would leave"

      Let's be honest though: does anyone really believe that if they had successfully resisted the pressure to scrap the two child cap that they would have said "right, we can keep the two child cap, so we'll leave sick and disabled people alone now"? I find that very hard to believe.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @rookie I was willing to give YP a chance but yes, it's been a fiasco from the word go. The Greens are looking a much better bet. Similar policies but without any of the nonsense dragging YP down.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John
      Yes, what happened in the summer was not a total victory by any means, but it was a bigger win than we would have thought possible at the outset and it inflicted political damage on them that they still have not recovered from (quite the opposite in fact - they're in a far weaker position now than they were then). They assumed their backbenchers would behave like dutiful voting fodder but there was genuine anger in some parts of the PLP  about what they were trying to do. The government can try to give its MPs as much "political cover" for future cuts as it likes, but that isn't going to cut any ice with constituents who know damn well that they'll be completely screwed. 

      If we don't put up a fight, then Labour MPs will assume they can get away with voting for cuts. If we do fight, and make it clear that such cuts will be toxic for them, then it comes down to a  question of who they're more afraid of: the party whips or their constituents. 

      Again, I'm not disagreeing that what you outline may well be their plan. What I am concerned about is falling into the trap of saying: if this is their plan, then, oh well, it's bound to happen and there is nothing we can do. That just demoralises people and saps the will to put up a fight, which is dangerous. We have to fight these people as hard as we can - we have no choice given that our lives are on the line.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @D People are supportive of removing the two child benefit cap. Because it was a major cause of child poverty. And people do not like the idea of children living in poverty. It is not the child's fault and they suffer as a result and it wrecks their life chances.

      Also not all children are planned, contraceptives are not 100%. And not all religions permit the use of contraceptives. And I do not know how the two child benefit cap worked in regards to widows and divorces and new partners and merged families or in regards to adopting the children of a deceased relative. And there was the infamous rape exemption to the two child benefit cap where people had to prove they were raped, and being in receipt for the third child would be indicative of that reason to anyone aware.

      And the child could be planned, a family could be able to afford a third or fourth child and then the unforeseen happens. You can go from comfortable to poverty. Many people reliant on disability benefits are all too aware of this. And also all too aware that people on benefits can be demonized and scapegoated by the media and politicians so they can have their benefits cut. A child is no more guilty of wrongdoing by being born, than an ill or disabled person is guilty of wrongdoing for getting ill or becoming disabled or being born disabled. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.