PIP appeal success rates have fallen by 5% in the quarter from July to September 2025, official figures released this week show.  Meanwhile, the number of claimants waiting for a PIP appeal has almost quadrupled over the last four years.

The latest His Majesty’s Court and Tribunal Service (HMCTS) statistics show that 26,000 cases were completed in the latest quarter, 63% of these going to a full hearing, compared to 59% last year.

58% of appeals were won by the claimant, compared to 60% last year. For individual benefits, the success rates were:

  • PIP 63%, down 5%
  • DLA 61%, up 4%
  • UC 48%, down 4%
  • ESA 46%, down 2%

The number of open social security appeals has increased by 11% compared to last year, mainly because the number of cases dealt with has fallen, rather than more appeals being lodged.

The number of PIP appeals lodged was down by 10%, but DLA appeals were up by 59% and UC by 25%.

PIP appeals accounted for 58% of all social security appeals and UC 23%.

However, tables produced by HMCTS show that there are currently 53,000 PIP appeals waiting to be heard, almost four times as many as the 14,000 waiting list at the same point in 2021.

The average time taken for an appeal to be heard was 33 weeks, up 3 weeks from a year ago.

You can download the full social security statistics from this page

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    PIP Appeals are taking 14-16 months in some parts of the country. I live in Cardiff and I have advised people to go to Citizens Advice for help. they lodged their Appeal September 2024 and have a hearing date for 5th January 2026. I know at least a dozen more who lodged their Appeal in late 2024 who have not yet had a hearing date. You are looking at 2 years from MR stage to Appeal Hearing
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    Does anyone know how long PIP reviews are taking at the mo please? Received my form a few days ago, managed to get a extension of 3 weeks extra due to xmas closures etc. last time i was reviewed end of 2022 they were behind by like a year or something. I ended up having a paper based assessment thank god (and the review before this was too). 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @lacoste1985 I received my forms mid June ,  by the time end of October I received a decision without a medical and my award was changed from getting a few years length to now ongoing.  
      My area is Liverpool, I imagine it will be different everywhere.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @lacoste1985 Well I sent my review form back in.... JUNE 2024, 18 months ago!! and all I get are texts every 3 months saying they are still to look at it! Already been extended once by a year and it's nearly that time of year again (late January is when my claim ends), so I hope it gets extended again. I don't know if waits vary because of region or condition but be prepared for a very long wait. Waits were long when I applied for PIP and went to tribunal 4 years ago and seemed to have got a lot worse since, so reviews don't seem to be a priority at all. 

      Personally think the DWP should have a year to do the review and if they can't do it in time, the original award should be issued again. The vast majority of PIP claimants have disabilities that will not change or improve, so reassessments even every 5 years as seems to be proposed is pointless. The whole thing with PIP is seriously flawed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    John did u mention a while ago about the possibility of there being no guarantee that the LCWRA abolition might not happen to existing claimants. Personally I hope you're right if you did say that , my apologies if you didn't but I know someone did bring it up and I thought it might have been you 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Neil Whoever gets in at the next election will have no choice to make cuts with our slumping economy,so we should make the most of the time we have left.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Neil
      Well what Starmer wants and what Starmer gets maybe two very different things. He is doing abysmally in the polls. The most unpopular PM since records began. And is obviously having trouble maintaining the support of his own MPs and the Labour affiliated trade unions. As he keeps reversing policy decisions. Be they on welfare or tax. Is he really going to survive long after the May local elections? 

      His cunning plan for May so far seems to be delayling some of the elections for reasons, and redefining the ECHR rulings on asylum seekers so he can be cruel to the "illegal immigrants" the right wing media demonised and having another budget before the May elections with giveaways no doubt. Will that really be enough to save him?

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Neil I'm Ruddy scared too.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @John Now I am really terrified of the future after reading all that.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Neil The government announced the WCA is being abolished and along with it LCW and LCWRA status. And that there will be no consultation on this. However we are a parliamentary democracy not a dictatorship. Starmer might get ousted as PM after the May local elections. And if Starmer remains as PM he still needs to get parliament to agree. And he is unlikely to be willing to rely on Tory votes to get it passed. As doing so would probably make his position as Labour leader and so PM untenable. So it is not a sure thing.

      If Starmer gets the changes he wants. It is unknown what legacy benefit or transitional protection there will be.

      It is hoped New Style ESA support group/LCWRA will remain as a legacy benefit (at least for those still eligible, those on PIP daily living), as that is what the pathways to work green paper seems to indicate. If not they will be in serious trouble as they will have to claim a means tested benefit instead if eligible.

      It is hoped those on the legacy higher LCWRA/health element who currently get the same higher rate as new claimants in the Severe Conditions Criteria group will get, will continue to do so. At least if they still qualify, get PIP daily living. Otherwise they would be looking at just getting transitional protection.

      It is hoped those currently in the LCWRA severe conditions criteria group will be passported into the new UC health severe conditions criteria group. As they have already been assessed as incapable of work for life and told they will not be reassessed for WCA. I also hope those currently with ongoing/indefinite PIP enhanced rate daily living awards will be passported into the new Severe Conditions Criteria Group. As they have already been assessed as severely disabled for life and told they will not be reassessed for PIP.

      Some believe to prevent a backbench MP revolt and get the legislation passed there will need to be some protection for legacy claimants. In particular legacy LCWRA claimants who do not qualify for PIP daily living and legacy PIP claimants who do not qualify due to any changes in eligibility caused by the new Timms PIP review PIP assessment system. As otherwise there will be a huge number of people who are going to be massively worse off. Both in terms of money and in terms of having a conditionality and sanctions regime.


      Going by the pathways to work paper the new system is supposed to be:

      Contributions based non means tested unemployment benefit time limited to 6 or 12 months. Paid at the current level of legacy LCWRA and new Severe Conditions Criteria Group. For able and disabled newly unemployed. With work coaches focused on helping them back to work.

      Severe Conditions Criteria. Means tested, non time limited. Paid at same rate as above. For those aged 22 or older and assessed as the most severely disabled for life, never expected to be able to work. The total amount increased by inflation but the health element is increasing at below inflation rate while the standard allowance element increases at above inflation. To overtime reduce the extra amount of UC people get for being incapable of working. It is unknown what contact they will have with the DWP.

      UC health. Means tested, non time limited. The UC health element paid at half the current LCWRA element and frozen so falling in real terms year after year. For those aged 22 or older and on PIP daily living component (the PIP assessment system is also being changed to focus on the most disabled). Viewed as facing barriers to employment. But still required to engage in support conversations about their aspiration to work and offered voluntary help towards and into work. Conditionality will be reviewed in future for this group if too few take up the voluntary offer of help towards and into work.

      UC unemployed. Means tested, non time limited. Full conditionality and sanction regime at the discretion of the work coach. The UC standard allowance element is being increased at above inflation rate. Both to make the benefit more capable of supporting people and to reduce the gap in money to those on UC health and those in the severe conditions criteria group.


      In the longer term it looks like. UC health and UC severe condition criteria group premiums will be eroded. So eventually there will in effect be no incapacity premium. So no "perverse financial incentive" to be deemed incapable of working. Leaving PIP as the benefit for disability paid in and out of work. With PIP itself focused on the most disabled.

      And in the future if the Labour right wing think tanks policies are adopted PIP regular cash payments reduced or replaced with support in kind or one off payments for specific costs, for many disabilities/illnesses. So no "perverse financial incentive" to be deemed disabled and no "overly generous" disability benefits that are funding lifestyles and unfair on hard working families.


      The future looks bleak.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 days ago
    Government are ramping up Pip assessments in 2026 so we will have to have face to face assessments.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Chips and gravy You could be right.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Annatar As far as PIP reassessments go I think they are doing the opposite. They are shifting resources from PIP reassessments to WCA reassessments. And increasing PIP award durations so the standard for those aged 25+, is 3 years for first award, and 5 years for re-awards.

      The DWP do claim their subcontractors are recruiting more staff to do assessments.

      And the DWP also claim they are going to increase the percentage of PIP assessments/reassessments that are done face-to-face to 30%

      But the government seems more interested in trying to clear some of the backlog of WCA reassessments. And has said they want to reassess those whose condition is likely to have improved and those who were awarded on grounds on substantial risk. Maybe they are trying to reduce to the number of people on LCW LCWRA who may lose it if they abolish the WCA and base eligibility to UC health element on receiving PIP daily living.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @pollenpath pollenpath Source?i will have some tomato ketchup if you have some?I think that Annatar is secretly Bert in disguise too 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @pollenpath Heinz or HP ( snigger) (sorry my s.o.h is very childish)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Annatar Source? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Hello all, I know this is not strictly relevant to this thread, but has anyone had experience of an employment tribunal for disability? I suspect I'm going through the capability process at work in the New Year.

    Also, saw my GP about work and suggested talking therapies/CBT. Again, any info/thoughts on it's usefulness would be much appreciated.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    The planned increase to 100% of new build homes being M4(2) Accessible and Adaptable has been abandoned. The new figure is 40%. Accessible and Adaptable means those with difficulty walking and those who use wheelchairs could visit the home, use the common areas, living rooms, and the facilities, a toilet. And that the home had the space to be adapted for the private areas to be made accessible.

    This seem short sighted as life expectancy is already into the eighties and most people in their eighties have mobility problems. So in the future we are going to end up with even more elderly people living in homes where they cannot fit a stair lift, or have no room to get round and into bed in the bedroom, or room to use the upstairs toilet.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    PIP award durations are being changed from April 2026.

    For those aged 25+. First time PIP award standard duration will be 3 years and PIP re-awards will be 5 years standard duration. Currently PIP awards can be as short as 9 months.

    The percentage of assessments that are done face-to-face is also being increased for PIP it is currently 6% that is increasing to 30%. For WCA it is currently 13% that is increasing to 30%

    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/reforms-to-welfare-system-set-to-save-19-billion-by-the-end-of-203031

    Not in the DWP announcement but mentioned in press reporting is that the DWP may also be increasing the number of PIP awards that are ongoing/indefinite.

    Being cynical I do wonder if these measures are in part to reduce the backlash against the planned future PIP assessment system change after the Timms review reports in autumn 2026. Both in terms of opposition to the PIP assessment being changed, and in terms of number of PIP claimants impacted by a changed PIP assessment system before the next general election. As it will slow the immediate impact effects on existing claimants by pushing more reassessments further into the future. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 days ago
    Ask for pip if available please 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 days ago
     

    All dentist required to provide free NHS dental treatment for all children paid for by the state at the current NHS price list uprated each year by inflation.

    A £150 NHS dental voucher for every adult in the UK to be used to towards paying for private insurance or paying toward dental treatments.

    Abolish NHS free dental care for adults. Currently for example those on means tested benefits are entitled to free NHS dental care.

    Abolish the NHS treatment price list for adults. Dentists free to charge what they like. Free market competition will keep prices low and drive prices down.

    My thoughts. The winners are children and those adults who currently have a private dentist. The losers are those adults who currently get free NHS dental treatment. They would be screwed. £150 is not enough to cover dental treatment costs. And dental treatment costs would soar as there is a shortage of dentists and there would be no mandated NHS price list for adults. No NHS dentists for adults to teether the price down. And no option of NHS dental care for adults be that via being registered with one or being able to access one via emergency dental clinics for those not registered with a NHS dentist.  

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @John I hope this doesn't coz many of us will be right royally stuffed.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @John
      For some reason the top of my post got edited off. 

      The UK's most influential think tank Policy Exchange has a new paper Pulling Teeth suggesting reform to NHS dentistry.

      All dentist required to provide free NHS dental treatment for all children paid for by the state at the current NHS price list uprated each year by inflation.

      A £150 NHS dental voucher for every adult in the UK to be used to towards paying for private insurance or paying toward dental treatments.

      Abolish NHS free dental care for adults. Currently for example those on means tested benefits are entitled to free NHS dental care.

      Abolish the NHS treatment price list for adults. Dentists free to charge what they like. Free market competition will keep prices low and drive prices down.

      My thoughts. The winners are children and those adults who currently have a private dentist. The losers are those adults who currently get free NHS dental treatment. They would be screwed. £150 is not enough to cover dental treatment costs. And dental treatment costs would soar as there is a shortage of dentists and there would be no mandated NHS price list for adults. No NHS dentists for adults to teether the price down. And no option of NHS dental care for adults be that via being registered with one or being able to access one via emergency dental clinics for those not registered with a NHS dentist.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    How appeals  and MRs are selected and processed is a mystery. There seems no logic or chronological order. A decision can be made out of the blue when dwp decides not to contest, or a claimant can be left waiting years without progress or any action.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Pat McFadden is an old style gunslinger.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Neil Neil are you wrapped up in army blankets on these cold nights.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @tintack He can sling his hook as far as I'm concerned, he is a dangerous and nasty person at the very least.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Should be having my uc wca around summer of 2026 currently uc lcw but face to face interviews and all the threats and sanctions is making me very mentally unwell so I’m trying for lcwra going down for autism and depression so prepared for mandatory reconsideration and tribunal if I need to I done this for 30 years and in my 50s now so I been on it a long time 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Minxy Has any esa/uc claimants actually had a reassessment since the beginning of the pandemic?

      I’m probably wrong but I thought the dwp were concentrating on new claims and reassessment triggered by change of circumstances (health conditions worsening)?

      Also I don’t know if uc lcwra awards are like esa support group in such that any award technically is ongoing and has no end date (just a recommended reassessment date)

      My last esa reassessment was complete 6 months before the pandemic started (though I had a pip reassessment about 3 years ago - so it’s not like the dwp haven’t been checking up on- though I don’t thing esa/uc and pip departments talk to one another) and my managed migration to uc happened earlier this year

      Point is I don’t think those of us who completed their esa reassessment within prior 12 months to pandemic starting are the most overdue another wca. There’s lots of claimants who haven’t been assessed since 2018, 2017,2016 and even earlier

      But if anyone has any up to date info  on where we are schedule wise on wca for those who haven’t been reassessed since pre pandemic I’d be interested to read it
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Minxy 2 years behind? My brother had their last ESA WCA in 2016, they were supposed to be reassessed after 3 years, so 2019. Still waiting, hopefully the WCA will be abolished before it happens as they have a ongoing/indefinite PIP daily living award. It would be annoying to put it mildly if they lost LCWRA between now and 2028/29 when the WCA is abolished and UC health is based on receiving PIP daily living component.

      The delay in reassessments does highlight that some of the increase in benefit claimant numbers that is used to justify the plan to abolish the WCA and change the PIP assessment system is directly due to government policy. Turning what were intended to be as little as 3 month LCW/LCWRA or 9 month PIP awards into 5 years and counting awards due to auto extending and the number of active claims is going to go up and up.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @James h I doubt very much that you will get a review anytime soon as the DWP are way way behind. People are 2 years behind. Try not to stress too much 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    From the guardian live text today:

    More than 10% of rise in disability benefit spending pre-Covid directly caused by other benefits being cut, IFS says


    Cutting benefits paid to healthy people leads to more people claiming disability benefits, the Institute for Fiscal Studies has found.

    It has published a report showing a direct link between cuts in one part of the benefits system, and rising claims in another part of the system, and it says that more than 10% of the rise in disability benefit spending between 2010 and 2019 (the period covered by the research) can be explained by cuts to other benefits.

    The IFS focused on this period because there were big cuts to non-health benefits during this period, while health and disability benefits were less affected.

    Explaining the study, the IFS says:

    We study four reforms: the 2011 cuts to housing benefit for private renters; the increase in the female state pension age between 2010 and 2018; the lowering of the benefit cap in 2016; and the introduction of the ‘lone parent obligation’ between 2008 and 2012, which required more single parents on out-of-work benefits to look for paid work. In each case, we find the reform increased the number of people receiving disability benefits, and we also find that two of the reforms increased the number of people receiving incapacity benefits.
    Explaining the link, the IFS says it “could be because the cuts to non-health-related benefits worsened the health of those affected or because take-up of health-related benefits may have increased”.

    The IFS concluded:

    Overall, a back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that all changes to non-health-related benefits and direct taxes from 2010 to 2019 increased disability benefit spending by £900m. This represents 13% of the £7bn increase in disability benefit spending during the 2010s.
    As for other reasons why spending on disability benefits has risen since 2010, the IFS says the increase in the size of the working age population, health declines since Covid, and the sharp rise in the cost of living between 2021 and 2023 are all factors.

    Commenting on the findings, Eduin Latimer, a senior economist at the IFS and one of the authors of the report, said:

    Across four different reforms, we find an unintended consequence of benefit cuts – that they lead to more people claiming disability benefits …
    One result of these spillover effects is that the fiscal savings from cutting non-health-related benefits are slightly smaller than previously thought. These effects will likely also have a long-term legacy, as people often stay on disability benefits for many years. The big-picture lesson for policymakers is that changes to one part of the benefit system can shift pressures elsewhere, rather than remove them entirely.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @D The government will see such findings as validating it's approach of reducing/removing the premiums and exemptions from conditionality disable people get over the unemployed. No point in claiming a disability benefit if it does not get you more money and does not get you any exemption from conditionality. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I wonder what the figures would be like if the Conservative/LibDem Coalition government had not removed legal aid from most welfare appeals. And created an extra step mandatory reconsideration where the benefit is not paid and the DWP can take as long as they like taking another look before telling the claimant they checked and the DWP decision is correct.

    And wonder what the figures will be if Reform get into power and make the regulations determining disability benefit eligibility and the assessor guidance confidential, not public domain. And take action against those helping claimants game the system by giving claimants advice. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.