The DWP has announced that 1,000 existing work coaches will be transferred to supporting sick and disabled claimants  in 2025/26, with 65,000 claimants getting “intensive voluntary support” to move into work.

The DWP say that work coaches will be offering support to claimants on health-related benefits, including those who are furthest away from work.

Coaches will provide “tailored and personalised employment support” and help claimants access support with writing CVs and interview techniques.

The DWP say that the redeployed work coaches are a “downpayment” on plans to overhaul employment support, due to be announced before the end of the month. 

At the same time as making the announcement, the DWP released figures from a survey which shows that:

44% of disabled people and people with a health condition don’t trust the DWP to help people reach their full career potential.

Nearly 2 in 5 (39%) disabled people and people with a health condition do not trust DWP to take its customers’ needs into account in how it provides services.

In the same announcement, the DWP claim that “the number of working-age people on the health element of Universal Credit or claiming Employment Support Allowance (ESA) has risen to 3.1 million, a staggering 319% increase since the pandemic, reflecting the alarming rate at which young and working aged people are increasingly falling out of work and claiming incapacity benefits.” 

However, if the government wishes to encourage companies to employ more disabled workers, the recent claim by disability minister Stephen Timms that the Access To Work programme is “unsustainable” is unlikely to help.

Access To Work provides grants for reasonable adjustments to help disabled people stay in employment.  The average payment is around £5,000.

But giving evidence to the work and pensions committee last month, Timms complained that “we used to talk about Access to Work as the best-kept secret because nobody really knew about it and employers did not know about it. That seems to have changed in the last two years and there has been an enormous surge in applications for Access to Work.”

As a result, some people are waiting many months for their application to be dealt with. 

Timms told the committee that the government plans to place more of the onus on employers to pay for adjustments, because “the current style of Access to Work is unlikely to be sustainable in the long term”.

As long as the DWP’s focus is on trying to improve the CV’s and interview techniques of disabled claimants, rather than support and encourage companies to employ disabled people, the efforts of work coaches seem doomed.

You can read “Government bolsters employment support to unlock work for sick and disabled people” here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Reading media coverage and non-disabled people's comments regarding these proposed 'reforms' has made me realise that we benefit claimants are viewed as lying lazy scum. This makes me feel personally attacked and, to be honest, has really upset me. I didn't know we were so hated :(
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Richard Don't let it get you down.  The majority of the people on those comment pages are actually the minority, most people are compassionate.  They write horrible stuff like that because they are either trolls or have believed all the right-wing press attacks and have never met people in our condition.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Richard Hi Richard, It's horrible but I wouldn't take it personally. What we're seeing is the end result of well over a decade of propaganda and divide and rule tactics. People who express these bigoted views just hate their own miserable lives and need someone else to blame for their own inadequacies and failures. People become bitter, resentful and petty. It used to be the EU, then it was 'immigrants' and this week it's 'benefit scroungers'...

      People also say things online and in the media that they wouldn't dare say face-to-face and may not even really believe at all. A lot of this stuff is said performatively for the upvotes, clicks and views. And if some people are genuinely hateful and do mean it? I'd rather they take their masks off so we know exactly who they are anyway. Hope you're OK and don't let a few idiots get you down.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Richard Anywhere it is perceived (incorrectly) that the disabled/sick receive free money.....it causes a lot of resentment amongst those at the bottom of the pay scale
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Does anyone know exactly when we can expect to see the Green Paper and actual (rather than media speculation) details of the benefits cuts.  I'm on leave from Thursday so would like to have the time to actually read their proposals in their entirety before commenting, but the leaks last week suggest it is going to be pretty savage.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Matt The Chancellor's Spring Statement will be given on March 26th. I've read that the Green Paper is also due to be published on that same date, but essentially no-one seems to know for sure right now.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Giving more money to those disabled but able to do some work would be taken through the High court as it is disability discrimination which is illegal.All this talk of giving one group of unemployed more than another will result in chaos.More testing they shout,they can’t even keep up with assessments now,leave alone do more.The only thing they can do is change the system for new claimants .If they wanted to ramp up assessments they would not get the money saving they need.Scandalous treatment of people in need,hope there are some lawyers ready to take on the fight.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Why don't they leave us alone 😔 😪 my experience with the work coaches during my esa migration was horrific. They was absolutely clueless to autism and bipolar and made me feel like I was thick. This labour government are ten times worse than the torys cant believe im even saying that but it's true. Get youre seat belts folks gonna be a bumpy 4 years 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    @Scorpion, well jsa and esa are legacy benefits and are supposed both to have been migrated to uc and ended by April next year, so what tosh is this about merging them? Just shows Kendall et al haven't a clue even about what is already happening. They're just spewing out desperate and incoherent nonsense. When the green paper comes it will have no concrete plans whatsoever, just more of the same babble.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Keir Starmer's Labour and its DWP are inflicting serious mental torture upon to disabled and sick people.

    I'm glad I didn't vote for Keir Starmer's Labour in the last general election, albeit being a Labour voter, as I saw the writing on the wall. I voted for the Greens just for not voting anything has to do with Keir Starmer - the epitome of a dishonest
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Hi everyone, 

    I just read in I paper that the plans for disability benefits will be unveiled this week.

    We have to stay united and reject their shameful plans for PIP and other disability benefits.

    It is worth mentioning that I have contacted my MP to make it clear that the reported changes are deeply damaging disabled people and their carers.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Steve I have sent a long email to my MP this morning. I think it is important to get in early so that MPs are aware that they will be facing strong opposition to the cuts. I researched thoroughly and included lots of statistics about the impacts of austerity on disabled people. I also alluded to local poverty and the huge unemployment in my area, and asked how there could be any outcome other than pushing people into further poverty.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    It's time to time out the media and wait for the day of green paper just remember just because something is on paper it may not go through if it does it gets challenged and It will as for the Muppet   seen on live on a news channel  saying labour have nothing to worry about there's to many of them well  she forgot when you put everyone like MPs charities disabled people  who are against cuts together labour are outnumbered the women forgot a few things have already been won in the high court this year and it won't stop as soon as that sat on report  gets given to who ever asked for it more people gonna move to support another party and  not labour and labour my be in the name for that  party but shame and embarrassment will be to hang on people something will workout in the end as for the media by next year they'll have nothing but the truth to report not lies and more lies .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @Bert But thanks for the reassuring comment as if I was really worried about this, your comment would just push me further into really bad depression. This is why I said we have to try and be positive on this groups as things like mental illness can be dangerous if pushed to extreme.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @Bert Maybe for PIP, but it won't for the other benefit as anxiety and depression can be more debilitating than a lot of physical illnesses.. And as I've said, by the time they get round to bringing all this in, I'll be near pension age anyway.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @axab43 Can't see Anxiety and Depression qualifying as the government have hinted before that those conditions are low hanging fruit
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Angela Probably 18 months
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Jim Anxiety and depression will have to qualify. I have severe depression, can't go out and hardly function. What will probably happen is they will make it harder for moderate anxiety and depression to qualify by changing the point scorers. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    "The plan, to be unveiled by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, involves the merger of Jobseeker's Allowance and the Employment and Support Allowance for those with a disability or health condition.

    The scheme would offer time-limited support, with all claimants required to be actively seeking work. This comes as Labour pursues a "moral duty to get Britain working again".

    Nearly all disabled people and those with long-term health conditions would have to take part in discussions about employment support under the new benefit."


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @Scorpion *one of these people 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Scorpion Job Seekers Allowance hasn't existed for quite some time and Contribution Based ESA is being replaced by Universal Credit too. They do producer some ill informed waffle! I keep reading that the WCA is being reformed for PIP-the WCA isn't even the assessment used for PIP as we well know. I really wish politicians would take the time to find out what actually happens already before trying to change it. Grrrrr. Rant over. Love and solidarity to everyone on here 🫂🤗
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Dannan Yep, that was my take on it. Thanks for the clarification.👍
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Jonno New Style Jobseekers Allowance and New Style Employment And Support Allowance are current contribution based benefits, and are not being phased out like the "Old Style" claims. I think they are referring to the New Style JSA and ESA.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Scorpion That's interesting if correct, because the vast majority of us will be migrating from ESA to UC and are already existing claimants so will not be affected by this. Unless they are planning on stopping the migration? I wonder what "delights" they have in store for people on UC.

      I think it's best to wait for the announcement and the Green Paper as many have said on here because the stories emanating from the media seem contradictory.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Let's hope and pray they get taken to court over these plans and lose again! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    We have been living in fear for the last few years thanks to sunak and now starmer and reeves. During the election campaign I emailed starmer and asked about disabled people and how under the tories we were fearful. His reply disabled people should be treated with dignity.  They are vile and callous . How can we get these so called jobs when people are being laid off because of her budget.  I can't work, as well as autism, ptsd  I have joint hypermobility syndrome which effects all my joints , digestive system and fatigue.  I used to work part time until 2023 as a cleaner and now have copd because of it. Neither conditions will get better only worse. 
    Yet they throw money around like this stupid deal with the chagos islands, carbon capture and other harebrained ideas from milliband. Oh yes I bet they still take their pay rises next year. 
    They are spiteful vindictive . Bullying  pensioners  farmers and now the disabled.  I live fearful of what coming next, my mental health has worsen. I just hope it's challenge somehow. Surely echr should get involved our human rights are being taken away

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Labour didn't really "win" last year, the Tories lost because they've became a detested joke, who truly won were Lib Dems, Reform, Greens and Independents and in 2029 more people will be voting for those 4 groups/parties.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Dave Dee Probably true, but fear an even lower turnout. We'll end up like America where only approx 50,% normally vote
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    If taking money from disabled people is "having their best interests at heart" then disabled people are in an abusive relationship with their government.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    A twitter post from someone who seems to know what she's talking about and she's been highlighting the media and political campaign against disabled people claiming benefits for a long time, Dr Jay Watts.

    A reminder re benefits:

    - nothing will change anytime soon
    - most changes will be for new benefits applicants
    - proposals will be watered down substantially as they have to go through the commons and then we will will take them to court under the equality act and win
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Scorpion Absolutely ! I think this is not registering with people. I don't want to scare monger but when they reasses its treated as a new claim so any change to descriptors etc would apply.
      The claim won't be assessed according to current descriptors.
      So a pip claim for example would run to its end date but could be down graded or refused if it scores lower according to new descriptors.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Dave Dee "- most changes will be for new benefits applicants."

      Provided they abolish reassessment, like the Tories planned.

      But, if they keep reassessing the current claimants who are already on LCWRA, then, this won't make any sense, as the claimants in question could lose their current award of LCWRA and, in result, won't be any different from new claimants.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    I hope thats sarcasm I really do 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Bert Don't be silly.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @T The job seekers perhaps haven't got the skills or any work history
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Bert If there is 812000 job vacancies then perhaps common sense would be for the idiot government to focus on giving these jobs to the actual job seekers or  to all the recent school leavers struggling to find work  :/

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Neil Cook There's 812000 job vacancies too fill I will gladly work part time if anyone will employ me to do my bit for the country
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    What the Tories, I mean, "Labour" (got confused a moment as they're being Tories in practice by attacking disabled people) mean is that work coaches will be tasked with harassing disabled people. Even non-disabled people have reason not to trust work coaches, as they have been on the attack against claimants ever since they existed, from sanctions to pressuring people into inappropriate jobs. As the government has announced other attacks on disabled people (cutes, making the already traumatic PIP assessment even more difficult), it's obvious that the "intensive support" will actually be harassing disabled people - especially those with mental health conditions - into work that is not suitable for them and threatening them with sanctions.

    I'm disgusted. I'd never have voted for Tories but by voting the Labour party, I unintentionally have done. On the bright side, the last election proves more MPs from smaller parties, and even independents, can get elected now, so my anti-Tory vote (which of course won't be for Labour as they're the same now) won't be wasted at the next election despite our dodgy voting system.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    The government have our best interests at heart
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @bert Good to see British sarcasm is alive and well, ah bert. 🤦‍♀️
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @bert Of course they do. Liz Kendall is that you?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @bert I'm ow I feel well taken cared for, hell the increase in meds and panic attacks where actually totally fine and great fun
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Had a look at DWP in relation to this it's states "intensive voluntary support" therefore I assume that you can decline 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Will this effect people who only receive PIP? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Jan it's been on the main news that people deemed unfit for work Will lose money but extra money for people who look for work 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Charger 7 Yea I seen that so you will be punished for being ill and not being able to work. Is this a tactic to try and make those people feel pressured into having to find work. Labour have just dug there own grave they won't last the four years 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Sam Yes. That seems to be the agreed thinking - apparently this is something that has been concerned for sometime inside Whitehall.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Sam But this couldn't possibly work, all it would do would massively increase the benefit bill more because yes we'd be paid the same but everyone else on UC would see huge increase. 
       I could see them simply just being cruel and brutal and keeping the basic UC level the same while drastically cutting the lcwra element.. That is something this labour clearly would be happy to do and then keep saying they done it because we all begged them to cut our money. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 days ago
      @Charger 7 I've seen some talk on twitter by clever folks that are usually right is the way they would want to do it would be raise the basic rate of UC by however much they decrease the lcwra group, so those in that group wouldn't be poorer but it would be less of an incentive to try to get the higher rate. 
      Tbh I think it's crazy the basic rate is so low and the lcwra is double. At least that way if the DWP mess us around and reassess us as not lcwra we wouldn't be looking at such a massive income drop
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.