We will have to wait for the publication of the Green Paper later today for full details of changes to personal Independence payment (PIP) and Universal Credit (UC).

But here are some of the main points of the speech.

Personal Independence Payment (PIP)

  • No vouchers
  • No means-test
  • No freeze.

But, from November 2026, claimants will need to score at least 4 points from a single descriptor to qualify for the daily living component of PIP, as well as scoring a total of at least 8 points..

So, if you select 4 descriptors scoring two points each, that will be 8 points, but it will not qualify for an award. 

But if you select one descriptor scoring 4 points and two descriptors scoring 2 points, that will be 8 points and you will qualify for an award.

There will also be review of the PIP assessment system led by disability minister Stephen Timms.

PIP existing claimants

The DWP says it "will work with Department of Health and Social Care to ensure that existing people who claim PIP who may no longer be entitled to the benefit following an award review under new eligibility rules have their health and eligible care needs met. The government is consulting on how best to achieve this."

This suggests that existing claimants will be subject to the new rules when their award is reviewed, if the review takes place from November 2026 onwards..

 Work Capability Assessment (WCA)

The WCA is to be scrapped in 2028 and a new single assessment system introduced. Under the new system, any extra financial support for health conditions (including PIP, ESA or UC health) will be assessed via a new single assessment which will be based on the PIP assessment – considering on the impact of disability on daily living, not on capacity to work.

There will be an increase in  Face-to-Face Assessments for PIP and the WCA.

Reintroduce reassessments for incapacity benefits, with exceptions for those who will never work and those under special rules for end-of-life care. Reassessments have largely been switched off since 2021.

A "Right To Try Guarantee" will be introduced which will guarantee that attempting work will never lead to a benefits reassessment.

Universal Credit (UC)

From April 2026, Labour will hold the value of the universal credit health top-up fixed in cash terms for existing claimants, and reduce it for new claimants, with an additional premium for people with severe lifelong condition

The Standard Allowance will be raised above inflation by 2029/30, adding £775 annually in cash terms for a single person aged over 25.

Access to the health element of Universal Credit will be delayed until a claimant is aged 22.

Existing claimants.  The DWP say “Those currently in receipt of UC health will benefit from the increased standard allowance and will not be affected by plans to reduce UC health in future.”

Assessments

People with the most severe disabilities or with health conditions that will never improve will never be reassessed.

When

The DWP say they will bring forward primary legislation this session to enable delivery of the PIP additional eligibility requirement and UC rebalancing reforms from 26/27.

The Right to Work Guarantee will be delivered through separate primary legislation which will be introduced “in due course”. 

Savings

The DWP say the changes are expected to save over £5 billion in 2029 to 2030.

Links

The Pathways to Work:  Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper.

 Liz Kendall speech

 You can try the proposed new PIP test here.

You can also:

keep up with what’s changing and when

find out what you can do if you are unhappy about Labour’s plans

follow the latest news about PIP and UC changes.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    Liz Kendall’s Alternative Green Paper Launch Speech....what should have been said!

    "We are here today in the House of Commons to launch this Green Paper. However, after deep reflection and consultation with colleagues across the aisle, we have made the decision to delay its introduction. This delay is not due to hesitation or lack of commitment to reform, but rather because it is long past time for us—on both sides of this House—to take responsibility for the fundamental failings of our welfare system. A system that has caused untold harm, trauma, and, in too many cases, the loss of life.

    We cannot, in good conscience, propose further reforms without first acknowledging the damage done. Therefore, today we begin not with policy, but with an apology.

    First, we apologise for our role in bringing into the UK’s disability assessment process a discredited model from the United States, designed not to support, but to deny claims and reduce costs at the expense of disabled people’s wellbeing. We recognise that this system—one we embraced—contributed to hundreds of suicides and incalculable suffering. We cannot undo the past, but we can and must acknowledge that these decisions cost lives.

    Second, we apologise for ignoring successive warnings from the United Nations, warnings that declared our treatment of disabled people a ‘human catastrophe.’ Instead of listening, we dismissed and deflected. Today, we recognise that those warnings were not alarmist—they were accurate.

    Third, we apologise for the way Universal Credit was designed and implemented, in particular the six-week waiting period that plunged so many into poverty, homelessness, and crisis. It was not an oversight; it was a policy choice—and it was the wrong one.

    Fourth, we apologise for outsourcing disability assessments to profit-driven companies that were given financial incentives to cut support, not to provide it. We accept that thousands of disabled people were left feeling gaslit, disbelieved, and humiliated, forced to fight for their dignity in a system designed to wear them down. We acknowledge the devastating mental health consequences of this—self-harm, breakdowns, even loss of life—and we take responsibility for allowing it to continue for so long.

    It has not been rocket science to understand that many of you are simply too chronically ill or disabled to work at all. Others could work only with extreme flexibility from employers—flexibility that society and the labour market have largely refused to provide. We have had the evidence for years. Reports have repeatedly shown this. And yet, it is only now that we are formally recognising the need for a Right to Try policy—ensuring that disabled people who do attempt work will never again be penalised or reassessed simply for trying. Many will never face reassessment again.

    But apologies are not enough. Today, we also commit to accountability.

    That is why we are launching an Independent National Inquiry into the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). This inquiry will examine:

    Ignored coroner’s reports that warned of benefit-related deaths.

    Hidden internal reports that exposed systemic failures.

    The deaths and long-term harm suffered by claimants due to government policy and negligence.


    We must face the truth of what has happened. This is not only about policy; this is about justice.

    Finally, we acknowledge that the political narrative surrounding welfare—driven by cross-party competitiveness—has been degrading, dehumanising, and unacceptable. We in government have not only enabled but encouraged sections of the press to follow our lead, spreading harmful rhetoric about disabled people, benefit claimants, and those too unwell to work. For this, we deeply apologise.

    Support, not suspicion. Dignity, not degradation. A safety net, not a trap. These are not just words. They must be the foundation of our new system.

    That process begins today. The Green Paper will not move forward until we have worked with disabled people, advocates, and experts to rebuild a system that recognises and respects their needs. We will not repeat the mistakes of the past. Instead, we will listen. And we will act."

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @CaroA Do we not get a poem this time, CaroA?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @CaroA How long did that monster take to type out?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @CaroA Very well written, but it'll never happen because ultimately HM Treasury, and by extension, vested interests in the financial markets, will dictate policy. It's the money, stupid.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    Hi does anyone know what will happen to people who work and also get pip how will these changes affect people like me who work part time and get pip??
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    I have to conclude that not giving any clear details about certain aspects, (such as what happens to the people in the support group, who are there because they are at severe risk, reg 35), is a deliberate plan to intimidate people with very severe illness....
    Nice. What a bunch of total W*****S
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Sid Right here, although awaiting a definition:

      "Amending the LCWRA Substantial Risk regulations to realign Substantial Risk with its “original intention” of only applying in exceptional circumstances.

      The DWP says: “We will specify the circumstances, and physical and mental health conditions, for which LCWRA Substantial Risk should apply. This will include protecting and safeguarding the most vulnerable, including people in crisis and those with active psychotic illness. We will work with clinicians to define the criteria and what medical evidence is required from claimants and people involved in their care, to ensure the process is safe, fair, and clear". 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Sid No wca, no support group. They don’t care about risk and harm to people, even after all deaths under tories.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    The scariest thing is, the linking of pip with ESA lcwra. The proposals will mean, if you don't have 4 daily living points on a pip descriptor,  i then you won't qualify for lcwra with your ESA and will be classed as a job seeker by DWP.
    I receive pip daily living but my points are made up of 2 for each descriptor. I also receive ESA support group. Under the proposed changes I will lose everything. 
    This will also affect other things such as, council tax support, prescription costs, dental care etc.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Anon ESA is completely stopping this year. Those of us (me Included) all have to ‘migrate’ to Universal Credit. You get letter through the post with a date you have to have applied to UC by. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Marc Absolutely. This is the most shocking part, which gave me a sleepless night last night.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Anon This is the worst of this evil changes. This made me sleepless last night.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Anon you can also add to that the benefit cap will come into effect on your housing support.  So if your rent is a grand per month or so, you'll receive 150- 200 pounds (very approx) less than your rent due to the benefit cap!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Anon This is what is causing the most outrage at the moment. I'll be shocked if this gets through.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    These reforms are simply appalling. Taking cash away from some of the poorest and most vulnerable in society. Whilst allowing the wealthy to gerrymander their earnings to receive large amounts of cash. For example a couple with kids and joint incomes over £100,000 can stash cash into pensions get tax relief and plan it so it brings down their earnings so they still benefit from child allowance, free hours for kids under 4 at nursery etc. also the grants for heat pumps which are £7500 -9000 and up to £16500 in some parts of Scotland tend to go to the better off. As you need to be an owner occupier and have a home suitable for the pump in the first place. As many poorer live in flats this isn’t possible generally. Also the current bill for pension tax relief is £50 billion annually 63% of this goes to the 5 million higher rate tax payers. The annual allowance was raised from £40,000 to £60,000 last year so if this was cut back down, this alone would raise large sums of money for the treasury.As they say wealth goes to wealth. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    Please can you include info on the New Style ESA changes? Those of us ineligible for UC will be left with nothing once the support group indefinite ESA changes to a time-limited award.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Rumtruffle
      Section 54 of the Pathways to work Green paper states:
      54. Alongside levelling up the rate, this change would end the indefinite entitlement to contributory ESA for those assessed as having limited capability for work-related activity (for new people claiming).
      Try to find solace in the last 4 words until we know more. I am hoping this means protection for existing claimants. Remember it could take a long time to enforce too.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Rumtruffle Yes I am likely to fall into this category as well probably be re assessed and not eligible for UC then on time limited support ESA  but what happens after that what is our support if any going to consist of and are we just going to be dumped on the scrap heap left with no money no assistance.  And when can we expect these changes to be phased in so I know when it is coming.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 days ago
    What about those on UC and LCWRA what will happen to us? I am so scared right now I won't be able to afford to stay alive if this becomes law I'm finished.... SERIOUSLY 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Liz Kendall lush husband joint salary £760k
    £4m house Notting Hill
    Not very Labour
    No Idea
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Does anyone know what will happen to the legacy benefit old contributions based ESA? My husband gets that and PIP and I'm his carer. He's 5 years off his pension age. He has a lot of care needs and because he requires extra heating and has medical equipment, our electricity bill is large, so relies on cESA.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Michael
      '''''ESA for those assessed as having limited capability for work-related activity (for new people claiming). Those unemployed after the time-limited period would be able to claim UC, depending on their personal circumstances.'''''

      I disagree with this statement.


      Because NS-ESA is none means tested, contributory based.

      For any new applicants, who get any stipends from an 'income protection, or payment protection policy, either one they have themselves if they were self employed, or from their employers, they would not be able to claim UC, as UC is means tested......
      Usually 50% or less.

      These policies have been sold to millions of working people in the UK. 

      None of these people would be able to claim the full amount of UC as well as receive their income protection policy.

      I bet this aspect was not even taken under consideration by the DWP when they were preparing this paper.












    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Michael Currently on esa contribution based which is non means tested so would not qualify for UC after new time limit. So is this time limit only for new people claiming and existing claimants can stay in esa as long as they qualify for support group? Currently in support group but if they scrap WCA how would they assess support group as under new pip rules wouldn’t qualify although currently do qualify for support group in WCA. Illness is severe enough for support group of WCA but not for 4 points in pip. So would lose pip (currently made of 10 points across areas)  I would lose esa after time limit and would not qualify for UC as means tested so would lose everything!!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Jackie Think the unemployment insurance would be between 3 and 12 months before we would be taken off it and have to claim UC. Is UC even possible if we have a partner who works? Didn’t think we could claim it. I’m massively confused! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Michael I am on contributions esa in the support group and her pip mobility. My husband works, under the new proposals when my unemployment insurance runs out would I be able to claim UC? As my husband works so I didn’t think I could claim UC. Many thanks 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @NB Here you go: 

      More info for ESA (CB)

      53. Unemployment insurance would be a new non-means tested entitlement for people who have contributed into the system. It would be created by replacing contribution-based Jobseeker’s Allowance (JSA) and Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) with a new single entitlement, paid at the current ESA rate (currently £138pw) and will be time-limited. This would provide stronger income 54. Alongside levelling up the rate, this change would end the indefinite entitlement to contributory

      ESA for those assessed as having limited capability for work-related activity (for new people claiming). Those unemployed after the time-limited period would be able to claim UC, depending on their personal circumstances. We believe this reform would align with the removal of the WCA, by offering a route to financial support for those with temporary and short-term health conditions, including for those who may not be entitled to PIP and therefore not entitled to the health element of UC. during periods of unemployment for those with a recent work record, while revitalising the ‘something-for-something’ contributory principle in the working-age system. People claiming this would be expected to actively seek work, with easements for those with work-limiting health conditions.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    In responding to the Green Paper, you don't have to answer the questions they ask.  You can answer the questions they should have asked, as in when they say how can we support people who have lost PIP, say don't put such tight restrictions on qualifying for points in the reforms and stop trying to get vulnerable people off benefits they need. There is no obligation to answer the question they want to ask... answer what they should have asked, like do you think these questions are fair or reasonable giving the vulnerability of the people being targetted by these reforms.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Sid I meant don't get drawn in to their agenda in justifying these cuts.  Just say these cuts are a disgrace and will push people who are struggling anyway into further hardship and suffering.  Use the comment boxes to say how this will affect you and why they should not be made. You don't have to play to their game of drawing up a false consultation that is disgraceful in itself.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @axab43 axab43 You're right - write whatever you want on the consultation. Not asking the right questions is now they limit our access to benefits already. 

      Can we use a microwave?  How about I don't have a microwave but that doesn't mean I can prepare a meal and cook it on an Aga having run to Waitrose and bought all the heavy ingredients which I've carried on my back on the run home in my expensive trainers. I get meals on wheels or eat in cafes (so I can't prepare and cook a simple meal - 12 points), or I get ready chopped or tins of veg and tins or cartons of soup my neighbour opens for me, delivered by Asda, which I cook/heat on an ancient electric hob (so I need assistance to prepare and cook a meal - 4 points).

      Can I use cutlery? Sneaky. Yes, because I eat soup with a spoon. However, that doesn't mean I can use a knife and fork to cut up food (so I need it ready cut, so need assistance - 4 points).

      Can we wash above the waist? Yes? No? How about I can wash the front but not the back (so I need assistance - 4 points).

      The questions asked in assessments are designed to deny us points, to keep hidden the truth which would serve us. The last government had the lawfulness of its consultation challenged and it was deemed illegal because it was disingenuous. This green paper consultation, as B&W points out in the next article, is phoney for not including questions which would allow the truth to be told, so it must be challenged. Meantime, I'm with you, axab43, participate in the consultation, and tell it how it is. Politicians are known for answering questions other than those asked in interviews. We can do that.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @axab43 What?!?! Help!!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @axab43 Well said.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    From the damn Green Paper, every claimant would have to engage with work coaches and there will be conditionalities and commitments, even though they put it euphemistically, saying sick people will have to engage with work coaches and have a conversation with them, and if they do not follow the rules, we would ask them for reasons.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @mbc127 They were trying to trip you up, devious tactic, like been interrogated.  Just give them your name, NI number and what group your in, nothing more! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Scorpion where is this? Even people on Lcwra group?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Scorpion It was bad enough migrating from ESA to UC.  The first interview I the UC interviewer was trying to force me to state what jobs I could do despite they knew I was in the support group (I even told him).  Eventually I got them to back off and leave me alone.  So I am dreading what will happen now. The work coaches are not there to help you, but enforce the system.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Is there any news about the mobility component? if you lose daily living, can you still get enhanced Mobility?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    I get contribution ESA and in the support group, I've been claiming this for probably around 9 years and I'm so confused about it now being merged and having a time limit before ending. Would I then start a new claim for uc? From my understanding if you don't meet the new pip criteria you also wouldn't meet the health part of uc, so I'm beyond worried how I'd have money to live 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Emily Cont based esa is not affected by income or savings,I'm on it as well,I can't apply for uc because last year my oh took a pension pot so we're screwed
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Wow, indeed this looks like a change of direction or is it, beware this could be a diversion as it was talked about Labour MPs being called to number 10 to make clear message that they need a change in tactics how they going to deal with the vulnerability in society. My guess is don’t and don’t let our guard down too soon….
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Thx beebee. My parents sometimes phone Scope&I also get a newsletter from epilepsy action every 2 weeks so Am ok for now am not super stressed a little stressed. am 40&with my learning difficulties I find read&writing impossible so my parents help me with that . Yes what was said today wasn’t what me&my parents wanted to hear. But I still get very bad headaches a few times a week due to my epilepsy that can last a few days meaning I have to sleep a lot . But this website has been really good for me to find out news thx again beebee you have a nice week 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Honestly the thing that baffles me the most is the descriptor change. Making it so you have to score 4 points on at least 1 descriptor is the part that is really going to effect a lot of people, myself included. I score 14 points over all of them with the highest individual score being a 3 but if this comes into effect I lose entitlement because even though overall I get enough points because I don't score enough on a single descriptor. To score 4 points you need to receive assistance for whatever the descriptor is.

    They are basically changing it to say that unless you "receive assistance" for something you are not considered disabled enough.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @ruiner99 Not really as I use an aid or have assistance for toilet and shower as I suffer extreme spells of vertigo due to a brain tumour but that only scores a 2 so I'm also in the didn't score 4 group
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @ruiner99 Exactly.  I scored 10 points for DL and 22 for mobility.  But my DL score is 5 x 2 points.  I thought my DL score was too low at the time as I do need assistance but I was just so relieved the assessment was over I didn't challenge it.  So now not only will I lose DL my carer will lose their allowance so that help will be gone.  I am also on UC and that will be affected too.  So what am I supposed to do now?  I have a brain injury which will never improve and I am unable to work.  FYI I worked full-time from 16-40 till I became ill.  

      I agree with all the support of getting disabled back into work if they want to or want to try it.  But some of us are not able to work at all.  So why are we being targeted?  Reducing my eligibility will mean I cannot get the help I need or pay my bills.  

      Plus what about the disabled people that are already working and need their PIP to help them cover their costs?  So whilst trying their hardest to be independent and also paying into the system they'll have their PIP cut.

      Does Liz Kendall really think that by reducing eligibility it means that all of our disabilities disappear and we can jump out of bed and head off to the job Centre?  

      All of us know how awful a PIP assessment is.  The strain and worry it causes.  Plus I am sure there are many like me that should have been awarded more points for DL but sucked it up for the fear of going through it all again.  They only had to phone my GP and Neurosurgeon and they could explain easily my disability and how it affects my life.  Plus they are obviously medically qualified rather than the young girl that assessed me at home.  

      Good luck to everybody.  If you can please email your MP or anyone that could make a difference.  


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    What Liz Kendall is trying to do is take one (WCA) and raise the bar for the other one (PIP) and ensure disabled claimants are kicked out by not being qualified or entitled for either…. That’s a grant less to pay for a disabled individual while they can save money and scoot off on holidays . Is this truly fair and just?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    How about this idea?  Stop paying over 80s on the old State Pension the measly 25p per week upgrade and cancel the insulting £10 Christmas Bonus. Neither amount makes any real difference to the lives of the recipients and are ridiculed in the media every time they get mentioned. That would save a fortune and I really don't think that anyone would miss the money, unlike the Winter Fuel Payment; the government had no problem making that means tested.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Do people remember Osborne u turning on reforms because think this reform  will be watered down first after consultation then organizations will get it all overturned people must try hang on there are things that can be done this stuff is never ending this will go back to court labour are just trying to make bigger history so that it gives them credit if they get voted out even if they fail just hope if they don't get back in that the next party doesn't try this but alot worse if labour fails it will be come a competition to see who finally did it noone should play with disabled people's lives .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    He just found out that’s there’s another green paper to come out on pip alone they want to remove a lot of the original descriptors for daily living ie washing getting dressed and cooking ect so a new lot of descriptors are coming out which is why the government has stated you need 4 points on on descriptor. This government is definitely be losing my vote next parliament if this happens 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact