We will have to wait for the publication of the Green Paper later today for full details of changes to personal Independence payment (PIP) and Universal Credit (UC).

But here are some of the main points of the speech.

Personal Independence Payment (PIP)

  • No vouchers
  • No means-test
  • No freeze.

But, from November 2026, claimants will need to score at least 4 points from a single descriptor to qualify for the daily living component of PIP, as well as scoring a total of at least 8 points..

So, if you select 4 descriptors scoring two points each, that will be 8 points, but it will not qualify for an award. 

But if you select one descriptor scoring 4 points and two descriptors scoring 2 points, that will be 8 points and you will qualify for an award.

There will also be review of the PIP assessment system led by disability minister Stephen Timms.

PIP existing claimants

The DWP says it "will work with Department of Health and Social Care to ensure that existing people who claim PIP who may no longer be entitled to the benefit following an award review under new eligibility rules have their health and eligible care needs met. The government is consulting on how best to achieve this."

This suggests that existing claimants will be subject to the new rules when their award is reviewed, if the review takes place from November 2026 onwards..

 Work Capability Assessment (WCA)

The WCA is to be scrapped in 2028 and a new single assessment system introduced. Under the new system, any extra financial support for health conditions (including PIP, ESA or UC health) will be assessed via a new single assessment which will be based on the PIP assessment – considering on the impact of disability on daily living, not on capacity to work.

There will be an increase in  Face-to-Face Assessments for PIP and the WCA.

Reintroduce reassessments for incapacity benefits, with exceptions for those who will never work and those under special rules for end-of-life care. Reassessments have largely been switched off since 2021.

A "Right To Try Guarantee" will be introduced which will guarantee that attempting work will never lead to a benefits reassessment.

Universal Credit (UC)

From April 2026, Labour will hold the value of the universal credit health top-up fixed in cash terms for existing claimants, and reduce it for new claimants, with an additional premium for people with severe lifelong condition

The Standard Allowance will be raised above inflation by 2029/30, adding £775 annually in cash terms for a single person aged over 25.

Access to the health element of Universal Credit will be delayed until a claimant is aged 22.

Existing claimants.  The DWP say “Those currently in receipt of UC health will benefit from the increased standard allowance and will not be affected by plans to reduce UC health in future.”

Assessments

People with the most severe disabilities or with health conditions that will never improve will never be reassessed.

When

The DWP say they will bring forward primary legislation this session to enable delivery of the PIP additional eligibility requirement and UC rebalancing reforms from 26/27.

The Right to Work Guarantee will be delivered through separate primary legislation which will be introduced “in due course”. 

Savings

The DWP say the changes are expected to save over £5 billion in 2029 to 2030.

Links

The Pathways to Work:  Reforming Benefits and Support to Get Britain Working Green Paper.

 Liz Kendall speech

 You can try the proposed new PIP test here.

You can also:

keep up with what’s changing and when

find out what you can do if you are unhappy about Labour’s plans

follow the latest news about PIP and UC changes.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Will be wonderful if and when you get the four points plus,are awarded pip and only get it for a year.  Back to square one. 
    Absolutely terrifying. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @The Dogmother No mention of knocking the 10 year PIP ( light touch reviews) awards on the head.

      Or if your in the start/middle of a 10 year award, will they end this, and make you go through their hoops again trying to get 4 points.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    So will everyone have to be reassessed or will that happen at the review stage of everyone’s claim. Also if you are on a 10yr light touch will that continue to the end or will you have to be reassessed 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Cabinet members and their estimated worth.
    Kier Starmer £7.7 Million
    Angela Rayner £4.7 million
    Rachel Reeves £7 million
    Yvette Cooper £3 million
    Ed Millinand £8 million
    David Lammy £6 million
    Pat McFadden £8 million
    Shabana Mahmood £2 million
    Wes Streeting £3 million
    Jonathan Reynolds £14 million
    Liz Kendall (joint) £40 million
    John Healey £16 million
    Heidi Alexander £6 million
    Peter Kyle £7 million
    Hillary Benn £4 million
    Ian Murray £6 million
    Bridget Phillipson £3 million
    Lord Hermer Unknown
    Lisa Nandy £4 Million
    Sir Alan Campbell £14 million
    Darren Jones £3.5 million
    Lucy Powell £3.5 million
    Jo Stevens £10 million
    Steve Reed £4 million
    Baroness Smith £5 million
    Ellie Reeves £4 million.

    Those tempted to reach for Reform UK can be reassured that Nigel Farage has an estimated £5 million. So he'll be on your side too.

    As for the Tories. Well, we all know what they thought about disabled people.

    But, no-one was misled. Labour did promise "Change" - though no-one who voted for them quite understood the sort of Change they were voting for.

    The answer. Organise. Fight back. Challenge this rotten system.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Wat Tyler Also bear in mind The Pensions Increase (Pension Scheme for Keir Starmer QC) Regulations 2013. A pension scheme that allows ONE man and ONLY ONE man to avoid paying the 55% tax on higher pension. No one else is exempt. 

      Wat, we need another revolt.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @Wat Tyler Did you see the smirk on Angela Rayner's face when Liz was giving her speech? it was unbelievably smug. I thought she was a staunch socialist and I'm sure she would have been very vocal if it had been the Tories making them.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Wat Tyler My jaws just dropped to the deck lol.......Liz Kendall (joint) £40 million.


      FFS just a joke.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Wat Tyler Diane Abbott?
      I like her, compassionate
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Wat Tyler Yea you can't survive on minimum wage tried it ended up having to take weekend job as well just to make it up.  Let them try it. They all live in a different world. Cost of living going up all the time bills etc. amount of people relying on food banks and not just u no employed. Amount that they get it's unreal. And they can claim expenses for everyday things. Just having a laugh.  PIP is already hard to get so making it harder will push people further into poverty. Yes the system needs overhauling but not expense of people's lives.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Quite simply, where are all of these jobs coming from?my able bodied, uni educated 22yo daughter cannot find any positions, how on earth could I? Constant absences through neurological conditions, severe mobility issues needing specialist equipment…Employers do not choose us! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @Scorpion Scorpion, yep, brouhaha, and therefore the same charge of illegality will apply to the subterfuge of this green paper as was applied to the Tory consultation that got thrown out by the challenge from the Public Law Project.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @Bettyboo Getting people into jobs was all a smokescreen brouhaha. Their plan to cut benefits to claimants. They don't care whether people get jobs.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    People saying all mental ill health will be excluded from PIP. They have tried doing this before, which the Tories did and it went to court was found to be discriminatory. That sets legal precedent. There are still clauses that cover mental health in the assessments now. Anyone who is agoraphobic, cannot engage in social contact this is covered in a descriptor. This descriptor was removed a year or two ago and put back after consultation.  I very much doubt it will be removed again. Liz Kendall can say what she wants but Mind has said to base PIP on physical disability and not mental is blatant discrimination and is against the Equality Act of 2010. 

    As it is, I will pass one of the descriptors anyway. Just repeating this as so sick of the attack on mental ill health when as said before, it can cause such suffering and is doing so for millions of people affected by all this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Scorpion Oh yes, I see what you mean now, sorry. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @axab43 What she said is this: "PIP was never set up to deal with mental health issues."

      What I'm saying is this: Then why decide to assess people with mental health issues on PIP?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @axab43 @axab43, I think Scorpion was saying it's a catch 22 situation for the mentally ill - the  very assessment system supposed to determine their needs will never judge their difficulties correctly, because, as Kendal said, pip has never been set up to deal with mental health issues. So I think Scorpion meant how cruel to submit them to the same assessment then - there should be an inclusive, or a separate one.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @Scorpion @Scorpion, people with mental health issues have never been set up to deal with mental health issues. The fact is that many fit and well, and, especially, rich and privileged people think mental ill health (and invisible diseases and disabilities) are a fiction. 

      The authorities arbitrarily assess the sick according to how outward appearance conforms to expectations of normality. It's as that person posted on one of these threads that a radiologist said they didn't look as if they had osteoporosis. People in charge don't look beyond the surface, when that is precisely what is needed to arrive at a diagnosis.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Anon thank you!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I am now a Pensioner (2024), I was awarded PIP 8 years ago.  I have indefinite award (3 years ago) of Daily Living + Mobility but not 4 points on one thing.  I have complex condition.  I have a small job to keep me social but rely on PIP to allow me to work. If they drop PIP I would need to claim pension credit and drop job.  So costing them more in the long run. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    No mention on people on DLA or PIP over state pension age.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Gabe L if have a 10 year award at state pension age thats not a bad result when you consider some people only get 1 2 or maybe 3 years its them that will be impacted more, so its highly unlikely they will be chasing pensioners, but i still think what the dwp are doing is illegal, you cannot just change rules to suit themselves its morally wrong, i dont think it will ever be passed in parliament or the courts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @alan
      Woah. They can still reassess whenever they like.

      A 10 year review is not necessarily a guaranteed immunity. I wish it was.

      But... they are 5 years behind on PiP reviews for 1, 2 and 3 yr awards ...  so you prolly won't be reassessed until it's due.

      They MAY guve the 7% of PiP claimants on soft-touch revuews immunity... it would be good for optics ... but currently we don't know.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @tinytim people claiming pip over state pension age wont be affected, what a relief that will be to some no more reviews
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @tinytim Yeh i thought there would had been a mention about that.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @tinytim Yes, what about them?

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Having had a read of the comments on mail online, it is very apparent that a large section of society believe many disabled people are 'scammers' who 'game' the system.... therefore, I can see, from Starner's point of view, why the new proposals to limit PIP will prove popular. This is merely to counter the threat of Reform. 

    If Labour are serious about getting sick/disabled people into work, they could start by raising the tax threshold to the minimum wage, which for a full time job, is approx £22K a year 


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @MrFibro National minimum wage come April will be £12.21 an hour. 

      £12.21 x 40 hours a week x 52 weeks a year = £25396.80 gross. Significantly less once tax and N.I. is taken off. Won't be much left after paying for food, bills, rent or mortgage.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Matt £22k a year that don't cut it.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I stopped working because I could not anymore due to ill health - was not a choice.  This is all so confusing and what is the meaning of "light touch reviews" in light of the new criterias? So they are moving the goal posts and the safety net so anyone those Assessors (on a target to get rid of us) can make us fail on reasssements! I hardly leave my house as I have stress, anxity and struggle on many issues.  In the past employers threatneded me up for being ill and taking too much sick days off...I can't even do those jobs any longer.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Vile, beyond words
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    What many have missed is thay Care Component of PiP is also a passport to Severe Disability Premium... over £80 a week.

    This will be lost too.

    And what does "Protection for Severe disabilities" mean ?

    What is Severe ?

    And if you can never work again ... some dictirs say this about severe mental conditions... is it full or part time work ?

    It seems she wants all psychiatric issues removed entirely from the benefits system.

    Of course this will just cost more elsewhere:
    1. more demands on Social Services,

    2. Admissions to psych wards ... 2K a week, 

    3. applications for Discretionary payments for rent, if you use you PiP to ESCAPE SOCIAL HOUSING as many currently do.

    It's a mess. And her advisors are not fit for purpose.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Michael
      But you get it back when you retire.

      I.E SDP IS included in State Pension credit IF you receive Daily Care PiP.

      I'm due to retire in 4 years. So it looks like I will NOT get the extra 80 quid in my Pension Credit as I will probably lose my PiP completely -- I have 13 points, but only 2 at most in any one category.

      Hope that helps.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Jim
      So in (some) Social Housing I was being Sectioned every couple of years... it is noisy and stressful..  armed police raids etc. Music all night, kids and dogs etc. Not good if you're bipolar.

      When I got PiP 10 years ago I used half of it to pay for rent in a private over-50s apartment... much better for my sleep and stress levels.

      Consequently I have not been Sectioned in 11 years !

      This has saved the Government tens of thousands.

      Hope that clarifies my point.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @Jim You can use pip to help pay rent to a private landlord if your housing benefit is not enough in itself to cover the rent. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @Gabe L Not mention eligibility for Motobility scheme or blue badge
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Gabe L Hi
      You say pip to escape social housing can you explain please. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    A 2 percent Wealth Tax on people worth over 10 million in the UK...  yes, they exist ! ... would yield 45 Billion.

    This is 10x what they may get from putting 2 million PiP claimants on the bread line.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @Gabe L Yes but looking at the list Wat Tyler gave above quite a few Labour MPS/ministers are above that! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Big Question: if you are on a 10 Year ongoing 'light touch' review...  will you be subject to a new full reassessment  ?

    This group accounts for only 7 percent of Pip claimants.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Claire
      But... they have made it clear that PiP is no longer going to be for people with psychiatric conditions.

      They are not included in those with 'severe conditions'.

      So anyone with a severe psych issue ... on a 10-year review ... will probably still lose it.

      But... we don't know for sure, yet.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Jim
      Let's hope they give us a Pass.

      If not ...  at least we know they're 5 years behind on reviews.

      My 10 year is up for a light touch review in 5 years... now, if this becomes a Full review and I lose it... which is more likely ... I will lose it then.

      So... 'make hay while the sun shines'  ...  I'm saving as much as possible   !

      (There's many ways of saving ...  buy important stuff like a new sofa and TV etc.)

      Good luck.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @Claire My ten year ongoing enhanced award is due to end November 2026. Will i be reassessed or will it be scrapped by then? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Gabe L Not until you are due an assessment…Torsten Bell, newscast podcast
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Michael Well yes but they have stated that those with progressive conditions and most disabled will never be reassessed.Most people with a ten year award will come under this.Otherwise they are going to be reassessing people they said would be protected and pensioners on pip when they became retired.Nothing is clear.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Liz Kendall’s Alternative Green Paper Launch Speech....what should have been said!

    "We are here today in the House of Commons to launch this Green Paper. However, after deep reflection and consultation with colleagues across the aisle, we have made the decision to delay its introduction. This delay is not due to hesitation or lack of commitment to reform, but rather because it is long past time for us—on both sides of this House—to take responsibility for the fundamental failings of our welfare system. A system that has caused untold harm, trauma, and, in too many cases, the loss of life.

    We cannot, in good conscience, propose further reforms without first acknowledging the damage done. Therefore, today we begin not with policy, but with an apology.

    First, we apologise for our role in bringing into the UK’s disability assessment process a discredited model from the United States, designed not to support, but to deny claims and reduce costs at the expense of disabled people’s wellbeing. We recognise that this system—one we embraced—contributed to hundreds of suicides and incalculable suffering. We cannot undo the past, but we can and must acknowledge that these decisions cost lives.

    Second, we apologise for ignoring successive warnings from the United Nations, warnings that declared our treatment of disabled people a ‘human catastrophe.’ Instead of listening, we dismissed and deflected. Today, we recognise that those warnings were not alarmist—they were accurate.

    Third, we apologise for the way Universal Credit was designed and implemented, in particular the six-week waiting period that plunged so many into poverty, homelessness, and crisis. It was not an oversight; it was a policy choice—and it was the wrong one.

    Fourth, we apologise for outsourcing disability assessments to profit-driven companies that were given financial incentives to cut support, not to provide it. We accept that thousands of disabled people were left feeling gaslit, disbelieved, and humiliated, forced to fight for their dignity in a system designed to wear them down. We acknowledge the devastating mental health consequences of this—self-harm, breakdowns, even loss of life—and we take responsibility for allowing it to continue for so long.

    It has not been rocket science to understand that many of you are simply too chronically ill or disabled to work at all. Others could work only with extreme flexibility from employers—flexibility that society and the labour market have largely refused to provide. We have had the evidence for years. Reports have repeatedly shown this. And yet, it is only now that we are formally recognising the need for a Right to Try policy—ensuring that disabled people who do attempt work will never again be penalised or reassessed simply for trying. Many will never face reassessment again.

    But apologies are not enough. Today, we also commit to accountability.

    That is why we are launching an Independent National Inquiry into the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). This inquiry will examine:

    Ignored coroner’s reports that warned of benefit-related deaths.

    Hidden internal reports that exposed systemic failures.

    The deaths and long-term harm suffered by claimants due to government policy and negligence.


    We must face the truth of what has happened. This is not only about policy; this is about justice.

    Finally, we acknowledge that the political narrative surrounding welfare—driven by cross-party competitiveness—has been degrading, dehumanising, and unacceptable. We in government have not only enabled but encouraged sections of the press to follow our lead, spreading harmful rhetoric about disabled people, benefit claimants, and those too unwell to work. For this, we deeply apologise.

    Support, not suspicion. Dignity, not degradation. A safety net, not a trap. These are not just words. They must be the foundation of our new system.

    That process begins today. The Green Paper will not move forward until we have worked with disabled people, advocates, and experts to rebuild a system that recognises and respects their needs. We will not repeat the mistakes of the past. Instead, we will listen. And we will act."

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @CaroA Do we not get a poem this time, CaroA?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @CaroA How long did that monster take to type out?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @CaroA Very well written, but it'll never happen because ultimately HM Treasury, and by extension, vested interests in the financial markets, will dictate policy. It's the money, stupid.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Hi does anyone know what will happen to people who work and also get pip how will these changes affect people like me who work part time and get pip??
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I have to conclude that not giving any clear details about certain aspects, (such as what happens to the people in the support group, who are there because they are at severe risk, reg 35), is a deliberate plan to intimidate people with very severe illness....
    Nice. What a bunch of total W*****S
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @Sid Right here, although awaiting a definition:

      "Amending the LCWRA Substantial Risk regulations to realign Substantial Risk with its “original intention” of only applying in exceptional circumstances.

      The DWP says: “We will specify the circumstances, and physical and mental health conditions, for which LCWRA Substantial Risk should apply. This will include protecting and safeguarding the most vulnerable, including people in crisis and those with active psychotic illness. We will work with clinicians to define the criteria and what medical evidence is required from claimants and people involved in their care, to ensure the process is safe, fair, and clear". 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Sid No wca, no support group. They don’t care about risk and harm to people, even after all deaths under tories.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    The scariest thing is, the linking of pip with ESA lcwra. The proposals will mean, if you don't have 4 daily living points on a pip descriptor,  i then you won't qualify for lcwra with your ESA and will be classed as a job seeker by DWP.
    I receive pip daily living but my points are made up of 2 for each descriptor. I also receive ESA support group. Under the proposed changes I will lose everything. 
    This will also affect other things such as, council tax support, prescription costs, dental care etc.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @Anon ESA is completely stopping this year. Those of us (me Included) all have to ‘migrate’ to Universal Credit. You get letter through the post with a date you have to have applied to UC by. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @Marc Absolutely. This is the most shocking part, which gave me a sleepless night last night.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Anon This is the worst of this evil changes. This made me sleepless last night.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Anon you can also add to that the benefit cap will come into effect on your housing support.  So if your rent is a grand per month or so, you'll receive 150- 200 pounds (very approx) less than your rent due to the benefit cap!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Anon This is what is causing the most outrage at the moment. I'll be shocked if this gets through.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    These reforms are simply appalling. Taking cash away from some of the poorest and most vulnerable in society. Whilst allowing the wealthy to gerrymander their earnings to receive large amounts of cash. For example a couple with kids and joint incomes over £100,000 can stash cash into pensions get tax relief and plan it so it brings down their earnings so they still benefit from child allowance, free hours for kids under 4 at nursery etc. also the grants for heat pumps which are £7500 -9000 and up to £16500 in some parts of Scotland tend to go to the better off. As you need to be an owner occupier and have a home suitable for the pump in the first place. As many poorer live in flats this isn’t possible generally. Also the current bill for pension tax relief is £50 billion annually 63% of this goes to the 5 million higher rate tax payers. The annual allowance was raised from £40,000 to £60,000 last year so if this was cut back down, this alone would raise large sums of money for the treasury.As they say wealth goes to wealth. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Please can you include info on the New Style ESA changes? Those of us ineligible for UC will be left with nothing once the support group indefinite ESA changes to a time-limited award.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Rumtruffle
      Section 54 of the Pathways to work Green paper states:
      54. Alongside levelling up the rate, this change would end the indefinite entitlement to contributory ESA for those assessed as having limited capability for work-related activity (for new people claiming).
      Try to find solace in the last 4 words until we know more. I am hoping this means protection for existing claimants. Remember it could take a long time to enforce too.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Rumtruffle Yes I am likely to fall into this category as well probably be re assessed and not eligible for UC then on time limited support ESA  but what happens after that what is our support if any going to consist of and are we just going to be dumped on the scrap heap left with no money no assistance.  And when can we expect these changes to be phased in so I know when it is coming.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    What about those on UC and LCWRA what will happen to us? I am so scared right now I won't be able to afford to stay alive if this becomes law I'm finished.... SERIOUSLY 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.