The DWP has published the results of a survey today which they claim shows that 200,000 people claiming health and disability benefits are ready for work now, if the right job or support were available.

The survey has been released to coincide with time To Talk day, which encourages people to talk about their mental health.  Its findings include:

  • 27% of customers felt they might be able to work in future but only if their health improved. Customers with mental health conditions were more likely to feel this way: 44% of customers whose main health condition was a mental health condition felt they might be able to work again if their health improved.
  • 5% - approximately 200,000 - customers felt they could work right away if the right job or support was available. Customers whose main health condition was a cognitive or neurodevelopmental impairment—including memory and concentration problems  alongside learning difficulties and disabilities, as well as autism—were around twice as likely to feel this way compared to other customers.
  • 49% of customers felt they would never be able to work or work again. 62% of these customers were over the age of 50, and 66% felt their health was likely to get worse in the future.
  • The findings indicate a link between take up of health and disability benefits and challenges in the healthcare system: two in five customers (41%) were on a waiting list for treatment for their health condition(s), and half (50%) who were out of work felt their ability to work was dependent on receiving treatment.
  • There is a potential opportunity in the rise of homeworking. A quarter (25%) of customers felt they couldn’t work, but when asked if they could work from home said they could. But customers were worried about the risk of social isolation and tended to see homeworking as a stepping stone to in-person work.
  • A key challenge is the complex relationship many customers have with DWP. Of those customers not in work who didn’t rule out work permanently, 60% were worried that DWP would make them look for unsuitable work, and 50% were worried they would not get their benefits back if they tried working.

Work and Pensions Secretary, Liz Kendall MP said:

“Today’s report shows that the broken benefits system is letting down people with mental health conditions who want to work.

“People claiming Health and Disability benefits have been classed by the system as “can’t work” and shut out of jobs and have been ignored – when they’ve been crying out for support.

“That is a serious failure. It’s bad for people, bad for businesses, which miss out on considerable talent, and bad for the economy.”

Whilst the fear of losing benefits if you try work is clearly a failing of the benefits system, the lack of suitable jobs and appropriate support within the workplace seems to have a great deal more to do with employment rights than it does with benefits.

But the main aim purpose of this survey, as far as the government is concerned, is undoubtedly to support whatever changes are proposed when the Green Paper is finally published in the Spring.

You can read more about the Work Aspirations of Health and Disability Claimants survey here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    The survey never asked me.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Jen I have been waiting for almost 10 months I am unable to use the mobility scheme  due to having less than 12 months I VERY MUCH AGREE If they cannot deal with the issue with maintaining reviews How are they going to get this done Waiting 58 weeks or more for a review is unacceptable 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @MrFibro Nor me! 
      Still waiting for my PIP review 14 months later. Good to see they have the time to do a survey instead of getting on with job in hand.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @MrFibro They are probably very selective who they ask! if indeed they do ask!?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @MrFibro Totally agree , we never get asked anything in these surveys,  I don't know anyone who has 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    Nearly a year of uncertainty and stress from the previous government and now this one  not knowing what is going to happen to us regarding making changes to the WCA to make it harder to qualify or scrapping it completely potentially losing a claimant £5000 a year, changes to PIP again potentially making you hundreds of pounds a month worse off , spying on claimants bank accounts with AI soon so we will be under the kosh of the DWP querying every transaction if you are unfortunate to get flagged up, and the managed migration from ESA to UC and the stress it will entail being a few weeks without money. Anyone would think they want us under the ground!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Gazilla Terrified and horrified that one, over privileged, group of human beings could have so little empathy for another, far less than privileged group of human beings. Punching down, funny how they never take on their over privileged donors, backers and friends, who may or may not be avoiding or evading paying tax. I hope their bank accounts are open to scrutiny in the same way. I honestly believe that our MP's should have to publish their own bank accounts. I thought we might get a couple of years of respite, from stressing about the arrival of the post. Hey ho, they forget who they are working for. Every member of society, at least those born here who have paid into the safety net for a lifetime. Bullies come in many guises, others are quite overt. My hope is that these (insert own expletive) never get sick or have an accident (?). And have to see first hand what a (insert own expletive) system that they are quite happy to inflict on others. We aren't people, we are numbers on a spreadsheet. Maybe one day, some humanity might shine through, I am not holding my breath, I even have to buy my own clothes and glasses, shocking, I can't afford to go off on little jaunts whenever I have to answer questions. 🎶 That's life...🎶🎶!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Gazilla Sorry Gazilla, spelled your name incorrectly earlier
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @sausage belly I'm en route to the job centre now , I have a few issues discalcula being one of them. So I typed in my amount wrongly for my assessment date I missed a decimal point and confused a zero with an eight , I messaged my work coach to help me as the person who usually does is sick , nothing,  I then took some money out of my account rhe next day , typed the right amount in , it then looked like I had placed a huge chunk in my account ! I wish ! So now I have to show all my details and bank statements... since when has doing this been right or acceptable? I'm actually terrified 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @sausage belly sb well said .. thankyou ... s ...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @sausage belly Thank you so well put.... and not to mention the years of untold stress and abuse so many of us have endured with repeated forensic assessments denying/gaslighting our authentic claims. They should be compensating for ruining so many of our lives and the loss of so many others who couldn't hack it anymore - documented in the book The Department by John Pring. The 'DWP scandal' should be recognised by a full public enquiry.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    I see somebody mentioning digilisation of PIP but how about those like myself who only have access to a smartphone, and no computer, how do we go on about completing a form online and submitting evidence to support our claim.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @adrian I'm in my fifties and bought a cheap smart phone it's Chinese cost me £50
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Annon T. I really feel for those people who aren't ICT savvy , it must be so hard for them now everything is going on line .The DWP should be responsible for supplying them with a smart phone if  if they expect them to use it .It's just another expense for people and a lot of stress because they are expected to know what to do - it's ridiculous. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Annon T. I have only ever had a paper assessment.I did exactly the same.They are not to be trusted.
      I am now over pension age and have a formal diagnosis.I had a letter saying  only light touch assessments will ever be done.So,I hope to never use my dossier,but,should I need it then its there
      Take care

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Michael Easily said by anyone under 60 years of age. I got friends in their 70s. They never had smart phn! Never worked with PC! Have no idea what an application is or what is an email, email address, Google account, Microsoft, Apple...and so on. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Scorpion I'd never trust DWP to admit having all I'd submit only digitally! I always keep everything photocopied and actuaky create two piles of evidence actualy making two sets, one sent by recorded tracking delivery and other exact copy of it at home. Many reported DWP saying they did not get certain medical evidence. I number every page like for instance page 5 of totally 40 pages has in top corner  5 (40) and can confront them with my own exact copy of need be. I do not trust digital system.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    Hi Everyone

    I've just read an article from the Telegraph via Yahoo that Liz Kendall has been forced to shelve the 
    proposed £3BN proposed benefits cuts.

    I just thought I would share what I read with you all because it could mean that the 'absolute horrors' we were to face are over for some time at least

    I truly hope for all our sakes that it is true but please don't shoot the messenger if it isn't 

    Sleep well guys and take care
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Gary B Gary B. Wow your PIP assessor sounds like a genuine caring,  truthful, professional, not the usual experience. That's great for you. That's what should really happen to all of us, instead we are treated as liars and scoundrels. Thses assessors are not even matched up to the customers disabilities! eg, what does an occupational therapist know about psychosis etc. I once knew of an assessor who asked a mother how long does she think her son will be autistic!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Jackie For your information, it's extremely unlikely that a monarch refuses to sign off a bill passed by the two House. The last time a monarch withheld their assent was 11 March 1708, when Queen Anne vetoed the Scottish Militia Bill on the advice of her ministers. No monarch has since withheld royal assent from a bill passed by Parliament. And I doubt KC really knows or cares what the upcoming bill and the WCA are about, leave alone refusing to sign off the bill.

      You should rather watch what your MP signs, as you vote for them, and not King Charles.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Scorpion It’ll be interesting to see wether or not KC signs it off as law I’ll watch him very closely from now on 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Scorpion Thank you for this thorough clarification. People need to see and read and take notice of what you wrote. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Gazilla They are quite a confused bunch, WCA said I was fit for work (which my job coach said was a way of cutting £20 from ESA, which I withdrew from, which is the point I suppose). The lady who did my PIP assessment said "you are fit for work? I don't think so"! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 days ago
    The gist of reforms are this year to digitalise the pip and make it online for whole claim .Eventually to make 1 health benefit all linked together with new job centres,for “advice” and “help”The whole sickness benefit reforms will take years to apply to current claimants.New claimants will probably be caught up in a harsher test,by maybe 2027.They also want claimants to possibly not need assessment if enough evidence,but will be linked to job centres in future.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @boris1 It was from Stephen Timms answering a Lib Dem question in parliament.It comes under something called Health Transformation,which is going to rebuild the entire system.Of course,the option to fill in paper forms is still there.I will see if I can find the article.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @Claire Where did you hear that?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    I worked for DWP for 40+ years and saw many people who were perfectly capable of work , but chose benefits as a lifestyle...... similarly, I also saw a number of people who desperately wanted to work but no employer would touch them............ 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @no longer a wage slave I would reiterate what others have mentioned, that unless you have seen claimants medical records you are not in a position to make such value judgements. Sadly your 40+ years working for DWP has indoctrinated your viewpoint towards the very people you should have been supporting. I can make a pretty good stab at which paper you read and your political persuasion but then I too would be making a value judgement on very superficial information. It is beyond disappointing that the entire department has such ingrained poor practice that it makes no allowances for the years, and in fact decades, of improved understanding of what are termed "hidden" disabilities. No wonder that change is unlikely to happen in my lifetime when you can simply regurgitate the kind of discrimination others have spent a lifetime to rid our society of. On a platform for those of us having to negotiate deep seated prejudice of those in positions of power. I can only take some comfort in the knowledge that you are no longer adding to the problem.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @no longer a wage slave Did you see their medical records? Your visible judgement means nothing. Unfortunately, it's this type of judgement that causes hatred towards disabled people with hidden disabilities. It's a blessing you no longer work there. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @no longer a wage slave People have hidden disabilities. They may look ok but they aren’t. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @no longer a wage slave And there are also people through no fault of their own who can't work,  there will always be bad apples in the barrel bit that's not fair on the decent majority, and benefit fraud is near non existent , they should be going after these dodgy MPs 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @Scorpion He meant the DHSS, AND BEFORE,
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    I have epilepsy&special needs&cerebral palsy in my lower back&right arm . I can’t work. I just wanted to say what shocked me about the bbc story about kendell saying people are taking the mick Is the bbc comments loads of people saying people with mental problems are snowflakes That outrageous in my opinion. But the other one was the amount of comments saying if you want to grown the the work percentage In Uk take disabled people benefits of them&they will jump of the sofa&get a job . Like I said above ⬆️ I have epilepsy so bbc letting comments like this be on the website is shocking&it upset me sorry everyone for the long message. Everyone remember look after yourself&stay strong 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Tomf For as long as disability has impacted my life there have been people like Kendall who have done their best to remove our financial support, in the past this has included Iain Duncan Smith and his sidekick Esther McVey. They are of a particular mindset that the answer to everyone's problems is work. Regardless of whether this is in the best interests of the individual, or indeed capable of being achieved. What those who believe this fail to understand is that for many of us there is no "Plan B" if we have our financial support withdrawn. This is it. This is the only option we have. Without it we simply cease to exist, which is something I believe would suit those in positions of power very well. This public attack on those of us forced to received benefits has been going on for the last 18+ years and sadly I can see no end to it. The moment that ILF [Independent Living Fund] was abolished on 30th June 2015 the message we are being sent is that we are now all reduced to our economic worth. Those of us who cannot work are considered to be of negative economic worth. I will never forget seeing the scenes of police officers manhandling wheelchair users in the houses of Parliament when demonstrating against the scrapping of ILF, anyone wishing to look it up there is still a very small amount of footage online, until they remove it entirely. Tomf we are stronger together, never forget that. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Apparently starmer has scrapped the reforms to sicknotes if true sounds like they scrapping wca but with everything put together it seems like  Kendal wants the young people and people with mild illness back in work place it also sounds like nobody in a certain age group will be reassessed so if they do make cuts people will go into a different group to what they in now could be wrong but sounds like it people got to wait for green paper to find out .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Lill @Lill  Where did you hear that about Starmer scrapped the reforms and nobody in a certain age group will be reassessed?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    I suppose you cant have disabled people carrying out care work for others
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @bert Bert ... that is in such a small statement correct correct .. brilliant young man.. and extremely humane and .. you know what total total truth .
      Thankyou Bert ... s ....
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @bert You suppose correctly.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Still says w c a and pip no mention at all for people in the e s a support group my husband was disabled at 30 after 13 months married he has now got so many things wrong from what started a back
    Injury to aniexty depression heart disease asthma c o p d high b p rushed into hospital with double phuemonia that's caused terrible resp issues and heart failure people are doing home visits he's housebound he suffered a seizure never had one in his life and they say horrible things this government has a lot to answer for when passing judgement when asked the question was Liz Kendal
    Going to means test pip no comments I would add my husband is now 58 and always  struggled to prove his illness I have cared for him for 27 yrs as well as worked been an un paid carer they don't look at that do they no words needed but I would like an answer for e s a support group
    Liz Kendall I'm waiting 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Un known A lot of what is being said is speculation. You have to ask yourself whether what is being said in the media is an actual fact or an opinion? We'll just have to wait a few more weeks to hear from the horses mouth so to speak what's happening.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Always bare this in mind, well it's what I've been telling myself after near enough 2 years of media propaganda. They want to target the cohort of 18-25 year olds who are on benefits (Not disability benefits), then they want to target depression and anxiety sufferers, lastly they want to target people who defraud the benefit system (Not disability benefits).

    I don't like the depression/anxiety one because it downplays the severity of the illness, it's like a poison nettle which left untreated becomes a slew of nettles.

    Labour's attacks on benefits are usually found on more Conservative leaning outlets, one of the main reasons why is the rise of the Reform Party. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 days ago
      @John Forest Who? Keir Starmer?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Dpb999 Could we crowdfund a  a disability or human rights  lawyer to take them on ? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Dpb999 The disabled community is fragmented all talk no action
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Dave Dee True
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @axab43 That's a great point, the media in particular the Times, Mail, Telegraph and such have gone on about "Mental Illness is the new bad back" as meat thrown to the wolves in their comment sections but we know how incapacitating it is. 

      I feel sorry for people with mobility issues but I admire them for their fight and perseverance. I don't think the likes of Fraser Nelson understands that such issues can happen in a blink of an eye and it could take anyone out of work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    Allegedly, only 3401 benefit recipients took part in this (again alleged) survey and they have discovered 200,000 are ready for work!!! 
    Make it make sense! 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    From the main topics the cabinet meeting discussed today was the sickness and disability benefits. I think this meeting will pave the way for the long waited announcements. We need, disabled people and carers, to have a say in the coming consultation and do not let them pass their damaging proposals.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 days ago
    If they're really serious about the support they keep parroting and want to support those who are willing to work, then, their support should go way beyond the usual help with CV writing and preparing for interviews for jobs which people won't get. They should rather focus on finding work placements that secure at the end of a short period of time an employment.

    Like in Nordic countries and the Netherlands, the DWP staff  should deal themselves directly with employers and secure jobs for the people in this category, rather than asking people to apply for tonnes of jobs in vain, saying to them. "Keep applying, you never know."

    No one should need an argumentative work coach with a patronising attitude for CV writing or preparing for interviews, as there are plenty of ready made CV templates on the internet and tantamount of job interview preparation guides on YouTube.

    I don't think they've got a shred of honesty in supporting anyone; all they want is to cut the welfare bill by cutting benefits in one form or another.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Scorpion They used to help disabled people my daughter is disabled, 14 year ago when she turned 18 and had to claim sickness, they said she didnt need to work?  I insisted they didnt write her of. She went to a disabled college that was set up to help disabled people into work. They had 6 up and down the country. My daughter couldnt go to normal college but this gave her the oppotunite to learn. She went on placement at the end of training with an employer who worked with the DWP, making sure everything was going ok, she has been there 13 year now. So yes I agree people can work with disabilities, if the support is there. DWP stopped funding these places. They used to have Remploy but DWP stopped funding. They want people back to work but dont want to fund and support them.
      My daughter has Autism ADHD and other mental health problems, also scoliosis and head tumour disabled people can work. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Scorpion Would be good if the government helped companies in creating jobs for disabled persons to do in the first place which means investment and helping employers to achieve this through incentives, money, and resources!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @WorkshyLayabout So true.  Private company involvement is a duplication of existing services. Why are they needed? Why is money wasted on them ?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Matt @Matt The government is quite happy to give £millions to private companies doing WCAs as well as how many £s to providers now running job clubs. That money should be used on improving job centres and services for those genuinely looking for work. However spending taxpayers' money on something useful is off the government's radar.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Scorpion true
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    A "complex relationship with DWP" - by this I assume you mean that we avoid them at all costs, as they will twist anything and everything we say. 

    I remember that just turning up to a WCA shows that you're able to travel, yet if you didn't show up you got no money. 

    So yeah I try to avoid speaking to them unless I absolutely have to. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    This survey is intended to justify and pave the way for their upcoming wicked plan, while distorting the reality.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    I worked in market research for over 20 years.
    I'd like to know how they selected their sample.
    For the results of a survey to be accurate you have to talk to carefully selected people for an accurate overall result.
    It would take me an age to explain these variable but as an example - within age groups there'd have to be representation of condition severity.
    There'd have to be accurate representation of differing conditions.
    To select this sample to be accurate would be complex and time consuming.
    3,000 people questioned is laughable.
    Therefore I do not believe this to be worth the paper it's written on.
    Purely a propaganda tool ahead of next months announcement. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Jon I did Statistics at quite a high level for A level Geography and Psychology. If the report was presented in any credible scientific journal it would be declined for publication for the reasons above.  There's no hypothesis, no statistical analysis or confidence level set which you must provide in areas such as medical research. Then again, this is the Government and its employees.....
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Maybe we should just ignore what Liz Kendall says in headline grabbing statements she knows will cause controversy?  She has to work through the assessment criteria, and those people who are genuine and will pass the criteria won't be made to work, whatever Liz Kendall may want to do. 

    Treat these comments with the contempt they deserve and just ignore her. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @axab43 Yes I agree with that as somebody who worked in tribunal representation for many years but tribunals have to apply the law as it is at the time and if Liz Kendall changes the way that people's impairments are recognised or weighted by a revised assessment system those people might not succeed with an appeal however self-evident it is that they are  in the real world actually or virtually unemployable. There are plenty of people with disabilities who work but asking employers to contemplate accommodating hundreds of thousands of people currently regarded as unemployable by the assessment system is not practicable.  The whole thing is not really about the well-being of currently benefit claiming disabled people getting back into the world of work possibly to be better off economically socially and in their health it simply about saving money.   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @axab43 Fair enough. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Anon That is because many people fill the assessment papers  in in a way that will make them fail.  

      Welfare Rights Advisers from Citizens Advice Bureaux told me they continually come upon people who get no points in the first assessment  but pass when going to Tribunal, when advised by the right people or when the CAB advisors fill the papers in for them.   You agreed with that yourself, because the DWP want to fail people but when it goes to Tribunal they pass. 

      Liz Kendall can't stop that, however much she may want to.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Jonno I meant she should be ignored as far as letting what she says affect us!  Ie not to let how she talks affect how we worry over what will happen.  As I said in my original comment, she cannot bypass the assessment process and find everyone fit for work whether they are or not.

      Absolutely she should be challenged and probably will be, by those more qualified and stronger to than we are.  There are many who are challenging these reforms, ie many disability charities and other bodies.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @axab43 "She has to work through the assessment criteria, and those people who are genuine and will pass the criteria won't be made to work, whatever Liz Kendall may want to do."

      Sorry, but this is laughable. It's dependent on DWP being honest and doing their job properly. They're after cutting costs, so it doesn't matter if we are genuine or not. 

      How many genuinely disabled people entitled to PIP get refused and have to go all the way to court to appeal??
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 days ago
    Mrs 4% thinks some benefit claimants are "taking the mickey". Appalling language.  Apologies if this link has already been posted.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Jonno Yeah, I read that too, shameful.  Sure, *some* must be playing the system but didn't Resolution Foundation say health benefits are the most difficult to play the system with and not the place where there's likely to be fraud.  Disgusting how they ran with this comment (and shame on BBC too)... just look at the people's comments below the article.  It got the reaction they wanted from the DM reader types.  It makes me feel scared, hopeless and hated.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 days ago
      @Jonno So much for all her talk about ending the blame culture!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @jossy There are as many as a percentage of politicians taking the mickey as benefit claimants.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.