How do you think Labour will treat disabled claimants if, as seems increasingly likely, they form the next government?  Will they be better or worse than the Conservatives?

Last week’s Labour party manifesto left our readers divided on what the future might be like for disabled claimants under Labour.  The document made few references to benefits and gave no clues as to what its attitude would be to major issues such as ESA to UC migration, proposed Green paper changes to PIP or how exactly the WCA might be reformed.

Many readers felt that Labour was just being cautious, because any hint of being soft on claimants would be jumped on by the right-wing press.

Others thought that Labour were saying little because they do not have anything positive to say to disability benefits claimants.  Some think there is little difference between the two parties and some commentors even believe that Labour would be worse news for claimants than the Conservatives.

Certainly, the manifesto could have offered some hope to, for example Carer’s Allowance claimants. A change to the current cliff edge earnings limit would not have major cost implications.

And, to ensure claimant safety, Labour could have offered to look again at the very tight ESA to UC migration deadline imposed on the DWP by the Conservatives.  Delaying the transfer would not cost anything, given that it was previously delayed to 2028 to save money.

Labour could also have stated in the manifesto that they would look at the Green paper proposals for PIP, but that it was unlikely that a voucher system or a catalogue would play any part in any future plans.  Again, this would not have had cost implications.

None of these undertakings would have offered much in the way of ammunition to the right wing press, but all of them would have reassured claimants that Labour would give them some respite from the current relentless attacks.

On the other hand, no part of Labour’s plans include cutting benefits in order to raise cash for other purposes, such as tax cuts.

And, whilst they have said they will replace or reform the WCA, they have not suggested that they will reform PIP.

So, if benefits will play a major part in deciding who you will vote for, readers will have to make an educated guess as to what Labour might do based on minimal information.

Knowing what other claimants are thinking may be helpful in reaching a decision.

So, please take part in our poll to tell us whether you think life would be easier, harder or much the same under Labour rather than the Conservatives and, if you wish, give your reasons in the comments section below.

You can only vote once and we’ll publish the results on Monday 1 July.

This poll is now closed

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    I've gone for Option 2 though there could be hopes of Option 1 once they are ready to do something. For now they offer little, but the previous ideas and actions of New Labour was serious about pensioner and child poverty and child disability. For now the difference is less in any positive promises and more in what they would not do - eg raid PIP to fund tax cuts as the Tories once again seek to "balance the books on the backs of children and the disabled". If constituency boundaries hadn't changed, I would be voting Labour to unseat a Tory and former DWP Secretary, but in the new one there is a wider choice of more supportive parties as the likely contenders. hope all telly's survive the next weeks and you have a chance to vote wisely and make a difference :-)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    I'm planning to vote based on my local candidates for MP. I'm not satisfied with  any of the party leaders but at least let me vote for a candidate who will be a good MP for my constituency.

    If you live elsewhere, your best candidate for MP might be from a different party than mine.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    I worked from the age of 16 until I became seriously ill at the age of 41 .iv always paid into the system hugely.I contributed to the system even more once I started my building companies and employed staff 'all on the books .I have 3 adult children that are all doing well and are also paying into the system due to the work ethics I installed in them .I could not continue to run my companies due to unwanted health issues. I'm in my 50,s now and  like other disabled people,needing help are made to beg and bow to the filthy rich MP,s for what is massively less than I paid in .ITS nothing new ,whenever the Government is in crisis they attack the poorest to appease the middle /upper class voters.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    Reform party is a complete cretin 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    There is no difference between the two.
    I would not vote for any.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    Labour will go ahead with £12bn welfare reform including PIP cuts. Same old Tories Same old Labour. Vote Reform Party please!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Reform Party Reform are just as bad, if not worse.  Green are the best for disabled, followed by lib dems.  Although lib dems have a history of lying(like the rest of them). 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Reform Party You are REALLY in the wrong place to peddle that party
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    Sadly, Labour aren't even considering looking at at least 3 very easy reversals that would help ease the cost of living burden - 2 child limit, bedroom tax and benefit cap! 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    Kier Starmer said yesterday that Labour is the party of working people and believe there is dignity in earning a wage, not handouts.
    Still think Labour are going to be better?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Aw It's concerning that they haven't mentioned noting 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Anon Yes, the Tories have said they will cut benefits to fund tax cuts, it's there in black & white. Labour have not put ANY benefit cuts in their manifesto. So Yes, absolutely they will be better in the short term and maybe beyond.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Anon Note how people at the upper end of wealth never hesitate to award themselves and their cronies lots of money, while assuring  those at the lower end of income that (an illusion of) "dignity" somehow compensates for poverty.
      Yet utility bills can only be paid with money -- not "dignity". 
      Starmer is Cameron Mk.2 on steroids.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    Here comes the new boss;;;same as the old boss....
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    There is no difference between the two parties'
    Disabled people claiming PiP are being targeted to help fill the huge debt,  The country now finds itself in due the government's incapacity to run a country. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    If Labour had a strategy to better disabled people's lives they would be telling us. Their silence deals volumes, they are no better than the tories. Vote Lib Dems or Green.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Emma Davies It's not that simple.  One step wrong for Labour and the media will use it against them.  We won't find out Labour's true intentions until they're in power.  I just hope they're not as bad as the tories. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Emma Davies And if everyone did that the Tories would get back in. In their first term they would bring in swingeing cuts to all benefits and we'd be in a right mess. Personally I wouldn't survive it, I'd be one of the fallen. Vote to oust the Tories or we're all doomed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    I’m hoping labour will be less harsh! I did send an email to leader of labour other day, while coming down from panic attack, to be more compassionate regarding disabled and welfare. The whole election and tories are making my mental health worse. I wanted to vote green but I will vote labour for tactical voting as my area close. I’m so depressed and in terror constantly. Good luck everyone and 🙏 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Emma Me too Emma can't eat sleep terrified for the future just vote labour 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    Also how are people supposed to make a claim for universal credit if they haven't got a computer or even internet. Also ESA wasn't supposed to go to UC by 2028 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Anon Assistance no longer readily available to many thanks to all these years of cuts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @John No it wasn't, but they've brought the date forward.  They keep changing the goalposts all of the time. 

      We will be worse off on Universal Credit, as it doesn't have the severe disability premium. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @John Citizens advice, welfare rights at local council, social workers and other organisations can help filling in the form.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    Under labour back in 1997 and 2007 I can remember they didn't demololise disabled people and there wasn't a thing called universal credit. I've never voted conservative.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @John Labour have said they won't abolish UC if they win.  It was also Labour that brought in the WCA.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    Labour has no empathy for disabled people  and their struggle.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    You can't trust Labour any further than you can throw them. Think they'd be worse than  all the other parties.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    Headline in the telegraph this morning,
    " Handouts lack the dignity of wages,  says Kier Starmer"
    The article is an interview with the Labour leader and hints at his stance on welfare. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Tomkins What can the unions do I don't understand it all 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Anon That was a tory newspaper 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Anon He's likely telling the gullible swing voters what they want to hear to get their votes.

      I've seen many articles lately expressing a need for compassion and understanding as well as disabled people having a say in policies.

      I'm not a huge fan of starmer and certainly not Kendall and Reeves but they have already been warned by the unions to expect a huge fuss if they betray the disabled.

      Rayner is more popular and left wing and many locals here including tories think she'll take over sooner than later as Starmer doesn't stick to a thing, he is easily pressured into giving in, which is of course actually a good thing where tory welfare policies are concerned 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    Labour is quiet because they have bad things planned.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Lulu Easy to say, but how do we choose? Will Labour be as/less/more harsh than conservatives? Who will you vote for?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Lulu I agree with you.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Lulu Easy to say, but how do we choose?  Will Labour be as/less/more harsh than conservatives? Who will you vote for?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Lulu To be fair we don't know that , we can only wait and see , at least we know what the conservatives have planned so definitely need them out for the whole countrys sake in my opinion not just for the people with ill health x
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 months ago
    Governments don’t seem to like, or understand what people with disabilities go through in our lives.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 months ago
      @Spud I'm still voting Labour to tactically get the Tories out.

      Disability groups need to put pressure on the general secretaries of the Labour affiliated trade unions! If the general secretaries refuse to speak out, then they are implicit.

      Disabled people need spending money to contribute to society and to obtain their essential needs. The Tories don't realise that giving them spending money helps reduce poverty, helps improve the economy, and a slice of the benefits go back to the treasury in form of VAT, duties, etc. The diabolical Tories would rather cut people's benefits to make them commit suicide, and in most cases, commit crimes such as shoplifting for essential needs.

      Abolishing the care charges will also help reduce administrative costs for care services.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.