Vicky Foxcroft, a government whip and the former shadow minister for disabled people has resigned her post as a whip in protest at the cuts to personal independence payment (PIP) and universal credit (UC).

Foxcroft built a very positive relationship with disabled people’s organisations in her time as a shadow minister and many were devastated when Stephen Timms was given the ministerial post instead of Foxcroft, when Labour won the election.

In her resignation letter this evening, Foxcroft wrote:

“I absolutely understand the need to address the ever increasing welfare bill in these difficult economic times, but I have always believed this could and should be done by supporting more disabled people into work.  I do not believe that the cuts to personal independence payment (PIP) and the health element of universal credit should be part of the solution.

“I have wrestled with whether I should resign or remain in the Government and fight for change from within.  Sadly it now seems that we are not going to get the changes I desperately wanted to see.  I therefore tender my resignation as I know that I will not be able to do the job that is required of me and whip – or indeed vote -for reforms which include cuts to disabled people’s finances.”

Foxcroft’s resignation from her post as a whip - not as an MP - so soon after the publication of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill will come as a blow to the government, even if not a huge surprise.  It may also embolden other MPs who have been reluctant so far to go public with their opposition to the cuts.

Vicky Foxcroft is on social media and can also be contacted at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. if anyone wants to offer her messages of support.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    My MP so proud of her ♥️
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Darren Yup Darren, you've got a good'un there.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    We need more of them to have a spine
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Lisa Nandy MP was just being interviewed on the radio. She said they have worked with disabled people on the new proposals. I was wondering what disabled people they were? As it doesn’t seem like it! They keep saying the cuts are a matter of principle. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Marc She bloody is! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Anniesmum Lisa Nandy is one of the very worst. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Anniesmum I have a nasty feeling as to whom.....as many will know on this forum I used to work for RNIB and I'm visually impaired. Both RNIB and Guide Dogs have very little in the way of campaigning but RNIB's campaign department did email me to say they have been in talks with ministers....so not directly with disabled people but with some of their 'advocates'. Other charities, such as Scope have been far more forthright in their condemnation of the proposal cuts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Anniesmum She said they want people to live richer, wealthier lives and they are expanding access to work. All this seems like lies to me, it’s being cut! She is either lying or being told lies.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Sent an email to thank her. 

    Still reeling. 

    UC & PIP BILL 2025 (draft) 
    Points to note:

     5.4.(a). to make different provision for different cases or purposes
     
    (b) to provide for a person to exercise a discretion in dealing with any matter

    These may seem innocuous, but basically this blocks decisions made being used as Case Law. 
    However. 
    Common Law principles of ‘fairness’ could be applied by us when fighting in Tribunals. Which we will have to. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @CMB Hi CMB. Not a solution, but I would contact your Council ‘Housing Options’ service or whatever they call it. Make a social housing application to your council/ local housing associations. 
      Let them know clearly that your current housing may be at risk. 
      If you are ‘disabled’ you are covered by their ‘vulnerability’ criteria. You will not get ‘priority’ until you have an eviction letter from your landlord. 
      If it a real fear, I would get the ball rolling now. Even if you continue to live where you are for now, you have set the ball in motion for the future. 
      Check out the social housing in your area to see where it is, and where you would like to live. Again, this gives you information to make informed choices later. 
      Good luck. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @ANGELA My fear is how to survive long enough to get to the actual tribunal. I immediately won't be able to afford rent. I developed pain disorder when forced to move before and my conditions will be made irrevocably worse by the stress and having to engage in job seeking. Some days having the tv on too tiring/painful for me. I'm sure there are many many people with the same fears and struggles and I'm certain that they'll try to remove 4 point scores from people who should get it.  You don't get 4 points, you lose everything at once. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    I wrote and thanked her for her courage in standing up to senior members of the cabinet, that are denying democracy by threatening mp's with loss of position or deselection. 

    Yes you want to be backed by your party- but when many party members have concerns as do many organisations, and the government hierarchy is not listening, your as bad in bullying that you berated the conservatives for 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    The warrior spirit has begun..now let it fly high.
    Thank you so much Vicky Foxcroft 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    I am grateful to her for showing she has a moral compass; and highlighting in her resignation letter that it is true that Starmer has told MPs that if they vote against the government they will loose their whip! As a disabled person I am completely aghast at the lack of understanding, empathy and compassion that is not being shown by the labour government. I am a long term labour voter. But with this assault on disabled peoples lives and livelihoods I will never again vote for these dictators. I can only beg back benchers to see with crystal clarity that loosing a whip is nothing compared to what disabled people will loose. Many of us will loose our lives. That's a fact. What a tremendous failure. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    this is the email I have just sent to Vicky Foxcroft. "Dear Vicky Foxcroft MP.

    My Name is *redacted name* though given in email:
    I am not your constituent, so I apologise for breaking the parliamentary rules in sending you this email. I send it to you in your former capacity as a government whip. though I am a disabled person. Please let me take this opportunity to thank you for standing up for disabled people and taking your principled stance against this government by resigning your position as government whip. I agree with you that cuts to disabled people’s lifeline which gives them independence, such as pip, and cuts to universal credit, should not be used as a balancing method for a government who wants to balance the books. May I suggest a statistic you may wish to investigate that I heard on radio 5live today on wake up to Money 20 June 2025? Around 16 billion pounds is not collected by HMRC from small business in owed corporation tax, about half the tax gap? Collect this, and the 5billion from welfare cuts would be covered more than twice over, though with the cuts to pip that would precipitate losses of carer’s allowance etc, would make the cuts to welfare around 9 billion. , a number still covered by collecting corporation tax owed. Please go further than resigning as whip, and voting no on this bill, please use your previous experience as shadow minister for disabled people to convince other MPs, if you can, to vote no on this dangerous bill. Thank you."
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Disability news are reporting today that the Government is secretly drawing up plans to means test PIP, even if we somehow manage to keep it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Quietplease that would then pit one disability against another as to cost of the independence. the whole idea of pip and dla before it was to level the playing field, as disability aids that enable disabled people to do the same things as those without disabilities cost more. if they are going to means test, maybe an underlying entitlement to pip, without financial assistance could be given for those over the means test threshold, as many services use pip as a proxi for disability. such as ride access passes at theme parks for instance.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Cathedral city
      Labour proudly announced they are not going to means test PIP or cut in the amount of PIP paid or freeze PIP uprating for those eligible. Labour policy is to move the goal posts to reduce eligibility. 

      I expect any government material generated on means testing PIP is due to it being something the Tories or Labour were considering before rejecting the policy idea and reaching their current policy decisions. And the decision to not make it public correct as to do so would cause confusion as to the government's actual policy, and would deter people in or advising the government from coming up with policy ideas, as they would fear their ideas being made public even if rejected by the government.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Peeved @Peeved, exactly, but they never join those dots.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Cathedral city It might be justified if they applied sensible means-testing criteria. Maybe annual income up to £35k would be okay. 

      I suspect it would prove to be a disincentive to work for those PIP claimants who are able to, as PIP plus additional income from work might push them over the means-testing cut-off point. So the whole helping people back into work mantra would sound even emptier.

      If they have a cut-off point of £16k in savings, or even less, then it wouldn't work well because disallowed claimants with savings above the cut-off point would burn through their savings at almost £9k a year (on maximum PIP) and have to reapply when they have less money.


      But yeah, I'm sure they'll have a go at means-testing PIP eventually and make a complete mess of it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Cathedral city How can you tally means testing with it being an in work benefit? Surely it will just discourage people from working which is the exact opposite of what they say they are trying to achieve. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Resign as an MP let’s vote in reform 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Giles Where did you here this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Porpoise let's not vote in Reform UK. want to see your disability beneifits go? see accessibility go? then vote reform. a lot of the gains made by disabled people have been thanks to the human rights act, which the reform party hate.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Porpoise Not only do Reform say they want to strip more disabled people of benefits than the Government they say the unemployed on universal credit (including thise stripped of disability benefits) will have four months to find a job then lose all benefits. After that you will just have to starve. Look it up. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Porpoise
      Reform's position on disability cuts is as bad as the government's if not worse. Dear Nigel's comments on the subject show he's all in favour of huge cuts.

      Bear in mind as well that Kendall wrote a piece in the Torygraph arguing that the disability cuts have to go through in order to fight the rise of Reform, presumably because she thinks Reform voters support the cuts. So as far as she is concerned every vote for Reform is a vote for disability cuts. It's obviously vital to vote against Labour, but it's essential that they lose votes to parties to their left, not their right.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Porpoise Reform are are bunch of Tories so be careful what you wish for. They want rid of the NHS so imagine what they'd do to welfare. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    The amount of people asking her on X where the "magic money tree" for benefits is really highlights how glad I am I don't venture onto that cesspit.

    I don't know, how about from the same tree that is no doubt going to fund Starmer wanting to play personal attack dog for the likes of Netanyahu and Trump because he clearly didn't learn anything from how Trump left this country with a huge defence bill by selling out to Putin.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Anna The magic money tree is growing in the gardens of the super rich. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Anna Water Companies are still being given Govt ‘subsidies’ in the form of payments for infrastructure. 

      Despite this:

      Since privatisation, £65.9 billion has been paid out in water company dividends. There was a 20% increase in executive pay last year, and Britain's privatised water and sewerage companies paid £1.4 billion in dividends in 2022, up from £540 million the previous year.
      (22 Feb 2024)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Anna I wonder where they think the magic job tree is
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    This is too funny.

    Rayner: You better not vote against these cuts and we'll sic the whip on you!
    Whip: proceeds to resign

    And I know she's just one whip out of the three or so that the Labour party have but even one whip resigning is certainly a good start!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    And the key thing in her letter is mentioning that she was a shadow minister for disabled people.  What a shame she didn't get to pursue that while in government.  We might be all in a better position now.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Starmer is braced for the biggest rebellion against his administration when MPs vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill in the House of Commons on July 1.

    https://www.ft.com/content/a22daa91-d28a-4e04-a07d-b96fc1d67d0b
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    No sympathy for you Starmer. You chose your path. Now lie in it.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago

    "One Labour MP, who wanted to remain anonymous, told the BBC: "I have heard anyone who breaks the whip won't be allowed to stand as a Labour MP at the next general election.

    "These threats are just making people more angry. We cannot continue to govern in this manner. Quite frankly, if that's his [the prime minister's] view he's lost the plot and is a bully."

    Hopefully the threats continue to have the effect of angering their MPs rather than intimidating them. Having a whip resign can only be helpful in that respect.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Yorkie Bard "and if they don't break the whip & they are allowed to stand as a Labour MP at the next general election - well guess what?

      They won't be elected - we will make sure of that!!"

      That's why we have to keep up the pressure between now and July 1st. We have to make sure Labour MPs are more afraid of their voters than the whips.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @tintack How vile of Starmer! Doesn’t sound a nice environment to work in. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @tintack tintack, and if they don't break the whip & they are allowed to stand as a Labour MP at the next general election - well guess what?

      They won't be elected - we will make sure of that!!

      We need to act as ANTI-WHIPS!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Good for her. She's setting a precedent. Truly wish I had an MP like her.

    And for those asking: as the post says, she's resigned as a whip. Not as an MP. She's done this so she can vote against the cuts. Whips generally cannot vote against their party, which is why she's stepped down from the position.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    Does this mean she has resigned her position as a whip and is still a labour MP? So she can still vote? 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact