There are widespread, but as yet unofficial, reports of “massive concessions” by the government in relation to planned benefit cuts, which will see current claimants protected and the backbench rebellion end.

According to reports in the Guardian and the BBC, cuts to PIP and the LCWRA element of universal credit (UC) will not apply to current claimants. 

In addition, a package of employment support measures worth £1bn will begin this year with more to come, rather than being introduced in 2029.

There will also be consultation with disability groups on other planned changes to benefits.

Future claimants, however, will be subject to the PIP four-point rule and to the reduction in the LCWRA element of UC.

It is claimed that the heads of government committees, who were leading the rebellion, have all accepted the government’s offer.  Though one campaigner, MP Peter Lamb, has said he will still not support the bill because the government is ignoring better options.

No official details of any concessions have yet been released and given the governments rushed timescale for getting the legislation through parliament, there will be little opportunity for MPs to scrutinise and debate the details.

Updatethe BBC are reporting that the protection of current claimants is now official, stating "Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall told Labour MPs that claimants of the personal independence payment (Pip) will continue to receive what they currently get, as will recipients of the health element of universal credit. Instead, planned cuts will only hit future claimants."

They also quote the leader of the rebellion, MP Dame Meg Hillier as saying she would now support the government's welfare bill.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    Concessions? Capitulation? Climb-down? What utter rubbish! The bill should be defeated whole scale and completely. It will still penalise the future disabled and sick. KILL THE BILL! Immediately email your MP! The totally vague proposed changes mean nothing!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Hedgehog Strongly agree. There'll be little (if any) "I'm alright Jack!" sentiments here. If what's still unofficial is later confirmed, then it's a gross injustice to myriads of future claimants who'll suffer ill-health or disability. Why should they receive far less help when we waste billions on overseas wars we don't need to be involved in
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    So unless there is going to be a different set of descriptor points for current claimants at review,nothing has really changed.The 4 points rule will apply when reassessed after November 26.This will then be written into law and used for everyone.Rushing this through and the rebels accepting this ,there needs to be a pause to ask the questions thrown up now.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @larry b LCWRA really?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @larry b That’s correct.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @larry b now they saing this, but wait couple of years and new rules will apply, like with the ESA/UC migration.  The protection is temorary!  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Claire i think they are saying if you are on pip now ,you keep it permanently at that level,unless you have a change ,you will not be judged on any of the new criteria same with lcw and lcwra.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    When I get my pip review.  Will I be assessed as a new claimant?  Will the new rules apply?  This has not been made clear?   If this is the case then nothing has changed.  If I don't qualify for pip then I will still lose the universal credit health element anyway.

    Is this just a tactically worded concession to persuade the rebels to back down?

    Once it goes through I suspect this will be the case.

    It needs to be scrapped and started again.  It's ridiculous that this is being rushed through and rebels not given enough time to scrutinise what the concessions Actually mean.



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Chrissy No you are an existing claimant so therefore you will not be assessed under the new rules, the new rules apply to new claimants only starting when it begins once the law is passed .

      You are safe do not worry 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    What do they mean existing claimants, will that mean anyone with an active claim? Will this end if benefits stop due to lying assessors?

    Sorry but this is incredibly vague.

    See the first headline is that disabled people are now personally responsible for the increased tax burden, why would the papers intentionally stoke hatred in such a way, do we not a recourse for this?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    As I said before the devil is in the detail. There has to be confirmation of this as part of the bill and this should be amended accordingly so that it cannot be changed through regulations later down the line. However having said this I do worry about future applicants as it still is grossly unfair for them and I am not sure I can support anything like that in good conscience 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    I'd be interested in the exact wording of the bill. Our fight will never be over: the next Government will come back to welfare reform sometime after 2929
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Matt To be honest, if they left it until 2929 I'd probably take that.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    While it might be a relief for current claimants, this would be pretty hard on people who're unfortunate enough to become disabled after the changes. They could have the same impairment and receive less or no support, meaning there's a two-tier system.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Fionn It is going to be discrimination both disability and age related direct and indirect!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    "The concession means that some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment will now be protected, as the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) calculated it could reduce potential savings by at least £1.5 billion per year.

    However, new claimants from November 2026 will still be subject to these changes in eligibility requirements."
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    So the so called migration is to continue, this is causing mayhem for many , some have lost their benefits due to errors and id issues and treated as new claimants!? 

    Jobcentre have been discrimating against the disabled and forcing people to some how drag their disabled adults in to a taxi with help from neighbours to a jobcentre
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    When they say current claimants does that mean all of those being migrated to universal credit are going to loose our higher income because we are "new" claimants on UC?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Imogen as long as you are in receipt of UC before the legal changes are made you should be ok ,you are being migrated over,so you have an historical status,i think it folks who are new to UC or pip claims after nov 2026
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Imogen I was wondering the same thing.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    Excuse me for sounding dumb. What is the actual change? If I come up for review am I assessed on the present rules after Nov 26? What if I lose my PIP claim because they're giving out more face to face assessments with a push for more rejection? 
    On UC if I try working and it doesn't work out is my claim new ? 
    These changes only benefit people on ongoing awards which was the case anyway. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    Mmmm although it is a relief, I still do not trust that dwp wont make it as difficult as possible and make it so you don’t pass ,the wca or pip in future….even if you don’t have to have the 4 points in pip….we all know what the dwp is like… 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Harli This is my worry too I’m guessing they are going to try and get as many existing claimants off it so they have to start again under the new rules
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    The whole thing is a complete policy mess. It is shambolic government by a mediocre group of politicians who lack credibility. Starmer talks about "fairness" but his only real concerns are saving face, and getting the wretched bill approved by whatever means. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    If this is the case does this mean that  claimants (over state pension age)who are on 10yr awards,when there reviews are due will stay on the old system and not the 4 point system. So basically it will only affect new claimsants only. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    Good news but we have to be cautious, we don't know what the full details are and what might be hidden in the headlines. I'm concerned about the package for employment support, does this mean that the government is intending to push disabled people into work? They are going to have to make savings in other ways now and they keep spouting on about getting more people into work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    What does this mean for long term DLA recipients not yet transferred to PIP???? If as speculating, existing PIP recipients will not be affected but new claimants will, this is sooooo unfair!!! And needs highlighting.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    I don't understand the point of the rebellion then. Apart from the fact there are ways to force current claimants into making new applications (lost paperwork/awards given by a tribunal meaning a new application next time for some), how can they create a system where disability is defined by a date?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @john Yes I understand what an existing claimant would be classed as, but thanks for explaining. 

      I meant, I don't understand what the rebellion has achieved. If it was about genuinely disabled people being forced into work, and not supported financially, then that's still going to happen to future claimants.

      I thought the point of labour was to be different from the tories. I didn't know about the past not honouring of legacy benefits, so again, thanks for explaining. It's not morally right though is it? To define a disability by a date? In fact, it's ludicrous!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Leah Existing claimants are anyone who is currently receiving PIP any reassessment or review will not use the 4pt PIP rule.

      As for new claimants being treated differently to existing claimants. Prior to the Tories welfare reforms. Disability was always defined by a date. As legacy benefit awards were always honoured even when the legacy benefit was closed to new claimants and a new benefit created. When the Tories chose to not honour DLA life time awards and to not honour SDA do not reassess awards it was the first time the government failed to honour legacy entitlements of disability benefits.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    As expected.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    When they say current claimants does this mean that when PIP is reviewed the new rules apply? I thought this was always to be the case that current recipients retained PIP until reviewed? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Jane63 that is the change,you will not be judged on future pips renewals using the new rules,so if you stay the same you need not worry about the four point rule.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Jane63
      Hi, If you get a PIP review before 2029 the old rules still apply on the 2 point, but once the WCA get abolished after 2029 current claiments will be subject to the new 4 point rule.

      This is my underdtanding of it anyway? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Jane63 "The concession means that some 370,000 existing claimants who were expected to lose out following reassessment will now be protected, as the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) calculated it could reduce potential savings by at least £1.5 billion per year.

      However, new claimants from November 2026 will still be subject to these changes in eligibility requirements."
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Jane63 Yes, we need clarity on this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Jane63 It's not clear, but probably not?. New claims usually means just that.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    whilst this is great for existing claimants, being one who was never going to be affected by these rule changes since i score 4 points in multiple categories, I never thought these proposals were fair to existing claimants, that being said, none of us know when coming up for reassessment, whether we would be assessed differently and lose the 4 points and have to go through appeals ( no dobt that will be the DWP stratergy next to get as many existing claimaints out of the 4 point brackets as possible, but since we should be exempt from these changes anyway, even if we do lose the 4 points, but still score enough to retain the daily living componant.

    That being said, this is truly still unfair to future disabled claimants and creates a 2 tier welfare system, which is unjust.

    I will never get my head around the fact that 24% of the population live with some kind of disability, and only 10% of those claim a disability related benefit and yet somehow this government and former governments seem to believe that this number is not credible and there must be people milking the system who do not deserve it...The numbers are tiny given the size of the population and considering the added costs of living with a disability and the day to day disadvantages that we face, living with a disability, how MPS can vote with a conscience implying that the most vulnerable people in society do not need help with extra daily living expenses, whilst at the same time, believing that they should be entitled to extra expenses to hep with their living costs to carry out their duties as an MP is astounding, these MPs and ministers are on extremely good wages, on top of that, many have second jobs and consultancy work and yet still feel its morally acceptable to claim money from the public purse to assist with their extra living costs, whilst at the same time denying that same public support for the poorest and most vulnerable in society...

    Great News for existing claimaints, but lets hope further changes can be made for future claimaints...

    Sort out the NHS first, bring down waiting lists, provide proper access to mental health support, not a paltry 12 session course of CBT and then wipe off those suffering from mental health and anxiety related health, once you have that in order, then maybe you can look at further welfare reforms, but not before 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @matt The fact is when they start tinkering around with PIP descriptors it doesn’t matter about the 4 point rule. They will knock the cooking a meal down to 3 points rather than 4. Engaging with people from 8 to 6. I suspect a lot of people will lose the enhanced and get standard. Some will even lose the standard. This government has shown themselves to be duplicitous and Starmer is just like Putin and Netanayu and Trump. They just want to stay in power because that’s what they crave. They can’t be trusted on anything they say right now. Every labour MP who failed to stand up and support the disabled should hang their heads in shame. They were clearly on the wrong side of history and they knew it. But their jobs and pay packet meant more to them.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.