PIP impact assessment

A PIP impact assessment has now been published.


UC rates

The Bill provides for above inflation increases in the standard rate of UC, from 2.3% above inflation in 2026/27 to 4.8% above inflation in 2029/30.

However, the LCWRA rate will be frozen from 2026/27 to 2029/30.

The LCWRA element rates for the 2026/27 tax year will be:

  • pre-2026 claimant  £423.27
  • severe conditions criteria claimant  £423.27
  • claimant who is terminally ill  £423.27
  • any other claimant with limited capability for work and work-related activity £217.26
Severe conditions criteria - no private doctor diagnoses allowed.

The Bill provides that claimants who meet the severe conditions criteria for UC will never have to have another reassessment and will be paid the higher rate of UC health element of £97 per week.

The criteria are essentially the descriptors for being found to have LCWRA for UC - we cover this in more detail in "How the severe conditions criteria work" on this page - with four further requirement:

  • The individual’s level of function will always meet LCWRA
  • The individual’s condition will last for the rest of their life
  • There is no realistic prospect of recovery of function, and
  • The condition has been diagnosed by an appropriately qualified healthcare professional in the course of the provision of NHS services.

That last bullet appears to mean that an adult living in an area where they will have to wait literally years for an NHS assessment of say ADHD or autism will not be able to pay for a private assessment and have that accepted for the purpose of getting the higher rate of UC health element.


"one of the most generous ever"

The DWP press release boasts that:

"The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill will provide 13-weeks of additional financial security to existing claimants affected by changes to the PIP daily living component, including those who their lose eligibility to Carers Allowance and the carer’s element of Universal Credit.

"The 13-week additional protection will give people who will be affected by the changes time to adapt, access new, tailored employment support, and plan for their future once they are reassessed and their entitlement ends.

"This transitional cover is one of the most generous ever and more than three times the length of protection provided for the transition from DLA to PIP."


Press release from the DWP

The DWP have issued  a press release headed "Welfare bill will protect the most vulnerable and help households with income boost".  It quotes Liz Kendall as saying:

"This legislation represents a new social contract and marks the moment we take the road of compassion, opportunity and dignity.

"This will give people peace of mind, while also fixing our broken social security system so it supports those who can work to do so while protecting those who cannot - putting welfare spending on a more sustainable path to unlock growth as part of our Plan for Change."


PIP changes in the Bill

The 4-point rule and the 13 week run-on if you lose your PIP because of it are confirmed.  Plus a clause which could be used to allow for pension age PIP claimants to be exempt from the 4-point rule

Clause 5 deals with PIP.  

Subsection 1 confirms the requirement to:

score at least 8 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the standard rate;

score at least 12 points, including at least 4 points for a single daily living activity, to get an award of the enhanced rate.

In other words, the 4-point rule.

Paragraph 6 (c) confirms that PIP will be payable for 13 weeks after a decision that you are no longer entitled to PIP daily living component as a result of failing the 4-point rule.

Subsection 2 says that the secretary of state (SoS) will decide the date on which the new rules begin.  The explanatory notes add that this is intended to be November 2026.  The change will not apply to any given claimant until their award is reassessed.  So for claimants with longer awards it may be some years distant - by which time there may be an entirely new PIP test.

Subsection 4 appears to be a "get-out clause" to allow the SoS to make special provisions for particular groups of people.  They almost certainly have pension age PIP claimants in mind here.  The paragraph actually says:

"to make different provision for different cases or purposes (including different provision for persons of different ages);"

So, for example, it might allow the SoS to decide that the 4-point rule will never apply to any person at or over pension age, who is already in receipt of PIP daily living in November 2026.   This would give pension age claimants an exemption, but it's interesting that this is not being put into the Act itself.

The subsection also allows the secretary of state to provide for "a person to exercise discretion in dealing with any matter".  

 

Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill published

The bill has now been published.  You can download the 22 page .pdf document from the Get file link on this page.

Or you can download the file directly from this link

You can download the explanatory notes from this page

There's also an impact assessment on the Universal Credit Rebalancing from the Department for Work and Pensions - May 2025


Money Bill

There has been discussion about whether Labour will seek to have this bill designated as a money bill, which would effectively remove House of Lords scrutiny.  A decision about whether a bill is a money bill is made by the Speaker of the House, after the report stage.  However, according to guidance on Money Bills from the Office of the Parliamentary Counsel: 

1.35 During the debates in 1911 it was alleged to be a defect in the bill that the Speaker was not required to make his decision earlier because of the risk of the Commons proceedings being completed in ignorance of whether the bill was to be certified. There is now an informal indication, published as a note when the Bill is listed on the Commons Order Paper, as to whether a bill is likely to be certified as a money bill.

The notice that the bill will be presented today on the Order Paper makes no mention of a money bill, so this seems to be an indication - though not a certainty - that Labour are not pursuing this possibility.


Bill due this afternoon

The Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill is due to be published this afternoon.  This is the bill that will enable the introduction of the PIP 4-point rule and cuts to universal credit for disabled claimants.

We’ll provides links, analysis and the opportunity for you to comment on this page.

According to the UK parliament website, it is a:  "Bill to make provision to alter the rates of the standard allowance, limited capability for work element and limited capability for work and work-related activity element of universal credit and the rates of income-related employment and support allowance, and to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment."

 

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Does constantly mean that instead of being unable to carry out a daily task for 51% of the time qualifies you to score points we now have to be utterly incapable of doing a daily living task at any point in time.
    If this is the case they are building in a very easy to apply condition that they can use to rule the vast majority of claimants. Only those with extremely severe conditions will be unable to do something once if only very slowly,unsafely,acceptably and repeatedly.
    No doubt the assessor will left to decide if a staggered step or a weak raise of a hand means you are functional at least once to be viewed as not constantly unable to carry out a task and class you as able to do the activity.
    Talk about loading the deck.
    The people? who planned this are simply evil.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Massively ALARMING.  I am out of date with this recent information. AS THIS 4 POINT RULE ACTUALLY been MADE LAW YET?

    HAS IT ACTUALLY BEEN PASSED AS LAW YET AS A MONEY BILL?


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Hugely concerning bill- not only about the minimum 4 points on a single daily living descriptor, but that you have to have this CONSTANTLY
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    I checked my PIP award last night. Reassessment set for May 2030 (after the next GE).  I wonder if I'll be called sometime in 2029....?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    I'm on an automatically renewed fit note so where does that leave someone like me?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @James Burton In Feb 2025 Keir Starmer ditched plans to end fit note culture 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Neil Cook Maybe waiting for a assessment that's what happened with me same thing but that was 2019 and lots has changed hopefully you get a assessment quickly 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Neil Cook You will eventually be contacted by DWP/job centre, I was. Long term though, the Tories/labour/reform have already spoken about plans to stop sick notes.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 days ago
    How can they determine PIP eligibility on age,  when PIP is about how a disability affects you.  A person who is 22 and has one leg cannot grow it back and neither can someone whose a pensioner. And a pensioner isn't expected to go to work.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John I don’t get high rate PIP i have rheumatoid arthritis i am nearly 63 years old how will these cuts affect me.
      Me and my wife also get joint UC
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Ang The issue I expect is pensioners with standard rate ongoing/indefinite awards, no end date, not reassessed just light touch reviewed, unless the claimant reports a change in their health. Reporting a change of circumstances including their health getting worse, being reassessed and losing their PIP due to the 4pt rule.

      Any PIP award whose end date would be past state pension age is usually made a ongoing/indefinite award if the health condition is not curable. And anyone with a fixed date PIP award who is going to pass state pension age is usually reassessed just before state pension age and a ongoing/indefinite award made if eligible. So lots of pensioners have standard rate ongoing/indefinite awards.

      For working age ongoing/indefinite awards are usually enhanced rate for those whose disability is for life and will never improve, and usually only given after multiple fixed end date awards. In theory a standard rate ongoing/indefinite award can be given for a disability that will never get better and never get worse, but that is uncommon and the government seems oblivious to them even existing. And if the aim of the government is people who lose PIP due to the 4pt rule can get jobs, it is less indefensible to stop their claim if they report a change in circumstances triggering a reassessment and fail to meet the planned 4pt rule if they are working age. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    July 1st is the second reading of the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill. When it will be debated and voted on in the Commons. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @john Thanks John for the update
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    BOTTOM LINE FOR CURRENT CLAIMANTS:

    I have read through the Bill word for word. I am on UC/LCWRA and PIP due to a serious mental health condition. This is my understanding:

    1) UC --- If you are already on UC/LCWRA then you will STILL get the same amount. We are called "pre-2026 claimants". I cannot guarantee whether they will suddenly ask us to be reassessed or not (although I would say this is doubtful), but even if they did, as long as you are still eligible, then you will still get the same amount.

    2) PIP --- If you are already receiving PIP then nothing will change until your next reassessment date, if that is after November 2026 (approximately). In other words, the new change - needing to get 4 points in at least one domain - does NOT affect you until you are reviewed again after late 2026 etc.

    Try not to panic. I know how triggery this is for many of us. Always seek support if you are feeling very anxious (e.g. mental health crisis lines etc). There is always a solution to challenges, no matter what. And I am a firm believer that things always work out in the end. 

    God bless
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Justin Michael I have not read anywhere that those currently receiving UC/LCWRA would have their benefits cut following another review after April 2026 (please send a link if you have read this?).

      Hope that helps!


      It does help a lot and more besides, so essentially your interpretation is that a person on esa since 2014 in the LCWRA and migrated over to UC in September/October 2024 to the equivalent health element? Would not be given the lower 2026 amount?, even  with the 4 point change to qualify to get LCWRA in pip?. Come ANY reassessment? 

      Been very confused,worried but your response here has cleared my mind some on this. It’s all very confusing,concerning with little understanding of what means what. The more is mentioned the more their is to unpick and understand.
      Thank you.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Tiggy8 Hi Tiggy

      In the Bill, lower down under SCHEDULES (point 4) it states the following:

      “Meaning of 'pre-2026 claimant' —

      (1) For the purposes of regulation 27, a claimant with limited capability for work and work-related activity is a 'pre-2026 claimant' if the claimant— 

         (a) was entitled at any time before 6 April 2026 to an award of universal credit that included the LCWRA element, and 

         (b) has been entitled to an award of universal credit that included the LCWRA element continuously from that time.

      The key word here is 'continuously'.

      If you read (b) above, it is my view that there is no other way to interpret this than meaning those entitled to universal credit CONTINUOUSLY (i.e. it must mean after any further assessments/reviews, otherwise it would not make sense), would REMAIN under the label 'pre-2026 claimant', and therefore receive the same amount (which is frozen until 2029/30).

      In other words, to the best of my knowledge, my OP stands.

      I have not read anywhere that those currently receiving UC/LCWRA would have their benefits cut following another review after April 2026 (please send a link if you have read this?). 

      Hope that helps!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Justin Michael 1) UC --- If you are already on UC/LCWRA then you will STILL get the same amount. We are called "pre-2026 claimants". I cannot guarantee whether they will suddenly ask us to be reassessed or not (although I would say this is doubtful), but even if they did, as long as you are still eligible, then you will still get the same amount.

      Where is this stated in the bill?, very triggering as you mention as I have read differently here that if you can reassessed after 2026 then you still get the lower rate instead?. Unless I’m anxious and mistaken over this point.

      Apologies if I’ve misread, just very much worried anxious etc with all this. Very little clarification and the bill is very confusing me to.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Lil Best of luck! :)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Julian Julian - I was in EXACTLY the same position as you a couple of years back and nearly died. But I survived. There is always a back. Do NOT give up. Please make sure you get the right help. Your soul demands it of you. I am not sure what text you got, but I've had that kind of thing before from DWP. But it ended up being OK. I also recently migrated to UC, and if you were able to do this then it puts you in a good position. Just keep going. One day at a time. Remember, I have been where you are - I know because of your words. You are not alone. You do not have to remain in such an acute state. Make sure you get the HELP you need. I will pray for you. Blessings
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    I'm wondering what happens with the severe condtions criteria for those assessed after 2028. According to B & W these criteria consist of qualifying for LCWRA under the current WCA descriptors with the additional stipulations such as no realistic prospect of improvement. But if these plans go through there will be no WCA after 2028, so how could someone prove they meet the LCWRA criteria in the first place? That's a particular problem for new claimants: at least those of us who are on LCWRA now can point to the fact that we've already gone through the WCA at least once (a lot more than once for most of us). As far as I can see the new severe conditions category means that the WCA will effectively have to be retained, at least for the purpose of assessing LCWRA for the severe conditions category. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @James h I am in the same boat as you, unfortunately got my diagnosis of Autism via charity and through private, due to my GP telling me it would be best due to a 3-5 year wait list. This means i will no longer be eligible for LCWRA, Even though i have a diagnosis of autism via professional DR'S with decades of evidence from birth. TLDR the state now no longer recognises my right for support of my autism. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @James h The point of the severe conditions criteria is to cut out pointless reassessments: if you're placed in that group then you will not face further reassessments. There should not be any "light touch" reviews as happens with PIP.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @tintack @tintack i agree what is the point of being reassessed for lcwra will never work again premium in 2026 for wca to be finished in 2028 only 2 years hardly worth it unless it just carries on for years and years with no more reacessment or maybe a light touch review I would get it being nhs diagnosed with austitic spectrum 10 years ago and I have never worked anyway being 28 years now of unemployment 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    I'm on UC/LCWRA and have been in one form or another for about 30 yrs plus, so what's gonna happen to me then, I'm absolutely terrified over this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Minxy Because they already have a huge backlog and although they have stated more reassessments may come pre and post April 2026, I would suspect, it is not going to be widespread. The DWP is already over-faced. Plus, they are only focusing on certain cases in terms of reassessments at this time. I could well be wrong, but that is my current take.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Dogmother By the time I’ve polished your cv burt it will be gleaming 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Neil Cook Don't worry about the down vote. As has been previously noted on other threads, the phantom down voter seems to appear at random and leave down votes on posts for no discernible reason.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Justin Michael Why would you say it’s doubtful that we will be reassessed ?  Thank you for your helpful advice. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Neil Cook Wonder why I got down voted on this? Just wondering 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    So private assessments for conditions not allowed- so what if the NHS paid for a private assessment under ‘Right to Choose’ because their waiting lists are so long? Surely it must be illegal for the government to be able to discount this, if the NHS funded it. (Private assessment it may be, but the NHS paid).
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Wilfywoolf As a former NHS CAMHS Consultant Social Worker who specialised in Autism and ADHD assessments I'm appalled that private assessments appear to be being disregarded. Knowing how long patients had to wait in our clinics to be seen due to lack of staff especially post Covid meant a percentage sadly had no option but to pay to be seen privately. And yes, the Right to Choose scheme did help to a degree. Interestingly a number of my former colleagues now work exclusively in these private colleagues due to the state of the NHS and its horrendous pressures so is the SoS saying their valuable assessments are worthless? Absolutely ridiculous 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    Hi all, due to issues at work I have not had time to read the full details of the bill but in essence it's dire.  Does anyone know if we will be able to order a mandatory reconsideration and appeal to a tribunal if PIP daily living is denied, or are the Govt intending to make it a case of, if the DWP rejects your application, that's it? I don't think my employers are going to be too happy with me trying to find another job with an additional £6k salary to offset the loss in PIP (taking into account having to pay NI and income tax).  All Labour care about is tax. End of!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Yorkie Bard Thanks
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @MATT MATT - There has been no mention of changes to mandatory reconsideration in all this. I am certain that you will be able to go through this & then onto tribunal.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Dogmother Why would you say that? The appeal process will still stand.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @MATT I don't think you can appeal.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    I think the stress on NHS diagnoses is open to legal challenge. Private medicine is big business. Medical consultants and other highly qualified practitioners form limited companies and their services financed directly by the patient or a medical insurance company. The power of medical businesses plus the BMA and other professional bodies has been underestimated.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Anon If you have a private diagnosis the NHS is not at liberty to accept that diagnosis without a confirmation diagnosis via the NHS.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @MariW Isn't this likely that its to do with the amount of private diagnoses of autism snd adhd,unfortunately it has been said in the media that private companies are handing out diagnoses of these conditions incorrectly,it's big business and I have read articles where gps have refused shared care because it isn't an NHS diagnoses 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    '.....the LCWRA rate will be frozen from 2026/27 to 2029/30. The LCWRA element rates for the 2026/27 tax year will be: pre-2026 claimant £423.27....'

    If the Green Paper proposal to replace NS ESA with a time-limited contributory health benefit goes ahead, and claimants are migrated to Universal Credit (UC) after 2026, they may not qualify as “2026 claimants” — which, under the current draft legislation, is the cut-off for receiving the £423.27 LCWRA rate. So there seems to be no confirmation that 

    Is this a classic case of policy sleight-of-hand: freeze one benefit, inflate another, and quietly let a whole cohort fall through the cracks?

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2025/06/18/disability-benefit-claimants-rise-starmer-reform/

    This link, behind a paywall, says that PIP claims will continue to rise over the next 5 years due to mental health claims and *fraud*. When you click on their highlighted 'fraud' link it gives a story of one woman with MS who exaggerated a claim. However, the intention of the article is to imply that fraud in PIP claims is a serious issue.

    Data available from various sources estimates PIP fraud to be vanishingly slight and anyone claiming it knows the assessment is extremely rigorous. If you do get an award you damn well deserve it! 

    Articles like this tend to appear when government decisions are imminent, and the purpose is to shape public opinion in a particular way, in this case to garner support for the green paper proposals. I
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @James Unfortunately the right wing press has long had licence to lie and mislead with near total impunity.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Quietplease That is an anecdotal evidence which means nothing but it's certainly bad journalism from a so called newspaper like the torygraph 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Quietplease My post got chopped. 

      In essence I was asking if there is any way of countering this type of false narrative, where a national publication tries to shape public opinion, in this case by implying that PIP 'fraud' is a big issue that is getting worse. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    I been apply Pip but I don’t remember when? Sometimes I lost my memory, I just remembered someone call asking for my situation? After that I didn’t receive any letters from them? I am very sad waiting for my pip results 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    Well, we're on the front of the newspapers on Thursday.  But not necessarily how you'd want us on the front pages. 

    The Mirror calls "PIP Cuts a Catastrophe" but the Daily Mail says "Benefits Bill is Set to Rocket By £18bn a Year" and the Telegraph chime in with "Benefits Claimants to Rise BY 750,000 Despite Welfare Reforms."  We're also on the front of the FT, where they estimate 160 Labour MPs disagree with the plans. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @SLB well I’ll just focus on that estimated 160 for now- that’s good 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    Absolutely vile bill! I have a rare condition which the NHS is unable to treat, and yet all my specialist neurology advice and diagnoses will be ignored? It’s utterly bizarre
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    Hi all well I’ve the answer to my own earlier question the parliamentary vote in this is in about 2 weeks time. But Liz Kendall is still saying as was quoted in the teatime radio 4 programme live tonight that this is not about saving money????. Really Liz then why is the government saying they need to cut £5.9million off the welfare bill. Try reading your own earlier comments for change!!. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 days ago
    One of the most generous ever … I can hardly contain my excitement. Can I ask a question please.  Do you get your PIP review from the date your award started I.e the date you applied or the date you receive confirmation of your successful award. So my application for PIP was  requested 6 March 2024 and I got my letter confirming I had a successful award in June 2024. My award was backdated obviously so would I get a form in September 25 to be reassessed?. My award looks like it was only 2 years. Thank you for any help 🤩
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Minxy It didnt give a date actually checked again but confirmed yesterday by ringing  them it’s between July 26 or July 27. So I’m probably looking at being reviewed under the new rules. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 days ago
      @Helen Galloway Is this for PIP? It should say when your review is due. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @SLB I’ve just rang DWP and been told my claim is upto July 2027. With a review between July 2026 and 2027 when I’ll get a claim pack through the post sometime anytime between those dates. Is this normal what they do. So I’m not going to know which system I’ll be reviewed under.  I was trying to look at my scores from the last award. Because some were lower than I thought but I was just happy getting the award. Didn’t want to risk disputing things. But those discriptors can be difficult . It has space for interpretation which is not great. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @Helen Galloway Hi, you applied in March 24 so your award is 2 years from then. Most awards for PIP are only 2 years, although in some cases can be 10 years. Your PIP entitlement letter will say when it runs from and until. Hope this helps!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @SLB I was awarded pip enhanced for daily care and mobility and I currently have 1 x 4 point (had another 2 x 4 point in previous award, which I lost, at review, although circumstances hadn't changed re the descriptor) but like many others I didn't check my individual scores, I was just relieved to get an award. My award was for 4 years, which ends in Sept 2027, but I reach state pension age in July 2027, (66yrs 8 months) I'm assuming my review will be around Nov/Dec 2026. On Gov sites, it says after you reach 65years, your award will be light touch review. Other sites It says 66yrs or only after pension age reached.
      Could anybody clarify please. 

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact