HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) have covered up the existence a bug that loses and destroys social security appeal evidence for years, the BBC has revealed. Judges and representatives were never informed of the issue, even though it has been known about for at least 5 years.

According to a leaked report the bug in case management software affects social security tribunal documents more than any others, but it also has an impact on family, divorce and employment cases amongst others.

The bug causes evidence such as medical records and contact details to be hidden and can cause them to be deleted or overwritten.

The affected software was introduced into HMCTS in 2018 to the “general horror” of IT staff because of its unreliability and long history of data loss.  But despite repeated warnings, senior staff sought to hide and deny the problem for fear of reputational damage.

A briefing to senior staff in 2004 initially said that the risk to the outcome of cases was high, with the possibility of an adverse affect on cases being “very likely”. 

However, after reviewing a sample of just three months worth of cases, HMCTS decided that the risk to all cases was low and “no further checks” were needed.

But, following this review, one employee raised a formal whistleblower complaint and the subsequent investigation in November 2024 found that there had been “large scale” data breaches which should have been addressed immediately, but HMCTS had taken several years to react in spite of many warnings from IT staff from 2019 onwards.

Benefits and Work is particularly concerned that, because the majority of social security appellants are unrepresented, the chances of missing evidence being highlighted and remedied is much less than it would be in say, a family court, where representation is the norm.

If you think you may have been affected by this issue, it would be worth trying to get advice from a law centre or advice agency about the possibility of having the decision in your case looked at again.

You can read the full article on the BBC website.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    Sorry I don’t know where the best place to post this, 

    Every household where the billpayer receives an eligible means-tested benefit will now be in line for the warm home discount of £150. The government is now issuing a call to eligible households to check they are named on their electricity bill, with suppliers set to rely on customers’ records as of Sunday 24 August.

    In England and Wales, this means households in receipt of Housing Benefit, Income-related Employment and Support Allowance, Income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance, Income Support, Pension Credit and Universal Credit will now be eligible.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 hours ago
    so convenient, the glitches never work FOR people....
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Bug? Sounds more like a feature to me. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    another great IT solution from the government that is full of bugs, cost billions, end up with cost ove runs, and then turns on citizens ! If you take together all the IT systems the UK government has created the cost is most like to end up being over 30bn and they still don't work right!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Well there must be a data protection offence in there somewhere? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Always listen to your IT folks, hiring them then ignoring them is utter recklessness. Though (if I may don my tinfoil hat) curious why it only deleted appellants evidence, not the DWP's. Very glad we index our submissions.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Marc Allison When I worked as an IT consultant a man in government said the following to me. "I don't understand it, we hire expensive consultants and then end up not listening to them!"

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact