The evidence that the DWP is a department in meltdown is growing rapidly, with the news that mandatory reconsiderations for personal independence payment (PIP) are now taking almost twice as long as they did a year ago.

In reply to a written question on whether  the DWP “plans to take steps to reduce the clearance time for mandatory reconsiderations of Personal Independence Payment decisions.” DWP disability minister Stephen Timms answered:

“We recognise that the most recent data shows an increase in Mandatory Reconsideration clearance times, from 37 calendar days in December 2023 to 71 calendar days in July 2024. To address this, we are recruiting Mandatory Reconsideration Decision Makers and have made overtime available to increase productivity.”

What effect these steps will have, with the DWP under pressure from so many other quarters remains to be seen.

For example, earlier this year we revealed that it could take up to ten years to clear the current PIP review backlog, with reviews taking on average 290 days to complete.

There was also the disclosure in May of this year that only 1 in 25 child DLA claims is decided on time.  In 2016-17 96.8% of child DLA claims were processed within the target time of 40 working days.  By 2023-24, this had fallen to just 3.5%.  

For PIP, the percentage has fallen from 85.1% processed within the timescale of 75 working days in 2016-17 down to 51.7% in 2023-24.

We also know that only a limited number of work capability reassessments are taking place, having stopped completely during Covid.

And the carer’s allowance overpayment scandal is largely down to the fact that there are not enough staff to respond to alerts from HMRC about potential overpayments, with 50% never investigated.

The fact that the DWP are pushing ahead with issuing managed migration notices to 800,000 employment and support allowance (ESA) claimants by December 2025, whilst unable to cope with their existing workload, seems foolhardy in the extreme.

As Citizens Advice, who deliver the managed migration Help To Claim support service for the DWP have pointed outbecause the ESA migration timetable has been accelerated so quickly, we’re concerned that DWP doesn’t have the capacity to deliver this support adequately and at scale — for example, whether DWP has enough staff to carry out all the home visits required.”

There is an “enhanced support journey (ESJ)” available to vulnerable claimants who fail to make a claim for universal credit. But as Citizens Advice also explain, “because the ESJ isn’t a legal process, there aren’t formal mechanisms to hold the DWP accountable if people fall through the net.”

So, for the DWP, managed migration at breakneck speed may be a fairly risk free process.  For the most vulnerable claimants, sadly it is not.

There is the flood of managed migrations from ESA to UC which won’t end before December 2025.  And there is the likely change to the work capability assessment due to be announced soon.  Plus there are wholesale changes to the role of jobcentres, which will be unveiled in a forthcoming white paper.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    I have just queried my MR which was returned in August and I have been told the waiting time is now 54 WEEKS!!!!!!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 days ago
      @Sandee There will be many MR's which have gone in they could easily do a paper based decision but Oh no! let's carry on with this circus.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Sandee Is that even legal?  I hope you getting something, while waiting!  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    In fact, I'm just wondering if they actually marked my MR as taking six months or the time it took from when they finally recognised that I'd made a valid request for a mandatory reconsideration or when it was actually made months prior in both writing and over the phone.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    In 2023 mine took six months but the DWP make an absolute pigs ear of i and effectively broke the law in the process.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    One things that's never talked about regarding the back log of reviews is the ability to renew for a blue badge. My pip was due for renewal April '24, I hadn't heard by the time my blue badge was due to be renewed. When I phoned the DWP they told me they couldn't say when I would get a review. They said the backlog was doe to Covid!
    I got an extension for a year in November, it said I may get a review before the extension runs out I may not. If I don't I will get another extension letter.
    The Blue badge people say the extension letter is not enough to get my blue badge & now I have to reapply as a new customer. I must send in medical proof that I am entitled either consultant letters or a letter from my GP. My GP will charge for a letter. I do have another letter but it's from 2011. I will send this but it's an absolute disgrace that I'm left without a blue badge when I need one due to DWP incompetence.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @JennyCB Same experience here. I also have to pay the annual Road charge for resident’s parking of over £70 per annum unless I have a blue badge. During PIP renewal etc that caused huge problems too. In the end PIP extended my claim at the last chance each and I ended up being renewed with extensions for three and a half years until they finally gave a decision. Chaos and stress all round. Thanks for mentioning that any delay with benefits has knock on effects not always known about and just adds little by little to the stress of the whole process. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    If you're in the dark about the changes/reforms to benefits ect, note the words from Alan Milburn, he kept saying "duty to engage". I'm implying that dependent on the severity of the individual's illness/disability they will have to engage either once every 2 weeks, once a month, once every 3 months, 6 months, a year.

    Labour are going through with the Tory changes to save 3 billion, will they scrap the WCA? Will a higher end of a health related incapacity benefit be for the most severely disabled? 

    Mental Illness will be looked at, Depression/Anxiety has been under the microscope for over a year which media led vitriol and hate poured onto them which makes me sick by the way. The offers of voluntary work, community work, workshops will arise for that cohort. More should or will be done to nip depression/anxiety in the bud, preventative measures will be important.

    Case and point if you can't work you won't work and nothing will change and this "duty to engage" will be a heads up, see how you're doing. It's about evidence and larger dossier will work in your favor as it legitimizes your case. Most of this will be pushed towards future claimants rather than current ones also. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @catoswyn How do these people get their jobs!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Dave Dee That certainly sounds like a probable direction of travel with the duty to decide on the level of ‘engagement’ being given to empowered work coaches alone. The message to those with mental health conditions seems to be ‘work is good for you’ and you’ll be cured once you get a job. Very reminiscent of Ian Duncan Smith and with horrific echoes of the ‘work will set you free’ ethos of times past. However, I’m not going to panic until I actually hear the details. Very frustrating that they just keep laying the ground work and not releasing the details. Suggests it may be bad. I also remember liz Kendall’s speeches when she challenged Jeremy Corbyn for the leadership. She is about as far right as you get in Labour and was a mouthpiece for the Mendelson arm of the party. Her appointment to the DWP brief was a signal of intent from the start.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    Then they need to STOP rejecting a majority of valid claims following the FARCE that is an “ASSESSMENT”
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    How can DWP be going ahead with the ESA to UC migration when the department is so obviously in disarray? It’s a calamity waiting to play out. Is there any possibility of them rethinking the whole timescale and deferring the switch? It would surely be in their own interest because the optics are not going to go down well when it hits the fan……
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @MrFibro They seem intent on losing support from every part of society.  The country will lurch to the right because of their incompetence.  What a mess, in such a short space of time.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 days ago
      @MrFibro A right pig's ear...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @David I can only imagine that Labour will get wiped out at any by-elections, and 100% certainty at the next GE!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Old Mother How convenient for the Goverment.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @David “because the ESJ isn’t a legal process, there aren’t formal mechanisms to hold the DWP accountable if people fall through the net.”

      Therefore  the gov saves money. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    Typical the DWP's having a major meltdown, at the  claimants physical, mental and financial expense.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @MrFibro Some claims are being processed very efficiently and without any reported issues, which raises curiosity about the criteria being applied.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 days ago
    Merry Christmas.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 days ago
      @rtbcpart2 The whole thing is a mess. I am very concerned about the managed migration as there may be support for individuals to set up a Universal Credit claim but what about maintaining a claim? In a previous role I worked with a number of clients who had been helped to set up a UC claim by Job Centre staff but who didn't understand how the  UC account operated, didn't know how to report a change of circumstance such as a rent increase and didn't know how to access a breakdown of their payments so couldn't check if these were correct. 

      In terms of PIP the whole thing is a mess with delays in MRs, the huge backlog of reviews etc. I have seen recently a number of Health Professionals reports which are extremely poor. In one case the HP claimed that the client couldn't have a problem walking or using the shower as during the telephone assessment she made no audible sounds of pain! In another the client was found able to prepare a meal as she was able to do up a seat belt!     

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact