The DWP is to begin continuous surveillance of the bank accounts of all pension credit, universal credit and employment and support allowance claimants using powers under a bill currently going through Parliament.  The department have said that they intend to use their new power to force any third party to pass on data to them more widely in the future.

The power to compel third parties into providing any data that the DWP wants in order to search for fraud and error is being conferred in last minute amendments slipped into the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, which has now passed its third reading in the Commons and moved to the Lords.

Initially the DWP say that they will use their powers to oblige the UK’s top 15 banks to monitor the accounts of all means-tested benefits claimants and report every time an account goes over the  capital limit or is used abroad for more than four weeks.

Because every DWP payment into a bank account has an identifying code attached to it, all banks know exactly which of their customers is on benefits and which benefits they receive.

Setting up software to automatically send details to the DWP of every claimant account that goes over the capital limit or is used abroad for more than four weeks will be very straightforward for banks.

The DWP say that each identified claim will be investigated in the normal way and that penalties will not be automatically imposed.

At the moment, almost 9 million claimants would be caught in the surveillance net, including:

  • 5.8 million universal credit claimants
  • 1.6 million employment and support allowance claimants
  • 1.4 million pension credit claimants

Any bank failing to collect and pass on data to the DWP will be subject to heavy fines.

 The new system will begin to be rolled out in 2025, though all banks may not be fully involved before 2030.

The DWP estimates that it will cost around £30 million a year for them to investigate potential fraud identified by the new system, but that they will save £500 million a year through reduced fraud and error.  

They also estimate that over the first ten years, the new powers will result in 74,000 prosecution cases and 2,500 custodial sentences.  

There is no doubt that the DWP intend to use these new powers much more widely.  The impact assessment for the new powers says that:

“The power is not limited to a specific type of data or type of institution/Third-Party to allow us to fight new fraud and error issues as they emerge and engage with new institutions as efficient opportunities become available to us.”

Later, the same document says: 

“This measure is drafted broadly . . .  to enable DWP to apply this measure to non-financial organisations in future if it is deemed appropriate and proportionate”

The new surveillance powers for the DWP appear to enjoy cross party support. Only 51 MPs voted against the amendment, with 30 of those being SNP and just 7 each from Labour and the Lib Dems.

Anyone who imagines that the DWP will use such sweeping powers reasonably and proportionately probably hasn’t ever claimed benefits.

And they probably also don’t remember the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, which was brought in to combat terrorism and organised crime and ended up being used to spy on dog walkers, pigeon feeders and people putting out their wheelie bins too early.

Capital and abroad fraud account for less than 15% of benefits fraud and error. The DWP will want to delve into many other aspects of claimants lives in order to identify the other 85%.  This is, beyond doubt, the thin end of a very thick wedge.

You can download a copy of the amendments to the Data Protection and Digital information Bill here.  The Power To Require Information For Social Security Purposes section begins on page 98.

You can read the impact assessment for the DWP surveillance powers here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Dwp have just requested my bank statements. They give me the money, they know better than me what I've got in the bank
    And has anyone noticed that when you receive your bank statements it says private and confidential on the envelope?
    I haven't got more than 6k in the bank, they're fully aware of this.
    I'd much sooner have my health back and not have to relay on the benefits system
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Kc However you can only be seen to be using your child's bank account for the child.  You can not be seen to be using your child's bank account as if it were your own.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Chris Fenoulhet All the information is contained in your award letter.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @siobhan You can have up to £6,000.00 max at any one time.  If you have between £6000.01 to £15,999.99 the excess amount will result in deductions to your benefits.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Chris Fenoulhet £10k for pensionable age and any amount between £10,000.01-£15,999.99 will result in a deduction from your benefits for each £500 over £10k.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @siobhan You should open an account in her name and then it will be classed as hers and she could have over £16k and it wouldn't affect your entitlement 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    So can somebody tell me if this law of banks checking our accounts is already in legacy or nothing happening till 2025. So many info's and comments around.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Akire24 That's what the changes are for. They will do it for anyone receiving an income based benefit. They won't need a warrant or your permission. That's why they are changing the law. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Scottish Heather They are testing it with 2 banks first. That could start as soon as the law has been changed. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Nana Theer powers of snooping will start happening from 2025 & not all banks. Only around 15 banks. All the rest will follow suit during & upto 2030.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Nana Happening 2025 as stated on here by benefits and work
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Nana They can ask you anytime to show bank statements or go to the bank if and only if they suspect you of fraud. But they have to have a reasonable suspicion it can’t be poking around just in case. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    I think this is a gross breach to our rights of privacy. A government targeting the poorest society is really disgraceful 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @daz It isn't the only legislation that has gone through unnoticed by the media / public. The European courts won't be an option soon either. The Government want to reverse the Human Rights legislation  and take us out of the EHCR. They are doing this already by pushing through the immigration legislation. Which basically tells the courts to do as the Government says. There is also legislation coming into force in January which affects the working rights of part time workers. The Government is reversing and possibly even worsening the holiday entitlement rights of all part time and temporary workers. There was a case a few years ago, which was taken to the European court, to give part time workers the same holiday entitlement as full time permanent workers. This was successful. There has been lots of lobbying by businesses and the Government weren't happy either with the cost of this. They are able to reverse this now due to Brexit as we don't have to follow European law, we can make our own in areas like this now. The working time directive is also being abolished. They just want everyone working all hours of the day and night regardless of any health condition or disability.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Surealunreal Yeah the sick and disabled thought the days of atos was bad enough jeeso they have stepped things up and stepped right over the line of discrimination 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Max Labour want it too theres literally no difference between them on this stuff
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Scottish Heather Dont vote for the main parties as they all want this in
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @daz Exactly dont expect labour to save you they dont stand for the working class and havent since blair
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Make no mistake about it, this is just the government and clearly politicians as a whole ramming their foot in the door of the privacy laws and once they break through that barrier then there's no stopping them and it's not just the disabled and pensioners that need to worry.
    I'm a disabled person, like so many others I suffer, 24 hours a day, the physical and psychological pain of my disabilities and as it is we have to suffer the persistent frightening, degrading and depressing process of having our whole life paid bare to any hostile tom, dick or sally the DWP decide to employ and just so we don't starve.
    Where will it end. I dread to think! But the country as a whole should be fighting against this
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Jules Well you are awake to it as many are here.  There’s more of us than them and they know it hence they trying to sneak it through.  Don’t let them get away with it
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Could we not put a petition together and get a huge amount of signatures from the vast swathes or people that would have their basic human rights abused under this legislation and demand that MPs vote to remove this from new law. Also, please could some clever person write up a sample e-mail that we could send to local MPs demanding that these added Orwellian powers do not get voted into law? (Please!)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Wiggles He’s a globalist labour love this big state stuff
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @K So who would you vote instead in a FPTP system? You will get Tories again obvs @K 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Wiggles Well we should all make sure starmer doesn't get in 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Haden c There is a petition on the gov Uk website, about 80 signatures…….
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Haden c They have already been voted in. It just has to go to the Lord's now. Only 51 MPs across all parties voted against. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    I think there is a problem using Metadata as a fishing net when used against the whole of society. It takes us from a point where we investigate due to suspicious activity to one where data is used in such an Orwellian manner. The principle is ok but the execution is very worrying. Where do you stop at the flagging and analysis of peoples data? This has worrying consequences for society as a whole.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Ian. Indeed it’s future crime like minority report
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Ian. It seems our government want to take our country down the communist China route. 
      All of this was started by Theresa May by signing the Snoopers Charter Act.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    The court if human rights states you are entitled to privacy. I actually got in touch with them over the dwp investigating me and having all my bank details. I won they dropped the investigation. I was the victim of a malicious phone report.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Michelle Well done
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Michelle Got in touch with who? The UK has been dragged over the coals for breaching Human Rights and nothing has happened/changed. In addition, we're looking to remove ourselves from these conventions. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    "Initially the DWP say that they will use their powers to oblige the UK’s top 15 banks to monitor the accounts of all means-tested benefits claimants and report every time an account goes over the capital limit"
    I presume the capital limit is £6000 so this will not affect most people anyway, and it has yet to go through parliament. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @karen No not yet I don’t think
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Sara No each month they will receive a report from each of the banks. Although it states starts in 2025 they are going to "trial it" with 2 banks first. They haven't said which. Each month they will receive a report stating balance of account. Any monies spent abroad for more than 4 weeks. They are also looking at possibly monies received where from and how much. Any money sent to and from abroad. So the testing could start as soon as next yr as soon as law passed. Only needs to get through the lord's. Already passed in parliament 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Akire24 Thanks that's helpful 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Sara If you got £6k in savings and then the rest in your bank is for bills you will be triggered every month then!  You can have £6k in savings.  My monthly bills and rent is nearly £3,500 so I would have to have £9,500 in the bank which is obviously over the £6k amount.  I would have to disclose what the money in the bank is for every month!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Sara It’s more complicated than that as we are allowed £6000 savings. But say your benefits and rent get paid in takes you obviously over it. Even if say the £1500 in rent goes straight back out to your landlord. The money only counts as savings if it’s been in your account for a month. So after a month of you havnt spend it on bills food etc then it now becomes savings. Other wise the savings would have to be say £4000 to allow Pay and UC and PIP to all go in and not reach the ceiling. It’s going need more software than a balance total alarm. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    So if your claiming any benefit ..you can't have anything that people have that don't claim benefits..i.e alcohol cigarettes a holiday .! They are degrading us all, we may be disabled and  chronical ill so does that mean we are not entitled to an evening out for dinner with family? A holiday ? We are expected to sit at home and go nowhere and have nothing ..why ? Because  through no fault of our own we are ill in some way. So being ill in this country makes you deserve nothing ..I would rather not even be here anymore..no privacy and no right to live a half decent life ..do not vote for a Tory government peeps ..keep your head held high ..we ARE deserving just like the rest ! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Max However all parties voted for it. Only 51 MPs voted against it. So all as bad as each other 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Max No doubt ! They make me sick ..should be held accountable for making the sick and poor sicker and poorer ! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Akire24 Scared to spend money on anything that they may see as a luxury ! Terrible way to live ..scrutinised 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Fibrolynn They are not going that far yet but who knows. What gets me is I’m lucky I can save on ESA & PIP but they would rather I waste it away if I’m Both have enough saved for my funeral easily 4-5 k and have enough for 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Carys I don't know if I want to vote at all as I don't know who would be best to vote for ! ..what a cruel scary world we live in ...couldn't possibly get any worse ! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    I’ve got a bold idea, in the spirit of full transparency - let’s allow checks into MP’s private bank accounts. They’re in public office we need to know they’re not breaking the rules… One rule for you to another for me, tell me this is fair and reasonable again. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    This is a sickeningly clear violation of privacy (Joint accounts?) and a very clear indicator that once again the DWP are attacking the disabled to whom they seem to believe are all liars waiting to be caught out. These millions they quote as savings they will make, have they actually released fraud figures supporting it? Or is it just wishful thinking? 

    Labour abstaining, shameful and stupid. They seem to be too busy wanting likes and retweets to actually care about the working class and the welfare state anymore. 

    I will absolutely not cooperate with this invasion, I do not break the rules, and I will not answer questions about where I spend my money, or what I spend it on. If they think I’ve broken a rule they can see me in court. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Well, this is just lovely isn't it? Nice and chilling this; being spied upon from our bank accounts. Mind you, it's just a small part of a total spy network on all of us, claiments and workers, old and young. it's pretty abhorent to say the least. A free democratic society is what we're being told we live in. 

    I fail to see how that is so nowadays. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @JustinR It’s not any more a free or democratic since the Tories voted themselves in the last 5 people 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    A lot of people in the comments don't seem to be reading the full article. It isn't about DWP being able to view all your transactions etc.

    They can already do that if they suspect fraud and are conducting an investigation. 

    The new rules are to compel banks to provide  lists of accounts where the balance is over the capital allowance or where it is being used abroad. They would then use this info to begin fraud investigations. They already get some info from banks, this is just adding more types of data. 

    Not saying this isn't problematic, but there's no need to start withdrawing all your cash and there's no point spreading fear about something that isn't happening.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Susan They are doing it to people who work they need to collect universal credit because wages are so awful .they created the monster of awfulness and they just get away with piling it on again and again . People have been brainwashed that the unemployed and sick are making it hard for them all their tax they pay in going to the sick end needy .it’s clearly not true it never was and never will be most people that receive a benefit have had to have stamps that means they needed to have worked we all pay in to this system in our times of need and we have all experienced being sick being laid off being sacked it’s life not crime and punishment for something that you already paid into .people need to think about what’s really going on and don’t put up with it .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Deb As part of the law they have changed it so they can request 3rd party spending without a warrant. Previously that had to have evidence of fraud to get a warrant to request information. As part of the law change they won't have to do this anymore. They can just request it if they want to. So yes they won't be doing it to everyone but no longer will they need proof. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Deb Has a whiff of the social credit system in China.

      China has been rolling out a system that ranks its citizens based on their "social credit." People can be punished if they drive badly, buy too many video games, or steal. It's not a unified, nationwide system, but China plans on eventually making it mandatory for everyone..
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    May I just add…. When the government propose such things… it draws attention
    Whilst we are distracted imo far worse things are quietly being done by them ‘under the radar’ as it were. This gov have done this time and time again so that now at each appalling headline grabbing threat…. I’m like ok but what really going on that they hope we don’t notice. 
    They are a very slimy lot.  The only reason to look at bank accounts should be to identify REAL poverty, and catch those falling and failing in our society. And to catch oligarchs and MPs stuffing their many pockets.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Hi, it didn’t take long after Covid for government, no matter its party makeup, to get back back to criminalising welfare recipients and wiping up public hatred for us again did it!?!
    Over and above the fact that the genuine welfare fraud they may stop is going to be pityfully small and as you highlight, the sweeping powers it allows mean that ultimately they can dictate how claimants spend their minimal income in the future …yet another human rights violation led by our own goverment. But I have a question I hope you can answer and set my mind at ease:
    I am a full time Carer for my disabled Step-Daughter, I receive Universal Credit, with a chunk of deduction for also receiving Carer’s Allowance. My Step-Daughter receives Enhanced Rate Mobility & Care PIP as well as ESA Higher Support Group benefit. Due to her disabilities my Step-Daughter also receives Direct Payments Support from our Local Authority. Because my Step-Daughter cannot manage her own finances, under powers granted by the Office of the Public Guardian, I am recognised by her bank to have legal access to her accounts, indeed in the App her accounts even have my name attached to them despite being solely her accounts. So according to the DWP my Step-Daughter is entitled to have up to £6K across her accounts, and I am allowed to have up to £6K across my accounts. 
    1). Is the banks reporting system going to differentiate between her savings and mine properly in these circumstances? 
    2). As my Step-Daughter’s Direct Payments account is an account in my name BUT the contents (quite often the balance of this 1 account can exceed the DWP threshold all by itself) being solely Local Authority funds, is it possible that the banks would report on this account as if the funds were mine leading to me being penalised?
    As so many disabled people will be covered by legal guardianship and receive Direct Payments Support from their Local Authority I am sure a great many will be worrying about these questions.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Russell Hayes I wouldn't worry yourself about it, you're not breaking any laws. in fact your saving the government a fortune caring for your stepdaughter.all credit to you.if.and when these powers come in contact citizen advice they will ring DWP on your behalf and sort this all out for you.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    If anyone has the will or inclination - please read the BBW report. You'll find more info on this matter, including but not limited to the retention of Biometric Data and how that data is held/stored/used. This has been wrapped up in the Data Protection and Digital Information 2.0 Bill:

    https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/DPDIB_Report-Stage_Amendments_Final.pdf 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    I’m really disgusted with this it’s an invasion of your privacy and if the government let this through well they will lose people’s votes I don’t vote at all any more as I’m disgusted with the government they don’t help people as this going into bank accounts is proof enough so the government can go and get lost I haven’t had anything all my life I had a hard time in my childhood I’m having bad times now I have nearly died twice and I have had to fight for everything I had I was a nurse I had to retire early through I’ll health and I’m still suffering with I’ll health it’s getting worse not better so I’m very much against this I think it’s disgusting 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Carys If anything they are slightly worse
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @CT Totally agree, but IMHO nothing will be different under Labour, who are also corrupt globalists who have proved to be no opposition to the Tories. Where's the investigation into MP fraud & criminality?! Nowhere to be seen ofcourse & they all just want to kick to sick and poor. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Twenty odd years ago I was claiming contribution based ESA with a small UC top-up. I was called in to the DWP office for a terrifying 'compliance interview', without being given any information as to why.  The carer had to stay outside the tiny office, and inside the woman treated me with absolute disdain.  She informed me that I was under caution, switched on a tape recorder, and wouldn't tell me anything, just kept barking at me what I had to tell her.  I knew that I hadn't done anything wrong, so just kept saying that.  Eventually she said I had to come back for another interview and I could bring legal representation if I wished to.  For two weeks I was sleepless, sick and terrified, waiting for the next appointment. I was stony broke, so my late father travelled to accompany me.  He wore a suit, and had read up on the DWP law.  They were very rude to both of us, but he insisted on knowing exactly what I was suspected of having done wrong.  Eventually they told him that they knew from my building society that I had received £111 interest on my savings account, so I obviously had savings which I hadn't declared.  I had my all my account details with me, and handed over the statement to my Dad, which showed £1.11 yearly interest.  My father said, you have clearly decimal pointed this, and passed the statement over.  They disappeared for a while, 'to carry out checks'. We received no apology, just a disdainful dismissal.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 28 days ago
      @By-the-sea63 I know it's been a while but that is so awful, but works for them doesn't it as you will be added to the "investigated for fraud statistic" " disgusting...... 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @By-the-sea63 Wow sounds about right
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @By-the-sea63 How awful You should have made a complaint. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Robert My Dad was amazing. He took the day off work to support me.  We were in shock at what a ridiculous waste of time and money it had all been. Shows how much misery they can cause with a stupid mistake, and they were so high-handed when we proved them wrong.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @By-the-sea63 You couldn't make it up what idiots they fairly showed themselves up there ha ha. I bet you laughed the whole way home.God bless your wee father.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Do they intend to monitor accounts where there are joint bank account holders.  That will be a breach of GDPR of the joint holder or do they plan to use the new powers to breach the privacy of not just claimants but also their partners who don't claim? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Pauline This is my question. However by the looks of things they don't care if it's joint or not. After 20 yrs of marriage I am going to have to be taken off our joint bank account. I don't get income based but lists ESA. My husband works and they have no right to spy on his account. We aren't breaking the rules as I don't get income based. But I am not willing to put him through that. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @KennG PIP is not income based so they wouldn't need to monitor anyone who only receives this benefit.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Pauline They will only check income based ESA.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @David I dont see how they can be joint claimants especially in cases like mine. My ESA isn't income based its contribution. I really don't see how they can justify looking at both of our financials in a case like this but I'm sure they will find a way to justify it. They always do. Disgrace of a government.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Pauline Good point that would then breach my human rights. if my wife were to get pip and I got nothing from the gov. however then they would use a catch 22 which is all payments eg PIP/Pension/Carers Allowance/ will all now be universal credit so they can claim they are checking on me when my pension comes into play !!!!

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    If they are intent on snooping perhaps they should look at how many times we are overdrawn, how much of the month we live in debit and how pitiful our bank accounts actually are, as I’m sure I’m not the only one that struggles every single month. The periods of time on lower benefit than we should have had left me in huge debt that I’ve not yet recovered from. Despite pip and  the other one ( brain fog) I live in poverty, have to buy secondhand and eat less than I should snd watch the heating carefully esp since the mortgage has shot up( thanks to stupidity of tories)
    Real life issues for some of us!
    I doubt they will ever say what percentage the tiny proportion of claimants who might have largest sums of money they look to catch out! 
    And pip isn’t means tested so why does it need monitoring anyway?
    It’s just a way in to do more damage to us all. Mental torment from DWP should be a proper diagnosis all of its own since the stress is incredible. Knowing they can stop all payments instantly ( as mine were last month….. their error of course!! But as always you find out too late on a Friday and have to panic right through to the Monday. . 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Sally Cl There will be an army of dole snoopers who will get paid by the dwp No doubt in the same way as ATOS HCP got bonus's for making the sick miraculously fit overnight.. Also I wonder how much it will cost the DWP to pursue the high percentage of failed cases through the courts. will the DWP release those figures (their legal costs that is)

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact