The DWP is to begin continuous surveillance of the bank accounts of all pension credit, universal credit and employment and support allowance claimants using powers under a bill currently going through Parliament.  The department have said that they intend to use their new power to force any third party to pass on data to them more widely in the future.

The power to compel third parties into providing any data that the DWP wants in order to search for fraud and error is being conferred in last minute amendments slipped into the Data Protection and Digital Information Bill, which has now passed its third reading in the Commons and moved to the Lords.

Initially the DWP say that they will use their powers to oblige the UK’s top 15 banks to monitor the accounts of all means-tested benefits claimants and report every time an account goes over the  capital limit or is used abroad for more than four weeks.

Because every DWP payment into a bank account has an identifying code attached to it, all banks know exactly which of their customers is on benefits and which benefits they receive.

Setting up software to automatically send details to the DWP of every claimant account that goes over the capital limit or is used abroad for more than four weeks will be very straightforward for banks.

The DWP say that each identified claim will be investigated in the normal way and that penalties will not be automatically imposed.

At the moment, almost 9 million claimants would be caught in the surveillance net, including:

  • 5.8 million universal credit claimants
  • 1.6 million employment and support allowance claimants
  • 1.4 million pension credit claimants

Any bank failing to collect and pass on data to the DWP will be subject to heavy fines.

 The new system will begin to be rolled out in 2025, though all banks may not be fully involved before 2030.

The DWP estimates that it will cost around £30 million a year for them to investigate potential fraud identified by the new system, but that they will save £500 million a year through reduced fraud and error.  

They also estimate that over the first ten years, the new powers will result in 74,000 prosecution cases and 2,500 custodial sentences.  

There is no doubt that the DWP intend to use these new powers much more widely.  The impact assessment for the new powers says that:

“The power is not limited to a specific type of data or type of institution/Third-Party to allow us to fight new fraud and error issues as they emerge and engage with new institutions as efficient opportunities become available to us.”

Later, the same document says: 

“This measure is drafted broadly . . .  to enable DWP to apply this measure to non-financial organisations in future if it is deemed appropriate and proportionate”

The new surveillance powers for the DWP appear to enjoy cross party support. Only 51 MPs voted against the amendment, with 30 of those being SNP and just 7 each from Labour and the Lib Dems.

Anyone who imagines that the DWP will use such sweeping powers reasonably and proportionately probably hasn’t ever claimed benefits.

And they probably also don’t remember the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, which was brought in to combat terrorism and organised crime and ended up being used to spy on dog walkers, pigeon feeders and people putting out their wheelie bins too early.

Capital and abroad fraud account for less than 15% of benefits fraud and error. The DWP will want to delve into many other aspects of claimants lives in order to identify the other 85%.  This is, beyond doubt, the thin end of a very thick wedge.

You can download a copy of the amendments to the Data Protection and Digital information Bill here.  The Power To Require Information For Social Security Purposes section begins on page 98.

You can read the impact assessment for the DWP surveillance powers here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Hi, it didn’t take long after Covid for government, no matter its party makeup, to get back back to criminalising welfare recipients and wiping up public hatred for us again did it!?!
    Over and above the fact that the genuine welfare fraud they may stop is going to be pityfully small and as you highlight, the sweeping powers it allows mean that ultimately they can dictate how claimants spend their minimal income in the future …yet another human rights violation led by our own goverment. But I have a question I hope you can answer and set my mind at ease:
    I am a full time Carer for my disabled Step-Daughter, I receive Universal Credit, with a chunk of deduction for also receiving Carer’s Allowance. My Step-Daughter receives Enhanced Rate Mobility & Care PIP as well as ESA Higher Support Group benefit. Due to her disabilities my Step-Daughter also receives Direct Payments Support from our Local Authority. Because my Step-Daughter cannot manage her own finances, under powers granted by the Office of the Public Guardian, I am recognised by her bank to have legal access to her accounts, indeed in the App her accounts even have my name attached to them despite being solely her accounts. So according to the DWP my Step-Daughter is entitled to have up to £6K across her accounts, and I am allowed to have up to £6K across my accounts. 
    1). Is the banks reporting system going to differentiate between her savings and mine properly in these circumstances? 
    2). As my Step-Daughter’s Direct Payments account is an account in my name BUT the contents (quite often the balance of this 1 account can exceed the DWP threshold all by itself) being solely Local Authority funds, is it possible that the banks would report on this account as if the funds were mine leading to me being penalised?
    As so many disabled people will be covered by legal guardianship and receive Direct Payments Support from their Local Authority I am sure a great many will be worrying about these questions.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Russell Hayes I wouldn't worry yourself about it, you're not breaking any laws. in fact your saving the government a fortune caring for your stepdaughter.all credit to you.if.and when these powers come in contact citizen advice they will ring DWP on your behalf and sort this all out for you.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    If anyone has the will or inclination - please read the BBW report. You'll find more info on this matter, including but not limited to the retention of Biometric Data and how that data is held/stored/used. This has been wrapped up in the Data Protection and Digital Information 2.0 Bill:

    https://bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/DPDIB_Report-Stage_Amendments_Final.pdf 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    I’m really disgusted with this it’s an invasion of your privacy and if the government let this through well they will lose people’s votes I don’t vote at all any more as I’m disgusted with the government they don’t help people as this going into bank accounts is proof enough so the government can go and get lost I haven’t had anything all my life I had a hard time in my childhood I’m having bad times now I have nearly died twice and I have had to fight for everything I had I was a nurse I had to retire early through I’ll health and I’m still suffering with I’ll health it’s getting worse not better so I’m very much against this I think it’s disgusting 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Carys If anything they are slightly worse
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @CT Totally agree, but IMHO nothing will be different under Labour, who are also corrupt globalists who have proved to be no opposition to the Tories. Where's the investigation into MP fraud & criminality?! Nowhere to be seen ofcourse & they all just want to kick to sick and poor. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Twenty odd years ago I was claiming contribution based ESA with a small UC top-up. I was called in to the DWP office for a terrifying 'compliance interview', without being given any information as to why.  The carer had to stay outside the tiny office, and inside the woman treated me with absolute disdain.  She informed me that I was under caution, switched on a tape recorder, and wouldn't tell me anything, just kept barking at me what I had to tell her.  I knew that I hadn't done anything wrong, so just kept saying that.  Eventually she said I had to come back for another interview and I could bring legal representation if I wished to.  For two weeks I was sleepless, sick and terrified, waiting for the next appointment. I was stony broke, so my late father travelled to accompany me.  He wore a suit, and had read up on the DWP law.  They were very rude to both of us, but he insisted on knowing exactly what I was suspected of having done wrong.  Eventually they told him that they knew from my building society that I had received £111 interest on my savings account, so I obviously had savings which I hadn't declared.  I had my all my account details with me, and handed over the statement to my Dad, which showed £1.11 yearly interest.  My father said, you have clearly decimal pointed this, and passed the statement over.  They disappeared for a while, 'to carry out checks'. We received no apology, just a disdainful dismissal.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 months ago
      @By-the-sea63 I know it's been a while but that is so awful, but works for them doesn't it as you will be added to the "investigated for fraud statistic" " disgusting...... 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @By-the-sea63 Wow sounds about right
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @By-the-sea63 How awful You should have made a complaint. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Robert My Dad was amazing. He took the day off work to support me.  We were in shock at what a ridiculous waste of time and money it had all been. Shows how much misery they can cause with a stupid mistake, and they were so high-handed when we proved them wrong.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @By-the-sea63 You couldn't make it up what idiots they fairly showed themselves up there ha ha. I bet you laughed the whole way home.God bless your wee father.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Do they intend to monitor accounts where there are joint bank account holders.  That will be a breach of GDPR of the joint holder or do they plan to use the new powers to breach the privacy of not just claimants but also their partners who don't claim? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Pauline This is my question. However by the looks of things they don't care if it's joint or not. After 20 yrs of marriage I am going to have to be taken off our joint bank account. I don't get income based but lists ESA. My husband works and they have no right to spy on his account. We aren't breaking the rules as I don't get income based. But I am not willing to put him through that. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @KennG PIP is not income based so they wouldn't need to monitor anyone who only receives this benefit.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Pauline They will only check income based ESA.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @David I dont see how they can be joint claimants especially in cases like mine. My ESA isn't income based its contribution. I really don't see how they can justify looking at both of our financials in a case like this but I'm sure they will find a way to justify it. They always do. Disgrace of a government.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Pauline Good point that would then breach my human rights. if my wife were to get pip and I got nothing from the gov. however then they would use a catch 22 which is all payments eg PIP/Pension/Carers Allowance/ will all now be universal credit so they can claim they are checking on me when my pension comes into play !!!!

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    If they are intent on snooping perhaps they should look at how many times we are overdrawn, how much of the month we live in debit and how pitiful our bank accounts actually are, as I’m sure I’m not the only one that struggles every single month. The periods of time on lower benefit than we should have had left me in huge debt that I’ve not yet recovered from. Despite pip and  the other one ( brain fog) I live in poverty, have to buy secondhand and eat less than I should snd watch the heating carefully esp since the mortgage has shot up( thanks to stupidity of tories)
    Real life issues for some of us!
    I doubt they will ever say what percentage the tiny proportion of claimants who might have largest sums of money they look to catch out! 
    And pip isn’t means tested so why does it need monitoring anyway?
    It’s just a way in to do more damage to us all. Mental torment from DWP should be a proper diagnosis all of its own since the stress is incredible. Knowing they can stop all payments instantly ( as mine were last month….. their error of course!! But as always you find out too late on a Friday and have to panic right through to the Monday. . 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Sally Cl There will be an army of dole snoopers who will get paid by the dwp No doubt in the same way as ATOS HCP got bonus's for making the sick miraculously fit overnight.. Also I wonder how much it will cost the DWP to pursue the high percentage of failed cases through the courts. will the DWP release those figures (their legal costs that is)

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Big Brother is watching you, What’s next on their agenda, DNA checks?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Patsy Don’t give them ideas!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Patsy This is just yet another cull by the back door.  I thought harrassment and bullying were against the law.  For everyone except the government it would appear. Shameful.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    I worked as a senior Charge Nurse in Mental Health for over 30 years.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    I am wondering how banks will distinguish between claimants on contributions based ESA and IR based ESA? The savings limits don't apply to contribution based and potentially anyone moving savings via their current account will be flagged up. Many savings accounts require you to nominate a linked current account and withdrawals are sent to that account. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Prudent For SG, the payment size as EDP is only paid for IR claimants.  Not sure about WRAG claimants though.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Kc It will because banks will send them details of your balance. They will then add a part to the report that automatically adds up all your accounts. Everything will be done on database analysis. It's all automatic once setup. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @KennG The amount of fraudulent benefit claimants pales into comparison compared to white collar crime in the UK.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Cjmp45 I'm not sure how it could work if each person had their capital spread across a few declared bank accounts.  Their proposed trigger shouldn't work.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @KennG Sadly this is how it used to be. My dad threw them out of the house after an older sister in between work tried to claim ‘dole’ in the 60s to help the family as money was tight. 

      He told them to stick their money and he’d do even more hours to keep the family going - was already working 70 plus hours a week. 

      Those days you worked every hour you could get regardless of childcare issues or disability. 😢
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Stephen Timms, Labour MP raised this matter in parliament last week. He seems to think that it's not just Pension Credited Pensioners they will be spying on but all State Pensioners. I don't agree with them spying on anyone, but I guess they can at least make a case for means tested benefits, but what fraud can a normal pensioner be committing? Surely their pension is their's to do with as they see fit and has eff all to do with any Government!

    I have felt spied on for the last several years whilst being in the unfortunate position of being on ESA. I finally get my SP at the end of this month and was actually starting to feel less stressed knowing I was free of the DWP and it's machinations, but oh no, this pops up out the ruddy woodwork. How dare they do this to law abidiing citizens. Why is no one fighting this.

    Where is my right to look into their shady bank dealings, because I can guarantee you there are more of them on the fiddle than there are pensioners.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Kc I have applied, but they won't confirm if you are entitled until after your 66th birthday. So no actual confirmation as to whether or not I will get it, although as I am in receipt of PIP daily living which gave me SDP on my ESA I think I should. Also you are right. I am on cloud 9 this morning. I just sent the DWP's a message on my FB Feed, Lily Allen's F**k You.

      My heart breaks though for all those poor sods still being put through this heinous system, spied on, judged and generally looked down on.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @TwistedWitch Make sure you claim Pension Credit Guarantee Credit on top of your State Pension if you were previously receiving income based ESA.  I'm sure your mood will improve once you're not being made to prove you're too sick to work.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @TwistedWitch Steven Timms also said that DWP could use this new idea to check pensioners that were entitled received AA who currently don’t- yeah cos DWP are caring like that NOT! What he failed to say is that there are still a lot of pensioners who don’t claim because they are too proud or were brought up to think claiming was shamefull How will DWP differentiate there? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @TwistedWitch 100 % agree
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    I fail to see how this could get through the house of lords. They will be granting the government acces to their own bank accounts, given most of them will be in receipt of state pension
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    We need to stand up to this invasion of privacy and making disabled people second class citizens. They have no right to assume we are guilty, and trounce through our bank statements. This is immoral and it needs to be stopped before it happens. People have a right to privacy, people have a right to being treated fairly, but this government seem to think we are nothing but scum and as such can't possibly have feelings or brains to feel the injustice in this. We need to work together to get this abhorrent act nullified and sign a petition to let them know we won't stand for this.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Helen I agree why are we allowing ourselves to be trod over
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    What about foster carers whose income is disregarded for universal credit purposes.  Also those of us who are the appointee for a family member for their PIP that gets paid into my bank account.  That isn't my income it is for my family member but would flag up as my income.  I also look after money for someone who can't manage their money so I have their money in my account as well which gets paid to them throughout the month!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @siobhan As appointee I assume the benefit is flagged on your account with the other person's NI number so this would show it was not your money and should be disregarded. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    This country is turning into a full on dictatorship. Should not be allowed as we are entitled to some privacy. Clearly not where the government are concerned. Makes me sad/angry what this country has become 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    My partner and I are both wrinklies and she gets full PIP and PC so our joint account will be one of the ones targeted. Wonder what they will make of all the small donations to anti DWP campaigns.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    This of course is subject to Human Rights Laws

    Article 7 No punishment without law

    1 No one shall be held guilty of any criminal offence on account of any act or omission which did not constitute a criminal offence under national or international law at the time when it was committed. Nor shall a heavier penalty be imposed than the one that was applicable at the time the criminal offence was committed.

    2 This Article shall not prejudice the trial and punishment of any person for any act or omission which, at the time when it was committed, was criminal according to the general principles of law recognised by civilised nations.

    Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life of the Human Rights Act

    1 Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

    2 There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as is in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals, or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

    Article 14 Prohibition of discrimination

    The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or other status.

    Basically Discrimination against people who through no fault of their own have to claim benefits to survive. After all no one else is liable to bank account monitoring before the event are they? therefore its discrimination on the grounds of status.
    I don't believe they can make it stick.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Rok All They already can apply to inspect any claimants bank accounts they want to.   But this means they will be getting extra help by the banks themselves flagging up accounts for inspection 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    Thank you for your message re this petition, I am pleased to provide the following link:

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/650940
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    I have just made a claim for NS ESA. 
    Can anyone please explain the legal justification for accessing my personal private bank records, when I am claiming a non means tested benefit, so it doesnt matter what my savings are?
    Surely I should be able to sue my Bank if they allow access in this instance? 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Cece Contribution Esa is not means tested and you can work whilst claiming it under their support for a max £ and hours. 
      You could have a million pounds in your bank and claim contributions Esa and pip BUT if you have a private pension they deduct your Esa after so much a week.   Esa also stops when you reach state pension age. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Fred I suppose they’d be watching for wage like payments above the limit 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @heatons True but it’s the principle of the big brother state creeping slowly in that should be fought against surely?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Cece Im not sure thats correct? Whats the threshold then? I thought that they didnt take your (bank account) savings into account, if you are claiming NS-ESA?
      (I could be wrong?)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Cece Contribution based ESA is not means tested - at least at the moment anyway!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    It’s an invasion of privacy and I can’t see how this bill will get passed , haven’t DWP hit yo have proof of fraudulent activity in order to prosecute ? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Wiggles So what we can still stand up
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Ton Yes it would it’s a bigger plan for mass surveillance it’s nowt to do with fraud they already have powers to investigate that 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Ton @Ton and if the Gov didn't defraud the system (contracts for friends not fit for purpose equipment, tax evasion, fraudulent expenses claims) the country wouldn't be in the mess it's in and wouldn't need to keep vilifying all benefit claiments. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Ton True but it’s the principle of the big brother state creeping slowly in that should be fought against surely? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Jules Sorry but as stated by B&W it has already passed through Parliament. It's gone to House of Lords now? Jenny Jones, Green Party said in House of Lords "Look at the government's plans to actually spy on the bank accounts of those receiving benefits... It really is a new low in this government's constant vile behaviour"

      "Never in our history has the government intruded on the privacy of anyone's bank account without any good reason. And now we're treating all people on benefits as potential criminals"

      "If MPs think this is a good idea, then why don't we ask them to go first? With all the cases of corruption, second jobs and undeclared incomes, would MPs be ok if the banks had the ability to raise red flags on their accounts? That does seem to make sense doesn't it? Just test the system before we use it on other people"

      For once I actually agree with the Green Party's stance on this.  Video clip on 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 years ago
    As usual, the government efforts to persecute the few against going after the many is beyond contempt. If only the same rules were applied to MP’s bank accounts 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 years ago
      @Mike Jones I think they are persecuting the many to get to the very few, estimated at 15% I think, who are breaking the rules. 
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.