The Labour List website  has updated its list of Labour MPs who have openly said they will vote against the Pathways to Work Green Paper cuts.  There are now 27 MPs who say they will do so, up from 12 just a few days ago.

Another seven Labour MPs have expressed opposition to the cuts, but not yet said they will vote against them.

For MPs to put their heads above the parapet this long before the battle begins takes a certain amount of courage.  They will undoubtedly come under huge pressure from Labour whips to back down before a bill to change the PIP points system and cut the universal credit health element for new claims is introduced in May.

If the bill is certified as a money bill, the Lords will not be able to amend or delay it for more than a month, meaning the cuts could be on the statute book by the end of July, ready to be implemented next year.

But with 27 Labour MPs now openly rebelling and one Labour MP having started a petition against his own party’s plans, not everything is going the government’s way.

You can check if your MP is on the list here.

If they are, perhaps send them an email to offer your support for their stand. 

If not, and you haven’t already contacted them, now is the time to do so.  Getting MPs to come out against the Green Paper cuts is undoubtedly the best way of defeating them. 

There’s more on contacting your MP and many other steps you can take on our What you can do page.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Labour are worse than Conservatives.

    In less than 1 year, they have done more harm to us than 14 years of Tory rule.

    The Tories showed more compassion for disabled people over 14 years, than Labour has in 10 months.

    FACT.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Nostalgic For Tory Rule This is not true, the Tories were awful.  Labour are basically Tories now though, we need real change.  And not in the awful form of Reform, as they're just another right wing party.  Greens are my first choice, then Lib Dems.  Greens want a wealth tax, and were going to increase money for the disabled. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Anon The facts speak for themselves.

      Labour have done more harm to us in 9 months, than the Conservatives did in 14 years.

      Think about that fact.

      The point is not that the Tories are in any way good. It is that Labour are an order of magnitude worse.

      It's not about what they say. It's about what they do.

      What did Tories do?
      What is Labour doing?

      Did the Tories rush through a money bill as an Act of Parliament to subvert our legal protections? No. They didn't.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Nostalgic For Tory Rule
      I personally believe you're trolling but just in case you're not: 

      The Conservatives have been very vocal about how they feel that these reforms are "not going far enough". 

      Also, with all due respect: where were you when Universal Credit and PIP was rolled out? When the Conservatives tried to make the latter harder to get in 2016? 

      And when Sunak suggested that we should live on vouchers? 

      The Conservatives have absolutely no compassion for disabled individuals. Having a rose-tainted view of their leadership simply because their policies presumably didn't affect you or their plans were stopped by legislation/them being voted out doesn't change that. 

      That being said, you can absolutely say that Labour are as bad as they are. Mainly because Labour are towering hypocrites who have put on a front of caring about us in order to lord over the Tories and win our votes. Which is utterly unforgivable. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @A Vouchers are still better than losing everything because you 'failed' an arbitrary 4 point PIP test.

      Labour done more harm in 10 months than Tories did in 14 years.

      How many people will perish from these changes? Thousands?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Nostalgic For Tory Rule Trying way too hard. The Tories were going to swap pip for vouchers.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    While I have zero faith in this atrocious Labour Party, I do still think when the time comes, that number will be significantly higher. Whether it will be enough to make this political poison for the government remains to be seen.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    It's not anywhere near enough.  And while many more mps are against it, they won't have the guts to vote with their conscience and risk losing the whip.  

    It is bizarre that they are pushing this through so quickly when the consultation questions suggest they don't know how to implement the changes or support those affected.  Important issues like whether there will be transitional protection, which people should not be pressured into job hunting, and what happens to the work allowance if you lose health UC are all up in the air, and the first two are addressed in the consultation questions.  It's like they have come up with the cuts and not thought through how to make them work....
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 days ago
      @Anon Absolutely spot on.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Slb It's not all that bizarre, to be honest. They're clearly rattled at how the Tory plans for the WCA (which they've pretty much implemented as their own plans in the essence that they wish for PIP to be a gateway to disability benefits as a whole) were dragged through the courts and declared "unlawful" so they're trying to leave as little time for more legal challenges as possible.

      This is probably also why they kept quiet about these plans for so long and took us for a ride. They learned from the Tories that showing your hand too soon gives those pesky advocacy groups time to mount a defence and mess up your whole proposal before it even gets off the ground.

      Obviously, more legal challenges still wouldn't stop an Act of Parliament but it may or may not have the effect of dragging things out when they want to save money as soon as possible and having MPs less willing to back it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Slb
      They haven't thought things out at all. ESA (C) claimants abroad have the right to live abroad and claim the benefit they paid NI toward. They will be unable to claim UC from abroad. It seems no-one from Labour has actually considered this small yet vital group of people.
      I think it's disgusting that ESA (C) is also being merged with JSA under the guise of the new time limited benefit. It's yet another way of forcing a group of people off benefits = success for statistics!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    A caveat is surely the PIP 4 point rule will need to go through a consultation aka a Green Paper and White Paper before being taken to a vote. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Dave Dee The 4 point rule isn't part of the consultation.  It says that specifically in the green paper.  Yes, there will be a white paper, but there's no doubt it will go through even if the Lords and committee stage criticise it.  However, there are lots of questions regarding these decisions, and things like transitional protection for those losing out ARE in the consultation.  On the plus side, things that do get passed often get delayed - such as UC, which took much longer to implement than planned, and the Rwanda scheme that never happened.  Hopefully similar issues will plague these changes and we can all get a few years extra of the money we deserve.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Further to my earlier comment, and confirmation that as a money bill Judicial Reviews will not work, I presume that primary legislation will have to go through a committee stage. I would therefore suggest contacting all relevant chairs of disability Select Committees to see if amendments can be made. I'm afraid cuts are going to go ahead.  On a previous thread I did mention the possibility of introducing a third, lower tier, of daily living component to PIP (as was the case with DLA). I appreciate this is not a popular option but might one of the few that will be available; the alternative is hundred of thousands in destitution, with the resultant cost to local authorities who will have no choice but to hike up Council Tax (which will be very unpopular) by far more than 4.99%
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Dave Dee It appears that the change to PIP eligibility will affect those with arthritis and similar conditions far more than those with mental health issues.  I agree about a third tier, but will Labour implement something that will affect the money they are trying to save? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Matt The "middle ground" which Labour could concede is a lower third tier dealing with in their words "less severe" or "mild" disabilities revolving around their favourite political pinata, Mental Illnesses.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    My MP is not on the list come on Ben Coleman we know you can do it! Is your MP on the list?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    There are other MPs not on the list who are against cuts think there will be more  that are keeping it to themself some MPs won't say to anyone else if they voting against they'll just do it .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Honestly, it's nowhere near enough. Shameful. Although I respect any that do vote against, because they will be pressured, threatened and punished.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Leah Let us all do everything that we possibly can to grow that number.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Is hartlepool MP  in or out what are your thoughts.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    My MP has been critical but not out right said he would vote against, I've emailed them to add him to the maybe list. I would imagine there are a good few lesser known MPs who have done similar
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Only an immediate legal challenge can stop this, and save 340,000 disabled people from abject poverty.

    ▪Petitions will not work.
    ▪Emailing MPs will not work.
    ▪They don't care about our survival.

    Lawfare vs Lawfare.

    Disabled people are a legally protected minority, who are being discriminately targeted by this green paper.

    Everything besides actual legal action is futile.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Legal Action Now I’ve been thinking this. Numerous charities and campaign groups have spoken out etc…. which is all well and good but legal action will be our only hope. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Anon That’s true although the pressure the Gov may come under from the UN special rapporteur, ECHR etc could be intense so is worth pursuing.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Anon How many votes against are needed to block it?

      ▪First-past-the-post system = non-democratic.
      ▪Party whip system = non-democratic.
      ▪Hereditary lords = non-democratic.
      ▪Monarchy = non-democratic.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Legal Action Now The courts can't quash or amend Acts of Parliament.  They could if the changes were being introduced via Statutory Instruments, which would be the normal practice.  But Labour are willing to risk a vote in Parliament in order to make sure that Lawfare won't work. So, unfortunately, being a protected minority won't help. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    Only 27 of them?

    Oppose....

    340,000 disabled people being pushed into poverty, in one of the richest countries in the world.

    I see.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 days ago
      @Anon 27 is not enough you can see this being pushed through, this will be the end for labour for a very long time.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 days ago
    A start, but really we need at least 70 labour MP's to vote against the proposed legislation. Not surprised Race (Exeter) is not on the list.....
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.