The number of universal credit claimants who were hit with a sanction reached a record high in October 2024, raising doubts over Labour’s willingness to support rather than punish claimants.

According to official statistics, there were 61,527 adverse sanction decisions in October 2024, the highest number ever recorded.  The previous highest was in January 2024, when 57,192 claimants were sanctioned.

In November 2024, 5.5% of UC claimants who were in the conditionality regimes where sanctions can be applied, were subject to a sanction. This is down by 0.1% from August 2024.

Failure to attend or participate in a mandatory interview accounted for over 90% of all sanctions.

Sanction figures by month for 2024, up to October, the most recent month for which statistics are available, are as follows:

Jan       57,192

Feb      49,488

March  51,091

April    49,986

May     48,672

June     46,969

July      54,368

Aug      49,554

Sept     55,675

Oct      61,527

Many claimants had hoped that Labour would immediately introduce a less punitive regime when they took control of the DWP.  However, figures for their first few months in office suggest that little has changed so far.

You can read the full sanctions statistics here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 24 days ago
    It never changes the ripping me of 2 tax credits esa payments iam low rate disabilty with serious health issues not been addressed they care about money no care or attension to detail ive dug into my own records its unbelievable coverups

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 25 days ago
    And nothing will change. It will be no different if Reform get in. In a matter of fact, Reform will be even tougher. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 27 days ago
    I only get universal credit.by the time they've taken deductions I'm living on 45pounds a week.im 56.i use candles of a night I can't afford electric all week.i eat very little.doctor had to give me iron tablets for anaemia.iv lost loads of weight but the DWP don't care.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 25 days ago
      @Snowy99 What about the foodbanks
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 26 days ago
      @Snowy99
      DWP don't care.  DWP do not care if their actions cost you your health.   DWP cares mainly about their Bonuses, and not much else!
      If you are ill or dissabled, please contact any local dissabled charity or call Scope helpline or e-mail them.    I've lived like you, while awaiting my Tribunals.  It've made my health worse.   Contact you local MP, ask them to help you!   Get your GP to refer you to Social Services, they will help you to see what else is available for you?   Ask for help and advice!   GP can refer you to a food bank.   In my area you have to have an oficial referal, but when I needed more food, before going for hart opperation, they helped me without any referal.   There are good people, arround, esspecialy some work in such pleaces.   Talk to people.   Do NOT give up!    All the best!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 27 days ago
    Very disappointed with Labour. I will not renew my membership now. Had hopes that they would take a more compassionate line with those most vulnerable? Obvs not  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 28 days ago
    Does the DWP take account of the dismal postal service in this country? I've waited 10 days sometimes for a letter I've expected in 4 to 5 days. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Gilliany I always send stuff like that via recorded delivery , they have zero excuse that they "lost" anything then 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 28 days ago
      @Gilliany Whenever time sensitive information needs to be transmitted to the DWP it has to be done via Royal Mail (2nd class).
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 28 days ago
    Labour under Kier Starmer have proved that they are very much on the Right because they would rather target the vulnerable then the rich 
    I am very concerned about this Budget coming up in regards to the welfare reform especially as the cost of living will be increasing again from April 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Emma Samways
      DWP is an instrument of torture.

      If the DWP really wanted to help unemployed people they just need to close all the job centres,  get rid of all the sadistic people that they find to work at these places, then get rid of all the people that work for the DWP.

      All unemployed people just need a basic income and left to contribute to society however they wish. That's it.

      I'm sure all of these people that work at the job centres, .. could find something more productive to do with their lives.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 28 days ago
    Starmer just announced Foreign Aid cuts to fund Defence spending, rather than the Tory version on Kunsberg - cut PIP to fund it.  Think they have realised the 'rebellion' they would face in the UK if they did make cuts to the most vulnerable. here.  May have dodged a bullet this time, but who knows what they have in store in their Spring Fiscal Statement.  Media also complicit in creating a moral panic around benefits for the disabled.  Shame on them!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @chezza1959 Their will still be benefit cuts
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @chezza1959 Ok will   bear that in mind  I know the media makes mischief.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 28 days ago
      @chezza1959 There's still going to be a Green Paper on welfare reform. This will take time so the only option was for Starmer to cut overseas aid (which the Tories should have done as they are, traditionally, the party of defence/armed forces).  Hopefully 2.5% of GDP will mollify the Americans but suspect Trump will want more. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 28 days ago
      @chezza1959 The media never seems to have a moral panic about the rich getting richer and richer or suggest taxing the rich to fund public services.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 29 days ago
    During the election campaign I emailed starmer about being disabled and the worry we have under the torys
    He said disabled people would be treated with dignity.  What a load of crap. He treating us as nothing. Be putting us in workhouse next. Saw one tory analyst on talktv saying that
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Tuxcat At least you got a reply, I didn't. We now know that Labour just lied about everything to get into power. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 29 days ago
    The media are not reliable and  in the government debates  they are more bothered about getting the 18 to 25s back to work more than anything there are mentions of every disabled person having the right to work but it will depend on people's situations  and the connect to work and work well are voluntary at the moment  if you Google it they are that's what they will be using to help people it sounds like there won't be sanctions  don't know what else they plan they just said that the welfare spending will be reduced that will be by getting people who can work and want to back to work also Tim's has said  the system will still support people with mental health but hasn't said how but people won't just lose their payments they are expected to spend a further 20bn because the Tories on welfare they also say that because the high court ruling they have to basically be careful and that they will listen to people and their organisations what ever that means .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Lill They are definitely looking at younger people. Let's face it, they are the future workers over the next decades. And there has been a surge in PIP and disability claims from that age group.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I have multi special needs and epilepsy&can’t work . I agree with a lot or what Dave dee says. I’ve had f2f pip and it’s tough. I thought Labour would be nicer to disabled people like me but clearly they are not . And Liz kendell well it’s so obvious she hates disabled people. Sorry my msg is long 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Tomf Don’t apologise, get it off your chest. It’s very tough out there. X
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Tomf At a previous election we had a Labour canvasser knock on our door, he let slip he was an ESA assessor. All about money.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    It says on GB news today England are going to have to increase defense spending either raising taxes or welfare spending too fund defence but Rachel reeves is not keen on raising taxes so she wants to tackle welfare spending that's not good news 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Charger 7
      This is politics of the far-right.

      Maybe Labour are playing from Trump's rule book: you say to your political enemies what they want to hear (we will cut welfare spending) and then you do what you want to do (tax the super rich).
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Recently Liz Kendall, secretary of state for wor work and pensions, reckoned that some people on benefits "are taking the Mickey".

    Benefit levels are appalling and we have a 1.7% increase to look forward to in April. There are millions of people in abject poverty, just a short distance from destitution, scavenging about in bins for food, or reliant on food banks.

    Liz Kendall is paid £158,000 a year. She even claimed £4,000 in expenses to heat her Notting Hill home with whom she shares with her husband. He only earns £600,000 every year. That means Liz and her husband are just scraping by on £760,000 a year. That is what I call "Taking The Mickey".
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Paul Lots of the uber wealthy (people earning or own assets over £10million) legally hide their money and assets in off shore family trusts meaning they pay little or no tax including inheritance tax. Last year Rishi Sunak earned £2million but paid a lower tax rate than his Downing Street cleaner on minimum wage! Yet he and his other millionaire conservative colleagues told us we can't tax the rich more because they would move abroad leaving this country much poorer??!!  Therefore, the only solution to raise money they said is to cut benefits to the poorest in society!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 25 days ago
      @Wat Tyler Taking the Mickey is claiming everything on expenses paid for by the taxpayer WHILST comfortably being within the top 1% of earners in this country. There is a word for this, but bet I won't be allowed to use it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 28 days ago
      @Wat Tyler
      It is the super rich getting richer and richer that are taking the mickey. They are taking the micky out of all ordinary people and our country.

      During covid the Conservative government gave out a trillion pounds £1,000,000,0000 to the richest in society.

      The rich are using this money to buy all the assets: houses, government buildings,  ..

      The rich are also coming for anyone with a mortgage, car, ..

      Eventually all ordinary people will have no assets and they and their family will be poor for ever.

      The only way to reverse all of this is to get the money back by taxing the rich.

      The media and right-wing parties (which speak for the rich) are telling us that the reason we are getting poor is  something to do with migration.  This is not the reason.

      Sorry for the rant.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    It's remarkable to me that NO ONE in Government ever seems to be capable of doing the math. I've cognitive issues and I can still figure out that there aren't enough jobs to people based on skill-matching. But sure, get everyone off the benefits and make them scrape gum off the footpath, that'll teach 'em for being a disabled. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 25 days ago
      @Bern400 812 thousand job vacancies
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 26 days ago
      @Blurp you are spot on.......currently 1 million job uk vacancies but 1.5 million unemployed people actively looking for work plus another 3.5 million long term sick/disabled people . 4.5 million people into 1 million job vacancies doesn't go!! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 26 days ago
      @Bert yes they are planning to tighten eligibility (so less people qualify) and reduce some of the payments for PIP. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Bern400 So the other 3 billion savings must come from Pip
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Blurp Agree
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I'm letting people know on here I've just had my Pip review it took 9 months to be reviewed and I've been awarded for another 3 years and nothing has changed they have kept it the same as before but I don't know if this will be affected by the new reforms coming in but ide let people know 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Aldo Amazing thought that the Tories pushed through the migration to UC at the clock of their fingers before the election and Labour continued with it. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Lindatiger The same, we are no longer eligible unless we lived in a big draughty house. That would make us eligible now.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 28 days ago
      @Aldo When they want to make changes to get back money, they can do it pretty quickly in my opinion but if they owe you anything, it's years until you get it.
      Like the warm home discount, which I use to be a recipient of. A vital benefit for people who are home bound. To my surprise it's gone, apparently the disabled are not allowed to claim it, even though I'm on the required benefits. 
      Now you have to be a pensioner or have children. I'm under 60 and childless sadly. Who has decided that we no longer qualify for help with our heating? And why are they targeting people who can't have children? 
      It has really distressed me, it's a delicate issue which troubles me greatly.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 28 days ago
      @Aldo I admire your optimism 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @robbie Robbie any changes that do come through will most likely only be applied to new claimants. If I were you I wouldn't worry because the government can't do anything overnight and it could be years before any changes are seen, and even then that's assuming they're not challenged and more than likely they would be. Also don't forget this government have already been dragged over the coals for the changes they wanted to make which they were then forced to reconsider.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Does anyone know how 'welfare' works in the USA, especially in relation to disability of working age people? I have a feeling that a lot of politicians, in all parties, would like to see something similar in the UK 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Matt Of course. Attack those most vulnerable.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Bert The criteria for disability in the US is the same here, I believe we modelled it on theirs.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Matt That's unemployment. Not disability.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 29 days ago
      @Matt Yes you have the humiliation of food stamps in America
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Bert Just gone online: in April 2023 the MAXIMUM a single person could receive in social security in the States equates to approx £153 per month, plus food stamps....hence my earlier comment above in relation to what many politicians would like to see come to the UK...
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I knew Labour would be no different and despite bearing down on a broken system keep on hoping for what?

    I don’t think they even know….
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    After 12 years of more or less being depression free it has started to return on a daily basis; along with increased visits to the doctor.

    Thankyou very much Starmer, Reeves, Kendall and Timms.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 28 days ago
      @Leprechaun me too  !
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Leprechaun Not only are they inflicting you depression and making you commute to your doctor, but also, they're mocking people with depression:

      “If they go to the doctor and say ‘I’m feeling rather down and bluesy’, the doctor will give them on average about seven minutes and then, on 94% of occasions, they will be signed off as not fit to carry out any work whatsoever."
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Will Labour be in power long enough to implement their welfare changes if the proposals are as far reaching and drastic as some of the speculation suggests?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @rookie I'm sure whoever replaces them will just continue it,  just like Labour did with the managed migration to UC. They didn't stop it. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Bert @Bert, which bill?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @rookie Probably be June 2026 before the bill becomes law
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Just to let people know who that despite all the endless news articles and government press statements out there saying otherwise, amongst comparable countries the UK does NOT spend "too much" on welfare benefits and especially health related ones! All the statistics show that it sits at the average amount for OECD nations (roughly a fifth of GDP). 

    BTW this includes pensions and housing benefit, which together take up the majority of total spending. Actual spending on unemployment, sickness and disability benefits are noticeably lower than average.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 27 days ago
      @Gawayn Keep it coming. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 28 days ago
      @philip Exactly, it's all spent on this country so it gets back the money. Circles and roundabouts. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @philip Exactly!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Gawayn Also I notice we are way ahead in housing benefit. Otherwise known as Landlord Gravy.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Gawayn Thanks for the charts. On working age cash benefits the UK spends a measily 3.9% of GDP. What's more virtually all of this goes straight back to the treasury in the form of tax as the £ moves through the economy. Welfare so called costs nothing really. All opposition is prejudice.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    No surprise there at all.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.