Reform UK has published its manifesto today.  It has less than half a page of text on benefits, under the heading “The Benefits System is Broken” and featuring a slogan of “In Britain, if you can work, you must work.”

On PIP and the WCA, Reform says: 

Face to Face, Not Remote Assessments for Benefits

Personal Independence Payment and Work Capability Assessment should be face to face. We will require independent medical assessments to prove eligibility for payments. Those registered with severe disabilities or serious long-term illnesses would be exempt from regular checks.

When benefits and work carried out a poll of readers two years ago on what sort of PIP assessment they would prefer, the results were:

  • Paper 59% 
  • Phone 20%
  • Face-to-face 20%
  • Video 1%

So this is a move that would be unpopular with the majority of Benefits and Work readers

The remainder of the text is devoted to raising the starting point for tax to £20,000 a year and an aim “Motivate up to 2 million People Back to Work”.

Reform say that:

“Reforms to benefit support and training will help people back into work. Particular focus on 16-34 year olds. Employment is critical to improving mental health. Tax relief for businesses that undertake apprenticeships.”

The manifesto goes on to warn that:

“All job seekers and those fit to work must find employment within 4 months or accept a job after 2 offers. Otherwise, benefits are withdrawn.”

You can download a copy of Reform UK’s manifesto from this link.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Worse than the Tories. Why would anyone believe them after the famous NHS lie on the bus?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Julia According to various news sources there are Reform Party bots loose all over the internet. 

      Either that or Farage is in danger of getting the biggest single case of Writer's Cramp in recorded history.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @DH I don't think a lot of the people here recently are genuine benefit claimants. Too many of the comments read like party political broadcasts. Many desperate or plain ignorant people are falling for their sham of a 'party' but I believe that those of us who are clued up are wise to their tricks. Anyone here who is using this forum as a way to promote their party at the expense of vulnerable people should hang their heads in shame.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Julia I am reading these comments and I am SOOOO troubled by the praise Reform are receiving here by Benefits and Work users. Are they being brainwashed? Do they not realise that they might be even more hardline against benefits than the Tories? Not only political parties are losing the plot, so are many people here.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Absolutely 💯 believe this is the way forward,  providing it is fair. Having had 24years of hell with both Labour and The Tory governments since being medically discharged from the Army, I believe if they can come up with a flexible package it would be even better. Dome of us vould possibly help out in our communities which is almost the same as working, but often we are not always well enough. The system should be there to help us get our dignity back by helping us put as much back into society as we can without penalising us. Anyway I am sure alot of people are skeptical about Reform but under Labour we all know we will go bankrupt again. And as for the Tories the UC was their downfall. Make the system fairer. So by having independent medical proof this does appeal to me , rather than someone who gets a bonus for finding fault who probably not even qualified. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Elaine Nigel farage the man who run away after brexit and only re became reform leader at the last minute.
      Shout from the side line politics when you have no hope of power just snipe at the other partys.
      This man wont make life better for the job seeker or disabled it would get a whole lot worse.
      There seems to be a mentality in the media to back deranged people for leadership like boris or nigel and to hell with the country.
      As long as the rich are richer and the poor are poorer thats ok.
      I tell you its not ok.
      The economy needs growing cost of living needs sorting the nhs needs fixing schools need fixing public services need fixing.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 months ago
      @DH And people like us who are disabled are thinking of voting for them 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Neil Loughbrough Reform wants to 'rip up' the equality act and remove the UK from ECHR, essentially getting rid of your rights as a disabled person and will be detrimental in fighting injustice against your benefits. How can you see this as 'the way forward'?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
      I am writing this email to ask if you can please make clearer your views on reforms to disability benefits and how this will be taken forward by reform Disability forums are full of people in abject fear of what is to come. Its hard enough living with these disabilities and this insecurity day in day out but having total uncertainty of where reform stands is making it's almost impossible to decide how to vote.

    Please also see my submission to the green paper about the proposed PIP reforms below.

    I think one of the main things to consider from this submission is that there is such a large underlying scandal behind the abuses of the DWP that if this fully comes to light it could easily compete with the post office and blood scandals. I think the next government should be incredibly careful with the reforms to not push us to the point of mass litigation against the abuses already acknowledged as traumatic and needing redress by the UN. The proposed PIP and ESA reforms would be the last straw for many of us pushing us to this.

    I would be so grateful if you could be so kind in responding to this email as i have read labours manifesto regarding benefits & to be quite honest it just seems that labour will just be carrying on where the conservatives left off with their cruel policies on the disabled people.
    I feel more clarification is needed as to enlighten the burden on disabled people (like myself) & not left in the dark on this serious matter.


     
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    Again as they will never have sufficient MPs to form a government it is not worth any further discussion. I have my suspicions when elected they will merge with the conservatives so my point in the conservative section would be the same.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Lynn Sheridan At the time of writing this comment (and of Feb 2025), we know the outcome of the election. 
      Unfortunately, Mr Farage is still so arrogant as to believe that disafected Tory MPs will defect to his Reform (Party? / Ltd Co ? Is he Leader or Owner? Not sure which it is now.) 
      Unfortunately for us, and the country, he's (or his party/business) just had a massive financial injection from (probably) the world's richest man. Don't expect him to do any great works for ordinary people though... 
      Seriously, donations from foreigners, especially those with a role in another country's government, should not be allowed to make donations to any UK political party or politician. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    There seems to be a totally lack of understanding in what PIP is for if they insist on face to face assessment.  Unless this also includes home visits and online zoom calls.  I could never have got to a face to face meeting being so unwell. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Dolly I've always had face to face PIP assessments. Twice they've come to my home as you can request a home visit.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    It's barely worth worrying about given that they're not even a proper political party, they're a limited company, funded by the extremely wealthy whose sole purpose is to push politics further to the right for their own benefit. They have zero interest in making life better for ordinary people, as evidenced by this dog whistle 'manifesto' The IFS this morning calculated that their 'costings' for all their false promises are out by tens of billions of pounds. Don't even bother.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Aw A failed analysis as no evidence to back up its claims other than costings but as a party they are hardly unique on that!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    A bit of clarity at last those with serious disabilities and long term health conditions be spared assesement no one got a clue about labours policies on welfare...
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 months ago
    The Reform party would be laughable if they were not so dangerous.  If you receive any state help voting for them is like Turkeys voting for Christmas.  I am not Labours greatest fan but to get this lot out I will vote Labour
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 months ago
      @Sandra I knew I would vote in the GE. 
      I believe it is important to use our vote, especially as a woman, where women had to fight so hard, some losing their lives in the struggle to get the right to vote almost 100 yrs ago.
      When the margin between Tory and Labour policies is so narrow, that makes it harder. The LibDems have good policies on health and disability, but I live in a very marginal seat. I voted Labour on that basis. 
      I'm not sure if I would have done, had I felt the election process/system was fair. 
      I think many feel the same way.
      Perhaps it's time we looked at our election system again? The last time we did (under David Cameron), the options offered weren't great - there was no real proportional representation option offered. 

      I'm sure neither of the big parties (Conservative or Labour) would support PR. But, I think it's what we need in order to have a more representative government to bring about more consensual change. 

      Our country has a lot of problems (same as many others)... related to falling birth rate / ageing population, but a huge reluctance on a lot of people's part to accept that if our own population don't have enough kids, we need to get more people here who will! 
      It's as simple as that... or stop all disability / out of work benefits..  or  let people die when they have a heart attack etc...

      A lot of this is political. 
      Hard questions in society generally are. Perhaps I've stated some things pretty starkly. 
      If we don't face facts as a country, it will become  question of priorities 're what calls ambulance crews turn up to...
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 months ago
      @Sandra You have a rather naive view of Labour