A survey for the More in Common non-profit organisation has found that the majority of the public do not support the proposed cuts to personal independence payment (PIP) and believe cost cutting, not getting people back into work, is the main reason for welfare reform.

According to the poll, only 31% of Britons feel that the Government is trying to limit the impact of cuts on vulnerable groups, while 20% think that it is not trying, and 36% think that the Government has actively chosen to target certain vulnerable groups.

54% believe that the cuts to benefits are about saving money with only 32% considering that they are about getting people back into work.

44% of all Britons think that welfare reforms are too harsh, 28% think they are about right and only 10% think they are too soft.  If Labour hope that their welfare cuts will play especially well with Reform voters, they might be disappointed to learn that 41% of Reform voters think they are too harsh, compared to 42% of Labour voters.

When asked about specific PIP descriptors, the public disagree with Labour’s 4 point system.

74% of Britons believe that needing assistance to wash below the waist should automatically qualify someone for disability-related benefits; 72% say the same about needing help to dress their lower body; 70% say the same about needing assistance to get out of the bath or shower.

None of these are 4 point descriptors, so none of them would allow access to the daily living component of PIP.

43% of Britons think that the benefits cuts make Labour appear mean-spirited.

34% of Britons say they know someone on disability benefits and 36% of people who know someone say the proposed reforms have decreased their trust in the Labour Party to manage public finances safely, 36% say it has made no difference and only 15% say the reforms have increased their trust.

Even amongst all Britons, not just those who know a claimant, 30% say the reforms have decreased their trust and only 15% say they have increased their trust.

So, it would seem that in spite of all the bile and hatred below the line on many media websites, the public are less than enthusiastic about benefits cuts - especially for disabled claimants.

You can see a detailed breakdown of the More in Common survey here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    And while I'm here, let's not forget that doing away with social security opens up a multi-£bn private insurance market, plenty of gravy for everyone involved, politicians, the media, everyone. That's all this is about. Greed.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    Sad 54% of the participants think that govt needs to or can save money in a fiat economy. Education in these matters would put so much of this nonsense behind us.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    Cutting/removing pip will decrease work participation and increase costs to national health and local councils.  

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    I can't fit myself into More in commons seven categories, does this skew their work? are they a bit elitist? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 hours ago
    Glad to see a lot of people haven’t fallen for their whole ‘we just want to help people into work!’ gimmick. 

    It’s almost like people are not stupid and if
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 hours ago
    Labour's own polling from this More in Common poll has them on 21%, they're down 13% from the last election and Starmer/Reeves are very unpopular, the problem is the Tories have Badenoch/Stride and Reform has Farage/Tice, all six of them aren't my cup of tea at all, it's hobson's choice.

    This is heartening for me because for a long while now the more conservative leaning press have done attack line after attack line about how much the disabled cost the taxpayers, I'm happy that the public sees through the lies and propaganda. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    This is the reply from my MP:

    Dear ...................

    I do not agree with the Government making savings by cutting welfare support, and I share the serious concerns of campaigners regarding Government plans to reform disability benefits.  

    For this reason, in a debate on Parliament on 4th November 2024, I said: 

    "The commitment to delivering the previously planned savings is more than alarming. The truth is that the way disabled people have been treated by the Department for Work and Pensions since 2010 will go down in history as a terrible and inexcusable crime. There is extensive evidence about the serious harm caused to people subjected to dehumanising assessments and sanctions, including reports of deaths directly related to the social security regime. We need a long-term overhaul of the social security system. It is not fit for purpose. I urge the Government to really look at that in detail going forward.” 

    I understand that under one option reportedly being considered, the Universal Credit (UC) “limited capability for work or work-related activity” category would be abolished, which would require often severely disabled or ill people to make preparations for work. That could see claimants lose about £5,000 a year.

    It has also been widely reported that Ministers intend to scrap the work capability assessment used to approve incapacity benefits and align the system more closely with assessments for personal independence payments (PIP), separate disability benefits that are paid whether or not someone can work.

    In January and April 2024, in support of PIP, I signed numerous Parliamentary motions (#EDM 309; #EDM 678) raising concerns about delays in PIP processing times and calling on the Government to review PIP with the aim of reducing these, while making the system easier and less stressful for claimants.
    (https://edm.parliament.uk/early-day-motion/61799).
    (https://edm.parliament.uk/early-day-motion/62177).

    I am aware that in January 2025, a high court judge found that an official consultation regarding changes to the WCA was ruled unlawful, following a legal challenge by disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC) campaigner Ellen Clifford. The high court said the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) had presented UK-wide incapacity benefit assessment reforms as a way to support disabled people into work without making clear the “primary rationale” of the proposals was cost savings.

    The consultation, which was carried out by the previous Government in Autumn 2023, failed to mention that 424,000 disabled people would see their benefits cut, many losing £416 a month, the judge found.

    I am conscious that documents released to the court also revealed that internal DWP estimates suggested the reforms to the WCA would push 100,000 highly vulnerable disabled people into absolute poverty.

    I do not agree with making welfare savings by cutting welfare support.

    I am only too aware that 14 years of austerity has had a brutal impact on the lives of many disabled people. Research by the Trussell Trust suggests that most food bank users now live in households where somebody is disabled.

    I would have liked the new Government to use the Autumn Budget 2024 to ensure that our social security system works for everyone when they need it.

    It has therefore been clear to me that for many years that the current social security system is not fit for purpose and in many cases actively damaging.

    I note the high proportion of Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) decisions that are overturned at tribunal and am all too conscious that each of the many thousands of incorrect decisions about what support a disabled person should be getting causes real suffering to that person and to their family and friends. There is extensive evidence about the serious harm caused to people subjected to dehumanising assessments and sanctions – and that there are reports of deaths directly related to the social security regime. I support the growing calls for a full transparent independent inquiry into these deaths and for all the information to be released to the public accordingly.

    That is why, in December 2024 and February 2025, I tabled questions asking about whether a public enquiry would be conducted into the deaths and serious harms arising out of the social security system.
    (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-12-16/20272)
    (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2025-02-26/33991)

    I have also tabled multiple written questions to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, enquiring into the assessment process for PIP and mandatory reconsideration request data. You can find their answers here.
    (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2022-03-31/151298)
    (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2022-03-31/151297)
    (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2022-03-31/151296).

    I have tabled numerous questions to the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, enquiring into the impact social security reforms have had on vulnerable communities (https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2024-12-16/20273).

    I strongly believe that it should be the new Government’s priority to address these wrongs.

    It is my view that protecting access to benefits ensures that society maintains a basic standard of living for everyone.

    You can see another one my spoken contributions in Parliament, from February 2022, in support of the need for a social security system that provides a safety net for people with disabilities.
    (https://x.com/ApsanaBegumMP/status/1900889599058047474)

    I can confirm that a member of my staff was able to attend the Scope Parliamentary event on 2nd April 2025 where they were able to gather information about the financial impacts of disability cuts and changes, and listen to the stories of disabled people affected.

    I pay tribute to disabled activists – such as of Z2K, Black Triangle, WOW campaign, disabled People Against Cuts (DPAC), and others – who have spent years campaigning for disabled people’s rights.

    Thank you again for raising this important issue with me.

    Yours sincerely, 

    ...............
    .........................

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    It annoys me intensely that pip is so much now in the conversation about work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    Oh that comment was cut short..
    When we are bombarded with constant changes beyond our control. It's a witch hunt,and sadly WE are the accused.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    I wish the general public knew the pain and suffering in our hearts, the physical and mental pain that comes with fighting and fighting the system. The hardship and worry on top of our already fragile health that spirals us down further,that adds to the pressure and exacerbates our terrible health and disabilities. How do we ever even try to get better when we are bombarded with constant changes beyond our control. It's a witch hunt. And sadly we are the accused.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    Only 43% ? I find that to be on the low side, i''m sure it in reality is higher.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    Benefits and work - can I forward this to my obstinate MP?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    I’m glad that for once, this is getting coverage - all the cuts the last 10 years all that stress, it felt like no one cared. But the more noise we make the better. 

    These cuts will kill and cause unimaginable suffering. Labour “for the many, not the few” seem to have forgotten their own catchphrase. 

    On top of that, they won’t get more people into work and they won’t save money - just raise bills for the NHS etc. 

    I suppose I was naive to believe that Labour would actually help us - 10 years of suffering and Labour come along, say nothing to ease fears for the better part of a year - then announce cuts that are openly discriminatory - affecting the human rights of so many, it’s difficult not to feel worthless right now. But I’ll fight these to my last breath, and that may just be what it costs - I can’t see how I’ll survive this. 

    (I have chronic pain that could kill me, and I’m on higher daily and standard mobility - I score no more than 2 points on any task for daily)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    Thanks Benefits and Work team!

    The kind of people expressing hatred online are the same types who don't listen to, or believe in facts. They are unreasonable and irrational tur*s.

    Don't let their comments get you down folks. The public is with us!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    Has anybody recently recieved their pip uprating letters yet? How many working days do they normally take? My appointee had to call up to chase it up yesterday they told the appointee it had been printed and processed on march 21st.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @John Doe Pip uprating letter dated March 19th received March 29th 2025.

      Fingers crossed you will receive your letter this week. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @John Doe I had mine last week dated 19, my sister had her today dated 20th. They’re on their way lovely. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @Neil Strange mine was dated 21st and still hasnt arrived and im getting quite desperate for mine.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @James When was it dated?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @John Doe Had mine last week, letter was dated 20/03/25
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.