Many thanks to everyone who has so far completed our survey on your experience of transferring from  child DLA to PIP, there’s still time to take part if you haven’t already.

A very high proportion of responses are from parents of children who are neurodivergent and/or have a learning disability and one of the standout results so far is that there is a huge variation in the quality of assessments that young people experience on moving to PIP.

For some, the assessment is a positive experience.

“I had a really good assessor who listened very well to my daughters complex needs and actually explained some to me, as being part of her autism, signposted me where to get help for sensory issues regarding food intake. As a result of their knowledge and help, my daughter has now been diagnosed with AFRID and seeing a dietician. It’s not all bad with the assessments.”

“The dwp staff were different than they are with adults, not sure if this is usual but they seemed less jaded and more empathetic.”

“I felt the assessor ( who was training ) was empathetic First one ever to appear genuine.”

Sometimes however, even though the assessment is a positive experience, the results are still dubious:

“I requested an in-person assessment, which was offered, and it was very effective. The assessor was able to tell from my daughter's body language and facial expression when she didn't understand what she had been asked. The assessor then waited patiently or rephrased the question or asked me. So I was very happy that the in-person assessment was available. I requested the assessor's report promptly, just in case an appeal might be needed. It was quite carelessly written and inaccurate throughout. My daughter was given points she shouldn't have had, while being denied points she should have had for other tasks. If it weren't for some identifying details in the report, I would have thought they'd mixed her report up with someone else's! The inaccuracies balanced each other out and the level of the award was fair, so I didn't need to challenge it.”

And some members didn’t have to have an assessment at all:

“The decision maker called me and clarified about my sons transport to school and lack of independent travel and contacted his specialist adhd nurse which avoided the need for assessment which i was grateful for.”

“We weren't required to have an assessment. They called me and said we had done their job for them in what we had submitted and I am pretty sure that wasn't me but son's OT who was very clear in her statement of support - even without clinical reasoning. I was asked an additional question about food prep and something else that I forget, but it was less than 10 minutes and they said it wasn't necessary to do a proper assessment.”

But for others, the assessment was a dire experience:

“It would’ve helped if the paramedic assessor hadn’t asked if she put bilateral hearing aids in one ear!”

“The initial assessment was by a physiotherapist who decided that because the young person wasn't on medication or under the hospital there was no issues. She deemed eating a dry pot noodle as him being able to make a meal The second and third assessors discounted his education needs as he was at a main stream  college despite evidence he was in a SEND hub and still not coping. He was eventually assessed before tribunal by a4th person who awarded higher care and mobility. Unfortunately mum lost her carers allowance and housing benefit whilst awaiting a decision which caused a lot of stress.”

“Would’ve helped if the assessor actually assessed my son based upon his conditions, rather than asking questions that have no relevance. Upon asking for the PA4, the assessor wrote completely different conditions and medications etc on this, it was like it was someone else’s report!”

We were pleased to see that a lot of respondents had found the Benefits and Work resources helpful:

“The resources a good ‘tick list’ to make sure everything has been covered. And I knew to repeat myself, when needed, yet again, in each different section on the PIP form.”

“Brilliant resource”

I found everything very helpful. You seem to have covered everything I needed to know.

“I used the Benefits and Work Guides for help with my son’s first Mandatory Reconsideration, even to the extent of using some of the wording suggested regarding possible telephone contact to dissuade people from continuing with the process and, as this was successful, I felt it must have been beneficial.”

“In preparation for my son’s PIP review a couple of years ago, I purchased the Benefits & Work training package, so felt better equipped to face the process a second time. He was awarded PIP this time, but at a lower level, so I again requested an M/R, which was unsuccessful. With encouragement from the Moderators and other members of the forum, we moved on to appeal and were successful when someone at a more senior level reviewed the tribunal submission and evidence – again, I believe this was due to the supersession rules, which I would not have known about but for information from B & W’s legal expert. Knowing I had the support of other members was what gave me the confidence to continue, but one of the things I feel is most important about B & W is that it is a subscription service and (so far as I am aware) does not rely on funding from any other organisation. Therefore, it has no loyalty to anyone other than its members, so we can be confident B & W will always act in our best interests.”

“It was at this stage of the process that I first discovered B& W and became a member, so that I had access to the detailed information contained in the guides and began to understand that DLA and PIP are very different benefits.”

Unfortunately it’s clear that not everyone who makes the transfer discovers Benefits and Work before doing so:

“I didn't know of the guides then but it would have helped in a highly stressful time. I had spoken to other parents in a monthly support group but they had no idea either.”

So, there’s still work to do on letting people know we are here as well as making sure that members helping their child make the move are as well informed as they possibly can be.

If you have any experiences or insights you would like to share, please complete our brief survey.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    Turn Streeting into a cul de sac, cut off his options.....as it were, he is a really nasty piece of work. Erm.. given what has been said here what is happening to those of us on Lcwra who haven't had an assessment by now diver still need pip daily living in order to keep our soon to be renamed Lcwra award then?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 hours ago
      @Frances Awaiting a pip tribunal slot and hoping I get one, basically 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @Frances Thanks for your clarity, Frances 🙏 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @Neil (real one) Yes
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @Neil (real one)
      Honestly I think this is all at the planning stage, nothing decided. The government has had a lot of ideas without plotting the route to implementation. The findings of the Timms review will be an early indication of the mood on welfare, then proposals will be debated and legislation will follow as parliament allows. We just have to stand by to raise our objections at the appropriate time, which cannot be until we know what we face.

      Anyone who feels they would qualify for a benefit or an enhanced award might be well advised to get on with a claim now.

      As you are waiting on an appeal hearing, Neil, you can only shore up your evidence and be prepared. Good luck!

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    So what would secondary legislation mean? What can they pass and what can't they? After reading your comments i feel extremely anxious as from what you're saying the Government would be able to pass whatever they want. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @Mike. Secondary legislation enables alterations to the regulations the primary legislation gave the secretary of state the power to create. For disability benefits this is generally the descriptors and points and assessment process and frequency of reassessment, and specific health conditions or circumstances being treated as presumed to give eligibility and arguably not give eligibility.

      Secondary legislation gets announced in parliament. Which is seen as a rubber stamp exercise. Although in theory parliament has so many days to object to the changes. A objection gets a yes/no vote on the change to secondary legislation without debate. If no wins the changes are stopped. This hardly ever or never happens.

      The courts can strike down secondary legislation if it is no in accordance with the intent of parliament when it passed the primary legislation. To determine that intent the court looks at the parliamentary briefing papers and parliamentary debates before the votes in parliament that passed the primary legislation, and the wording of the primary legislation. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @Anon That was an amazing explanation, it really helped me, thank you so much for taking the time. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Mike. Apologies Like You I am feeling anxious and stressed if anything changes but secondary legislation introduced by the Government can be challenged via the courts.

      "Yes, courts can strike down (quash) secondary legislation. While courts cannot strike down primary legislation (Acts of Parliament), they can invalidate secondary legislation—such as Statutory Instruments—if it is deemed ultra vires (beyond the powers authorised by the parent Act), irrational, or in breach of the Human Rights Act 1998." Hope this helps 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ckgplx9vzq2o

    Obviously if we change leaders this kings speech is null and void but I checked the 124page kings speech and their is no welfare bill included.

    This could mean one of 2 things:

    1) Starmer gov don’t plan to introduce another welfare reform bill (pip reforms) till the next kings speech so summer 2027 earliest

    2) Starmer gov plans to only use secondary legislation for welfare reforms (I think only primary legislation/bills has to be included in the kings speech)


    The cynic in me thinks Starmers gov will pick option 2 - welfare reforms are highly controversial and waiting to summer 2027 to introduce it (a max of 2yrs before the next GE has to be held) is at best cutting it fine, at worse another rebellion/backlash like in summer 2025 could do repairable damage to labours chances in that election. Secondary legislation allows them avoid gov scrutiny and my bet is the gov will publish this secondary legislation bill in autumn/winter 2026
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @D The government is not restricted to only introducing primary legislation mentioned in the King's speech. The government can introduce primary legislation not in the King's speech. The issue is parliamentary time allotted. Primary legislation not in the King's speech is likely to be fast tracked through parliament. Which Starmer would want to do anyway. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @D "Ministers have said primary legislation would follow the Timms Review and Milburn Review, with findings expected later this summer and autumn."
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @D I think your right.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @D We could have Wes Streeting as Pm and he's keen on Welfare Cuts.

Free, Fortnightly PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

News, Coupons, Campaigns, Feedback.

Over 140,000 claimant and professional subscribers.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.