The proportion of personal independence payment (PIP) awards that are increased as the result of a planned review has plummeted threefold in the space of two years, with a particularly steep drop in the most recent quarter.  There is no obvious explanation for this fall and it is hidden in official DWP statistics, which only give a five year rolling average.

Fewer than one in fifteen planned review claimants saw an increase in their award in the latest quarter for which figures are available – November 2025 to January 2026 - falling from around one in ten for the same period last year and around one in five for the same period two years ago.

In the last five years, the percentage of awards that have been increased as a result of a planned review has never fallen below 10%, except for two months: July 2025 when it fell to 8.33% and November 2024 when the figure was 9.9%.

Yet in the most recent quarter for which statistics have been provided, all three months saw increases for fewer than 10% of planned award reviews:

Nov  7.93%

Dec  5.41%

Jan  5.99%

This gives an average over the quarter of 6.44% of claimants getting an increase.

The same quarter last year (Nov 24 to Jan 25), saw 10.16% of claimants get an increase in their awards.

For the year before (Nov 23 to Jan 24), the figure was 20.9%.

Overall, changes to the results of planned award reviews have been very marked over the last two years, with a strong increase in the percentage of awards that stay the same and a much smaller percentage of winners and losers.

In the latest quarter, 3.34% of claimants got a lower award, 3.56% last year and 8.6% the year before that.

And in the latest quarter 78.2% of claimants got the same award following a planned review, 76.3% a year before and 53.2% two years before.

Yet none of this is apparent from the official quarterly PIP statistics.  Because the DWP only give a five year rolling average, their latest statistics for planned award reviews show (our figures are in brackets):

Award increased  15% (latest quarter actually 6.4%)

Award maintained 63% (latest quarter actually 78.2%)

 Award decreased  6%  (latest quarter actually 3.34%)

On the positive side, this means planned award reviews are becoming less risky for claimants.  If the current rates continue, almost eight out of ten will see their award unchanged and only one in thirty will get a lower award.

But many claimants have conditions that deteriorate over time.  And many of those claimants would rather wait for a planned award review than risk upsetting things by requesting a change of circumstances review, even when they believe they should now be entitled to a higher rate of PIP.

There has been no change in the law that would account for the fall in increased awards.  Nor has there been any change in publicly available guidance for assessors or decision makers that would account for it. But, unquestionably, something has changed to account for such a significant and continued fall.

All statistics were obtained from the DWPs Stat-Xplore tool

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    Why no article on the disgusting words coming from the Tony Blair Institute and what could really  be being them?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    The review stats might include the mass reviews done by the DWP to correct errors in how PIP was assessed. After the DWP has lost legal cases. That resulted in large numbers of claimants getting their awards increased. That would explain the higher award increased figures from previous years. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    Many of us would rather wait till our review than a change of circumstances sure. 
    But with the timms review due in the autumn and the gov probably using secondary legislation to rush things through with little scrutiny (plus we’d streeting commissioned study and the recent Tony Blair institute study heavily hinting that the gov may try and exclude mental health/neurodivergent conditions from qualifying for pip) and rumours that backbenchers standing against cuts last summer have now shifted opinion to align with the gov warped view many of us may not have that luxury.
    Triggering a change of circumstance to hasten a pip assessment rather than wait for a review is an unnecessary risk but being a guinea pig for the likely cut criteria incoming from the timms review recommendation is beyond catastrophic for many existing pip claimants.

    Providing the dwp don’t change the rules halfway through the review/reassessment process it wouldn’t surprise me if a number of claimants with 18months or less trigger an early reassessment of pip over the summer (with 11 months left on my current pip award that’s what I’m considering doing - my reviews have up till now started 13 months before end date so this wait is making me very nervous)
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.