Claimants who had a face-to-face personal independence payment (PIP) assessment last year were almost a quarter less likely to get an award than claimants who had a telephone or video assessment, figures released by the DWP have revealed.

The statistics were given in a written parliamentary answer by DWP disability minister Stephen Timms.

They show that over the last three years the gap between face-to-face assessments and telephone/video assessment success rates has been growing, rising from 11% in 2022 to 13% in 2024.  The full figures are:

  • 2022  Face-to-face: 42% Telephone, video: 53%
  • 2023  Face-to-face: 44% Telephone, video: 56%
  • 2024  Face-to-face: 44% Telephone, video: 57%

The difference in success rates does not appear to be explained by, for example, by the DWP inviting people who have less severe conditions face-to-face assessments, because allocation to assessment types appears to be largely random.

According to Timms, where claimants need a specific type of assessment, such as a telephone assessment because of difficulties with travelling, then they will be allocated that.

But all other claimants will get the next available appointment, regardless of whether that is face-to-face, telephone or video. 

Part of the difference in success rates may be the opportunity to for assessors to undermine claims with baseless “informal observations” at a face-to-face assessment, such as:

“Is tanned.  Suggests good health.

Overweight.  Suggests good appetite.

Smartly dressed.  Suggests good drive.”

In November 2024, the latest statistics we have for assessment types:

77% of assessments were remote, either telephone or video, but overwhelmingly these were telephone

18% were paper

4% were face-to-face

1% were unspecified

So the chances of having a face to face assessment have been small since the pandemic. 

However, Timms has also revealed that the proportion of face-to-face assessments is set to rise from Autumn of this year, so the risk will increase in the coming months.

As a method of reducing the number of successful claims and cutting the cost of PIP, switching to more face-to-face assessments appears to be an effective strategy.  It also requires no legislation whatsoever.

But claimants can ask to have  their assessment type changed, for example because travelling to an assessment centre for a face-to-face assessment would be painful or distressing.

The right to a review of the type of assessment you are allocated and the right to a further review are explained at pages 105-107 of our member’s Guide to PIP Claims and Reviews, along with sample written requests for a change of assessment type.

We have also updated the section of the guide headed “What kind of assessment will you have?”  at page 103, to inform readers about the different success rates for different types of assessment.

Members can download the current Guide to PIP Claims and Reviews here.

You can read the full parliamentary question and answer here.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    Most Assesment Failed because The assesors are unaware of certain medical issues and Never is there Report!! In Favour of The Claiment!! I Hope Everybody Appeals!! If they are not Treated Properly!! The Dwp!! Cannot be Trusted Anymore theres too Much Damage thats Been Done!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    The whole assessment process is designed to fail claimants, current and new. I distinctly remember TV reports of severely disabled children who were deemed well enough even though they clearly could not be left unsupervised at any time and yet, the assessor decided that they looked well enough...
    I was also told as functioning well became when they did the assessment at my home, they saw my many books (they are never ever setting foot at home!), and that's even though I clearly looked unwell and could not string a sentence together. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Yes I definitely think that’s right! If you read my medical records it’s crazy how many health professionals have said wow, from looking at you I wouldn’t even realise what you had going on.

    I think having a telephone appointment helped the assessor concentrate on my actual health rather than the image I portray.  Some illnesses are hidden and we hide them well. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Budgie I agree. I have Addisons disease and part of my lung removed as well as mental health issues. Looking at me you would have no clue. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    The government is writing its list for Santa, bit of this, bit of that, bit more with bells on as they get carried away. But you haven't been good girls and boys, have you, Keir, Angela, Rachel, Liz? You haven't been kind, you haven't shared, you haven't been honest, you haven't helped old ladies and oh, you really haven't done your homework. What is more, we are well placed to tell you, there is no Santa. Maybe you'll get a sour dry orange in your stocking, more than most of us, just not what you wanted.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    An assessor once wrote I looked well nourished because I was over weight to look at.  

    The truth was I have fybromyalgia so exercise was limited and I also have an eating disorder so I only ate chocolate and sweet things.  

    My gp had written in my notes after blood tests that I was malnourished and needed extra vitamin type pulls for 3 ro 6 months with a review and possible further intervention.  

    Once I sent that printout to dwp my points increased 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Jaxjax @jaxjax, a radiologist asked me when I was in for a scan after a hip fracture whether I was sure I had osteoporosis, as if I had self diagnosed and requested a scan myself! I said a scan after a previous fracture had indicated I did and she said, oh, you don't look the type. And that's not even a dwp assessor, but a specialist clinician. What can we do when the prejudice is everywhere?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    OK. I just looked at the Peston programme from last night. There were some "leaked figures" on there, and I'm going to try to explain them as best as I can.

    According to the programme, the £810 that we receive for LCWRA UC would go down to either £737 or £664. That's a potential loss of either £73 or £143 a month, depending on which amoutn they go for. Nobody wants to lose £143 a month, of course, but that appears to be the worst case figure. However, it WOULD also mean that there would be a modest increase for those on LCW and basic rate - either £32 or £63 a month.

    NB: Peston talked of 25% and 50% "redistribution." This is not the same as 25% and 50% cuts. For those interested in percentage cuts, they would be 9% of the total of £810 for being in LCWRA or 17%.

    As for PIP, the show suggested that it wouldn't increase with inflation this year, and they would bring in a new set of descriptors with the aim to remove 620,000 people from PIP - out of a current total of 5 million - by the end of the parliament. That's a reduction of 12% of claimants.

    HOWEVER, (and this is my own view, not facts from Peston) the chances of them applying the UC cut to people already on the benefit would be slim. Much of this is to do with the transition protection from ESA to UC. They sold that migration as us not losing any money when we transferred - it is in writing that we will get the same as we got on ESA. If they change that by cutting our UC benefit, someone is bound to take them to court, and there's little doubt that they would win, as they would be breaking the "deal" that we had when we migrated.

    I realise not everyone is (or has been) involved in migration, but I think it's easy to see how difficult it would be to work the new amounts for those already on UC. Headlines in the newspapers of  disabled claimants suddently being stripped of up to £1700 a year would not be pretty. What's more, we can look at the past to see what might happen in the future. In 2017, £160 was taken away from those in the LCW group. BUT if you were already in that group when the change happened, you continued to get that money (and still do). It only applied to new claimants.

    What they could do in a worst case scenario, I guess, is not give those currently on UC any yearly increases until they hit the revised amount (similar to the transition payment), but that's going to be one hell of a lot of admin.

    The Peston show maintains that the figures they gave last night are correct - but nothing has been announced officially. Yes, these figures were leaked, but even the show admitted that they don't know whether LCWRA UC will be cut by £73 or £143 a month. And often political leaks occur in order to gauge what the reaction is from the public and the press before making final decisions. But it's probably fair to suggest that this is a worst case scenario.

    Feel free to correct me on any of the above if I've misinterpreted what was said on the programme.  I hope the above is useful.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Matt Can I ask why you would think this?  My next review date for PIP would be October 2027. I can't see how they can just take money away from people already on PIP now, especially for mental health claimants only.  Their statements on this are so vague though, it makes it seem like they will, scaring everyone when they know they are doing it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @SLB Thanks, very helpful.  From what you have mentioned, those currently on PIP will be left alone for some time (although rates will be frozen from next year) until it's time to be reassessed when (I assume) there will be stricter eligibility tests to continue to receive PIP.

      The other major way I can see the Government doing to save money is to stop those who reach pension age who are already receiving PIP from getting PIP after state pension age and being moved to Attendance/Carers Allowance
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @SLB Good news then
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @SLB Thank you for this SLB
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 14 hours ago
    Many of you will notice how the DWP and the current labour government have been throwing out graphs and predictions of the increase in cost of PIP year on year all the way to 2029. You see only one set of figures however, what you do not see is the year on year increase in tax revenues nor the increase in Gross Domestic Product (GDP) on it which would show as a percentage of these the forecasts are in keeping with the growth in revenues and the growth in GDP. This method of costing year on year without taking into account inflation, devaluation of money, and increase in government income through revenues and increase in GDP mislead one into thinking the only thing rising is the cost of welfare and PIP. The government is producing propaganda by slanting facts and misleading people into disregarding other important financial factors. I saw a BBC article today doing exactly the same and yet there are no journalists questioning these basic economic variables worth their salt!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @James Their is no growth
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @James Not really the case. The figures are mostly to do with the amount of claimants - which shouldn't rise with inflation.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 hours ago
    Off topic, but does anyone know how long the saving limits have been £6,000 and £16,000? I came across a post on another forum dating back to 2008 mentioning these amounts - which is helluva time.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @WorkshyLayabout The savings limits of £6,000 and £16,000 for means-tested benefits, which determine eligibility and payment amounts, have been in place since 1990 and haven't changed since then. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @WorkshyLayabout
      According to  r/BenefitsAdviceUK on Reddit

      Capital Limits were introduced in 1988, 6k was the max. 3k was the lower limit which is today's money is £8,186.77 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @SLB I beleive you can request twice monthly payments in UC 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @WorkshyLayabout Probably c 1997 when Blair became PM. They should be increased (but won't) just as the Govt will not increase tax thresholds (known as fiscal drag)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @WorkshyLayabout I don't know, but considering the arrival of UC can result in £1500 or more hitting your bank account in one go, not to mention PIP falling around the same time for part of the year, it doesn't take much to go over £6000  at certain points in the month.  And that's without mentioning people are applying for the first time (or being moved into a higher group) getting a huge back payment due to delays in making decisions. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    Just like tom from Scotland I have Autism and I have epilepsy and cerebral palsy in my lower back.  so I can’t work . I get pip feel it will be bad for all disabled people let’s be honest liz kendell doesn’t come across as someone who likes disabled people. Everyone try to have a nice week 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @Tomf @Tomf -  'liz kendell doesn’t come across as someone who likes disabled people'

      Ha, ha, you think?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    Glad to see there's been at least some kickback against the cuts in the media.

    Btw, just to remind everyone that despite misinformation being spread by the government and media spending on social security is actually less today in terms of share of GDP than it was 10 years ago. Also the forecasted raise in PIP spending by the DWP/OBR is highly dubious as it seems to assume continuation of covid pandemic level rises despite that being essentially a one off event.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @bert
      Which specific government forecasts are you referring to? Seems you're including pensions and housing benefit here which take up the vast majority of total benefit spending. Actual specific working age UK social security spending (which includes unemployment benefit along with sickness & disability) is just 5% of GDP! This is noticeably lower than many comparable OECD nations. The UK is not spending "too much" on sickness and disability.

      And as I've said above there are significant problems re those gov forecasts on benefit spending anyway.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @Gawayn I observed this over 10 years ago that as a percentage of GDP welfare spending has been falling and the same with as a percent of the tax revenues. There is also the surplus from NI taxes and Personal Taxes which is used to generate bonds and to add insult to injury the 1-2% earned in interest from those bonds are then used to off set the so called debt burden, a burden that is artificially created by setting taxes too low and hence the need to borrow and pay the banks that interest. There is something really rotten going on in the Kingdoms of Britain!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @Gawayn Isnt the benefit bill long term expected to account for one in every four pounds the government raises in taxs.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 hours ago
    If you have a physical disability that affects your mobility or similar, just by you attending a f2f assessment you have failed in their eyes, I failed both f2f home visit when they did them, and phone, 
    the 1st time I had to got too tribunal to get an award , and the current claim I was made an offer b4 tribunal
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    If this doesn't only apply to new claimants then I am in real trouble. I've been this way for just over 30 yrs, people can't be expected to suddenly be ok especially after a period of time as long as that 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    I hope it's new claimants only or I won't be able to afford new batteries for my mobility scooter and I'll be stuck in my flat as a result 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Charger 7 There is no indication this will apply to new claimants yet.  And your sentence does not make sense as those already receiving PIP will not be affected by what you quoted, which is taking money off those who can't work and giving it to those who can (Universal Credit.)  It has been said PIP will be revamped but historically, this has only been for new claimants and existing claimants only when their claim comes up for renewal. We will have to wait and see, there is a thread about this above
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Neil Cook It's everybody Neil new and old claimants it's says people who are already receiving Pip could be affected by taking money off people who can't work but giving extra who work or look for work and that Pip will be revamped 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    is it definitely next Wednesday when Reeves will announce the cuts?  I'm free and would like to watch BBC Parliament.  I do think we, as a disabled group, need to come up with practical solutions the issue of employment because whoever is in power are only interested in tax receipts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Matt No, it’ll be on the 26th March when she does the spring statement. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 hours ago
    The most severe changes Labour wants to enact are going to court, surely "Mr Human Rights Lawyer" Keir Starmer has figured that out? It would be a terrible look for the former head of the CPS to have his plans to brutally cut benefits seen as unlawful. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    It is worth reminding everyone that the Tories cut £156 a month from those in the LCW group of UC back in 2017.  BUT if you were put in that group BEFORE 2017, you STILL get that £156 a month now, in 2025.  

    Using that as a precedent, any new cuts to the amount of PIP or UC would likely only apply to NEW applicants rather than current claimants.  Alternatively, they could work it in a similar way to transitional payments from ESA to UC.  It is highly unlikely that current claimants are going to have cuts of hundreds or thousands each year.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Steve Correct. It may not effect us initially, but come reassessment, the new deductions (if there is any) WILL apply. And, thet are ramping up UC health assessments ti get it back to pre covid levels, so we will ALL see reductions withing the next couple if years, even if not immediately.

      All reassessments, whether ESA, UC or PIP are treat as new claims upon reassessment, which means new payment levels after review. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @Steve Errr...how exactly do you suggest we reject plans?  It's not like we can go on strike, is it?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @Steve  People on LCW are still getting the £150 that was ditched in 2017.  So clearly if you stay in the same group after reassessment, you don't lose the money.  Likewise, those moving from ESA to UC are keeping their current rates, and will do if they are reassessed and stay in the same group.   The PIP reassessment form isn't the same as the initial form, it concentrates on changes to the condition, and doesn't start from scratch.  But it's unlikely PIP will be cut anyway, beyond freezing the amount going forward.  Also proposed changes to the WCA were not going to apply to current claimants going reassessed for some years.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 hours ago
      @slb PIP is fixed term benefit for the most of claimants and before it ends, DWP sends a renewal and treats it as a new claim and I think the same rules apply to Universal Credit.
      So existed claimants are going to face the same fate as new claimants.
      All we need to do is to be united against these cuts rejecting any plans that damages disabled lives.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    If they are wanting people with long term mental health issues to get off benefits and get a job they are doing it wrong, all this talk has made me so much worse and even further away from ever being able to do as much as volunteer
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Jaxjax I may be ok with working from home as my skills would lend themselves to that (ie work mostly based around computer literacy/editing skills.) For the many whose whole careers have been in construction or retail, to expect them to work from home would be totally unrealistic.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @axab43 Spot on ! These lot will have blood on their hands if they force mentally ill people into jobs and an environment they can't handle. I was raped , contracted HIV and I self harm and have bulimia,  I have bad days and VERY bad days,  I'd be a liability for a potential employer 
      I just hope and pray that Labour realise this is cruel and unsustainable 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Sam Same as me Sam, I self harm and have bulimia and all this worry has made me cut and burn myself more ! The stress and fear we are all facing - I wouldn't wish it on anyone 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @axab43 They may well look at working from home.  Or flexitime type things.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @Sam Yes, me too! THey are pushing people with mental health who will not react well to all of this and make it all worse. Whatever they say, they can't push people who can't function in a work placed environment to suddenly be able to function in a work placed environment. Can't make people well mentally when they are ill.  It is stupid.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I am disabled and I have autism spectrum and am half fortunate is that I am in Scotland and so might only slightly be affected by these cruel cuts being proposed by the UK Government . I feel for those that live in England an my moral conscience that I cannot sleep at night as my concern has always been  to think for those less fortunate than myself. I wish I could work but I cant due to my disabilities and I feel ashamed that I cannot do anymore to stand up for those disabled financially worse off than myself. My heart goes out to every disabled person that might be impacted by these cuts. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Tom I think it is likely that the Scottish government will reduce ADP by a comparable amount as they will receive a reduced block grant from the UK government to cover welfare payments. I live in Scotland and expect to be impacted to the same degree as the rest of the UK. ESA and UC are not devolved. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Tom Some will consider moving to Scotland especially thoses who are living in the North.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I imagine so John 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Well it's seems pretty obvious to me that Starmer, Reeves and Kendall are effectively throwing benefit claiments under a bus. I can't actually believe what I'm hearing and reading about these benefit cuts. Why not go after the billionaire and millionaires instead of taking money off people like us who are getting barely enough money to live on in the first place.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Matt Maybe it's time to limit how much money can be taken out of the country like many other countries have laws against doing so.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @CJA They are doing this because they have no ideas as to how to make the economy grow, invest, or do all the normal things a government does to achieve economic growth. Instead they have managed to contract the economy and reduced government revenue because of their own self inflicted tax freeze and so have little room except to attack money spent on the welfare of the disabled and sick. They took about unsustainable but seem to forget rather conveniently that this increase in the baby boomers population will actually start coming down once the boomers have died off. The spin words to us thinking we are not educated or bright enough to understand things. They try to split the working classes into segments so that they can attack our disabled and sick children, grandparents, and family making them into a scape goat. They are also putting in place things that will affect every single now working man and woman when they fall sick and disabled as they will being after all humans. This is the most disgusting and low attack on the people of the country while pandering to the rich and privileged to become even more richer. If this is not corruption and lack of genuine good government then I don't know what is!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @CJA Because, unfortunately, billionaires can move their money out of the country at the touch of a button and take it to a tax haven, eg Panama. And if you have money, you have power.