Benefits and Work has published a supplementary guide for carers of young people on DLA who are being reassessed  for PIP, as our research highlights the huge variations in success rates.  Claiming PIP is not like claiming DLA and being fully prepared for the unfamiliar processes and award criteria can make a real difference to the outcome.  

Overall results

DWP statistics for young DLA claimants being reassessed for PIP over the last five years show that, overall:

  • 62.8% received a higher award.
  • 11.8% received the same award.
  • 4.7% received a lower award.
  • 20.7% received no PIP award.

So, almost two thirds of young people moving from DLA to PIP get a higher award – but one in five get no PIP at all. 

A higher award is one where the young person’s PIP award is worth more money than their DLA award.  (These figures only include initial PIP claims, they do not include appeals or repeat applications).

However, the variation in success rates based on health conditions is particularly striking. 

For each DLA award, the DWP record the main disabling condition.  Where a young person has more than one disability or health condition the DWP decide which health condition they consider to be the main disabling one.

This is where the huge differences show up.

Lower awards

At one extreme, a shocking 85% of young people with diabetes get no award of PIP at all when they move from DLA.

And 61% of young people with cystic fibrosis also get no award.

For asthma, 47% get no award and 13% get a lower award, leaving 60% worse off.

For epilepsy, 25% get a lower award and 20% get no award, meaning 45% are worse off.  On the other hand 48% get a higher award, meaning that only 7% remained in the same position.

Higher awards

The majority of young people are better-off as a result of being reassessed for PIP.

So, 73% of young people whose main disabling condition was listed by the DWP as learning difficulties got a higher award. 

However, learning difficulties for DLA can cover a very wide range of issues, including Down’s syndrome,  fragile X syndrome, autism and Rett disorder.

Unfortunately, much of the DWP’s conditions terminology is outdated and some categories are very broad.  You can see a detailed list, with explanations, of DLA health conditions here.

There are similar, though slightly less pronounced, results for:

  • Blindness: 65.4% higher award
  • Behavioral Disorder (broad DWP category including eating disorders and conduct disorders): 65.1% higher
  • Hyperkinetic Syndrome (largely corresponds to ADHD): 65.0% higher
  • Deafness: 62.1% higher
  • Psychosis (DWP term covering depressive disorder, bipolar affective disorder, other mood disorders): 58.9% higher
  • Psychoneurosis (umbrella category for a wide range of anxiety, stress-related and other non-psychotic mental health conditions): 58.7% higher

You can see a full chart of DLA to PIP reassessment outcomes here.

DLA to PIP guide

Our 36 page supplementary guide is aimed at parents and carers supporting young people through the move from DLA to PIP.

The guide gives a clear overview of the whole process, so that you can safely navigate your way through the different stages leading to a PIP award.

It also highlights important differences between the two benefits, including:

  • PIP is based on a points system
  • The idea of the “average child” is no longer relevant
  • Day and night don’t matter anymore
  • Aids are assessed very differently
  • Supervision is harder to get awards for
  • Medical assessments play a much larger role

Case studies are used to show how these differences work in practice.

In addition, the supplementary guide looks at the PIP activities that can be most challenging when making the move from DLA and clearly sets out how to approach explaining your child’s difficulties.  Activities covered include:

  • Preparing food
  • Managing therapy and monitoring a health condition
  • Engaging with other people face to face
  • Making budgeting decisions
  • Planning and following journeys

There’s also a valuable section on how evidence from schools, colleges and apprenticeships can be used to help make the correct award more likely.

Many thanks to Keely Gabriel for creating the new guide.

Members can download a copy of “Child DLA to PIP Reassessments – A supplementary guide for those supporting young people” from this page.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 days ago

    Given how low out of work benefits are this would cause destitution.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    The Tony Blair Institute for Global Change has released another insights report "The Opportunity Bargain: The Hard Choices Britain Can’t Duck on NEETs".

    According to the Tony Blair Institute the solution is apparently for most of those aged under 25 with mental health conditions and neurological developmental conditions. To instead of providing PIP cash benefits, to fund treatment targeted at the underlying health need. And instead of providing UC health cash benefits, to fund treatment, training, work experience and employment support.

    And for all young people to increase work experience at school and college and for the unemployed. Freeze the minimum wage for those aged under 20. Extend the use of apprenticeships to entry level jobs. So jobs that presumably require little or no training get to pay people the lower apprentice minimum wage. Reduce employers national insurance for employing those under 25. Reduce workers rights especially protection against unfair dismissal for those aged under 25. So making young people more attractive to employers. Employers presumably looking for free work experience labour or cheap workers they can sack at whim.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @JBob1234 Blair should really learn how to kind his own business he is so out of touch it ain't funny, how would he like to live how some of us do, in fact Blair put your money where your mouth is and try our life out for 23 months and see how you like it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @JBob1234 The Institute missed out house, feed, clothe and keep them clean and warm affordably on the wages paid.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    Last October I was migrated to UC I get the health part and pip, but it seems I’m on ESA still paid from ESA but not from UC my rent is covered and so is my housing benefit. They know i had savings caused by dwp arrears. So after going back and forwards they were taking money off my health benefits. After a fourth visit with bank statements. The woman on the desk was being obnoxious said she would give statements the decision maker like she had threatened me with them, also my earlier 1st visit to a different job centre seen all my evidence including the proof I was back paid in 2022 but put it in an isa. Both of these decision makers allowed me to disregard the saved money and a months pip. For as long as my uc claim. The recent decision maker pointed out that this decision had been made the first time. I have just been refunded for 3 months of £126. I calculated all my bank and savings but UC are still saying it’s over£6k and take the £4.35 off each £250 but me and my support worker tallied it. And it was well under £6k. So I’m currently waiting for a person I asked to add up the sums which I sent him before sending it to change of circumstance. I asked if I had missed something out that was taking it beneath our calculations. Another thing my support worker comes 1 day a week so when theDWP sends me for face to face job centre meeting for the next day . I ring them to change the appointment for when he’s with me otherwise I’d get wound up by them. So this is where I’m at. I was a section 117 re mental health act as I had a section 3. I recently was lucky and got a letter giving me UC until Nov 2030 without an assessment. So I have breathing space too. I just have to make sure I don’t go over the £16000 in savings  with disregarded income disregarded. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Maria nelson
      @Maria nelson That sounds hard going. There's just one thing I can suggest might be confusing the calculations:

      dwp arrears paid as a lump sum can be disregarded indefinitely if those arrears add up to £5000 or over in the one payment, but they can only be disregarded for a year if they are under £5000.

      Could your arrears have been wrongly assessed before, or be wrongly assessed now?

      Sorry if that doesn't help. Good luck with it all.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    My daughter who is now 35 has not been moved across to Pip. She had a letter of intention from DWP but it's never happened. No reviews nothing . 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    I’m going to offer a glimmer of hope here, my neurodivergent son recently went from high rate DLA care and low rate mobility to enchanted both part on PIP! His assessor (done via me!) was so helpful, insightful and actually gave me advice on things to raise with CAMHS, which has now led to new diagnosis of AFRID being made! I couldn’t believe how lovely he was, baring in mind this wasn’t a full assessment it was just a quick call to clarify a few things! He really explained the eating issues I had put on the form and offered explaination as to why my son done the things he did! He was really sympathetic and knowledgable on neurodivergence and helped us so much. At first I was very sceptical thinking that his kindness was too good to be true until I the award letter and saw the points that had been awarded. It’s easy to bash the DWP on here and the assessors but we got very very lucky. I wish I could say it was the same for all, but there are good ones out there. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Anon N Thank goodness for your experience. Let's hope there are more like your son's assessor. So happy for you both.
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.