Thirty eight pages of amendments have now been tabled for the committee stage and third reading of the Universal Credit and Personal independence Payment Bill tomorrow.  The Commons will have just one chaotic session to work through them all before voting on a final, amended version, of the bill.

The Deputy Speaker will select which amendments are to be considered and group some together to speed the process.  For a bill which will affect the lives of millions to be rushed through in an afternoon in this manner suggests a desperate desire to avoid scrutiny on the part of the government.

In the days running up to the third reading, MPs of all parties have put forward amendments. Some are unlikely to pass, such as a Conservative amendment (NC12) limiting eligibility to PIP to British citizens and excluding claimants with “less severe” mental health conditions.

Some others also overlap, with MPs from different parties putting forward amendments dealing with the same or similar issues.

Readers may want to contact their MP one last time, urging them to vote against the bill, but also suggesting amendments they would like them to support in the run up to the final vote – in case the bill is passed.

You can send your MP an email along the lines of:

Your name

Your address

Dear [[name of MP],

As one of your constituents, I am writing to ask you to vote against the Universal Credit and Personal independence Payment Bill at its third reading (see this page for suggested reasons).

I would also urge you to consider supporting the following amendments:

[List amendments, for example:]

Graeme Downie amendment (17) which allows for the severe conditions criteria to apply to claimants who have fluctuating conditions, such as Parkinson’s or multiple sclerosis.

Kirsty Blackman amendment (33) which removes the requirement that, for the severe conditions criteria, a diagnosis must have been made by a health professional providing NHS services. 

Debbie Abrahams amendment (19) which changes the date on which the universal credit cuts start, from April 2026 to November 2026.

Dr Marie Tidball amendment (NC11) which establishes a Disability Co-Production Taskforce for the Timms review.

John McDonnel amendment (NC8) which prevents any proposal from the Timms review adversely affecting anyone’s eligibility for PIP.

Best regards

You can download a copy of all the amendments from the document Notices of Amendments as at 8 July 2025 from this page

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    UC BILL NEGATES POSITIVE IMPACT OF PREVENTION FOCUSED NHS PLAN
     
    The Bill will push thousands of disabled people into poverty negating the positive impact of the government’s prevention-focused NHS plan.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    Why is the PDF only 24 pages long then?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    How will the speaker decide what amendments to select first?  I understand that if there is not time to cover everything MPs are still expected to vote on a flawed Bill?  It seems that disabled people are pawns in a political game.  Which is disgusting.  The Government have used every procedural trick to force this Bill through parliament and avoid democratic oversight.  I don't know how any MP can vote for it.  What if that are a lot of MPs who oppose the Bill?  Will the Government suddenly allow extra time to discuss all the amendments before the vote?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    What about the amendments preventing cuts to the UC Health element?  It is short sighted and dangerous to cut this before the outcome of the Timms review is known.  The majority of people in the UC Health/LCWRA/Support don't meet the severe conditions criteria.  Even if Amendment 17 Re:  Fluctuating conditions is included in the severe conditions criteria many will still be excluded because they will not be classed as life long even it they are very debilitating e.g. CFS, Long Covid, Severe/Complex mental health and some people will not have an NHS diagnosis.  I will be asking my MP to support amendments which oppose the cuts to the UC Health element. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Anon25 This is Richard Burgon's amendment 2a
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Anon25
      There is a suggested amendment for this. 
      This amendment would continue the level of the Universal Credit health element at £423.27 for all new claimants and not the proposed lower rate.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    I'm extremely confused at what is going on at the moment. I am currently in mental health crisis and not able to focus or really find out facts. Would some kind soul on here give me a brief simple run down, hopefully with good news as all i see at the moment is bad and that we as a community have lost and will lose more in the future. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @kevin Hi kevin, it is all very confusing, but it might well be that the chaos serves us best in the end, as people will feel they cannot support the government's bill when it's so unclear what's on it. We're all on a bit of a knife edge before tomorrow's vote, so no point pretending we really know what's going on, but stick with us and those you know care for you and you'll get through. We definitely haven't lost.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @kevin This is a good summary.  Scroll down the article to the heading 'What happened at the 2nd Reading' and read from there if you want to keep it brief:                      https://www.scope.org.uk/news-and-stories/the-universal-credit-bill-has-passed-its-second-reading-here-is-everything-you-need-to-know
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @kevin Hi Kevin,

      I don’t think anyone knows right now - it should be clearer by the end of tomorrow, when all the amendments have been voted on. Then B&W will give us their usual excellent summary. Did you have a chance to catch any of the debate 1 July? I found it very inspiring and heartening to see that so many MPs really do care. Here’s a link that shows the bill’s passage - in case it’s helpful.

      Sending lots of good wishes your way ☀️
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @kevin Hi Kevin,

      Sending lots of good wishes your way ☀️
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @kevin Many mps have put forth changes (called ammendments) to the bill some of which the speaker will select tomorrow (based on popularity, relevance and his own unbiased judgement) they then vote on which of the ammendments will be in the final bill. Then, sometime tomorrow evening we get the final vote on the bill. The ammendments are important, this is where the government puts in all the changes they agreed to with rebels. We need the mps to vote for the good ammendments so the final bill they then vote on will be something that doesn't screw us all. 
      Hope that's clearer