The final version of the Universal Credit Bill (formerly the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill) has now been published on the parliament website.

A copy of the updated explanatory notes has also been published.

Immediately below the title of the new bill is the following note:

[The Speaker of the House of Commons has certified this Bill as a Money Bill within the meaning of the Parliament Act 1911.]

This confirms that the bill is a money bill and that, therefore, the Commons can ignore any amendments the Lords might attempt to make.

Readers can therefore assume that this is the final version of the bill which will come into force in April 2026.

You can download the final version of the bill and the explanatory notes from this page.

The version of the bill is “HL Bill 123 (as brought from the Commons)” – click on the Bill (4) link to get it.

The explanatory notes are “HL Bill 123 Explanatory Notes” – click on Explanatory Notes (3) to get them.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    There are still many disabled People presently receiving   ESA IR with the LCWRA element which is Promised by the Gov to be protected, BUT THERE IS NO MENTION OF THIS IN THE BILL 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @Roy Haynes People on ESA IR will have migrated to UC by April 2026.

      I didn't realise there was an LCWRA element to ESA IR. I was under the impression that there was the Work Related Activity Group(WRAG) and the Support Group and that LCWRA referred to UC and New Style ESA. 

      This bill won't be enacted until after April 2026 by which time the people in question that you mentioned will already have migrated by then and will receive TP if they are eligible. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @Roy Haynes There is no reason why it would be mentioned if there are no changes.  Everyone will be migrated by March 2026. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @Roy Haynes It would be good to have confirmation that migration to uc from esa support group and or housing benefit won't make you a new claimant.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    They don't make it an easy read do they
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @tom It is not meant to! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    We need to change the narrative. We didn’t bankrupt the country the cons did why should we pay it. We are not the problem or the solution.

    Timms prejudiced against us so his review will be another farce. We will all get reassessed just in time for April. I hope this evil government pays a high price for this 

    I have only just transferred from ESA to UC expect forced labour anytime especially having read the dogs dinner of a bill. Unfortunately for me I don’t get PIP which would have been helpful.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    I just received a letter from my MP, and I want to highlight some points from that letter, and I will put my interpretation between brackets,  which may or may not be true. 
    1. Nothing will change for people currently receiving PIP. (Now and Forever)
    2. The pip eligibility criteria for news claims will remain the same until the Government has concluded its review of the assessment process in Autumn 2026. (New claims only will be affected after that review)
    My MP is Under-Secretary of State  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @SevenLions There is no "forever" with benefits.  A new government could come along and change everything. The best a govt can do is make a promise until the end of a parliament.  Anyone promising more than that is lying. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @SevenLions Unless we hear this from Timms or Kendall, I think that we will need to fight for protection for current claimants of pip after Timms review as Timms and Kendall will by very sly on this one. I say this as the fact remains that they both want CUTS, CUTS, CUTS.

      I believe that if they thought that they could get away with it, they would abolish disability benefits altogether.

      We all need to keep an eye on this one. Timms review Nov 2026. Don't take your eye off the ball.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    Just received a very long email from Steve Race, MP for Exeter who has backed the cuts from the start. I'll try to get it scanned onto the forum so others can read. I also see GP's, in a pilot scheme, are not to issue sick notes but send patients to either the Job centre or the gym!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @Matt
      What are they going to do for patients at the Job centre??? What jobs are they going to find them???
      When I was first on what was Income Support and I had to keep sending in "sick notes"  , I went along to the local job centre and begged them for a job, my husband had just died and I was left with two children both at school.
      The member of staff who interviewed me sent me home telling me that I was not well enough to get a job.  Cannot believe how on earth the staff at the job centre will cope with all the extra people who will have to attend and look for work.  They will all end up signed off and ill themselves.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @Matt Where do you see that about the GPs?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @Matt YES Matt this is what more than alarms me and I want to be clear what I am about to say here. Towards the end of the Tory reign this is what they were consulting with Primary Care GP services about. Starmer, Kendall Reeves and Co continued with this over shaping welfare reform or should I say a  damn money bill. I KNEW this was going to happen! Just hoped that it would NOT come about!

      I KNEW about this early this year, perhaps, you could say I found out about it by coincidence when I was looking for something regarding 'social prescribing' and GP's overuse of this! In addition to overuse of MSK pathways for complex orthopaedics. In other words both of these  were introduced to supplement existing conditions, if and only if the patient could do so! Neither was it ever intended to be a one size fits all approach! Neither was it ever intended to be instead of GP patient centred care! However, there has been a trend to free up GP time by replacing GP patient centred care with the above! Causing untold problems!

      The 'knock on effect' of the above was also that this had been extended to and sold to GP's to instead of having their precious time taken up with having to write 'sick notes' to refer them to the Job Centre' NOT that at the present time this applies to me, but after the 'Timm's' report is complete GOD help us all! However, I emailed my GP over this knowing that they had already participated in consultations pertaining to this, behind patient's backs and I am UNABLE to share on the site the extent of punishment for KNOWING this before, I should have done, that has been inflicted on me ever since.

      It is a frightening, scary time, that as vulnerable patients that the Government's including the last lot with this lot carrying forward this concept and basically enforcing it, selling it, to our primary care providers as 'It will free up your time as a GP'

      Well for me KNOWING about this ,all it has done has impacted on what was once good doctor/patient relations because I could NOT believe that my GP of 10 years could have even entertained this. I confronted him with it just before the Green Paper Proposals were announced. 

      Very sore subject with me! In addition to pitching us the disabled against the 'small businesses', the disabled against the disabled. NOW we have them 'Pitching' us against our own GP's! 

      My GP said, 'It is business decisions' I replied so 'business decisions' are now overriding clinical decisions'?

      I hope your GP is NOT going to be entertaining this; mine has
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    Of to the Lords it goes where we can hear from the likes of Lord Mackinlay former member of the DWP select committee. Who tells the media we are being taken for absolute fools. It is too easy for people to get the golden ticket of a lifetime on handouts. I have got four prosthetic limbs and I go to work every single day of the week. If I can do it, for heaven's sake, Britain, get off your backsides.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @UC I think the post in question has been misunderstood by a lot of people on here going by the down votes. 

      The poster in question is referring to Craig Mackinlay(Google him) and is using his words. There are not the words of the poster. 

      As another poster has already said quotation marks would have clarified the issue but having said that I am surprised how very few people seem to know who he is given the importance of this matter. 




    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @John Who goes out to work every day? Lord Mackinlay? I think I understand you John. I misunderstood the whole post. It's Lord Mackinlay who has four prosthetic limbs.  Had to look him up.  Thanks John. Well all I can say is good for you Lord Mackinlay!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @UC That is what Lord Mackinlay has said. As rtbcpart2 has pointed out I probably should have made that clear in my post.

      Looking at his record as a MP where his election involved breaching financial rules (he was acquitted at trial, one of his campaign activists was found guilty and got a suspended prison sentence). And Mackinlay's time as a MP where he was found to have breached rules on potential financial interest multiple times. The reason he was made a Lord appears to be that he became severely disabled when he was a MP. So in effect he was given a golden ticket of a lifetime of handouts for becoming disabled. And is now getting paid to be a Lord and to be the director of a anti net zero group, a job he would be unlikely to have if he was not a Lord. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @UC Hi UC I do NOT think John for one minute is being derogatory towards us, himself or the site he is just quoting what the likes of Lord Mackinley former member of the DWP select committee will start blurting out in the Lords! Due to the historic 'vitriol' from this Lord!

      This particular Lord is known for this type of rhetoric. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @John You have got it John! As always, spot on! 

      I am absolutely at my wit's end! If you get chance run that expert acumen of yours over my reply post to Matt.

      It is TRUE what I write and the harm it has caused.


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    They must also support new clause 8, which would ensure that changes from the Timms review are introduced as primary legislation. That is essential in ensuring democratic scrutiny - otherwise, MPs will not be able to amend or vote on the legislation.
    Nadia Whittome

    Bill Debate 9 July (4.45pm)

    Clause 8 didn’t pass - and this still seems useful information.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    The timings pip review that's coming late 2026 will it mean everyone on pip as to re apply for the new one I can't find mutch about it thanks 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @Wayne No I don't believe so.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @Wayne That would be being reassessed I have not seen that anywhere 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Wayne Unlikely.  Any changes will be brought in as reassessments naturally come around. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 hours ago
      @Wayne From what I can tell, any changes to PIP have been scrapped completely, but I'll wait for someone else to also clarify that!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    So if I'm right exsitng uc claimants only on LCWRA are still screwed just been delayed. The Government will ramp up reassessments to fail......

    Even the rebellion was brain wash letting this go through.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @David A poster on here mentioned that they were currently suspended and uploaded an internal DWP memo on here demonstrating that.

      No idea if it was genuine or not.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @GLB Have we had any news about the DWP ramping up reassessments for UC claimants in the LCWRA group? For a while the news we were hearing was that these claimants would not be re-assessed again after the end of 2025. Has that changed now for some reason?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @GLB What do you mean we're still screwed? Oh god I hope not.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @GLB Apart from a few brave legends who staunchly argued and voted against it throughout.  The handful of Labour MPs who actually had integrity.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    What makes this a money bill? 
    I thought there was still a question mark over that?
    Can we do ANYTHING  to get it changed? I've no real clue about these things. I can't make it stay in my head. I need to hear it from someone who can explain it in layman's terms if possible. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 hours ago
      @The Dogmother No unfortunately I don't think there is anything we can do, not the lord's. They can suggest amendments to the bill but the government don't have to except them because it's a money bill. That is my understanding.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @The Dogmother If my health allows, I’m still going to write to any members of the Lords with an interest in disability.  Not that it’ll achieve anything (just like my emails and voicemails to my MP didn’t throughout the process), but I have to do something.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Very dissapointing to have it confirmed that it has been certified as a Money Bill; which I assume it's primary purpose is to save money (And avoid a wealth tax etc.).  Does it mean that this Bill can not be legally challenged?  I assume not.  This is a very sad day for disability rights.  The Government have used every procedural trick to rush this Bill through parliament so it did not have to face scrutiny or opposition.  Very sad to think that 336 so called 'Labour' MPs; including my own MP have voted for this to pass without consultaton or basic democratic oversight.  The pledges the Labour party made in their election manifesto of 2024 to champion disabled people's right and to put the views and voices of disabled people at the heart of everything they do broken.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 14 hours ago
      @Anon25 I feel the worst thing that has been done over the past 8 weeks is the campaign to vilify disabled people. Every news program I watch is painting us as scrounges & disgusting people. The hatred with the public is getting worse. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Dr Marie Tidball’s Amendment

    Timms’s helpful checklist
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I thought It would get clearer after seeing it,but it really didn't, but I guess that's the idea.The ESA bit if your in the support group and the severe illnesses criteria will old claimants stay protected and it said constantly all the time and TiMMS said the other day in parliament it was the same as before, but safely reliably within reasonable time isn't the same as before did he lie again or am I confused between the 2 criteria. I apologise if I'm just not taking it in right but it's taking a toll my stress. Or maybe I'm paranoid that there slipping it in the backdoor, constantly slight of hand.I feel it will be a sad day.should it even be a money Bill if it's got severe illnesses criteria in it
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.