Under both Conservative and Labour governments, the DWP have colluded with the press to demonise younger claimants living with mental health issues, ADHD and autism.  Ministers have joined in, to create a smokescreen which obscures the politically inconvenient truth that the majority of those at risk of losing their personal independence payment (PIP) under the Green paper proposals are older people with physical health conditions – many of whom have worked all their adult life until they became ill.

Sickfluencers

In January, the Canary highlighted the fact that “Disabled people living with mental health conditions came on the receiving end of an exponential surge in corporate media attacks against benefit claimants in 2024.”  It also found many articles “blaming the rise in disability benefit claims on the increase in claims from autistic people, and people with ADHD.” 

Sinister TikTok and Youtube “sickfluencers” who encourage young people to make spurious claims for benefits rather than find employment have become a staple of these hate tales, which continue to the present day:

Spike in disability claims for ADHD — as influencers provide advice  Sunday Times 14.04.2024

‘Sickfluencers’ help followers claim benefits as 15,000 a week approved  Times 30.11.2024

The benefits sickfluencers teaching Brits how to play the system and take YOUR tax to splash on flash cars and exotic hols  The Sun 07.02.25

The £3.5bn-a-year benefits bill for anxiety and ADHD  Telegraph 19.03.25

Disability benefits for anxiety and depression double since pandemic  Times 25.04.2025

And Liz Kendall, in her speech launching the Pathways To Work Green Paper argued that PIP claims were “rising faster among young people and mental health conditions . . . And the consequences of this failure are there for all to see. Millions of people who could work trapped on benefits… denied the income, hope, dignity and self-respect that we know good work brings

But, if this is the problem that the reforms are designed to fix, why are the bulk of the cuts aimed at older people with physical health conditions?

Physical health to be hardest hit

All the figures provided by the DWP suggest that it is physical health awards, not mental health or neurodevelopmental ones, that will bear the brunt of Labour’s cuts.

PIP awards at risk are those where the claimant did not score a minimum of 4 points for any daily living activity.  DWP statistics show that of all at risk awards for working age claimants:

  • 72% are based on physical health
  • 26% are based on mental health
  • 1% are based on ADHD
  • 1% are based on autistic spectrum disorders (ASD)
  • 0.25% are based on learning disabilities.

(Numbers do not add up to 100% due to rounding). 

Clearly, from these numbers, ADHD and ASD awards are not at the forefront of cuts.

The DWP did not provide us with a condition specific breakdown of awards, but even from the categories it did provide, the focus on physical health is very apparent.  The percentage of awards with no 4 point or higher descriptor is:

  • 79% for back pain
  • 77% for arthritis
  • 71% for regional musculoskeletal diseases (excluding back pain)
  • 68% for chronic pain syndromes
  • 62% for cardiovascular disease
  • 55% for respiratory diseases

By comparison, 48% of awards for anxiety and depression have no 4 point or higher and, as we have seen above, 19% for ADHD and 6% for ASD.

What Labour are threatening with their Green Paper then, is almost eight out of ten awards for back pain and arthritis being stopped and even awards for conditions like heart disease and breathing problem being taken away from well over half of all current recipients.

If Labour were honest about this, they would probably find their plans much harder to sell.

Older claimants to be hardest hit

The other claim being made by Labour is that these cuts are aimed at preventing a whole generation of young people becoming permanent benefits claimants and never experiencing the “dignity and self-respect” of work.

The truth is the opposite:  younger claimants are much less likely to lose their awards while older claimants, most with a lifetime of graft behind them, are much more likely to lose their PIP. 

According to the DWP’s statxplore, the percentage of PIP claimants aged between 50 and 66 is, for example:

  • 82% of those living with arthritis.
  • 79% of those living with respiratory illness
  • 75% of those living with cardiovascular disease
  • 63% of those living with back pain
  • 57% of those living with chronic pain
  • 54% of those living with regional musculoskeletal diseases (excluding back pain)

Claimants living with mental health conditions tend to be younger:  only 36% of claimants living with anxiety and depression are aged  between 50 and 66. 

Those living with  neurodevelopmental issues are even younger: just 4% of claimants living with  ASD and 2.5% of those  living with ADHD are aged between 50 and 66.

But, as we have seen, mental health and neurodevelopmental claims make up only a little over a quarter of all at risk claims.

Whereas, just the six physical health conditions listed above, include over half of all the 1.3 million at risk claims. 

When it all unravels

There is no question, as our research has shown, that claimants living with mental health conditions will be hit dreadfully hard by the Green Paper changes and some of them will be amongst the most vulnerable people in our society.

But the number of claimants with physical health conditions who will be plunged into desperate circumstances by a sudden drop in income will be even greater.

Labour ministers may well succeed in conning their own MPs into voting the changes to PIP into law before the summer recess.

But, when the cuts actually come into force in November 2026, the deception will not hold.

It will rapidly become obvious that Labour is systematically destroying the income, not of young people led from the path of gainful employment by greedy “sickfluencers”, but of older people with a lifetime of work behind them. 

And as images begin to appear in the press of disabled people close to retirement age, some using wheelchairs or supplemental oxygen kits, queueing at food banks and debt advice centres, Labour MPs may regret their gullibility.

By the summer of 2029, after two and a half years of thousands of older, disabled claimants being remorselessly stripped of their PIP every single month, there will be a general election at which they may regret it a great deal more.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Starmer, Reeves, Kendall will not interpret the massive local election losses as having anything to do with the green paper benefits cuts.

    Because the votes all went to Reform, who are even harder on benefits.

    Therefore, they won't change a thing.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 minutes ago
      @Anon This is what I've been saying repeatedly on here, only to get told that I don't know what I'm talking about and the priority is just robbing Labour of seats. 

      I suppose the logic is that as long as you vote for the bigger bully in the playground, the important thing is that at least the bigger bully will punch the smaller bully in the face as well as yourself.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Anon Imagine them with their fingers in their ears going "la la la la"!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    It's to be hoped more Labour mps will be emboldened to step forward now and challenge Starmer and his posse, especially as those who have already made their views public have identified disability benefit cuts as the reason for Labour's losses.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    Keir Starmer says that the "tough decisions" his government made in the Budget are starting to bear fruit.

    He must be lying even to himself, as it's crystal clear that they're rather backfiring.

    He says: "The message I take out of these elections is that we need to go further and we need to go faster on the change that people want to see."

    This is way beyond dishonesty.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Scorpion Politicians believe their own propaganda, they are in fact the last to know how unpopular they have become and are shocked to find out they are hated. This happens to everyone who become leaders and are surrounded by their yes men who keep telling him how popular they are! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    @Anniesmum, I was baffled until I realised it was Ellie Reeves on the Today programme. I thought is it or isn't it, what's going on with Rachel? Then I twigged it was her sister. She sounded totally out of her depth, hardly a great choice to wheel out for the interview. Here's the video, where she looks like a rabbit in the headlights

    https://www.google.co.uk/url?q=https://twitter.com/BBCr4today/status/1918213529435250704&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjcuKyb1oSNAxVtVUEAHUCND4UQFnoECAQQAg&usg=AOvVaw3dsqbAcweFpFef_H5DmlBg
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @robbie Haha I know! When I heard her speak I was thinking she is stumbling more than she normally does. Then I realised it was her sister! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    According to the BBC, the three biggest issues for Labour councillors when canvassing were immigration, winter fuel cuts and planned disability cuts . Possibly some hope here
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @Matt Mail saying the same thing,Jason Groves reporting disability cuts and winter fuel the main talking point the Labour activists were hearing.Once these cuts are debated in the commons and the Lords and the true list of people losing most of their income I think things will change.Carers needed for people with 12 points but not 4 will be forced to look for work , alongside the disabled person.The very idea that sick and disabled will be up against robust , healthy candidates for work is simply ridiculous.Any Labour MPs who vote for this callous culling will lose their seat at the next election.Whether that seat goes to Reform is yet to be seen, hopefully not.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    I'm reposting as there were a number of typos - original post was done using a touch screen which is not very effective!

    Hello all, went to the polls last night in Exeter and voted Greens. I see, depressingly, that reform are doing well. I do think they will merge with the Tories before the next GE, which bodes ill for the disabled, and the wider population who rely on the welfare state

    Labour keep banging on about the benefits of work. At the moment, my productivity is being monitored, and my line manager is threatening Performance Improvement Plan (the Government new version of PIP?) I'm in the process of contacting both the Head of HR and the CEO to make a formal complaint, although I have no illusions how this will be viewed by management....

    Currently only 27% of blind/partially sighted people of working age are employed. And those who are employed face the very pernicious reality of being underemployed...and the chances of training, let alone promotion, is nil.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Matt Indeed, it's a serious concern. While many of us wholly appreciate people's growing anger with Starmer's awful, treacherous Labour government that targets society's most vulnerable citizens, I suspect that some voters have as little idea of what it means if they put Reform in power as when they voted Brexit. If anything, Reform are likely to be far more punitive to the long-term sick & disabled. Not only that, reportedly there are plans to privatise the NHS. All of this would be a huge disaster the long-term sick. - Agreed. No surprise if Reform & Tories do a deal prior to the next GE. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    "Left wing Labour MP Richard Burgon wrote that the Runcorn defeat was "entirely avoidable" and was "the direct result of the party leadership’s political choices". He said: "By pushing policies like cuts to disability benefits and scrapping the winter fuel allowance, the leadership is driving away our own voters — and letting Reform squeeze through.

    "The Labour leadership must urgently change course and govern with real Labour values to deliver the change people are crying out for. It should start by ditching the plans to cut disability benefits and increase taxes on the wealthiest instead. If it fails to deliver that real change, things could get far worse..."

    "The result has sparked warnings that the next general election could be devastating, and MPs were quick to publicly challenge their leader."
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    I’m being interviewed for Carers Uk campaign on 7th May. They sent me a filming briefing which includes this statement about their campaign: 

    Campaign background: The UK Government’s proposed welfare reforms will disproportionately affect carers and disabled people, exacerbating financial hardship for thousands of families and placing greater pressure on our social care system.
    Carers UK is urging the Government to immediately reconsider the proposals, considering the severe impact they will have on unpaid carers and the individuals they support.

    I also prepared a statement for the APPG on the same day and Carers Uk were keen for me to keep the elements that really emphasised the depth of my anger at these proposals. They sent me the agenda of the meeting, which is mostly focussed on the green paper. 

    I know my statement may make little impact and it’s only one meeting but I just hope I can give it my best and not crumble when faced with the MPs. The first time I read out my statement to practice and check how long it took to read, I choked up. It’s personal.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 54 minutes ago
      @Gingin Is it going to be filmed and made public so we can watch it?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Gingin You go get 'em and don't pull any punches or be afraid of them!!  Xx
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Gingin Bravo, @Gingin. You're an inspiration to us all.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Gingin You're standing in your truth, Gingin, and it will protect you from any scrutiny by those pushing the lies. I greatly admire and appreciate your integrity and will be thinking of you on the 7th!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    https://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/victorious-labour-mayor-tells-keir-starmer-to-start-listening-to-voters-as-reform-support-soars_uk_68144bf3e4b0f2e8a510de22

    Well said - Ros Jones.

    And well done, Labour! You’ve managed to mobilise a million disabled people, their friends and carers against voting Labour.  At least, if nothing else, our votes matter.”
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Gingin Thanks Gingin and to you for all your hard work good luck at the carers filming event  - we will be thinking of you! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @CaroA Thanks CaroA, good to know someone even in the evil party who has just won a position of power sounds like she’s on our side
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 hours ago
    https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/polling/2025/03/has-labour-bungled-welfare-reform?utm_source=chatgpt.com

    I am so opposed to Reform - hoping it has been a protest vote this article seems to point in that direction!  It seems if nothing else our votes count....
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @James Until it affects them, or their family.  Otherwise.....you're right.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 hours ago
      @CaroA The problem is everybody hates benefit claimants nowadays and their is only greens or Lib Dem’s who would go softer and they aren’t going to be part of a government back to the pip I might be able to get the new pip after 2028 for asd but not sure if mild autism would still get it going to worry about that nearer the time
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 hours ago
    Reeves is being interviewed on radio 4. She doesn’t seem to be listening to her own party councillors. The people on the ground don’t want the PIP cuts, national insurance and winter fuel cuts. They are so pig ignorant! She doesn’t seem to want to change her mind and not listen to the people who voted them in. Idiot! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Anniesmum I want to just change that, it was her sister who was being interviewed. She sounds exactly the same! 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 hours ago
    Hello all, went to the polls last night in Exeter and voted Greens. I see, depressingly, that reform are doing well. I do think they will merge with the Tories before the next GE, which bodes I'll fit the disabled, and the wider population who rely on the welfare state 

    Labour keep banging on about the benefits of work. At the moment, my productivity is being monitored, and my line manager is threatening Performance Improvement Plan (the Government new version of PUP?) I'm in the process of contacting both the Head of HR and the CEO to make a formal complaint, although I have no illusions how this will be viewed by management....

    Currently only 27% of blind/partially sighted people of working age are employed. And those who are employed face the very pernicious reality of being underemployed...and the chances of training, let alone promotion, is nol.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 hours ago
    Labour won in my area despite my Herculean efforts (vote of 1, haha). I do hope Labour get a thrashing in the results, but sadly it may be Reform’s gain 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    It made me feel sick just reading all of that but it's what I've suspected, all of this is a smokescreen, a lie, propaganda waged upon disabled people who have paid into the system.

    There WILL be legal repercussions because of this, the devil of all of these plans is in the detail. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    Where  are  they getting that pip is an out  of  work  benefit,? You can work and earn what ever you can and still claim PIP because it  is  also  not  a  means tested benefit. As long as the type of job  doesn't undermine. Your given health  issues., So why the focus on non-working  PIP claimants.?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    In a programme of local government reorganisation 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Is there any point in signing the online petitions? In the Dailly Records says they have responded to one and it's the same well rehurst lies and waffle.  
    And any one else unable to vote, I am from Crawley and the council is   that's convenient!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @No hope My own view of the petitions is that we weren't organised enough.  Numerous different petitions were started, when it really should have been one, with the letter signed by the various charities etc.   As someone pointed out on X yesterday, there are 4m disabled people, but the petitions are sticking around the tens of thousands.   That shouldn't be the case.  There should be half a million signatures by now, but they're spread out far and wide and therefore have no real clout.   Is it too late to get one big petition started?  I don't know.  If so, we only have May to do it in. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @No hope No hope. 

      I do still think that it is the right thing to do to sign the on line petitions, this latest post from B&W confirms what a lot of us already had suspected. It was an absolute smoke screen of deception, at first, but after the announcement of the green paper proposals I think most of us started to guess, that it would be this age group! WHY I have NOT got a theory on it yet. However, I am in that age group.
      Next year when the proposals hit and then another 3 years until the general election. 

      I am still hanging on to the HOPE that there will be sufficient bank bench revolt but I doubt it. If the House of Lords object they could hold it up for 12 months but after that time it would automatically be passed. 

      I DESPAIR
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @No hope In my personal experience of GOVT petitions is they are Ignored, or they gaslight the public regardless of the number of signatures
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @No hope Yes there is a lot of point as it will show as a record in the future even if it is dismissed by the leaders now. You must vote and register to vote so that they can be held to account electorally. Sooner or later when they are out they will have to take stock of what went wrong and voting is an important thing. Remember Labour got in on the basis of 20% OF THE 33% Of people who voted so voting against them will hurt in the long run. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    It's awful what they are putting genuinely sick people through and making them more destitute.  They say it's to stop fraudsters but really it's a way to slash people's benefit. The effect on mental health will be enormous.  There is a lack of clarity on the time limited unemployment insurance for old style cb esa as it just refers to ns Esa and Jsa.  And afterwards if you apply for uc you have £50 a wk loss which is a lot.  It's so unfair.   Has anyone heard whether old style cb esa is included or not yet? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I think disabled people trudging into Food Banks will become normailzed. Just as in the United States people now accept seeing pensioners and the disabled among the street sleepers.This is part and parcel of human nature. Firstly the recognition of different layers of social status.Then stigma towards the lowest social groups. Followed by marginalisation of these groups as they are " othered " and stereotyped. The process is complete when the sub group is seen as different, to be avoided and is somewhat to blame for the situation they find themselves in. This unfortunate human trait is linked to " emotional reasoning " and no story is more loved by the Tabloid editor than the " dirty other " talking advantage in your town.