After just a week, Labour’s Keep Britain Working plan for the employment of disabled people  is already in tatters, condemned by disability charities and trades unions, whilst the unemployment rate hits a four-year high.

The “Keep Britain Working Review” led by former John Lewis boss Sir Charlie Mayfield, was a major pillar of the Pathways To Work Green Paper

It’s aim is to “focus on what employers and government can do to increase the recruitment, retention and return to work of disabled people and people with long-term health conditions.”

The report was released last week, with the government announcing that it will work with 60 “Vanguard” employers over the next three years to create a “healthy working lifecycle” to reduce sickness absence, improve return-to-work rates, and increase disability employment rates. The government will work towards developing the programme into a voluntary certified standard by 2029. 

Amongst the Vanguard employers, many claimants will be unimpressed to see the names of:

  • Capita
  • Maximus
  • Unum

These are all companies that are now, or have in the past, been heavily involved in assessing the fitness for work of claimants on behalf of the DWP.

The report was quickly condemned by Disability Rights UK who argued:

“Yet another government-commissioned report blames Disabled people for not working. Mayfield's report has a focus on "fixing Disabled people", but you can tell he wasn't listening to our community because it's so rife with medical model-focused language . . .

“The report comes at a time when the government is cutting schemes like Access to Work, which we know support us into the workplace . . .

“This review fails to unpick just how broken our economy is. Just 2.5% of those off work as long-term sick move into work every year, and they are predominantly in jobs that are poorly paid, strenuous and insecure, such as couriers, domestic cleaners, bar staff, coffee shop staff, security guards, warehouse operatives and farm labourers. None of these jobs are the ones the government is shouting about in its growth strategy - yet, in towns and cities across the country, especially in deindustrialised areas, they are all that exist.”

And the PCS union, whose members work in Jobcentres but who were not consulted at any time by Mayfield, was equally damning:

“The report advocates handing over significant powers to employers, written entirely from an employers' perspective it pays no regard to how pressures of work can contribute to ill health; no mention of workplace stress, insecure work, or employers paying such poverty pay that workers are reliant on benefit payments.

“The report further fails to address critical factors such as NHS waiting lists for physical and mental health conditions, the high levels of poor quality and overcrowded housing, and actual levels of poverty across society.”

But perhaps most disastrously of all, todays unemployment figures, as reported by the Guardian, have reached 5% - their highest level in four years.

So, far from increasing the “recruitment, retention and return to work of disabled people”, Labour is failing spectacularly to keep Britain working in any way at all. 

In reality, the “Keep Britain Working” scheme is already well on the way to being another tick-box, voluntary programme, like Disability Confident.  It will make employers look good, whilst doing absolutely nothing to change the reality for disabled people hoping to move into, or stay in,  work.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 15 hours ago
    On 26th November branches of the union Unite Community will be holding protest actions against cuts to benefits and against killer sanctions. There will be a protest outside Parliament on budget day and local protests in dozens of towns and cities all over the country. All are very welcome to join our protests.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 17 hours ago
    DWP minister McFadden has launched a Independent Report into Young People and Work which will be headed by Alan Milburn. The report will focus primarily or solely on those with disabilities or health conditions. Alan Milburn is a former Labour Minister, who became a Tory government advisor and turned down the offer of becoming a Tory peer and Tory government minister. Alan Milburn has previously said disability benefits should be cut for all but the severely disabled and that disabled people should have a duty to engage with the DWP. He has said his report will be uncompromising and will make far reaching recommendations to change the system. So it looks likely the report will include recommending cuts to disability benefits and increased conditionality and sanctions. And McFadden has referred to the rising numbers of young people on disability benefits as a disease and a unaffordable burden on society. Rhetoric straight out of the history books which makes me at least pause to fear possibly worse fates than loss of benefits if society continues along this path of scapegoating and dehumanization.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Deaf and disabled peoples organisations should be the 'vanguards' and leads of any work reviews.  They consistently employ a minimum of 50% deaf and disabled workforce.  Yet continue to be ignored. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Money wasted on pointless reviews / initiatives. 

    Put money into a UBI scheme instead. Let us then do what we can to earn / work without fear of  poverty / homelessness.

    Remove pointless Hectoring / compliance initiatives. It’s all politically motivated and performative. 

    People with illness / disability are not on a level playing field with other workers.  No initiative will change that.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Old Mother Incredibly well said Old Mother.
      Just in case any reader isn't aware, UBI is Universal Basic Income. Money for everyone has been carefully calculated to cost the State, therefore all of us, LESS than all the means tested payments that would no longer be necessary for many citizens. You can trust the calculations; many were done involving a super clever, extremely self effacing, old friend of ours.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Work is not a medical treatment for sick and disabled people. It's like prescribing a seaside holiday for depression or a cuddly toy for suicidal ideation. Utter nonsense. If work is so therapeutic then why is it creating record levels of ill health? Probably not for John Lewis CEO's though.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    The medical model of disability that shoves all the emphasis on disabled individuals rather than the social barriers to working is the problem.
    Others have mentioned lack of employer flexibility. There is also difficulty travelling to and from work, low pay, lack of adaptions, treatment commitments, dealing with prejudice and so many other factors that limit the viability of work for sick and disabled people.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    Disabled people who want to work and who are able to work absolutely need as much help as possible in enabling that to happen in terms of employers.

    The main elephant in the room as far as employers are concerned is not about making physical changes to the workplace. 

    It’s about flexibility. 

    Many employers cannot offer much flexibility because of the nature of their work I.e emergency services type work, or work needing to meet very tight deadlines, work in very busy environments etc…

    Much work that disabled people can do needs to allow flexibility.

    Employers don’t want to be flexible.

    They just don’t know how to allow one person who is disabled, flexibility, and not someone else or everyone else who is not disabled. 

    Add into the mix, any changing and fluctuating needs around that flexibility and it becomes easier for employers to only employer the fittest disabled people so they can brandish that odious Disability Confident badge.

    It’s a way more in depth subject than just demanding employers take on disabled people. 

    This leave only those who are desperate for staff and who pay minimum wage.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    The author of the Keep Britain Working Review has said hating your boss is not a mental health condition and that ill and disabled people not working are failing to take personal responsibility. So it is easy to see why he was picked to do a independent impartial review. And no surprise it blames rising numbers of people claiming mental health conditions and the welfare state providing perverse incentives to not take personal responsibility.

    And no surprise that the former CEO wants a employer led system where the employer and health professionals work together with the ill and disabled to get them back to work. As who doesn't want to be managed by their boss when they are off work due to their health. And who doesn't want their boss knowing their private medical information and leading the effort with their doctor to get them back to work. And who doesn't want a sickness benefit and disability welfare system that is employer led not doctor and DWP led. As boss know best. Don't forget to doff your cap and mind your yes sir's no sir's. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 days ago
    "But perhaps most disastrously of all, todays unemployment figures, as reported by the Guardian, have reached 5% - their highest level in four years.

    So, far from increasing the “recruitment, retention and return to work of disabled people”, Labour is failing spectacularly to keep Britain working in any way at all."

    5% unemployment rate is actually very low and believed to be ideal. As low as possible without being detrimental to the UK economy.

    The ‘non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment’ (NAIRU) for the UK is generally taken to be 5%. Unemployment below this rate causes inflation as employers compete to recruit and retain staff, and hinders economic growth as employers struggle to recruit and retain staff.

    The natural rate of unemployment for the UK is also generally taken to be 5%. That is unemployment due to a mismatch between those looking for the work and the skills required by employers and pay offered by employers. People not taking jobs because either they do not have the required skills or the pay is too low.

    Unemployment below 5% means the government needs to increase the number of available workers. Usually through immigration. Or these days it seems by redefining people assessd as incapable of any paid employment as work capable.

    A unemployment rate of 5% or higher means we already have enough unemployed workers available.

    It is good news it reduces the economic argument for redefining people deemed incapable of working as work capable. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Danny2 The benefits bill is much larger due to new needs on the system. That's what we cannot change, new folks will need the WS. But the gov won't stipulate how much this costs, instead they turn on sick, disabled folks and this attitude is pushed by the media. Some sick and disabled folks are now terrified by the media attacks coming fast and furiously every week. 

      To say more folks have become sick and disabled, or there are too many "winging it" isn't the full picture. Plenty of doctors would send patients to work if it cured their conditions. The reliance on "behavioural insights" think tanks and giving more cash to private healthcare providers, like Maximus, won't help as we know there are hardly any doctors on their books. The gov have merely carried on the barbaric plans the Tories prepared. We are going back to the Victorian attitude re the poor, disabled and infirm- where a moral judgement on who is deserving or undeserving of help is pushed in the media.  Disraeli and Dickens stood up for those on the margins back then by stating the UK had "Two Nations" within at the time of the Empire. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @John @John Your financial analysis may be correct, I’m not qualified to judge. But politically it’s very wide of the mark.

      Labour have made getting sick and disabled claimants off benefits and into work a central plank of their plan to boost growth and improve the country’s finances by cutting the benefits bill. They intend to invest many hundreds of millions in doing so and they cannot afford to be seen to fail, particularly given the growing media hate campaign against disabled claimants.

      Schemes to support claimants back into work will quickly have sanctions attached to them if they are seen to be failing. It will be disabled claimants who will get the blame for not finding work, even if there are no vacancies.

      So, a rising unemployment rate is definitely not good news for disabled claimants, particularly those with LCW rather than LCWRA.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.