Labour are rushing to get the first vote on personal independence payment (PIP) and universal credit (UC) cuts over and done, with the second reading scheduled to happen on Tuesday 1 July.   The earliest the vote on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill could have happened is the day before.

The government may be hoping the tight schedule will reduce the chances of organised opposition both within and outside Parliament.  There are also reports in the Independent that Labour are trying to crush opposition from backbench MPs by threatening that they will be ruled out of government jobs and could lose the Labour whip if they vote against the cuts.

But the resignation of former shadow disability minister Vicky Foxcroft from her position in the whips office last night in protest at the bill will have come as a blow to ministers, who will be hoping there will be no more high profile resignations in the next few days.

Meanwhile Disabled People Against Cuts had already announced a protest rally in Parliament Square on Monday 30 June, starting at 4.30pm and it’s likely that other protests will take place around the country.

Campaigners will now have just a week to try to persuade sympathetic Labour MPs to follow their consciences, rather than allowing tribal loyalties or fear of consequences to dictate how they vote.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    Folks there is something that l have never seen addressed before by anyone.
    I have seen a leak about means testing PIP (DWP)
    However, we are taxed individually not as a couple so how can means testing be different? 
    I’d like to secure a TV slot to really make this flaw known nationwide.
    Could l ask for support from as many of you as possible to take this further please?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Minxy I think it is,they want to bring it under universal credit so it's a double whammy,get 4 points, keep pip oh wait  you saved up when working? Oh you can't keep it then,and that probably excludes half the pensioners whom some will have gotten pension lump sums,it makes no sense, your basically forced to have a work place pension, you have to opt out not in,then you work 40 years then become disabled and it'll be, no,you can't claim disability benefits because theyre now income related so look after yourself, you have a pension live off that, it's going to get to the point where hardly anyone will qualify or maybe that's the whole point

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Cmjdexter I read it,and because my partner has savings I will lose it but I'd lose it immediately leaving us on just over £700 a month to pay everything  I'm freaking out,
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Cmjdexter I would worry about it if and when it happens.  It probably won't given their struggles getting the eligibility rules changed.  But I'm surprised that means-testing PIP wasn't something they thought of BEFORE the eligibility rules.  If they made the cut-off or taper at the right level, it would have been far less controversial than what they're actually doing, because at least SOME PIP for most people would have been kept.  I know that's not what PIP if for or about, but if we were confronted with means testing or hundreds of thousands losing £9000 a year, I'm pretty sure which one most people wouldn have wanted.   They could have asked for comments on both choices through a proper consultation and then gone with whichever was least unpopular.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Cmjdexter I think this is unlikely to happen.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Cmjdexter Maybe I'm naive, but I'd be quite surprised if they actually tried. Means-testing PIP will waste more money than it saves via admin costs and we know means-testing will certainly affect pensioners more than younger claimants and Labour still haven't got over the backlash they got from means-testing WFA and they most likely never shall.

      I just can't picture them dancing with antagonising the "grey vote" yet again by doing this and I think that's the only reason they ruled it out back in March.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Anniesmum She has been a very big disappointment for me as I thought she fought for people and not for her leaders on issues of social importance. I was mistaken she is nothing more than one more yes man on the band wagon.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Anniesmum She's going to say cut it
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Anniesmum Awful interview by Labour MP Lisa Nandy today
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    Benefits system 'not sustainable', Labour MP Anneliese Dodds claims

    link   
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @SLB Labour will have too put taxs up in the Autumn anyway because they have no money.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @clearwater Had the Tories not cut N.I. by 2p TWICE before the election, it would have been fine, but Labour were too scared to reinstate it.  But there are other ways to cut the benefits bill.  Even if they had lowered the amounts for PIP across the board, for absolutely everyone, it still would have been better.  Nobody wants to lose any money, but losing 10 or 20% is better than losing virtually everything.  And it's all a smoke screen anyway, because 5bn isn't going to make a great deal of difference either way given the size of the benefits bill.  And if this is about getting "those that can work" into work, why give benefits increase to the fit and healthy.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @clearwater Benefits is sustainable if unstainable tax cuts are stopped and that the rich and corporates are taxed a fair and equitable amount. This idea that we must support tax cuts and then take away vital support stinks
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @clearwater True
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    The government/DWP now is posting social media posts stating "9-out-of-10 PIP RECIPENTS in November 2026 are expected to be unaffected by the PIP 4-point change in 2029/30"

    As well as it's videos 
    Our welfare reforms will help those who can work, into work
    With messages ostensibly aimed at disabled people of.
    "don't give up even if you are knocked down a hundred times, it will be there the opportunity and you just have to not give up."
    "jobcentres are very good places for disabled people to come"
    "with the experience, knowledge, empathy and understanding in order to be able to help other people"
    The DWP also has people in the videos saying in effect.
    I was depressed then the jobcentre got me a job and now I'm not depressed.
    Not working made me feel worthless and then the jobcentre got me a work placement and I no longer feel worthless.

    The DWP is really trying to sell it's policy. And as the policy is not yet law. The target audience must really be MPs.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @john That's great if you can work or Almost work ready, many of us will never work again  at 56 and being ill for 30 years,( tried jobs in this time but sacked from 3) and I haven't worked now for 12 years I'm unemployable ,noone will employ me,I can't even guarantee I can walk to the shop 2 days in a row,it's just madness, the severe disabled group wo t ever apply to me because I can't claim uc,I'm on cbesa my partner works and has saved up,I jyst don't know where thus us going to lead us I'm even concerned about him,he's going to feel that its all on him and he has his own health problems now at 56 and having done manual labour jobs for 40 years and he can't do it anymore, the body is knackered 



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @gingin I must admit a lot of the comments under the posts on X have been very negative about the videos and full of anger.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @john We need to all comment on them as much as possible. I have. Especially if MPs are seeing the posts. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @john It is aimed at MPs I’m sure and the wider public. They really are vile and liars. Revolting party.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    Anyone else talking to Albert Toth at the Independent? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    I have also seen the leak from DWP about means testing PIP.
    It doesn’t stack up because the costs of disability don’t go away just because your poor spouse/ partner has to take them on. You can’t magically make your disability go away because it will be too costly.
    Very often ( as in our case) partners pay huge amounts towards National Insurance.
    If they want equality, well then everyone disabled or not must pay the same.
    Of course they can’t. We are taxed individually. Don’t bloody means test as a couple then…
    What planet are these idiots in?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    It seems the vote will be in the lap of the Gods.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @truth @truth, it really will not. That way of thinking undermines all our protests and the courageous campaigning of the organisations and individuals who have gone the extra mile to oppose these unacceptable 'reforms'.

      The outcome of the vote rests in our ability to get enough mps onside and we have to keep up the effort, not resign ourselves to any misplaced sense of fatalism.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    Actually that's incorrect. It's 24,000.000
    If you count state pension and disability allowance for children. So it could be that many votes up the spout. IF only everyone voted.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    It's said 3,000.000 on some sort of benefit. That's 3,000.000 votes down the plug hole. Do they realise the repercussions of what they're doing ?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Hilde I doubt Starmer cares, he'll get his payout from whoever he's doing this for when he leaves office.  Just as David Cameron got his 10 million payday.  Our politicians don't work for us anymore, they work for big business. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    I spoke at a Labour Party meeting last week and all the members were against the cuts. They agreed to put a motion to the next CLP meeting opposing the cuts. The hope being to increase the pressure on the local Labour MP to vote against the cuts.
    Please take action if possible on this critical issue. There is till time to make an impact.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    With this assisted dying bill that has now pretty much passed, it is coercion from the government to disabled people to take their own lives. In private members ballot rather than direct from government.

    Democide wrapped in more choice (coercion) rather than direct violence. Coercion, the very thing that the assisted dying bill has tried to prevent.

    Remove the disabled from life by their own choice (Coercion).

    2 bills to save the UK trillions by the end of the century

    Government not so stupid after all.

    This is no coincidence that These 2 bills are to be passed in the same year.

    Blood on their hands? - Yes.

    Blood on their hands by their own beliefs? - No

    l.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    "Thus, cases of injustice, and oppression, and tyranny, and the most extravagant bigotry, are in constant occurrence among us every day. It is the custom to trumpet forth much wonder and astonishment at the chief actors therein setting at defiance so completely the opinion of the world; but there is no greater fallacy; it is precisely because they do consult the opinion of their own little world that such things take place at all, and strike the great world dumb with amazement."

    Charles Dickens: Nicholas Nickleby.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 days ago
      @Slb It's almost as if we have returned to Dickensian era

      Key quote from Christmas Carol :
      " If they would rather die, they had better do it and decrease the surplus population" 


      Translated to current day proposed cutbacks "  we need disabled people to all be in work and not needing benefits" 

      Cruel and callous labour, no compassion for the more vulnerable in society. 
      They should hang their heads in shame. 
      There are as SKB has pointed out perfectly other ways of making savings. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Slb The demise of the socialism world was the removal of the counter weight against capitalists, now they have simply gone back to their old Dickenson views of the 19th century and surely this in itself will give rise to new revolutions to contain such lust and greed. 
      With regards the people who work for these people they are no more then the "Kapos" and "SunderKommandos" of the ruling clique who desperately will feed others to the fire in order to save their own skins, but in the end their fortunes are sealed even if they hope to delay the inevitable of what will happen to them. When you deal with the DWP staff for instance they are just a step away from being in the same position as those they are allegedly helping in this process only they hope by throwing others under the bus they will escape themselves the process that has been unleashed. In the end it will all fall as well as the dickenson politicans of our times. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Slb @Slb, I love it when you go all highbrow 😉
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Slb SLB - and there was me initially thinking that you were using a very ancient version of AI to write your comment!

      This so fits today's labour government!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    "Labour are trying to crush opposition from backbench MPs by threatening that they will be ruled out of government jobs and could lose the Labour whip if they vote against the cuts."

    Sickos. Let's hope the backbench MPs aren't bigger sickos by otping for blood on their hands.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    its the end of any respect i had for starmer. my only hope is that enough MPs will vote with integrity. This is whats missing here, Integrity. The constant '' benefits needs reforming '' when we all know its about 5 Billion the govt will save, and if it goes ahead starmer can bang his sick disturbing little drum of '' i saved you, my govt saved 5 billion a year '' this man and his followers have , i hope gone down a road of NO return. In respects of saving their careers. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @jeff You can not respect anyone who back stabs their own leader surely that was a sign of treachery 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @jeff My respect vanished the minute Blair took over 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    Starmer reacts with fury when Labour MPs vote against him. He can please himself.

    Feeling betrayed are you Mr. What about betraying the original basic  Labour Party principles and all the people who voted you in expecting compassion and positive change.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @GLB  @GLB, "it does not take into account things like people getting better and no longer needing PIP or leaving benefit for other reasons."

      ... such as freezing or starving to death, or giving up and opting for assisted dying. Thanks for the assist, Ms Endall.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    That fact that Liz Kendall believes that these cuts are compassionate, is pure evidence that she is not fit to be in her job.

    I would imagine that Rayner and Starmer feel the same also.

    This along with threats to support cuts.

    Democracy is "no more". Democracy is "abolished". Democracy is "over".

    The UK is officially now a dictatorship.

    Starmer = Putin 2.0
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Charlie Whips job in terms of voting is to persuade voters to vote in line with party  policy. What the whips are actually doing is blackmailing voters and blackmail is illegal in the UK.

      Watch the whips get away with blackmail. That is our dictatorship. Watch Starmer abolish the offence of blackmail in time. Especially if Labour somehow get a second term. 

      Give in to blackmail and the offender blackmails even more.

      Extortion turns a wise person into a fool, and a bribe corrupts the heart - Ecclesiastes 7:7
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @John i was just thinking exactly the same and even called Starmer "Puntin " so right Democracy is over. Welcome UK to "Dictoatorship.....and i bloody voted for them ....
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    I wish all the Mps who are voting against these barbaric cuts would start their own party, honestly the way things are I think that they would do very well and I'm sure many would vote for them.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Pixelmum Yes there are plans well advanced to create a new Left party which will contest the local elections in May 2026. In Huddersfield a new Left group has been set up (0ver 200 attended the first meeting) which will be part of the new national party probably led by Corbyn. Let's hope it gets some of the unions on board to provide both money and activists.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Pixelmum Corbyn is, and he's starting a new party. Let's have some hope..
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    From BBC News reporting on Assisted Dying Bill 

    Disabled people want MPs to assist them to live, not die - Foxcroft says (published at 12:04)

    We're now hearing from Labour's Vicky Foxcroft who says this is her first time speaking in the Commons since the general election, adding she wished she didn't have to speak up today.

    In the debate, she says that during her four years as shadow minister for disabled people she spoke to hundreds of disabled people and organisation.

    "They were and remain extremely fearful of assisted dying," she says.

    As a reminder, Vicky Foxcroft has resigned as a Labour whip over the government's plans to cut disability benefits.

    Foxcroft says that they "need the health and social care systems" to be fixed first and they want MPs "to assist them to live, not to die".
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Yorkie Bard You can see why they took her out of her shadow role.  Cares too much.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 4 days ago
    So ministers can get sacked for opposing the bill? How is that democratic!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 days ago
      @Del Yes in my eyes thats not a vote it's bullying sumbody do what they do not want to

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact