Labour ministers have resorted to online scam techniques to try to force their PIP and UC cuts through the Commons on Tuesday. And there’s a strong chance that their dubious promise to exempt current claimants from the cuts is, in reality, only a two year reprieve.

But its not too late to for you to try to stop them, as one MP has confirmed.

Blank cheque

Ordinarily MPs would know what they were agreeing to when a bill is presented for its first vote. 

And if they do vote in favour, there is then a committee stage at which a group of MPs look at possible amendments, consult with experts - -such as disability groups in this case – before presenting amendments to be considered by the whole House. 

This process usually takes weeks or, for a bill that will affect millions of people like this one, even months.

There is then a final vote on the amended bill, at what is called the third reading.  But it’s incredibly rare for the government to lose at this stage – the last time it happened was 48 years ago

After the final vote, the bill goes to the Lords, to be carefully scrutinised again.

But in the case of Tuesday’s bill, MPs won’t actually know what they are voting for. 

Because ministers have promised there will be amendments which will exempt all current claimants, but they probably won’t even have been published by Tuesday.

MPs will just have to trust ministers who say that what they are actually voting for – the 4 point rule applying to all claimants – is not what will really happen.

Chaotic few hours

And then, a week after Tuesday’s vote, the entire months long committee stage will be shrunk into a few chaotic hours in front of the whole house, voting on amendments they have barely seen and with no chance to get advice from experts.

And, what is more, the government have applied to have the bill certified as a money bill.  If the Speaker agrees, then the Lords will have no power to change any of it.  Even if they do try, it will automatically be passed without change after one month.

Online scammers

Isn’t this exactly how online scammers work? 

Promise to save you from losing all your money as long as you hand over your account details immediately.  Quickly, quickly.  No time to talk to anyone, don’t hang up the phone, do it now or it will be too late. You’ll lose everything.

And yet, in reality even if the PIP cuts are put into law this month, they don’t actually take effect until November 2026. That’s sixteen months from now.

So, why can’t they be properly discussed and put into a separate piece of legislation next year?

Unless Labour have things to hide.

Labour’s dodgy promise

Labour’s promise to exempt all current claimants from the PIP and UC cuts may not be all it seems.

Kendall’s letter says that in relation to PIP, “The new eligibility requirements will be implemented from November 2026 for new claims only.”

But she says nothing about what happens in 2028, when disability minister Stephen Timms has finished rewriting the PIP eligibility criteria and the new rules are put into law. 

Labour says the new PIP rules will be coproduced with disability organisations.  But who honestly believes those groups will be given a veto on anything, especially with the government determined to cut costs?

So, if Timms decides that the four-point rule is a good one and should stay, then under the terms of Kendall’s letter, it will apply to current claimants from 2028.

Kendall also says “we will adjust the pathway of universal credit payment rates to make sure all existing recipients of the UC health element . . .  have their incomes fully protected in real terms.”

But she doesn’t say what will happen in 2028, when the work capability assessment is abolished and only claimants with an award of PIP daily living component are eligible for the UC health element. 

If current claimants are not exempt from this change as well, then 600,000 who don’t get PIP daily living will no longer have their income protected.  And if the PIP four point rule is also incorporated in the new PIP assessment from 2028, then hundreds of thousands more current claimants who don’t get four points, will lose their health element when they lose their PIP.

Contacting your MP will make a difference

Now, none of this may be what ministers intend.  But MPs voting on Tuesday won’t have a clue what they do intend, because the whole process has become a chaotic shambles – in spite of the fact it has the power to plunge hundreds of thousands of disabled people into poverty.

So, please consider contacting your MP and asking them to vote for a planned Labour amendment – which, ironically none of us has seen yet – which will give MPs more time to consider the cuts.  And if that fails, then vote against the bill in its entirety.

You won’t be wasting your time.  There are still rumoured to be 50 or 60 determined Labour rebels, with many more unsure what to do.

And, as one MP told the BBC yesterday,

"it shouldn't be underestimated the potential effect of a weekend of emails from constituents, constituency surgeries etc".

Let yours be one of them.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    From guardian live text:

    On Friday a reader asked how the Pip concessions announced at the end of last week would affect people receiving DLA (the disability living allowance). Pip replaces DLA, the predecessor benefit for disabled people to help them with extra costs they face because of their disability, but some claimants are still on DLA, which can also be claimed by under-16s, and have not transferred over.

    By the time the blog closed on Friday, I still had not had a reply from the Department for Work and Pensions.

    But the DWP subsequently came back to say that people moving from DLA to Pip would count as new claimants. They also said they were considering how new eligibility rules for Pip would affect adults moving to Pip from DLA and further information would be published in due course.

    The DWP also pointed out that people getting DLA can voluntary apply to transfer to Pip at any time (implying that people worried about missing out should move across to Pip before the new criteria are due to come into force, in November 2026.)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Published in today’s guardian, “DWP says 150,000 more people pushed into poverty by benefit cuts - not 250,000, as forecast said before U-turn
    The Department for Work and Pensions has just published an analysis saying that, allowing for the concesssions announced last week, the welfare cuts will still push an extra 150,000 people into relative poverty.

    Here is the key chart from the document.

    Impact analysis of UC and Pip cuts
    Impact analysis of UC and Pip cuts Photograph: DWP
    In March, when the government published an impact assessment of its original plans, that said the plans would push an extra 250,000 people into relative poverty.”
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Hi Everyone, dos anyone know whether this Bill affects those who are on a combination of New Style ESA and UC please? I was migrated over from ESA SG to a combination of New Style ESA and UC and I know there are many of us in the same position. Does the bill affect those in this population please? The concessions don't make any mention of this population. 

    Many thanks in advance.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Inclusion London has a user-friendly tool for sending a letter to your MP, available here.

     https://www.inclusionlondon.org.uk/campaigns-and-policy/act-now/stand-up-against-cuts-to-disability-benefits-write-to-your-mp-today/
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Just published in today’s guardian, “Plaid Cymru urges Labour MPs to vote against welfare bill
    Plaid Cyrmru has urged Labour MPs to vote against the UC and Pip bill tomorrow. In a statement its DWP spokesperson at Westminster, Ann Davies, said:

    Liz Kendall claims the UK government is working toward a “fairer, more compassionate benefits system,” yet there is neither fairness nor compassion in protecting existing claimants while penalising those who become disabled in the future. People do not choose when to get sick or disabled, and so arbitrary cut-off dates make no sense.
    These so-called concessions are nothing more than an attempt by Keir Starmer to quiet dissent within his own party. Over the weekend, Eluned Morgan [the Welsh first minister] hailed these partial U-turns as a personal victory, despite having “reserved her position” on the proposed welfare cuts barely three months ago.
    But the people of Wales, whom the first minister is meant to defend, will find little cause for celebration. The economic blow to Wales will be disproportionate, and the UK Labour government’s refusal to publish a Wales-specific impact assessment is a slap in the face to the people of Wales.”
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    “Just published in today’s guardian, “Emma Lewell has joined the list of Labour MPs who signed the reasoned amendment saying the UC and Pip bill should be dropped and who are still opposed to the bill, despite the government’s concessions worth £3bn.

    Explaining why in an article for PoliticsHome, she said:

    Even with the promised concessions, we are still being asked to tighten eligibility criteria. A cut in support for those who will need it the most.
    I am one of several disabled MPs, and not once did anyone from the cabinet or No 10 reach out to me. Even worse, it appears they didn’t reach out to the multitude of disabled rights organisations or trade unions in agreeing to those concessions. Why were they not in the room when vital decisions about their lives were made?
    These concessions are about party management and saving face.
    There is no new bill, there are no new explanatory notes, and there are no impact assessments on the new proposals, and no time for sufficient scrutiny. There has been no formal consultation with disabled people. The majority of employment support won’t be in place until the end of the decade, access to work is in a worse state than ever before, it is unclear what the impact on carers’ allowances will be, and it creates a two-tier benefit system where disabled people will be worse off …
    On Tuesday, I will vote against this bill.
    Lewell has dyspraxia.”

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Boo A morally bankrupt government who has failed so far to engage & consult properly with disabled claimants or charities who represents disabled people also failed to engage with their own disabled MP’s. This shows the level of contempt for anyone who is disabled!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I sent my MP a long email yesterday outlining the misinformation the Government are giving out regarding this proposed bill. I explained that rather than the 200,000 the Government claims will be affected a FOI had revealed that in fact across the two levels of daily living award the figures were more than 6.5 times as much at 1,320,000 who would not meet the 4 point criteria. I apologised for bothering him again so soon as we had recently corresponded on the Assisted Dying Bill.

    This morning I got an extremely long email in response. Firstly he told me not to apologise for contacting him as it was important for him to know what his constituents' views are. He then explained in full why he would be voting against the bill, no matter what 'concessions' were offered. He appeared to have a very indepth knowledge as to what disabled/chronically sick people have to cope with and for the first time ever corresponding with an MP I felt listened to and that he cared. In fact, it was so nice to hear someone respond to me like a human being who cared what my life was like that I couldn't get through it in one reading as it brought me to tears. He wasn't a Labour MP. I do feel that I have someone in my corner if push comes to shove who will listen to me.

    I pray that enough MPs are not falling for the bull that Kendal is spouting and that this bill doesn't get through this second reading, because if it does it's a foregone conclusion it will be passed. And we all thought the Tories were the party to avoid when it came to the DWP!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Just published in today’s guardian, “On Friday a reader asked how the Pip concessions announced at the end of last week would affect people receiving DLA (the disability living allowance). Pip replaces DLA, the predecessor benefit for disabled people to help them with extra costs they face because of their disability, but some claimants are still on DLA, which can also be claimed by under-16s, and have not transferred over.

    By the time the blog closed on Friday, I still had not had a reply from the Department for Work and Pensions.

    But the DWP subsequently came back to say that people moving from DLA to Pip would count as new claimants. They also said they were considering how new eligibility rules for Pip would affect adults moving to Pip from DLA and further information would be published in due course.

    The DWP also pointed out that people getting DLA can voluntary apply to transfer to Pip at any time (implying that people worried about missing out should move across to Pip before the new criteria are due to come into force, in November 2026.)”
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @Boo They are sneaky snakes that can't be trusted. I hope MP's will see through their lies and dirty tactics.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Boo Unbelievable DWP have suspended the transfer of DLA to PIP to 2028, what they didn’t make clear, the usual slight of hand tactics from this morally bankrupt government is that according to the above response you will be classed as a new claimant when they resume the transfer!!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    in response to the newsletter, I wrote the following to my mp as a final plea. "Dear Jack Abbott mp:

    My name is , I have emailed you about the Labour government’s welfare cuts bill recently. I am a disabled person, I’m totally blind, and I live in your constituency. I wish you to vote against this bill, and here’s why. While I welcome the conssessions protecting current pip claiments, I have reservations, and I feel this bill is dangerous in its current form.

    REASONS for you TO REBEL
    If it’s wrong to push current claimants into poverty, why is it right to do so to hundreds of thousands of future claimants?
    The Bill has become a confusing shambles. Did you know that MPs such as yourself will have at most a single day to study the proposed amendments protecting current claimants, the PIP review terms of reference and any other new documents before they vote.
    Ministers are rushing the bill through with as little discussion and scrutiny as possible. They say it is urgent, but the PIP changes don’t come into force for another 16 months, so they could have been the subject of a separate bill next year.
    Claimants have not been consulted on the changes in the current bill at all.
    A committee process that should take weeks or even months, looking at amendments and getting advice from experts, will all be done in a single afternoon on 9 July, as the government rushes the bill through.

    The Labour government wants the bill to be certified as a money bill, preventing the House of lords from having any say over it, the conservatives did the same thing with their welfare reform act in 2012, in my view this ended in a very badly drawn bill, which enacted, caused suffering for years after, do labour want to follow in the Conservatives footsteps? Would it not be good for everyone to have their say, including the Lords to prevent the same issues that the conservatives caused with their reforms?
    Please Read This article from over 10 years ago linked to, which I feel is still relevant today, change conservative party for labour, and in my view the arguments still stand, I hope you agree.
    Jeff King: Welfare Reform and the Financial Privilege – UK Constitutional Law Association

    Also, MPs will be voting without seeing a formal impact assessment of the effect of the bill on health or care needs or the Office for Budget Responsibility assessment of how many people will move into work because of the changes.
    The protection from the 4-point rule for current claimants may only last until 2028, when new PIP rules are due to be introduced.
    Disability charities and trades unions are still very much against the bill, even with concessions.
    The PIP exemption for current claimants may only be a temporary respite, as the rules for PIP eligibility are to be changed in 2028, with a view to cutting costs.
    The UC protection may be only temporary for 600,000 current claimants who get the UC health element but don’t get PIP daily living component. They may not be protected once the work capability assessment is abolished, and PIP daily living is the gateway to the UC health element in 2028.

    Thanks to the people at Beneifits and work for the contemparary research done and wording of the above, though I did sprinkle some of my own in about financial privilidge from early 2010s

    www.benefitsandwork.co.uk
    Please stand up for current and future disabled people in your constituency by voting against this bill. Thank you.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Does anyone know current rough numbers for the vote tomorrow? How many will vote no still? How many will be needed for the bill to be scrapped (at least for now) 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I am not sure I want to be governed by people who say they will get their way even by lying to the disabled populus.

    Between the Tories and now this Labour government the spin they have put on genuinely disabled AND the old is shameful and that`s the politest way I can put it!!   
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I feel that we can't trust them to keep to the promises once the bill is passed.  And why should somebody not receive the benefit just because they have applied in some future date.  We have to jump through hoops to get this, even if medical evidence is provided there is no guarantee.  My MP is minister for the DWP and all he does is blame previous governments.  There has been no proper and correct consultation and no real impact assessment.  I don't think half the MPs understand what PIP is about, there are constant comments about getting people into work.  A number of people on PIP do work and the allowance is vital for them to do that, but there is also no understanding of how difficult it is for disabled people to actually get a job even if they are very capable of work.  Employers have to make adjustments but when there are equal candidates who don't need adjustments who will they employ?  There is no guarantee that there won't be a future change to this bill and no guarantee that the voice of disabled people will be included in any discussions.  The details are too sketchy.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    There is no change to pip or UC bill  in 2028 fog present or new claimants in this bill read the small print.This is a ruse by labour government why MPs do not see it as it is so blatent.

    .






  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    And are we to assume that pensioners, when their present award runs out, will similarly be re- assessed using the 4 point rule.   Now it was said that pensioners would not be affected by the changes, but recently that tune has changed?     
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @Dhyanna I don't think we can assume anything at all. It still seems to "make it up as we go along". I don't believe any of them. Sooner we chuck this bill down the toilet the better
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Dear PM, thanks for the welfare concessions, but I still won’t vote for your bill. Scrap the whole thing
    Richard Burgon

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Does anyone know the names of the other 8 select committee chairs?

    I understand they are now voting for the Bill – and this may have changed.

    Of the 108 Labour MPs who have signed the amendment, 10 are Labour select committee chairs including Meg Hiller and Debbie Abrahams.
    24 June

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8d6947ej5ro  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Vicky Foxcroft, MP

    Foxcroft said she had not made up her mind how to vote on Tuesday.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jun/29/starmers-disability-benefit-concessions-are-not-enough-says-rebel-labour-whip
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Emma Lewell, MP

    I will vote against the Welfare Bill - I don’t want anyone to feel the regret I've had since 2015.

    https://www.politicshome.com/opinion/article/i-will-vote-against-the-welfare-bill 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    More details of concessions to be given to MPs today:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce83304r12no
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @Gingin
      More lies and twisted words to be force fed to MP's today.

      Corrected it for the BBC.