The government has announced that tens of thousands of universal credit (UC) claimants with limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA) are to be offered support from jobcentres, including signposting to HGV driver training and on the job training in construction and hospitality.  Accepting the support is voluntary and your benefits will not be affected if you refuse.

1,000 Jobcentre staff - to be known as Pathways to Work advisers - will offer support to claimants with limited capability for work (LCW) or LCWRA.  They will be based in every jobcentre in England, Wales and Scotland and will aim to engage with 65,000 people by the end of the financial year.

The DWP say that “The offer is voluntary and will be made to LCWRA claimants via their Universal Credit journal with tailored appointments taking place monthly.“

The kind of support on offer includes:

  • being directed to Connect to Work, which provides personalised job-search assistance, employer engagement and on and off the job support, or
  •  WorkWell, which combines medical help with career guidance
  • signposting to work placed training schemes in sectors including construction, hospitality, and manufacturing
  • skills training in programmes such as IT or HGV driving.

We would stress again that there is no obligation to take part in this programme, claimants are free to simply turn the offer down.

There’s more details from the DWP here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    These offers are being made to claimants bus their online journals ?if so what about those who were phone claim only claimants? Where does that leave them.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Dpb999 They can stick their phone offer where the sun don't shine, personally.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Neil Cook Possibly will receive a phone call instead.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    It’s only voluntary so no big deal just ignore the journal message or a polite no thank you if this ever this becomes mandatory though in future then that’s when the problems start  they going on about hgv construction and  kitchen all stressful long hours even for an able bodied person I would say working with animals would be better more of a calming experience and a career too 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Chips and gravy Even working with animals is hard work.  Despite the calming effects of animals. They have to be physically able to lift weights and know how to deal with a bolshy animal.  A skill which you learn over time.  It can be frightening to face an animal which is unhappy for whatever reason. 


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I did shop, cleaning and factory work, these all made my health worse, I also went to an admin college to learn clerical work, even that was tiring.

    Appointments taking place monthly? I only speak to my son 99% of the time, the 1% is my mum, I rarely leave my home. I have enough issues with my mental and physical health without this spiteful lot adding to them.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The Work and Pensions Committee – 5 current inquiries

    Govt. response to Get Britain Working: Pathways to Work is now overdue.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    MPs on the Work and Pensions Committee have called on the DWP to reform the conditionality regime, including sanctions, placed on jobseekers and people in work on Universal Credit. The Committee also want to see a personalised action plan, which better reflects their skills and experience, replace the Claimant Commitment.

    Jobcentres shakeup needs more detail and ambition, say MPs

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I have Severe heart failure, give me the big truck!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @melrose even better with constant passing ou and temporary paralysis episodes
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    This is what ChatGPT has to say about what the system could look like:

    > What’s so frustrating is that it didn’t have to be this way. If, over the years, the DWP and successive governments had focused on genuinely supporting people rather than surveilling and punishing them, we might be in a completely different place.

    Instead of gaslighting and endless reassessments, they could have built a culture of trust — where people’s accounts of their own conditions were believed, and where support was shaped around building confidence, stability, and quality of life. Instead of hammering everyone into the same boxes, they could have looked at what each individual needed to manage their health and, if possible, explore safe and meaningful ways to reconnect with society or with work on our terms.

    A humane system would have recognised that living with long-term illness or disability is already a full-time job in itself. It would have valued the right to relax, the right to some peace, the right to a life worth living — rather than constantly threatening to take those things away.

    That’s not weakness or dependency; that’s the basis of dignity. And perhaps, if there is genuine listening to claimants’ experiences, what is currently a blunt and damaging process might one day reform itself in the truest sense of the word — into something more humane, flexible, and respectful of the lives it touches.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @HL Thanks HL I just copied in the piece id written below I had been chatting with it about all of this anyway.  Hope this helps.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @CaroA That’s interesting – what were your search terms?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    There is absolutely no acknowledgement of the extreme harm the DWP system has done to so many of us over so many years. How many of us physically shake when asked to fill out forms about our health or personal circumstances? How many avoid GPs altogether for fear they might say something that gets twisted and used to undermine benefits?

    The systemic gaslighting — with forensic reassessments carried out by incentivised private companies — has left us constantly on edge. The implication that you could work if only you “tried harder” seeps into every aspect of life: our relationships, our ability to manage extremely challenging health conditions, and even our relationship with relaxation itself. Many of us now find it almost impossibly hard to switch off or believe we have a right to any quality of life, because even a thin veneer of looking “well” can feel like a risk to our security.

    Meanwhile, neighbours slap us on the back with “cheer up” or “take a holiday” suggestions, not realising the toll. For some, the pressure and self-hatred this creates has even led to self-harm.

    And now they expect us to ‘engage’ with work coaches? For many of us, the very idea evokes dread. As SLB has said, there’s no genuine tailoring here — just one-size-fits-all hammering round pegs into square holes.

    It’s hard to know what to think. Thank God for now it’s not compulsory. Let’s hope it’s more refined than their Reform agenda press release seems to imply.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    So we must all prepare to be a jack/jill of all trades, depending on the labour shortage. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    It sounds more like the premise for a comedy sketch than a government policy. So we have assessed you as so severely disabled you are effectively incapable of any and all paid employment, and incapable of any activities towards working, and qualify to have a someone claim carer's allowance to provide you will full time personal care. Have you thought about becoming a bricklayer on a building site? How about a lorry driver? How about a waiter?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 days ago
      @John Blah blah, I speak for myself thanks.  I don't need to know your nonsense, as I get full rate PIP and LCWRA, but I do feel trapped like I have no prospects, and do NOT need to be told by you that this is 100% bad.  You do NOT speak for ALL disabled people!

      Tons of clowns voting me down for voicing my opinion on here, you should all think about your attitudes and treat others better. 

      OBVIOUSLY this scheme won't help ALL disabled people!  But it could help some that want or need it.  Try to open your mind. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @John John - you have expressed my thoughts exactly!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Alex But how are these Specialist Job Coaches trained? what university qualifications or business experience do they have? I was employed as a JC Clerical officer, I had a DipHE in social policy, not only that I'd worked in small business for stock brokers who gave me a realistic (non public service) insight into business & enterprise.  Also I liked my clients, the ethos at the JC was one of contempt for "scroungers" and I couldn't go along with it. Only good JC officers were ex CID and their focus was on finding work for fit/well men between the ages of 18 to 60yo.  Ex CID were not keen on pushing the sick and disabled as they felt it was immoral. I do, the idea that non medically trained Work Coach can assess health issues is crazy. It will cause harm to some claimants. 

      Also saw a great waste of public money, for example sending graduates on literacy courses as part of their claimant commitment for JSA. We could have stuck them in schools for a bit of voluntary rather than wasting time & cash on mandatory NVQ 1/2 courses. Public services, like the JC, are inflexible and judgemental so I went back to the private sector and was paid to treat our clients/customers very well indeed. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Alex
      I implore you to read this post in full to try and comprehend how ill or disabled the people we are talking about are. To understand why the opportunity to work in construction say a brick layer on building site, or work as a HGV driver, or in a service job like being a waiter is not going to be suitable. To the point it is so absurd I compare it to being like a dark comedy sketch.

      To qualify for LCWRA you need to meet one or more of the following.

      Terminally ill expected to die within 6 months.

      Receiving treatment for cancer by way of chemotherapy or radiotherapy, or about to or recovering from such treatment.

      Is pregnant and there is a serious risk due to pregnancy complication or medical condition of damage to her health or to the health of her unborn child if she does not refrain from work-related activity

      Due to disease or bodily or mental disablement and by reasons of such disease or disablement, there would be a substantial risk (likely to happen) to the mental or physical health (hospitalization or death) of any person if they were found not to have limited capability for work-related activity

      Engagement in social contact is always precluded due to difficulty relating to others or significant distress experienced by the individual

      Has, on a daily basis, uncontrollable episodes of aggressive or disinhibited behaviour that would be unreasonable in any workplace (has to be more than verbal)

      Cannot convey (by any means (speaking, writing, typing or any other means)) a simple message, such as the presence of a hazard (like a fire)

      Cannot understand (by any means (listening, reading, braille or any other means)) a simple message due to sensory impairment, such as the location of a fire escape

      Reduced awareness of everyday hazards leads to a significant risk of injury to self or others; or damage to property or possessions, such that they require supervision for the majority of the time to maintain safety

      Cannot learn how to complete a simple task, such as setting an alarm clock

      Cannot, due to impaired mental function, reliably initiate or complete at least 2 sequential personal actions

      Cannot cope with any change to the extent that day to day life cannot be managed

      Cannot convey food or drink to their own mouth without receiving physical assistance or regular prompting from someone else. Or cannot chew or swallow food or drink.

      Cannot either press a button, such as a telephone keyboard or turn the pages of a book with either hand

      Cannot pick up and move a 0.5 litre carton full of liquid (that is about 17 ounces or half a kilogram weight)

      Cannot raise either arm as if to put something in the top pocket of a coat or jacket

      Cannot move between one seated position and another seated position located next to one another without receiving physical assistance from another person

      Cannot mobilise (on flat ground using a walking stick, walking frame or manual wheelchair or any other aid if needed) more than 50 metres on level ground without stopping in order to avoid significant discomfort or exhaustion or repeatedly mobilise 50 metres within a reasonable timescale because of significant discomfort or exhaustion

      At least once a week while conscious and despite wearing and using any possible aids, experiences loss of control leading to extensive evacuation of the bowel and/or voiding of the bladder, or substantial leakage of the contents of a collecting device, sufficient to require the individual to clean themselves and change clothing.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @John This is the future they're pushing us towards though, isn't it. There will be no such thing as limited capacity for work related activity unless you fit the severe conditions criteria. That's what the Bill passed over the summer was laying the groundwork for, sadly. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I was working in hospitality – it was exhausting. The shifts were long and mostly late, with no break until the nearly the end of the shift. So working hungry and tired – even the healthy young workers found it too much.

    Whilst I don’t know if this is typical, this type of scenario would need to be addressed in order to make jobs suitable / sustainable.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Just retired after over 40 years roofing.
    Tough work,all weathers,no guarantee work or pay.
    Stopped three years ago crippling arthritis knees and hands.....like most building workers it does catch up with you.
    BW have been fantastic in advising me how to claim the entitlements I am due...not a benefit as I have paid thousands in to the Hoover the years since 1975( £19k Tax/NI ten years ago)
    If you need help definitely subscribe to this site 👍.
    Point I make is construction is a very tough industry and NOT an easy channel for government and job centres to think they can just move people in to.... especially if medically or mentally vulnerable.
    Great industry but not for everybody.
    Good luck all

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Right, so if you're on LCWRA you're deemed to not be expected to work, so let's ease you in with CONSTRUCTION, HOSPITALITY, and driving an HGV!!! That will really help people with physical health conditions, and those with anxiety issues.  One has to wonder what the people at the DWP are smoking.   But this harks back to a general problem which we see in the WCA, too.  When trying to find out if you're fit for work, they ask you if you put your arms up in the air and lift an empty cardboard box - as if all disabled and those with health conditions are capable of aspiring to is manual work, seemingly in Poundland.  It would be funny if it wasn't so insulting.   

    I realise that comment might sound snobbish towards those who do manual work, but it's not meant to be.  What I'm getting at is that the only work they think we could possibly do is minimum wage jobs stacking shelves.  There's a general assumption that the disabled are not trained or qualified in anything else.   

    I now have sixteen books under my belt - most (but not all) self-published - and I would be over the moon if they offered me a training course on marketing those books, or even how to make effective advertising videos for social media (particularly tik-tok which I really don't understand, but is known to increase book sales substantially when used right) so that I can make the most of them, and maybe make a living from them and eventually stick two fingers up at the DWP!  But there's no indication that what they offer is ever going to be fine-tuned in that way to what an individual might find useful.  And I'm sure there are other "self-employed" people (I use the term in quotes as many of us don't make a living from it) who could find courses on aspects of their business useful too - especially as being self-employed is often the only likely way of us returning to work as it allows us to work around our conditions. 

    Instead, they view the disabled as one big group, as if we have lost our individual identities, aspirations, and aptitudes as soon as we became ill.  But we are not one big group, we are a hugely diverse group, educated anywhere from GCSEs to PhDs, and each of us with our own skill sets that could, perhaps, at some point be utilised to get us back to work.  They just don't see that - or want to.  They want a one-size-fits-all answer for a group of millions because it would be an easy fix and a good headline.  Except that, unless they change their view, that fix and headline is never going to happen.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @SLB Can I just make note - this is a voluntary scheme but, anything the job centre ask you to do must make it more likely that you will gain employment. Had this when they'd wrongly put me in LCW before I was moved to LCWRA. They tried to send me on a CV writing and basic skills work programme. My CV was already up to date and I had been teaching every GCSE subject up to becoming ill. I've an honours degree in Geology. They threatened me with sanctions if I did not go to a class I was mentally capable of teaching, but not of physically attending which was due to all of the above just not going to happen. 

      Also, is it going to be the same as the last scheme where disabled people were "invited" to volunteer - but then there appeared compulsion in the form of sanctions for non-attendance?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The dwp link above says that among lcwra claimants there are "approximately 1.3 million because of a mental illness and 900,000 with back pain, arthritis, and other musculoskeletal conditions".

    So, by April, Jobcentre staff are aiming to engage with 65000 of them, who are then going to build houses and drive lorries. Mm hmm.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Dwp minister speech transcript from earlier today:

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    I can see what the government may be offering here but for many who have disabilities the HGV is way off the reach cause you need a class 1 driving license which includes a very hard medical even for able bodies who can fail the medical but than the other jobs skills might work for some people and I hope it does also has quoted by the headline is purely voluntary 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Some  who are  on  this benefit are there because they CANNOT  work due  to their health conditions, or  that their health  condition  would mean they would take too much time  off work  due  to their limitations
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Good idea on paper; they must factor-in that many people simply cannot do this kind (or any kind) of work. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Dods This shows why without genuine claimants voices at the table on the Timms review what could be coming our way down the road next year. Clearly they plucked 2 jobs out of the air which are on their list of shortages to achieve economic outcomes or reduce the need for migration without a single consideration that HGV requires a medical to get such a licence and construction work is long shifts without reasonable adjustments with building sites such as building homes or major infrastructure projects will not lend itself to many of the reasons why claimants are put in the LCWRA group in the first place!