The first DWP oral questions in the House of commons yesterday failed to shed any light at all on the government’s attitude to personal independence payment (PIP) vouchers or the timetable for managed migration of employment and support allowance (ESA) claimants to universal credit (UC). But it did allow Labour to publish 31 formerly secret benefits reports in order to embarrass the Conservatives.

Many claimants had hoped, and much of the media had claimed, that Liz Kendall would use her first oral questions to reveal the government’s plans for PIP, and in particular whether a voucher scheme was to go ahead.

In fact, there was not a single question on this issue or on managed migration.  Instead, the opposition concentrated its fire on winter fuel allowance, where they see Labour as being most vulnerable.  And Labour MPs largely asked questions they knew ministers would be happy to answer.

It now seems likely that claimants will have to wait until the end of the month, for the budget and the probable publication of the “Getting Britain Working” white paper, to discover what Labour has in store.

The release of the 31 reports was presented as a new era of transparency at the DWP.   In reality, many of the documents are now very old and of limited value.  Meanwhile, there has been no sign of the DWP responding any more quickly or readily to freedom of information requests under Labour than it was under the Conservatives.

So, mostly this data dump was piece of political theatre, although a report on the huge barriers faced by ESA claimants in relation to work is possibly even more relevant today than it was when the data was originally collected a decade ago. 

Benefits and Work has not had time to go through all of the reports, but those listed below may be of interest to readers. If you find any valuable information please do pass it on via email or in the comments below.

Barriers to Accessing Health Support for PIP, NS ESA, and UC Claimants

Experiences of PIP applicants who received zero points at assessment

Take up and use of the Universal Credit Advance Payment

The Impact of Fluctuating Health Conditions on Assessment

Specialism in the Health Assessment: Initial Exploratory Research

Not Started and Unfinished Claims to Universal Credit (UC Hesitancy Research)

A health, social and economic profile of ESA recipients: Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey 2014

The full collection of reports can be found at these two links:  DWP research reports and DWP ad hoc research

You can watch DWP oral questions on parliamentlive.tv

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    Labour and conservatives are as bad as each other they care more about business and investment more than about people who can't work their keeping it quiet on pip reforms hoping it deters charity's from stopping what's ever they plan   it's a tactic the comments about disabled people yesterday on how they have a right to work and that labour can't raise the 80% employment rate without disabled people is alarming not once was it mentioned on what they'd do for people who are unable to get back into employment I think their going to pilot something just like they did when they rolled UC out  then roll it out I think pip is being reformed but I don't think it's going to be vouchers they'll means test it and continue payments at reduced rate i think they'll stop payments for people with minor illness and want proof from people who haven't given enough evidence in their claim and  with lwcra I think they'll change it to as if people are looking for work but it will be about their health and they'll have to prove their recieving treatment for physical or mental health and be in contact with a coach more than not at all I think   they'll then choose to keep people on their group or move them to lcw which will then eventually put them in iws group i hope I'm wrong and hope that they'll say theirs a safety net for people who can't work the government won't get over 3million people off benefits by next year but I think they'll make a target for a chunk of that number every year over their time running the country  they'll have to prove their plans are working   .
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Lill I disagree. What we've seen already shows Labour are *worse* than the Conservatives. At least under conservatives plans people in ESA/UC Support Group were going to be left alone, no more WCA etc. The Labour years are going to be very nasty.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    The absence of any question about vouchers means that the government is left to decide where and how to strike if there is a strike against disabled people on the voucher issue. It is unfortunate that from time to time we hear the Conservatives defending the weakest in society more than the right wing of the Labour Party. But it is still a game of ping pong between the two parties, and the victim is the poor community.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago
    All the MP's just close ranks irrespective of their parties.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @MrFibro Simply, the Conservatives party, the right-wing Labour Party and others are in a state of panic because the capitalist system they defend has begun to collapse, so you see them lining up together even if they differ in form, but in substance they are united to defend their system.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 months ago


    I’ve just posted my distress about this hidden report on my Universal Credit journal, adding that, after decades of reassessments, I’m not sure I will survive another one in my older age. I made it clear that I’m not well enough to work and that there are many like me—people who need help and support but are being pushed beyond their limits by this system. Instead of being able to focus on managing our conditions and recovery, we are constantly retraumatized by a process that feels designed to break us down.

    I also mentioned that it must be deeply distressing for the decent people working within the DWP to witness the effects of such a brutalizing system on claimants. 



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @(No) hope Years ago Iost my incapacity benefit a lovely fella from dfc northern Ireland helped me get my money back he went out of his way when he didn't have to. It's like all walks of life there's good and bad.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @KimABT Thank you Kabtt I'm sorry things were so tough for you working at the job centre but really good you treated the claimants so well. 

      I had a very tough day after posting that on my UC journal berating myself for doing it.  I'm not sure if I should have done it but I was so incensed by hearing about these reports I felt I had to do something. I'm hoping there won't be any backlash from it.  I just got a reply from the job coach saying that this is to do with ESA not UC I would have to contact them with any concerns....or similar wording.  Possibly stupidly I went back and repeated some of what I'd said but just asked for it to be put on my record which they agreed to do.  We will see - feel very low spirited today.... poked the sleeping tiger! Keeping on keeping on.....
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @KimABT I know someone who works at a jobcentre near here. Yes, there’s too much emphasis on sanctions, and the penalties are very harsh, but this person I know says some people just don’t want to turn up at appointments and will make any excuse not to go. Some live far away or out in the sticks so it’s a hassle to get there, that’s true.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @CaroA It was too brutal for me as a JC officer. In most jobs we become part of the ethos of the place, when I've worked in schools I could be part of the push to make our children the best in the district - we'd push to win rugby, cricket, essay writing competitions and scholarships. I could back the board in a football club as I was never asked to treat our disabled fans with contempt over their concessionary tickets, we treated them equally and with respect. But at the DWP it was a miserable contrast, I tried to make a positive difference by being respectful & kind, I'd not demean clients in any way. If I'd had my way they'd get a cup of tea if they missed the bus and were late, in the job centre my line manger wanted to sanction them. Few of the staff at the JC understood the rural bus service and it's limitations. 

      It is a brutalizing system, be careful on your journal as I've written a lot on policy directives, a member of UC staff misinterpreted my writing and then I had a message saying my UC had to stop - it was crazy as I'd only ventured opinion and the person concerned couldn't distinguish between opinion and fact.  So by all means express yourself but read it through before you post onto the journal. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @(No) hope Thanks (No) Hope and for the kind way you expressed yourself yes I have read John Prings book twice now...but amazingly I have come across some decent, kind ones. God knows how they stay working in an organization like this I think many end up leaving.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Anon I have tried replying several times, but none have been published. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @T I honestly don’t think what she said was that bad. She’s the minister for employment so of course she wants to boost employment. They also want to help more disabled people to get into work - not an easy task but a good ambition. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @A Well we know Labour will reform or replace the WCA. It was in their manifesto. If there’s no WCA there can’t be any LCWRA, it’ll either be scrapped or some other UC element added if someone gets PIP (which is what the Tories proposed)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @Butterflychild66 This entire thread is full of suggestions, opinions, speculation and guessing so I’m not sure why you went for me. I find it interesting to read the various ideas and thoughts put forward. 

      I’ll be very surprised if they (Labour) do nothing. So you have to expect something to change. There’s a white paper coming (presumably this month?) on Getting Britain Working and then the Budget, so more info will emerge then. 

      I think any party that gets into power is going to change the benefits system to be honest. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 months ago
      @WatchandWait You can list all your friends and even all the friends of your friends. Make no mistake, these are not measuring tools or gauge for millions of people.


Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact