Prime minister Rishi Sunak appeared to blame claimants for high taxes and high migration numbers as he set out his five point plan for welfare reform in a speech given yesterday at the right-wing think tank, the Centre for Social justice, founded by Iain Duncan-Smith.

The five welfare reforms the Conservatives will introduce if they win the election are:

  • the WCA will be made harder to pass;
  • GPs will no longer issue fit notes;
  • legacy benefits claimants will move to UC sooner and work requirements will be increased;
  • PIP will no longer always be a cash benefit and fewer people will be eligible;
  • DWP to be given powers to seize goods, arrest claimants and impose fines.

Irresponsible burden

In his speech, Sunak claimed that there 850,000 more economically active people in the UK since the pandemic, due to long-term sickness.

He argued that the country “can’t afford such a spiralling increase in the welfare bill and the irresponsible burden that would place on this and future generations of taxpayers.”

 As well as increasing taxes, the rising number of claimants is to blame for high migration numbers according the prime minister:

“We can’t lose so many people from our workforce whose contributions could help to drive growth.  And there’s no sustainable way to achieve our goal of bringing down migration levels, which are just too high without giving more of our own people the skills, incentives, and support, to get off welfare and back into work.”

Sunak went on to set out five welfare reforms the Conservatives intend to introduce in the even that they win the next election.

Reform 1:  the WCA will be made harder to pass

Sunak argued that in 2011, only 20% of those assessed under the work capability assessment (WCA) were found to be unfit for work.  But the figure now is 65%.

“That’s wrong. People are not three times sicker than they were a decade ago.” Sunak argued.

The solution is to make it harder to pass the WCA, something the government is already drawing up plans to do.

“So we are going to tighten up the Work Capability Assessment such that hundreds of thousands of benefit recipients with less severe conditions will now be expected to engage in the world of work – and be supported to do so.”

Reform 2:  GPs will no longer issue fit notes

The Conservative’s attempts to replace the sick note with the fit note, which says what work you can still do with support, has been an abject failure.

94% of fit notes still sign people off completely.

So, now the Conservatives plan to stop GPs issuing fit notes altogether and give the job to people who may not even be medically qualified:

“So we’re also going to test shifting the responsibility for assessment from GPs and giving it to specialist work and health professionals who have the dedicated time to provide an objective assessment of someone’s ability to work and the tailored support they need to do so.”

A consultation on reforming the fit note process was launched yesterday and will run until 8 July 2024.

Reform 3: legacy benefits claimants will move to UC sooner and work requirements will be increased

Sunak announced that “we’ll accelerate moving people from legacy benefits onto Universal Credit, to give them more access to the world of work.”

The DWP have since used X (formerly Twitter) to reveal that

“The Prime Minister’s welfare reform speech earlier today announced the acceleration of the Managed Migration of legacy ESA/ESA & HB cases to #UniversalCredit. All migration notices will now be sent by the end of December 2025. We will work with stakeholders on the detailed plans.”

The rules around UC and work should also be tightened according to Sunak.

Instead of nine hours, “Anyone working less than half a full-time week will now have to try and find extra work in return for claiming benefits.” 

In addition, “Anyone who doesn’t comply with the conditions set by their Work Coach such as accepting an available job will, after 12 months, have their claim closed and their benefits removed entirely.”

Reform 4: PIP will no longer always be a cash benefit and fewer people will be eligible

Sunak claims that spending on PIP will increase by 50% over the next four years unless the rules are changed.

He argues that whilst some people need money for aids such as handrails or stairlifts “Often they’re already available at low cost, or free from the NHS or Local Authorities.  And they’re one-off costs so it probably isn’t right that we’re paying an ongoing amount every year.” 

In addition, claimants with mental health conditions are to be targeted because “for all the challenges they face it is not clear they have the same degree of increased living costs as those with physical conditions.”

In fact, Sunak wonders if these claimants should be given money at all:

“And we’ll also consider whether some people with mental health conditions should get PIP in the same way through cash transfers or whether they’d be better supported to lead happier, healthier and more independent lives through access to treatment like talking therapies or respite care.”

Sunak announced that a consultation will be launched in the next few days to decide how to stop the PIP assessment system being “undermined by the way people are asked to make subjective and unverifiable claims about their capability.”

The government wants to see more medical evidence required to substantiate a claim and “a more objective and rigorous approach that focuses support on those with the greatest needs and extra costs” with a limit on “the type and severity of mental health conditions that should be eligible for PIP.”

Reform 5:  DWP to be given powers to seize goods, arrest claimants and impose fines

Sunak announced that the Conservatives are preparing “a new Fraud Bill for the next Parliament which will align DWP with HMRC so we treat benefit fraud like tax fraud with new powers to make seizures and arrests. And we’ll also enable penalties to be applied to a wider set of fraudsters through a new civil penalty.”

In other words, the DWP will be able to search claimants homes, seize possessions such as computers and mobile phones, arrest claimants and impose fines.

The plan to give the DWP police powers is something we have been warning about for some time.

Will any of this ever happen?

These plans are largely based on the Conservatives winning the next election.  There is no indication that any of them will be supported by Labour if they win.

Of them all, the one most likely to come about whatever the election result is the earlier date for moving income-based ESA claimants to UC.  The move was delayed by the government until 2028/29 in a bid to save money and the pause was never popular with the DWP, who would prefer to complete the process in one go.

There is a real possibility that whichever party is in power next, they will decide that yet another change of date will cause too much confusion.

For the rest of the reforms, the best we can say is that when it comes to voting, claimants now have  a clear picture of what the Conservatives have planned for them - even if Labour’s intentions are still unclear.

You can read the full text of Sunak’s speech here.

You can read more about the PIP changes and find out how to take part in the consultation here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    I would just like to take a moment to highlight something I have witnessed on various disability forums and advocacy website comments lately. There appears to be a lot of people/bots coming forward not defending the Tory proposals (because they're plainly indefensible) but who are coming out raging against Labour. I'm not trying to interfere with anyone's free voting choice but I hope we might all bear in mind that there are some dark political forces at play just now, who know that if people can be turned off the only other alternative then the Tories will get back in by default. If this is not what you want, especially now we know what they have in store for us, however much you might feel put off by Labour's silence ok our rights - remember if we do nothing or cote for a third party with no chance of winning an outright majority, we might as well vote Tory. Be clear what you want people.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Meg On the face of it, for various reasons Starmer's version of Labour is certainly not the opposition that one would hope for, but sadly they're all we realistically have at the moment. However distasteful voting for them in their current guise may be, and however melodramatic you might think it may sound, Labour may now be the only option that some of us could have for survival beyond the next two to three years.

      (MODS: this reply was meant for here but somehow ended up under a different post - probably my fault, sorry - if you'd like to swap/replace them, thanks)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    Just heard they are back to waffling about vouchers instead of pip payments and-or having us send receipts back to them for items purchased for refunding. (So they can see if we've used pip for items to help with our daily lives)
    What kind of a country do we live in.
    So,it's definitely not about saving money at all.Its about humiliation. I'm disgusted. Keeping tabs on us at every turn.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @wibblum And what about those whose wives and husbands have given up work helping to look after them? They give a carer's allowance if on PIP. It is a pittance. I had to raid my private pension 4 years early at the age of 61 to allow my wife to stop working to help me at home during the day due to me falling and having nobody around. Carers allowance does not cover the cost of not working. How do I get a voucher for that?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @wibblum I meant to say revel not remember 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @wibblum Unfortunately i remember IDS and his smiling face as he tried to 'revolutionise' the benefits system.
      How he was almost beside himself with glee at what he'd proposed.
      And all the back patters around him.
      The entire system stinks to high heaven,then and now.And they know it.
      They remember in the detriment of those they deem unworthy of life and do so blatantly.
      Any right thinking person would consign them to history. 
      We simply cannot go on day and daily under the Jack boot of tory Rhetoric. 
      We are being deliberately and constantly picked on,bullied and dragged into a mire of destitution.
      I can't take much more,like most of you. We are so up against it 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @The Dog Mother Yes I've just heard about the waffling about the vouchers too. Yes that would be very humiliating. I am utterly disgusted too. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @The Dog Mother On the face of it, for various reasons Starmer's version of Labour is certainly not the opposition that one would hope for, but sadly they're all we realistically have at the moment. However distasteful voting for them in their current guise may be, and however melodramatic you might think it may sound, Labour may now be the only option that some of us could have for survival beyond the next two to three years.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    They are launching a consultation this afternoon until July 23rd. 

    It's vital everyone makes it clear none of it's on to send a loud clear signal to labour not to even consider any of these disgusting ideas when they take the reigns.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    More deliberately disingenuous claptrap from Stride on BBC Breakfast today. In his exact words, PIP "can be thousands per month", said in such a way to insinuate that every single PIP claimant receives thousands of pounds each month, siphoned directly from the pockets of every hardworking family in Britain.

    You can literally hear the gears on their propaganda machine cranking up. Expect to hear more lies like this in the coming months, now that they've been emboldened by the 'success' of their Rwanda 'Solution'.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    Where exactly are they going to find these 'trained professionals' to issue fit notes and who's going to handle the decision appeals when they refuse? 
    It's pure lip service from those desperately trying to save their own skin. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Barney Their 'trained prefessionals' will no doubt be Jobcentre employees who have attended a three-hour 'disability awareness' seminar.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    Sunak is going to be making an announcement today on future plans for disability benefit. Apparently, he is going to discuss paying benefits in vouchers only or making claimants provide receipts to show what they are spending their money on.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    I'm on Pip and without it I don't know how I will look after myself sometimes I can't move and don't leave the house and others I'm so manic I make no sense and don't finish anything, my history has made me scared of people and I can't stop from shaking and being sick. If I have no control o or my emotions and people have to come with and also help me even cook and clean for myself it's cheaper for me to offer to pay people than a government health worker who don't exist to come in and then remove my son in to care because they will say I'm unfit to have him.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    Interesting that Matthew Parris, the conservative Times columnist, says adhd does not exist, and autism is over diagnosed. I suppose there have always been uninformed and prejudiced people lacking in compassion, who have refused to acknowledge the reality of others' experience, treating difference it as if it were self indulgent affection. The sort of people, for example, who would advocate conversion therapy for homosexuality. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @notsoeasy Tories tend to view the world in simple, binary, black and white terms. There's no shade. No nuance. No grey areas. They have a parochial view of the world and that's why we're in so much danger with them at the wheel. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago

    Responding to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's plans to stop GPs issuing sick notes to people too ill to work, Green Party co-leader Carla Denyer said:

    “How cold hearted do you have to be, and how lacking in empathy, to see this crisis of ill health as anything other than caused by decades of austerity and lack of investment in the NHS?

    “The PM should be fixing the NHS so that people can get well, not blaming people who are ill.

    “We would invest in mending the health and social care system, not denying people the right to see a GP when they need it.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Deb44 Doubling down on those 'weaker' than oneself is the tory way, and their criteria for 'weakness' is of course purely financial. It certainly isn't moral.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Deb44 Ok, fair enough but the Greens won't get anywhere near Government, so what they say is irrelevant.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    All of this depends on whether the Conservative government wins the next election unless I'm mistaken. That should be the focal point of thought if you're feeling anxious and stressed.

    Sunak can promise to give gold plated unicorns to every adult in "the next parliament", the fact is that the next parliament is after the next election and unless a political miracle happens the Tories are going to lose hundreds of seats.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Sara @Sara, I hope you are right.
      I've done a wca and pip assessment within the past year.
      I thought I'd at least get a break from anything dwp connected for a while.But I've read the uc early movement is already set up, as they've been moving people on tax credits and others for years and this is more a natural progression. And already needs no further legislation. 
      That worries me.It all does,every new proposal. 
      I'm absolutely demented with it all.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @The dogmother. We have to hold out for the dwp to mess it up when we need them to. The original roll out of uc fell way behind schedule, so here's hoping. 

      Such a palaver, especially if you're near pension age and would soon face further changes in the form of a state pension, and maybe a pension credit claim, not to mention a new housing benefit claim. All about costs, say the tories, well, the waste of public funds sorting out those variables.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @JJ The move to us on iresa and hb to UC is for next year.Three flipping years early.  I can't see much stopping that .
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    https://www.gbnews.com/politics/rachel-reeves-crackdown-benefits-cheats-tax-avoiders-tony-blair-advice

    The only people who like the Labour Party are those who saw their houses triple in under a decade. They were an absolute horrific nightmare, and so were Tories. 
    Both parties are utterly horrific.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Pete Companies ended final salary pensions, because of Browns raid, when he was chancellor, he was warned by the treasury , the cbi and no10 the equity would go into property and under blair there was a 30 fold increase in BTL, as people bought the small houses historically bought by FTBs, to use as their pensions. The banking credit bubble made people feel rich, as their houses tripled in value, due to the bankers committing the biggest fraud in history, labour have never said it was a crime, or it was a mistake, instead they have created the worst economic divide in centuries and the people who did it are still in charge. I missed the boat, as I began working in 99, and within 2 years house prices doubled. Someone in the same job as me, same wages, just a couple of years older, everytime their house doubled in value, they just used the new found equity to purchase BTL. If the average house still cost 3x individual salary, it would cost around 75-80k, not 260k +
      Back in 1997, nobosy would have voted for Blair if he had tried to pitch houses at 10x salary. The 20thC median was 3x salary. Blair and co, are straight up evil. New Labours horrific mismanagement are the root of all the problems we have today.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Carol K People have forgotten there hasn't actually been a genuine 'Labour' party since 1990.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Ally Well said!  I am similar. DWP under last Labour government was helpful and supportive.  I was able to retrain and find employment - in fact the DWP - job center advised against taking too many hours in new role as it would worsen my disability.  

      DWP is a dept that mirrors the current government- it used to be humane and helpful. But that all stopped the moment Tory’s got back in. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Fred It wasn't so much that house prices tripled, it was how Labour encouraged btl investment and did almost nothing to improve the lives of private renters. 

      These changes proposed by the Tories feel a lot more threatening if you live under an AST in privately rented accommodation. The reason such tenants have high rents and insecure tenancies is as much to do with the 13 years in power Labour had as it does the Tories.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Carol K But they were also the first to acknowlege the monumental catastrophe it is. At least they're saying they've learned from it
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    When will Mr Sunak address the real worl.  The vast majority of people on long term sick would rather be at work but no one is willing to make the adaptations this requires.  We had to jump through hoops for my son to be given PIP and he does work but every time we put in a claim it goes to appeal and then is overturned but the amount of money and man hours this uses is a waste. 
    I agree wirh chasing the fraudsters but to chase those who need the support is wrong. My sons girlfriend has been unemployed for the past year and is capable to work but much longer and she will become unwilling to work. At no time in the last year inspite of having her regular meeting at the job centre has anyone offered to help her find work.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    In the Autumn Statement 2022 it stated that plans for Pension Credit/housing benefit merger were originally for 2025 but has been delayed to 2028/2029.
    Is this the case or has that now been brought forward as well. Does anyone know?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @robbie
      Thanks robbie.  I guess Mr. Noone does know something then - don't worry seems to be the theme of the day ;-)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @lesley Tbc, lesley, tbc. Noone does know, but the new Move to Universal Credit website tells us not to worry, so we're not worrying, right? Who's worrying?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    Absolutely astounding.  The man has no idea how things can impact on people's lives.  Such long wait list for mental health support.  Who is this man listening to???
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    This Tory government has been engaging in a war on the poor and vulnerable since 2010. Its demonization of those on benefits is part of their divide and rule agenda in an election year. The immorality of its actions is clearly apparent in its sheer indifference to the suffering it has caused and continues to cause. The only crumb of comfort is that this despicable Tory government faces a huge defeat in the upcoming general election. We will then have have to fight for our rights against a Starmer led government which agrees with the Tories on most economic issues. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    This is a last ditch desperation by the Tories because they think benefits bashing is popular and they're appealing to their shrinking base. What is a less severe mental health condition, pray? Oh hang on, it's 'a bit of anxiety' or 'feeling a bit bluesy' (in the words of Mel Stride). How insulting and dismissive when the symptoms of anxiety, for example, are COMPLETELY physical. And where do neurological illnesses that often present as mental health (like autism) fit in? Surely this is discrimination once again against mental health conditions which we saw before they attempted to put mental health on a par with physical health? Isn't it ammunition for mental health discrimination? And how much MORE medical evidence can they ask of a person for PIP? It's really difficult to get PIP even with sufficient evidence and then they ignore it half the time (this happened with me)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    @keepingitreal. Also, re the migration timetable on the Move to Universal Credit site it says:

    "Look out for a letter in the post at some point this year. The table below will give you a rough idea of when you’re likely to receive your letter. This is just a guide so don’t worry if you don’t receive a letter by the date given below."

     All righty! We won't worry. Not worrying. Let us know when to start worrying.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @reasonstobecheerful And we're paranoid when our posts get cut. As I was saying, of course we're worried, many of us are worried witless. We don't need to be told not to worry if we don't get the letter. Not getting the letter is not what's worrying. The tories are mucking (think rhyming word) with our heads.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @reasonstobecheerful For the three (so far) of you who have 'downed' my comment about worrying, robbie is right - you have missed the irony. I was taking a swipe at government info which has threatened us with action, then postponed the action, then u-turned and brought it forward again, only to patronise us by saying not to worry if we don't get the letter to action the action.

      Of course we're worried, many of us are worried witless. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @reasonstobecheerful Ha ha, think a couple of folks might have missed the irony there.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @reasonstobecheerful I saw someone on the news yesterday that said they are so behind on migrating the previous people to UC, they are likely to be way behind in their deliverance of any such measures.  
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    Down and bluesy. Such an off the cuff, dismissive and ignorant phrase.?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 months ago
    I'm currently undergoing tests for a few nasty symptoms that could be extremely serious so that's my number 1 worry right now.

    I am not going to worry about this the reasons why are

    1. There is no way on the planet the tories will be relected

    2. As someone else said Starmer has condemned these plans without outright saying so by making it clear the NHS is the number 1 priority over welfare tightening.

    3. Labour already stated the changes to the wca will not be happening under their watch.

    4. Worrying makes everyone's health so much worse and achieves nothing, I've learnt this the hard way on the past.

    5. There's already a general fierce backlash and a resignation from a tory representative for dementia. (Labour will be paying attention to all this backlash)

    Also let's look at dla to pip and the move tp UC so far. Both are years and years behind every single date they've given.

    Because of the speed, staff and work involved there os no way everyone will be on UC within 18 months.

    It's hard but please try and keep calm.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Katathome01 I do not agree with this.  They have already stated that they won't.  These kind of posts do annoy me as they just creat fear and panic.  They may introduce new plans to reform those who can work and are not, that does not mean they will introduce things like taking away PIP altogether.  (Keir Starmer gave a rebuttal to that when he told Rishi Sunak he should concentrate on the NHS before introducing such moves.)

      Labour will always be better than the Tories.  I completely believe that, they may still do some reforms but nowhere near what the Tories are.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @MrFibro They don't think they'll ever become ill, sick, disabled, or, perhaps most signifiantly, poor. Their lack of imagination stems from never having been without funds to alleviate whatever might afflict them.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Katathome01 Except a vote for anyone other than Labour is a vote for the Tories because of our first past the post voting system, effectively making it a two party race
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @Anon But anyone can become sick, ill, disabled.  So why would someone vote for Tory with their inhumane policies towards benefit claimants, fully knowing what the DWP would implement on them.  If and when they were to become ill, sick, disabled ?


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 months ago
      @keepingitreal
      Both Starmer & Reeves have stated, categorically, that they'll be hitting we Disabled & chronically ill hard!

      Labour hasn't been great at protecting us since Blair, and their stance, since then, is growing worse by the day.

      For those too ill/disabled to work, it'll get to the point, as it was pre-1940's, when there will be no support for us, unless it's in the modern equivalent of  the Workhouses!

      Any of us, looking to Labour to protevt us against all of this, is on a hiding to nothing - Starmer Et Al, are total Tories, especially where not working is concerned.

      Tbey will hit us even harder than the Tories already have, and still are, if only to show their pals, in the benches opposite, that they are harder than them!

      If you want ANY protection, come the GE, then either vote Green, or any Socialist-minded Independent MP.

      People always forget that there's more than two political parties here, and a combination of Greens and Independents, could easily serve in a Government, where Labour has just a minor role!

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.