Pat McFadden, secretary of state for work and pensions, has revealed that the Timms review will issue its interim report before the parliamentary recess.  He also confirmed that the review has the power to recommend cuts to personal independence payment (PIP) and that he had personally asked them to look at “conditions like anxiety and depression, neurodiverse conditions and so on”.

McFadden was addressing the Commons Work and Pensions committee on 17 June.

On the timing of the review, he explained that there are “two very important reviews under way”: the Milburn report on young people and the Timms review.  

“I expect an interim report from the Timms review before the summer recess. Both reviews will give final reports before the end of the year. Depending on their conclusions, which I do not want to anticipate too much here, if legislative change is needed, it will come after that.”

The last day the House sits before the summer recess is Thursday, 16 July.

McFadden went on to confirm that the Timms review could recommend cuts to PIP, but not big increases: 

“In the terms of reference, we were sending a signal to the reviewers not to come forward with a big, increasing cost package. There is nothing to stop them coming forward with measures that reduce costs, but we did not want them to come forward with a review that simply says, “Let’s pay much more into the system.”

McFadden also revealed for the first time that he had personally asked members of the review to look at certain conditions:

“In particular, there has been an increase in conditions like anxiety and depression, neurodiverse conditions and so on. Is this benefit fit for purpose in the way that it is designed, in dealing with that variety of conditions? That is a very interesting question for the reviewers. When I went to speak to them a few months ago in one of their sessions, that is the question I put to them to consider.”

On the day after McFadden’s appearance before the committee, a Conservative peer put forward a private members bill that would end awards of the standard rate of PIP for claimants with a primary condition of anxiety, depression or ADHD.

The bill has no chance of becoming law, but it demonstrates a growing political consensus on reducing the cost of PIP awards for anxiety, depression and neurodiversity.

You can read the full transcript of the work and pensions committee meeting or watch it on Parliament TV

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    Sabre rattling again and discriminatory against neurodiverse individuals with these conditions. Maybe I’ll sue the government for giving  me chronic versions of both and leaving me unable to carry on working dumped with no support. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    Yet until recently Stephen Timms used to state that the PIP review was "not intended to deliver cuts".
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 hours ago
    Burnham will be in No. 10 soon, and Ed Miliband will more than likely be the Chancellor. Pat McFadden will be gone, and there's every chance that the new round of performative cruelty that he and his team have been cooking up for the disabled will be thrown out with him. Burnham knows that he has to get this right or Labour is going to die and things will get very dark indeed. Getting it right will not involve reheating the same right-wing, anti-welfare policies of his predecessor. He will also be aware that many of the people who voted for him in Makerfield - which apparently has an above average number of people who depend on PIP/disability benefits -  will have done so because of the fear instilled in them by Reform's promise to cut their lifelines - i.e., they voted for him in the desperate hope that he, as Prime Minister, will do what every Labour leader should do - protect the sick, the poor, and the vulnerable. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Adam Amen!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Adam Oh god I hope you're right about this I really do.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    My Complex-PTSD was labelled as ‘anxiety’ and/or ‘depression’ for years by the DWP. 
    The throwaway that ‘everyone gets anxious or depressed’ is disrespectful and further compounds trauma. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    "In the terms of reference, we were sending a signal to the reviewers not to come forward with a big, increasing cost package. There is nothing to stop them coming forward with measures that reduce costs,"

    Well, what a surprise. Nice to know it's so even-handed.

    If Burnham becomes PM, which now looks all but certain, I hope McFadden gets the boot and is replaced by someone who doesn't seem like a Dalek.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    I would be very interested to know if these proposed cuts would affect those claimants with more than one diagnosis, for example someone with anxiety and heart disease, or depression and cancer, and so on. It would be far better for claimants themselves to identify what their primary condition is, rather than the DWP, who will always choose the conditions that attract the most severe cuts.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 hours ago
    Schizophrenia and Bi polar would be deemed severe and Autism plus ADHD and Anxiety plus Depression less severe that's my understanding.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 hours ago
    So what about serious conditions mental health conditions like Bipolar, schizophrenia, psychotic depression, each of those conditions have depression and anxiety as part of their multitude of symptom's, are they now not severe enough for PIP?

    Depression, anxiety and ADHD don't just have one aspect that affects those suffering from them have to cope with, it is multi layered and can cause and destroy lives for those suffering with them as much as Bipolar and schizophrenia. 

    This is so vague it leaves so much open to interpretation, it could cover every mental health condition and neurological disorder.  Would someone on here break it down as to how they are going to work it please?