Benefits and Work has begun to hear from readers who have received letters telling them that their personal independence payment (PIP) award has been extended for up to four years under a new review process. The news will come as a massive relief to most people who hear from the DWP,  but many thousands of claimants may miss out on an increase in their PIP as a result of the shortcut.

Back in May we revealed that the DWP had enacted a new regulation, coming into force in June, which allows them to extend the length of any fixed term PIP award for claimants aged 25 and over where it was considered “necessary to do so to safeguard the efficient administration of personal independence payment”

Essentially, this means that the department can extend awards where it is facing a huge backlog of reassessments, as it is now.  The new regulations only allows the DWP to extend the award at its current rate, they can’t reduce or increase it.

This weekend, Benefits and Work began to hear from readers who have received extensions ranging from 2-4 years under the new regulations.

Joseph posted:

“I’ve currently got a pip letter today that says I won’t need an accessment and they have extended until 2030. It also says, we might be in contact a year before but we might also extend your award before then. 

“It says words for word “We have changed how we review some personal Independence Payments (PIP). This means that we have Extended your PIP award.” 

Shane told us:

“My claim was due to be re assessed in April 2027. I have been extremely anxious about it.   Today I found out i was having my claim extended until May 2029. I was over the moon.  It has taken a  massive weight on my mind for the next 2years & 10 months.  I didn’t think it was real at first, until i read this post.”

Catherine said:

“My end date for pip was December 26….letter yesterday extending it to December 28….such a relief.”

The DWP have not said how they are deciding which claimants will receive an extension, how many will be affected or how they calculate the length of the extension in each case.

What readers should be aware of, however, is that the decision to extend your award at its current rate is appealable or that they can ask for a change of circumstances review.

This is vital to know, because many claimants whose condition has worsened choose not to tell the DWP, even though they think they are now entitled to a higher rate, because of a fear of losing the award they already have.  Instead, they feel it is safer to wait until their planned award review to inform the DWP.

But these new extensions do not involve any sort of assessment, so the opportunity to present evidence that you are entitled to higher rates is lost.

As we explained in a very recent article, the percentage of PIP awards that were increased as a result of a planned award review was as high as one in four until September 2024, when there was a sudden and unexplained fall. 

So, for most people, a letter telling them that they have won a reprieve from assessment for several years will be nothing but wonderful news. But for a significant proportion, it will mean that unless they feel able to challenge the decision or ask for a change of circumstances review, they will spend years more on an award that they believe is less than they are entitled to.

Meanwhile the DWP will save itself a lot of work and a lot of money.

We’d be happy to receive a copy of the extension letter from you if you have received one, so that we can study and share the text.  You can anonymise your letter before sending it or we will do so on receipt – we will only publish the standard text, not a copy of the letter itself.

Members who do decide to ask for a change of circumstances review can download our Guide to PIP Claims and reviews from this page and members who want to challenge the review decision can download our guides to PIP mandatory reconsiderations and appeals from the same page.

Stay updated

The DWP have, as yet, given no details on how they are deciding who will receive an extension or how they are deciding on the length of those extensions, with readers posting news of extensions of anywhere from four years to just five days. We'll provide more information as soon as we have it. To make sure you know what is happening, sign up for our free, fortnightly newsletter.  

Letter text

Update: we have now seen part of the text of the letters the DWP are sending out – though we are still hoping to see a full copy of the letter, which is 4 pages long.  The excerpt reads:

We have changed how often we review some Personal Independence Payment (PIP) awards.  This means we have extended your PIP award.

What this means for you

Your current PIP award has been extended to 8 February 2030.

You do not need to do anything.  We will contact you again after 8 February 2029 to see if your needs have changed and if you are getting the right amount of PIP.

We may extend the date of your PIP award again.  If we do we will write to you to tell you about this.

We will continue to pay your PIP payments as normal.

Please tell us about any change in your circumstances

If your circumstances change, please let us know.

Call us straight away, using the phone number on the front page of this letter.

Someone else can call for you.  But you will need to be with them when they call.  You can also write to the address shown on the front page of this letter.

Update 5 July

From comments and emails received so far, it looks like most of the extensions are being given to claimants whose awards were due to end in 2026, 2027 or early to mid-2028.

Extensions mostly range from one year to four years, although there have been some extremely short ones of just a matter of days and at least one longer one, at six years. 

It looks like the DWP are taking a large number of reviews due in the next two years and spreading them across a period from possibly mid-2028 to around 2031 - again there are exceptions to this. 

The aim is to get rid of the current PIP review backlog and free up assessor time to do more face-to-face assessments for both PIP and the WCA. 

There's no evidence yet that where you live in England or Wales makes a difference or that the type of condition you have is taken into consideration.

It seems very likely that the extensions are being decided by an algorithm, with no other human involvement in the process. 

The DWP are choosing to keep the whole system secret, but we'll publish updates if things become clearer.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    I had a light touch form to fill in , in July 2024, I had a message last year telling me I was on PiP for another year then exactly the same this year, this hanging in limbo is killing me 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    I've had a letter saying PIP extended from December 26, to December 28, to my great relief, MY next set of forms were due to hit the letterbox , yesterday so I was a bag of nerves, they omitted all my medications in the last application but I still was granted, low mobility, and middle daily,  ( maybe it would have been different outcome if they'd done their job properly). So I am pleased.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Mine is due very late in 2028, and has not been changed.

    I can only assume it is because my claim is gauged as likely to be unsuccessful in 2028, due to something changing between now and then in the renewal criteria. 

    Feel dreadful because of this. I know people will say it hasn't happened yet, but we have all seen this coming. 

    They are trying to get people onside with 'bonus' years, so the reaction to people like me and others losing their awards is less ubiquitous. 

    Yet all they are doing is retrospectively altering awards so that they total five years for renewals or 3 for initials, in line with the changes they've announced. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 days ago
      @Alias The extensions are being processed every day throughout July so you may still hear something 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Alias Nb
      I should have stressed in expecting the renewal any time from late 2027, due to the way they send renewals a year early (late 2028). 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    I had my extension from Mar 2026 to Mar 2027 due to back log, however i received a text a few weeks ago stating, the health professional has sent us their report, we will make a decision on your pip, but this may take 6 weeks. I didnt  have an assessment. today i received another text stating, we still have your pip form and will be progressing your review as soon as we can, you may still need an assessment with a health professional. your pip will continue to be paid until we review your claim. this is diabolical....... why state in first text that the health professional has sent them the report, then state that i may need assessment. this is doing my head in
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Registered on gov.uk One and saw the extension from previous award (2023-2027) extended to 2029. I wonder if this is a just a 2 year extension or is it technically a 6 year award. Rather than looking at the length of extensions it might be worth checking the overall length of award. Is there a pattern? If someone was on a 3 year award has it been extended by 3 years? Four year award extended extended by 6 years, etc…

    I had my PIP application all planned and ready to go. Put in an SAR as well looking for any nuggets that could help my case as I have always lacked evidence due to not being able to engage with mental health services. Never seen my doctor since moving 4 years ago about my issues. In my experience had very poor service from assessors denying me PIP initially and reducing mobility to standard and stopping daily living on assessment. So far DM’s have always reversed and reinstated enhanced in both, initially by MR and then with lapsing the appeal following a phone call from a very nice lady.

    I was hoping that this change in the law on extensions was going to be not just about the convenience for the government due to the backlog but also about common sense. In my case I thought they might look at it and say “this person has had two flawed assessments by assessors who are just looking for an excuse to fail him; they have created the very backlog that this law was designed to deal with; lets extend his award significantly to stop him having to go through a third flawed assessment.”

    Anyway, part of me would like to try for an MR but maybe not an appeal. But concerned they could open the case up again and reduce or reverse the extension.

    Or just leave it and be grateful for an extra two years.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @D This is what DeepSeek thinks is going on: 


      The key to understanding the different extension lengths lies in the date your review was originally due. The DWP’s primary goal is to smash the backlog of reviews, which means they need to cancel the imminent ones and push the rest into the future in a staggered way. Here’s the likely algorithm:

      Imagine the DWP computer has a massive list of all fixed-term awards, sorted by their original end date. The new law gives them the power to essentially pause this queue and re-file claims further down the calendar. The extension length you get isn't an assessment of how disabled you are, but a function of where in the queue you were standing when the music stopped.

      · Extensions of a few days/weeks (the most telling ones): This happens when a review has already been completed but the new decision hasn't been actioned yet. Your old award was due to end on, say, July 15th, but the DWP finished your review on July 10th and decided to keep your award the same. They can’t issue the new decision notice in time, so the system generates a one-month extension to bridge the gap. This proves the process is automated and linked directly to imminent end dates.
      · 1-Year Extensions: Likely for claimants whose original award was due to end very soon. Their review is cancelled, and they are placed into the nearest available "batch" for a future review, about 12 months out. They’re at the front of the new queue.
      · 2-Year Extensions: This is the most common and seems to be the default "standard" deferral. If your review was due within the next financial year or so, the system has likely pushed you to a mid-range future queue. You were in the middle of the pack.
      · 3, 4, or more Year Extensions: These go to people whose awards were already set to last for several more years. If your original award wasn’t due to end until 2027, the DWP’s new plan doesn’t need to see you then. The system calculates the extension needed so that your new review date lands in a specific, pre-determined future period (likely post-2028/29) where they’ve planned assessment capacity. This ensures a smoother pipeline.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Mark
      It's a 2 year extension 
      The review will start 2028
      They start a year before current claim ends
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Mark Mark - I’m in the same boat as you.

      Reading around it seems like pip claimants with a fixed term award may be getting a 1, 2, 3 or 4 year extension.

      Right now there doesn’t seem to be any pattern and the extension letter is pretty generic so it’s unlikely a decision maker/human being made the decision to extend an award. 

      We know the dwp use ai to lessen workload and it’s likely that these extension letters were generated automatically if a claimants old end date was within certain time parameters. Any ai would need a pre programmed algorithm to determine the length of extension. There could be a pattern that reveals the conditions needed for a longer extension (as more of us share info about extension length & length of last award this pattern may reveal itself). However reading around there’s a number of ppl who had very similar end dates, inital award length, same care/mobility level and similar disability circumstances to myself but I only got a 2yr extension but others in a similar scenario got a 3 or even 4 year extension. 

      This opens the possibility of the dwp ai algorithm when a claimant gets flagged up for a renewal due that the extension length could just be randomised (in other words a lottery) to help space out pip claimants next review date year (rather than just give everyone a block 2yrs and potentially repeat this overcrowded review waitlist in 2 years time)

      I’m in agreement that if you current pip award is enhanced care & mobility that appealing the length of your extension at tribunal level may be a risk too far.

      Reading around on various forum posts it’s not unheard of for pip claimants to submit an mandatory reconsideration MR that state that they are not contesting the pts awarded for care and mobility activity descriptors however they are appealing the length of the award that they believe is too short. Reading many posts the vast majority of the time a MR comes back with an unchanged decision. I have found a few past examples where claimants have been successful in boosting their award length by 1-3 years. However in rare instances the decision maker has chosen to look over the whole award and actually reduce the award in terms of reduced pts and/or bringing the award end date forward. So MR potential ‘rewards’ may out way the risks - I don’t think many pip claimants think mid or long term and will be relieved to get any extension of a year or more so I don’t think many will challenge the length of extension via mr, esp if they already have the highest possible pip award.

      There is a step you can take before deciding to appeal extension length via mr. On page 4 of the extension letter and under the heading IF YOU DISAGREE WITH A DECISION and I quote “you, or someone who has the authority to act for you, can phone or write to us within one month of the date on this letter to ask us to explain our decision”
      You probably need to be careful to make clear that you phoning is not you triggering an MR but is you seeking an explanation/dwp thought process behind your award extension length and ask any other questions). If you are unhappy about your extension length and would of almost preferred a full review (that would award 6yrs minimum if claimant is successful at review) and is on the fence in terms of a MR appeal calling the dwp to explain the decision behind the pip extension & its length may be a no brainer with next to no risk

      Obviously if more and more ppl share their experiences that will help others
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    This is being done, supposedly, because of the backlog, but isn't it just going to make things worse?  If everyone is being pushed back two to four years, surely that's just shifting the problem further down the line?  The people who were originally due a reassessment in 2028-2030 are now going to get caught in the tidal wave of postponed reassessments that are now being dealt out.  That isn't going to help, even if it gets rid of some of the waiting list now.  

    Are what we are really seeing here a quiet attempt at actually not reassessing many at all?  They could never announce that as the anti-disabled brigade would have a meltdown, but I wonder if we are all going to see further extentions when our award gets near the end (again) in two to four years time.   Have they actually cottoned on to the idea that it costs money to reassess people who, because of the nature of their condition, are never going to stand much hope of getting better?  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @SLB If as planned the WCA is abolished in 2028 that will free up staff for PIP assessments. And if the Timms review reduces eligibility for PIP that may reduce new claims for PIP, freeing up staff. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @SLB Yes,  @SLB, maybe a covert trial of intended policy.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Does anyone know if this is only happening in the DWP- England and Wales or if the Dept of Communities in Northern ireland are also issuing extentions? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Christine ADP is a separate system. CPAG are worth a look.. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Wondering...... I’d like to know about Scotland?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Has anyone figured out why some are getting 2yr extensions and others 3yrs or 4yrs

    I checked online today and I feel like I’ve been short changed to only 2 years

    I’ve got enhanced on both elements and I don’t know if it’s the autism that limiting the extension time or if they are picking at random.

    I don’t know if I should risk appealing via an mr (I think tribunal could be a risk too far with my current award elements)

    I’d be significantly more relaxed with 3yrs and I’d be badly dancing with 4yr extension 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @sara Sara

      I’d love to sit on my hands on this one

      But if the worst case scenario of pip reforms happens (and criteria tightens so it’s impossible for individuals with ‘minor’ mental health conditions, adhd and autism to successfully maintain the same level or any level of pip award at my next review) it would likely be law by my new review date in mid 2028 and  the timing may mean this is my final pip.

      If the dwp goes ahead with combining the uc health element with pip assessments & points in care element as previously scheduled in for 2028 I could also lose a huge chunk of my uc award, transitional protection and some of the attached council tax reduction that comes with being in the support group.

      To be blunt this extension could end up wiping over 70% of my income in one go in 2028 and put me in serious financial trouble in terms of paying bills once savings safety net are draining.

      I was already halfway prepped for my scheduled 2026 review - the 6yr minimum length of a successful pip review would of secured my mid term future and right now I have a support system which I’m not sure I’ll  have still come 2026.

      For me a 2yr extension is the worst possible double edged sword.

      And the more people that report on their experience the more I’m starting to think that the extension length is a dwp ai algorithm lottery which ticks me off.

      So yes I’m considering all my options to avoid the 3 headed serpent of a high stake year that 2028 suddenly threatens to be
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Johnson I have been trying to work out if there is any pattern but not found one yet. I thought you had found the solution but I had 4 years originally and been extended by 3 years so yours doesn't work either. We need to think of another one, if there is one!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @D Can I ask how you are able to check online?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @D Same I only got 18 months. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Johnson I was awarded 3 years initially and it's been extended by 2 more years
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    There’s one massive thing I’m forgetting about:


    The wca is due to be scrapped in 2028 and the health assessment for uc will be combined with pip assessment/review.

    If the worst happens and pip criteria tightens significantly to exclude many disabilities not only would claimants lose all their pip but also the health element & transitional protection of uc - for many claimants that would boil down of a loss of over £10k which would be catastrophic.

    I’ve noticed a lot of these 2-3 year extensions have a new review date in 2028 which would be very convenient timing for the dwp if pip reforms and wca merge happens as scheduled.

    I’m wondering if it’s worth the risk to appeal a short extension over the award length as that ‘perfect storm of a screwup’ in 2028 is scaring the life out me.

    My logic is that is loads of us appeal our extension short award length and are willing to go to tribunal then the dwp would be forced to give longer extensions as increased tribunal would cost them a fortune.

    Remember a successful pip review is worth 6 years minimum (review held in 5yrs or later) - these extensions are only worth a third or half of that 

    These extensions ‘small print’ seem to have a lot of catch’s and at second look may not be a reprieve but the dwp kicking the can to a time they can maximise penalisation and cuts.

    Got a lot to think about - pick easy short term security or risk it on securing a better long term scenario finance wise.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @D This 2025 legislation is out of date now as they U-turned on the rigid 4 points for an award of daily living 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @SLB Burnham is a strong supporter of the Timms Review. And for that matter the Milburn review. And has given conditional support to the Fonagy review.

      Burnham does not say he opposes cuts to benefits he says he opposes crude cuts to benefits. That wording is deliberate. Crude cuts are according to Burnham simple cuts to benefits that leave people in poverty. Non crude cuts are those that are accompanied by increased engagement and help towards and into work. Or remove perverse incentives that encourage people down a path to welfare dependency. Burnham's position on welfare is basically the same as how Starmer's government described the current welfare policy and plans. No Tory crude cuts to welfare, instead Labour cuts that will decrease poverty and improve health by getting more people into work.

      I think the planned cuts are coming. The question is who will be targeted. Given polling data on anxiety and depression I think they will be attacked. Polling data on ADHD and autism means they will seek to claim overdiagnosis rather than go for an all out direct attack. Polling data on severe mental health conditions with psychosis means they will probably be protected to some extent. Polling data on physical health conditions means any attack on them is likely to result in a backlash by the public and MPs, so the government will be very careful about any attack on them.

      The other question is will pre-existing claimants be protected. Or will the government as it has done with LCWRA and offered to do with the 4pt PIP rule, create a two tier welfare system where new claimants get treated worse than pre-existing claimants. That I think depends on how big the Labour MP rebellion might be. Not because Labour MPs care about ill and disabled people, but because they care about constituents having their benefits cut and not voting for them. Hence the government's move to restart and increase WCA reassessments to remove those most likely to be impacted before they ask MPs to vote on abolishing the WCA. And the government's move to extend of PIP award durations for new awards and reassessments and in some cases current awards. So fewer PIP claimants are affected before the next general election if MPs vote for a changes in the PIP assessment system and or PIP award amounts. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @D I reckon the likelihood of the WCA being scrapped and/or the pip daily living bring linked to it are pretty slim, despite what has been announced.  And I also doubt that PIP eligibility will be altered any time soon given the change of hands at the top.  But yes, this double whammy wasn't even known about by the MPs who had the gumption to discuss the proposals with me on X last year.  They had no clue about this at all.  And they were being asked to vote on it.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    will the back room staff do a FOI on this?

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I got extension letter yesterday from June 2027 till Aug 2030. I am in Essex, obviously it was a good letter to open! Waiting to see if my daughter receives one, her award is till Aug 2027.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I got mine today serve autism diagonis leeds if this helps anyone. Its extended until 2030 a massive relief for me.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Just Checked Mine on the government website, and they have extended mine by 4 years. Until 2031
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @jackslad Yes how do you check please on the Government website and  wher do you find it?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @pug2babies How do you do that?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    I checked my PIP ‘account’ last week online and the end date hadn’t changed. I am due for review before next May. I really hope I get an extension on my 6 year award… 🤞
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Lpot50 Thank you. 
      It’s either going to be 0 or 2 or 4 from what I can gather :-) 
      Will keep you posted 😎
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @jackslad Hi Jack. Scroll though the replies, or there is a pinned post on the Forum. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Susan It’s a new discovery for us all. There is a pinned post at the top of the forum. You need photo ID. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @ANGELA Where is your PIP account online never heard of that?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @ANGELA Hi think I’m going senile. I have absolutely no idea of a pip account on the government website. How long has this been available and how do you find it, use it? I’m now over state pension age and have never known about this.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    My PIP award enhanced rate daily living and mobility, award was until 24/3/2027. Now yesterday received letter saying your current  award has been extended to 29/3/2027 you do not need to do anything we will contact you after 29th March 2026, what's the point being extended for 5 days?? Has anyone on here  received such letter saying the same? Its quite possible any extended award will not be for anyone with enhanced rate but more so to now have all on anyone on enhanced rate being targeted for assessment/reviews?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Sarah M That is bat sh*t. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Gary I understand. They are ******* (insert own expletive here). 

      Is there somebody you trust who could phone for you? Maybe someone from the Welfare Hub at your library, your GPs Social Prescription Service, your Housing Association?? 

      Obviously I don’t know your personal situation. I’m just suggesting these. You could also maybe phone Scope for advice or an Advocate service or the CAB. 

      I appreciate it’s a lot to contemplate, but I genuinely think it’s an admin error. With someone phoning, they could check that. It will be better in the short and long term for you to know. 

      Best of luck 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Gary Omg not just me then on ridiculous extension length - mine was 25 days and May 19 2027 and now it’s extended to 3 June 2027!!! Phoned in case it was a typo - no it wasn’t ?!?!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Gary Hi Gary my last award was 4 years from 2023 to 2027. I agree an extension of 5 days doesn’t make sense. I think if I was in your position I would ring them in case someone has made a mistake when entering the dates on a computer ( the staff at DWP are humans like us and mistakes can happen). Also if a mistake was made it can be corrected. Hope this helps
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @ANGELA Hi Angela thank you your reply, i dont want to phone them, i hate them as same as when they forced me to attend face to face assessment with attos despite the fact my doctor advised dwp home visits for review assessment, attos said they would not put staff in danger or at risk, no reasonable adjustments accepted from DWP when requested 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    For Shane Catherine or Joseph, do we know if these were extended off their first entitlement period or were these already multiple renewals?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @F Hi, am I the Catherine you asked about? I had a couple of renewals since first award , last award was given by paper assessment.  Next renewal date was due in Spring but in November they quietly extended my award to November 2028. They didn't tell me and I found out when renewing my Blue Badge in January this year . I have longterm condition and have had that since 1997 so almost 30 years now.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @F I can't answer for them, but mine was after multiple renewals.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Has anyone got a 4 year extension yet? (or is that only reserved for the 10 year rolling awards?)

    I’ve only read of mostly 2 year extensions (and a few 3 year extensions and one 18 month extension for some reason)

    Are they sending everyone letters if they are doing this?

    Has anyone on here ever appealed a pip review or extension if they are happy with award itself but think the award length should be longer?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @D Yes I had a 4 year award and appealed and got 10yr. In enhanced x2. I was helped by assessor as they had stated about my distress at regular assessment. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @D I put in an MR solely for the length of my award and went from a 4 year to a 10 year award!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Is this a rolling thing, or has everybody who is going to get this extension been granted it now?
    Mine hasn't changed on the gov website. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @ANGELA How do you know that?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @1234 Apparently letters are going out in the next 6 weeks..
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Wonder why my posts don't seem to be getting through since the news forum downtime yesterday 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    I got an extension letter this morning, moving my date from mid 2027 to mid 2029.  I'm half happy and half anxious - as it means any changes to eligibility could now come into force before my next review. So it's good and bad for me.  It certainly seems that there is a renewed attack on the disabled right now, especially from the vitriolic - and wildly incompetent - Helen Whately of the Tories.  There were also attacks on Question Time last week from the Tory representative.  I ended up addressing him on X:

    So, kevin hollinrake on Question Time bemoans the fact that the proposed eligibility changes for PIP last year didn't go through. 

     Those changes, Mr Hollinrake, combined with changes to WCA, would have cost disabled people £9000 a year in many, many cases.
    He says that those with minor mental health issues shouldn't get PIP, but PIP is given to people for how their condition affects them, not on their condition itself. And it does not matter if people are in work or not. NOBODY knows what cumulative conditions people have on PIP because the list of conditions are not listed on forms in any order. Therefore they are not put into the system in any order. So "mild anxiety" might be listed as the first condition on the system but that same person might have cancer, be in a wheelchair, or be blind. This is the issue: you are making assumptions without any way of actually extracting that kind of information.  

    Your own party has just had its knuckles rapped for coming out with this kind of codswallop, and yet you keep going with the misinformation and skewing of data. Labour didn't consult a single disability organisation, charity or individuals last year about their proposed changes. Not one - I have a reply to my FOI that proves that. Despite that, despite the fact that people's lives would have been wrecked, your party would have voted FOR the changes. That shows you didn't do any research into it either.

    If you want changes to welfare, so be it, but remember this: most of the people with mental health conditions on PIP are there because your party governed while waiting lists for talking therapies went from 6 weeks in 2012 to two years in 2024. Likewise, people waiting for elective surgery on the #NHS. Your party did this and yet you have the nerve to say people should not be supported financially because your austerity measures resulted in them getting ill enough to go on PIP because they couldn't get treatment. YOU created this mess, not the sick and disabled.

    Now, go away, do some research, and come back when you have got beyond announcing policies that are scapegoating the sick and disabled of this country. We are not a political football or a way of scoring points with the electorate.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @SLB Hope they read and digest, SLB.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @SLB Well done Shane. Pity there are not 100.000, more like you. 
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.