Claimants who had a face-to-face personal independence payment (PIP) assessment last year were almost a quarter less likely to get an award than claimants who had a telephone or video assessment, figures released by the DWP have revealed.

The statistics were given in a written parliamentary answer by DWP disability minister Stephen Timms.

They show that over the last three years the gap between face-to-face assessments and telephone/video assessment success rates has been growing, rising from 11% in 2022 to 13% in 2024.  The full figures are:

  • 2022  Face-to-face: 42% Telephone, video: 53%
  • 2023  Face-to-face: 44% Telephone, video: 56%
  • 2024  Face-to-face: 44% Telephone, video: 57%

The difference in success rates does not appear to be explained by, for example, by the DWP inviting people who have less severe conditions face-to-face assessments, because allocation to assessment types appears to be largely random.

According to Timms, where claimants need a specific type of assessment, such as a telephone assessment because of difficulties with travelling, then they will be allocated that.

But all other claimants will get the next available appointment, regardless of whether that is face-to-face, telephone or video. 

Part of the difference in success rates may be the opportunity to for assessors to undermine claims with baseless “informal observations” at a face-to-face assessment, such as:

“Is tanned.  Suggests good health.

Overweight.  Suggests good appetite.

Smartly dressed.  Suggests good drive.”

In November 2024, the latest statistics we have for assessment types:

77% of assessments were remote, either telephone or video, but overwhelmingly these were telephone

18% were paper

4% were face-to-face

1% were unspecified

So the chances of having a face to face assessment have been small since the pandemic. 

However, Timms has also revealed that the proportion of face-to-face assessments is set to rise from Autumn of this year, so the risk will increase in the coming months.

As a method of reducing the number of successful claims and cutting the cost of PIP, switching to more face-to-face assessments appears to be an effective strategy.  It also requires no legislation whatsoever.

But claimants can ask to have  their assessment type changed, for example because travelling to an assessment centre for a face-to-face assessment would be painful or distressing.

The right to a review of the type of assessment you are allocated and the right to a further review are explained at pages 105-107 of our member’s Guide to PIP Claims and Reviews, along with sample written requests for a change of assessment type.

We have also updated the section of the guide headed “What kind of assessment will you have?”  at page 103, to inform readers about the different success rates for different types of assessment.

Members can download the current Guide to PIP Claims and Reviews here.

You can read the full parliamentary question and answer here.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 31 minutes ago
    Just like tom from Scotland I have Autism and I have epilepsy and cerebral palsy in my lower back.  so I can’t work . I get pip feel it will be bad for all disabled people let’s be honest liz kendell doesn’t come across as someone who likes disabled people. Everyone try to have a nice week 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 52 minutes ago
    Glad to see there's been at least some kickback against the cuts in the media.

    Btw, just to remind everyone that despite misinformation being spread by the government and media spending on social security is actually less today in terms of share of GDP than it was 10 years ago. Also the forecasted raise in PIP spending by the DWP/OBR is highly dubious as it seems to assume continuation of covid pandemic level rises despite that being essentially a one off event.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    If you have a physical disability that affects your mobility or similar, just by you attending a f2f assessment you have failed in their eyes, I failed both f2f home visit when they did them, and phone, 
    the 1st time I had to got too tribunal to get an award , and the current claim I was made an offer b4 tribunal
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    If this doesn't only apply to new claimants then I am in real trouble. I've been this way for just over 30 yrs, people can't be expected to suddenly be ok especially after a period of time as long as that 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 hours ago
    I hope it's new claimants only or I won't be able to afford new batteries for my mobility scooter and I'll be stuck in my flat as a result 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    is it definitely next Wednesday when Reeves will announce the cuts?  I'm free and would like to watch BBC Parliament.  I do think we, as a disabled group, need to come up with practical solutions the issue of employment because whoever is in power are only interested in tax receipts.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 5 hours ago
    The most severe changes Labour wants to enact are going to court, surely "Mr Human Rights Lawyer" Keir Starmer has figured that out? It would be a terrible look for the former head of the CPS to have his plans to brutally cut benefits seen as unlawful. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 6 hours ago
    It is worth reminding everyone that the Tories cut £156 a month from those in the LCW group of UC back in 2017.  BUT if you were put in that group BEFORE 2017, you STILL get that £156 a month now, in 2025.  

    Using that as a precedent, any new cuts to the amount of PIP or UC would likely only apply to NEW applicants rather than current claimants.  Alternatively, they could work it in a similar way to transitional payments from ESA to UC.  It is highly unlikely that current claimants are going to have cuts of hundreds or thousands each year.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @slb PIP is fixed term benefit for the most of claimants and before it ends, DWP sends a renewal and treats it as a new claim and I think the same rules apply to Universal Credit.
      So existed claimants are going to face the same fate as new claimants.
      All we need to do is to be united against these cuts rejecting any plans that damages disabled lives.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    If they are wanting people with long term mental health issues to get off benefits and get a job they are doing it wrong, all this talk has made me so much worse and even further away from ever being able to do as much as volunteer
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Sam Yes, me too! THey are pushing people with mental health who will not react well to all of this and make it all worse. Whatever they say, they can't push people who can't function in a work placed environment to suddenly be able to function in a work placed environment. Can't make people well mentally when they are ill.  It is stupid.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    I am disabled and I have autism spectrum and am half fortunate is that I am in Scotland and so might only slightly be affected by these cruel cuts being proposed by the UK Government . I feel for those that live in England an my moral conscience that I cannot sleep at night as my concern has always been  to think for those less fortunate than myself. I wish I could work but I cant due to my disabilities and I feel ashamed that I cannot do anymore to stand up for those disabled financially worse off than myself. My heart goes out to every disabled person that might be impacted by these cuts. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 33 minutes ago
      @Tom I think it is likely that the Scottish government will reduce ADP by a comparable amount as they will receive a reduced block grant from the UK government to cover welfare payments. I live in Scotland and expect to be impacted to the same degree as the rest of the UK. ESA and UC are not devolved. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Tom Some will consider moving to Scotland especially thoses who are living in the North.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    I imagine so John 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    Well it's seems pretty obvious to me that Starmer, Reeves and Kendall are effectively throwing benefit claiments under a bus. I can't actually believe what I'm hearing and reading about these benefit cuts. Why not go after the billionaire and millionaires instead of taking money off people like us who are getting barely enough money to live on in the first place.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Matt Maybe it's time to limit how much money can be taken out of the country like many other countries have laws against doing so.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @CJA They are doing this because they have no ideas as to how to make the economy grow, invest, or do all the normal things a government does to achieve economic growth. Instead they have managed to contract the economy and reduced government revenue because of their own self inflicted tax freeze and so have little room except to attack money spent on the welfare of the disabled and sick. They took about unsustainable but seem to forget rather conveniently that this increase in the baby boomers population will actually start coming down once the boomers have died off. The spin words to us thinking we are not educated or bright enough to understand things. They try to split the working classes into segments so that they can attack our disabled and sick children, grandparents, and family making them into a scape goat. They are also putting in place things that will affect every single now working man and woman when they fall sick and disabled as they will being after all humans. This is the most disgusting and low attack on the people of the country while pandering to the rich and privileged to become even more richer. If this is not corruption and lack of genuine good government then I don't know what is!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 hours ago
      @CJA Because, unfortunately, billionaires can move their money out of the country at the touch of a button and take it to a tax haven, eg Panama. And if you have money, you have power.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 hours ago
     Very good article well worth a read, posted today titled “labour is becoming the enemy of the vulnerable “ on funding the future
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 hours ago
    Peston last night leaked what they're thinking, 25% cut or 50% cut to those on uc lcwra didn't give details on pip cuts,you can probably watch the program on catchup ot maybe itv catchup platform, they gave the amounts as well
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @Anon but these cuts have already happened or will as when we migrate to UC, we wont get inflation increases …
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @Anon @Anon Holy gawd.. that is absolutely insane. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Anon That literally breaks so many uk & international laws of human rights I can see them being taken straight to court. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 16 hours ago
    Just mathematics:
    PIP in 2028-2029 is projected to be £28bn from £13.3bn in 2019 increasing by 110%.
    The government is spending £22bn on PIP at the moment which means the spending increased by 65% since the pandemic.
    Now the government wants to save £5bn from the post pandemic increase which means cutting down that increase from 65% to 27% by targeting the conditions behind this sharp rise, like mental health conditions especially among young adults.
    Should we worry? Yes, because we do not trust politicians nowadays because they have taken the country from failure to another but I am certain the coming changes will not be bad as the media portrays.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Mr. Unknown The government does not take into account inflation rates, it's own increase in tax revenues, nor devaluation of money to buy things. Measurements like this should not be on year on year cost rises but should be on year on year living standards and in that the governments are failing. It is the standard of living they need to worry about not the costs since it is always offset by increase in tax revenues
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 hours ago
    When will this government realise  if your to I’ll to work how can they make you or force  you to something you can’t actually physically or mentally do. This government won’t get voted in again they have already took away pensioners heating allowance than the farmers dispute now the sick disabled vulnerable group thanks for reading my post 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 hours ago
    They could easily save money if they would stop all the unnecessary reassessments and Tribunals!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 hours ago
    It’s being reported by the media, that the benefits reform announced, which many expected to come tomorrow, has been pushed back a week. As Labour MPs have expressed concerns about them.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 hours ago
    are changes to pip announced in the upcoming budget likely to come into effect immediately?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 hours ago
      @John No, it could take a couple of years for them to come through and you can probably expect any radical changes to be contested in the courts if recent history is anything to go by.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @John Yes
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @John No, I thinks that is highly unlikely
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 23 hours ago
    All charties have just started to put pressure on Racheal reeves budget now charties have started to boil then comes the steam perhaps Racheal reeves might just listen if she don’t sure there going to be court cases against government. Disability discrimination act and human rights why should genuine disabled who actually cannot work end up worse off than a able bodied jobless person or am I really missing something out here any comments welcome on my post thank you 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Michael From a non bias perspective why can't they simply tax the rich instead of punishing the poor and needy?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Michael Very true
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @Anon I'm surprised that seems very low
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 6 hours ago
      @Michael No that’s not right. Being able to work but unemployed is different to not being able to work due to illness and disability. Because the 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Bert I'm on cbesa and I only get £273 every 2 weeks
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.