Labour have made it clear today that, regardless of any concessions they might make to rebels, they still intend to force the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill through with the absolute minimum scrutiny parliament allows.

Lucy Powell, Leader of the House of Commons, announced the proposed timetable for the bill today.

Powell told MPs “I want to reassure colleagues that we take parliamentary scrutiny and process of bills extremely seriously, and that’s what our parliamentary democracy is all about.”  

At the same time she revealed that the second reading will take place on Tuesday and every other stage of the bill – committee, report and third reading - will be rushed through in the space of a single day the week after.

Not only that, but as feared, a symbol on the parliament website shows that Labour aims to have this bill certified as a money bill, removing any effective power from the House of Lords to amend it.  The final decision on this rests with the speaker, after all amendments have been voted on.

We covered the fast track procedures for a “committee of the whole house” and a money bill here a fortnight ago.

Labour’s plan will make it much more difficult for rebel MPs to scrutinise and amend any concessions offered by the government, as this series of posts on Bluesky by Ruth Fox,  Top of Form

Bottom of Form

Director & Head of Research at the Hansard Society explains:

The Government cramming Committee, Report & 3rd Reading into 1 day the week after 2nd Reading (so much for intervals between stages...) means if they pull the Bill they will have 2 days of Commons business to fill. But of greater concern is that this timetable has important implications for...

...those Labour MPs who have signed the reasoned amendment. If the Govt promises concessions in advance of 2nd Reading those will only crystallise at Committee Stage on the 9 July. If they are not quite right, or what the MPs think they were signing up for there will be little time for making...

...changes. If normal procedures are followed the Government should table amendments at least one sitting week in advance - so by the end of Wed 2nd July, the day after 2nd Reading. Non Government MPs will be able to table their own amendments up to three sitting days beforehand - so by the end...

...of the sitting on Friday 4 July. But if MPs are not happy with the proposals made they will have to be resolved on the floor of the Chamber itself on the 9th. This is where the lack of time for reflection, taking advice, can get messy with amendments being proposed and voted...

...on almost in real time. The Bill will go to the House of Lords but it is a money bill so the Lords does not normally have a Committee and Report stage (it is “negatived” in parliamentary parlance) to amend the Bill. They debate it at 2nd Reading and then the remaining stages are a formality.

This underlines how important the Commons scrutiny is. There is no revising backstop for money bills.

So, it seems clear that the government still intends to railroad this bill though before the summer recess, even if they have to give some ground in order to do so.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    What happens to those of us on UC/LCWRA only then? Are we screwed too?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Neil Cook LCWRA rates for current claimants will now go up with inflation.  Changes llto LCWRA eligibility are not in this legislation. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Neil Cook I am on LCWRA only. What will happen after next reassessment? Should I claim PIP now? How will that protect me?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    Does this mean that people currently on pip won't be reviewed again or that they aren't subject to the 4 point rule on review? If it' the later what's to stop the DWP scoring you down anyway? We all know how much we dread pip reviews and how hard it is to maintain an award. I'm so confused right now.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    I’ve heard about the changes but what is going to happen to people that are still on DLA indefinitely waiting to change over? Where did they fit in? Are they classes as a new claimant or are they still classed as a claimant? Please could you help me understand these new changes to the PIP that could go ahead.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Peachy1966 I don’t understand either scary for all the existing DLA applicants who isn’t their fault they still on DLA 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    I have been a Labour supporter all my life, but I
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    It feels like its delaying things with bringing the employment support fast forward Will this eventually affect current claimants later on its a strange one but for now think were okay 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    Based on the concessions offered, it seems they were actually planning to remove PIP from *current* claimants who don't have a 4 pointer. Is that right? I don't recall seeing that bit of detail anywhere. I thought the 4 point idea was intended to apply to reassessments and new claims.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
     Concessions made. It will only apply to new PIP claimants.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    ‘This disaster bill won’t pass on Tuesday. The dangerous obduracy of the prime minister and chancellor confirms precisely what Labour MPs say: they haven’t listened, they aren’t listening and the fear is they won’t learn to listen.’

    https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jun/27/labour-welfare-bill-cabinet-benefit-cuts-keir-starmer


  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    To lighten the mood:

    Liz Kendall looked the picture of misery as she sat silently on the Labour frontbench. Lost in a private hell. Occasionally looking anxiously at her phone. Presumably checking to see if her shrink had replied to her WhatsApp for an urgent appointment.

    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/jun/25/a-week-off-from-pmqs-cant-save-starmer-from-awkward-questions-over-welfare-bill



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @Anon They have spun some seriois garbage in relation to this U turn. Anyone catch the comments being made through mainstream media will see.  The tin eared "we have listened, heard" LOL. Of course you have
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Gingin She thinks that talking positively about the bill magically overrides the devastating harm it will cause to millions of disabled and vulnerable people. Just because she is framing it all positively.

      Dystopian doublespeak. Very nauseating.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    They need to make sure all those still on DLA are classed as existing claimants it's the dwp fault they haven't yet been moved.

    That said It is NOT ok to give future claimants such warped treatment.

    the duty to engage Timms keeps banging on about  needs to be shot down when the other paper starts going through a majority can't for numerous reasons interact with strangers face to face or even get there.

    As a side note I think they're absolutely sick ramming this through, hope via the speaker or rebels they still get a nasty shock.

    I'll continue with other disabled people to use my radio station and social media to keep challenging the lies and giving the disabled a voice both on air and off.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @nightcity/TVGR Radio Sussex I am the same don’t know what happens to DLA applicants who have not been reassessed u see no fault of their own 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    Is this true what the political editor from sky news has been told 
    As she has been told that existing PIP claimants will be able to keep their payments, which means 370,000 people will not lose out. This will cost the government at least £1.5bn, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    No.  Old claims won't have to go through the new criteria, meaning no one is going to lose their money 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    Given the concessions that are now being reported on ie: only affecting new claimants instead of existing. I wonder if claimants circumstances change, if this then renders them a new claimant and subject to the changes. For example, reporting a change of address or a worsening of your condition. 

    I'm hoping the rebels still vote against this. Mel Stride saying today that these concessions aren't fair to hard working people. Seems he forgets that many on PIP are in work. Fed up of this rhetoric that keeps being pushed that those on benefits are lazy layabouts. Im fed up of feeling like something someone has trodden on. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    Is this slight of hand, promise of major concessions to existing claimants, but are they already ensuring that you want qualify when you get your next review, it’s already begun people with 4 points some in more than one category are currently having their awards reviewed and points downgraded to only scoring 2 points on each question they previously scored 4 points!
    reviews that were 5 and 6 years long are now reviewed in 18 months to 2 years.
     It’s already happening to too many now, what’s it going to be like when the legislation is voted upon.
     I don’t trust them!
    Existing claimants may not have to get the elusive 4 points on a single question but anecdotally existing claimants are already receiving less points and shorter awards in just the past few months.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    We have all seen the concessions but what happens when you get a reassessment? Do you get hit by the cuts? Won't stop me fighting for everyone including those coming behind us needing support. Reckon this is an attempt to break the group of MPs against the bill.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    This article shows that this bill is all about votes because it is popular with voters McSweeney Starmer cheif of staff said. I have suspected Starmer attacked people on benefits because his and Labour poll ratings are diving and he saw it as a vote winner. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    I'd feel pretty uncomfortable if the only substantial changes to the bill were to apply them just to new claimants. What a horrible divide that would create after all the solidarity we've enjoyed here.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    Please can everyone that is able to send this to their local MP, marked as urgent. I don't even know how this can be legal. Keir will clearly stoop to the depth's of hell. Human rights lawyer? My back side!  Just when you think progress is being made they resort to dirty underhand tactics like this. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    Confirmed deal:


    So the gateway to LCWRA and Carers Allowance is still in place I assume for new claimantS…😞 Or maybe for everyone? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Anniesmum That’s what I was wondering too- Carers?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Gingin I think they said those on universal credit health is that the same as LCWRA? Would still keep it at the level of money we are already on. So won’t apply to current claimants? I’m hoping this applies to carers allowance aswell.

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.