The influential, Labour dominated Commons Work and Pensions committee (WPC) has written to the government calling for it to delay any changes to personal independence payment (PIP) eligibility and universal credit (UC) rates.

The WPC began an inquiry into the Pathways to Work Green Paper on 3 April, but has issued interim findings and recommendations because a Commons vote on some of the provisions is expected soon.

The WPC warns the government in its letter that the proposed changes “might not incentivise work, as the Government hopes, but rather push people deeper into poverty, worsen health, especially in more deprived areas, and move people further from the labour market, as evidence suggests has happened in the past with similar reforms.” 

In its letter, the committee asks the government to: “delay any changes to PIP eligibility or UC rates, extend and expand the current consultation, and work to co-produce measures with disabled people and their organisations, reflecting the Government’s commitment on ‘nothing about me, without me’.

The letter goes on to recommend that the government:  “take a ‘precautionary principle’ approach and immediately undertake an independent, comprehensive analysis of the impact of the proposed cuts in UC health support on employment, poverty and health outcomes.”

Finally, the committee urges the government to:  “delay its plans to amend the eligibility criteria for the daily living component of PIP and engage disabled people and their organisations in order to coproduce proposals for a new PIP, as part of the PIP review. Most importantly, we need to guarantee that those who need PIP will not lose out. At that point, it should publish and properly consult on its proposals more widely.”

Liz Kendall has until Monday 2 June to respond to the letter.

Chair of the committee, Debbie Abrahams, told ITV news that there was expert evidence that cutting benefits could increase the risk of suicides. 

The WPC is made up of 11 MPs:  7 Labour, 2 Conservative, 2 LibDem.

Moreover, as the Canary pointed out, four of the Labour MPs are members of the “Get Britain Working” group which actively supports benefit cuts.

In theory, this is a committee whose loyalty the government should be able to count on.

So, for it to express such strong concerns about the Green Paper will be a real blow for Labour, which is struggling to find anyone who is in favour of its proposals.

You can download a copy of the letter, along with oral evidence transcripts and copies of written evidence here.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 hours ago
    SLB - one the committee has just shown his true colours!

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 3 hours ago
    Letter received from Ed Davey today:

    “Just a note to say thank you for letting me share your story and concerns on PMQs today. 

    Reading your submission to the APPG and speaking to you on the phone helped me understand your understandable worries about the impact of the PIP changes on family carers like yourself.

    I know also how difficult it can be to talk publicly about your situation - but it’s so important that voices like yours are heard. So thank you again.

    I’m determined to battle these changes hard! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Gingin Very, vey well done Gingin - you are the tonic we all need!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    I confess that I shed a tear or two last night when this letter to Liz Kendall was published.  It's good to know in absolute concrete terms that a cross-party group of politicians is on our side.  I feel as if we are winning the war - slowly, but surely.  I have posted the conclusion of the letter on X, and encouraging everyone to repost it so that the government can't somehow try to cover this up or hide it.  I admit I am rather gobsmacked that this letter isn't making the news today.

    I feel that if we could have everything delayed (as the committee requests) by even as little as six months, we might escape the worst of the cuts.  I say that because that would mean bringing in the new rules in, say, late spring or early summer 2027.  Bearing in mind that it would presumably only apply to reassessments and new claims started after that day - and that the assessments are taking 8-12 months - that would mean that people would start to get results using the new rules in the spring of 2028.  That's just twelve months before the next election.  

    Would Labour really want its voters starting to feel the effects of the new eligibility rules in the year leading up to the election?  I don't think so.  It would be suicidal for the Labour party at that point.   There may be tweaks to the system here and there - and, yes, some of us will lose out - but I don't think they'll make it so people are losing eight to ten thousand pounds a year - or more.  I have no idea what would happen after the next election - or who is likely to win it - but I think it would be unhealthy to worry about that at this stage.

    I also wonder if a U-turn and/or delays would result in the sacking of Liz Kendall.  These are, after all, her ideas, and they are inadequately researched, inadequately presented, and come with an inadequate attempt at rigging their own consultation.  Debbie Abrahams to take her place, I wonder?  She has been on the Work and Pensions committe for 9 years of her time as an MP.  She should be a shoe-in, and could certainly help to mend relations between claimants and the government.  That said, she did vote for the changes to winter fuel allowance.  

    Overall, though, rightly or wrongly, I'm feeling both more emotional and optimistic today.   But I also now realise that I can't keep a fight up on this level for another eighteen months.  Yes, it has certainly kept me occupied, but I think it would send me over the edge mentally if this goes on beyond the summer.  If there's a U-turn, we might have to wait until July to hear it - announce it close to the recess and then run away to constituencies for the summer so we forget about it all. 


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Gingin Well done ! You deserve it. Enjoy your new role. 

      Thank you for the support you have e given us all. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 hours ago
      @Gingin Many congratulations Gingin. And thank you for all you are doing.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Gingin That's great news!  Congratulations!!!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Gingin Congratulations Gingin, thats amazing! well deserved!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 4 hours ago
      @SLB SLB, I share your optimism and am carefully feeling a little joyful today (if you can be carefully joyful!) - it’s not a done deal but it’s really nice to have some good news for a change and, as you say, to have someone on our side! You’re right to think of taking care of yourself as well. 
      So I had a job interview today as my current role is at risk and I thought there was no chance of continuing to work from home at my level, but this job came up out of the blue. It’s a job about people being heard (to be vague), so I told them about fighting to be heard and about being invited to an APPG to share my and my family’s experience. I didn’t mention Ed Davey- thought that was a bit much! I waited all day for the outcome- so nervous. Then the call came. The manager said it was stiff competition, but they offered it to me. I think sharing my story like I did was a big factor. Happy day for me and for my husband and children 😊
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    Speaking of "all of us campaigning together" @CaroA, I was wondering in my post under the "Are Tories set to vote against Green Paper cuts?" article whether we should up the anti by inviting (pushing?) even the sympathetic and rebel Labour mps to pressure their unsympathetic colleagues into supporting us and voting against the green paper. With enough momentum things could turn from Labour mps being afraid to defy the whip to their being afraid of voting on the losing side - if the vote goes against the cuts.

    It's one thing to hope for a Tory vote against the government, but what we need is to flip that inflated parliamentary majority Starmer has taken for granted, and rub his nose in it.

    We are making headway. Hang on in there, @CaroA!



    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @sara Yes! Loving that picture you painted there Sara
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @CaroA Brilliant, CaroA
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @sara My post wasn't fully published this was the response to my MPs letter that paragraph was just removed!  The bullet points are my MPs response to my concerns and I gave my response back to them.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @sara Thanks so much, @Sara — I really appreciated your encouragement earlier. 


      - The changes won’t come in immediately but Nov 2026.

      - Existing claimants will likely be “protected”

      - Lifelong conditions will be spared reassessment

      - PIP will rise with inflation

      - A new UC premium is coming

      - There’ll be £1bn in employment support

      - Concerns about the 4 point PIP changes are being “raised with ministers”

      - And we’re encouraged to respond to a consultation that doesn’t even include the June proposals
      ...........


      It all sounds reassuring on the surface — but none of it really addresses the damage these reforms are set to cause, or the total lack of proper consultation. So I wrote this in response:

      > Thank you for your thoughtful response and for all the work you’ve done over the years to support Disabled people. I can hear how challenging this is for you.

      However, the upcoming June vote is not something that can be left to behind-the-scenes conversations with ministers who have shown no willingness to listen or shift their position. If anything, they appear to take pride in being utterly intransigent.

      These policies must be voted against — and I hope you will not only take that stand yourself, but encourage your colleagues to do the same.

      These changes have not been properly consulted on. Any and all proposals of this scale should be paused, rethought, and reconsulted on — with full impact assessments carried out before any vote takes place, and with the full and active involvement of Disabled people, carers, carers' organisations, and disability organisations.

      I appreciate your reassurance, but vague assurances that people with lower PIP scores and complex health conditions will be “looked after” will do nothing to repair the smashed trust already deeply embedded in the DWP — and now, sadly, extending to this government through the scale and direction of these devastating proposals.

      The only real reassurance at this point is to hear that good MPs like you are voting against this.

      Thank you again for responding. I hope you will please stand firmly with us with as many of your MP colleagues as possible at this critical time.

      Yours etc
      ....

      We must do our best to persuade our MPs to be in the vote against camp. If anyone wants to use or adapt this for their MPs feedback please do. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    Here's the latest from Mrs 4%. I am tempted to channel my inner John McEnroe and shout "you cannot be serious" but apparently she is. According to her, benefit cuts are key to fighting Reform UK.

    Lost for words.

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Jonno
      "According to her, benefit cuts are key to fighting Reform UK."

      ......and yet the evidence shows that they are losing far more votes to the Lib Dems and Greens  (who both oppose the cuts) than they are to Reform. The last poll I saw on this said that 11% of 2024 Labour voters were open to voting Reform, but 41% were open to voting Lib Dem and 29% for the Greens. So what do Kendall and co do? Er....ignore the 70% they're losing to the Lib Dems and Greens and chase the 11% who might vote Reform. Who will never vote for them anyway, no matter how far to the right they go. That's the thing with the Labour right: they're not only callous, they're also politically incompetent. And these are the self-styled "adults in the room". Oh dear....


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @rtbcpart2 Ha! Brilliant move DPCG!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @Jonno
      Never mind her @Jonno, just enjoy this - I can't hear it too often, it's brought on a chuckle since the first time it was pointed out:

      "The Disability Poverty Campaign Group has circulated analysis among Labour MPs that showed that for more than 200 of them, their majorities are smaller than the number of PIP claimants in their constituency"".

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @Jonno She hasn't an ounce of shame, which is what makes her so dangerous. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 8 hours ago
    Thanks to benefits and work for publishing this good news, there is so much doom and gloom around at the moment. It's promising that the WPC are supposedly loyal to the labour party yet even they can see how harmful and harsh these proposals are, not to mention the effect they are already having on disabled people and their families. But of course, Starmer, Reeves, Kendall and Timms will take no notice, they simply won't listen as they haven't been doing all along. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 9 hours ago
    Probably a question for the people at B&W: does the govt have to act on these recommendations? Or is it protocol to do so?  Or is it known for governments to just plough on anyway? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @Sam Thanks
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 hours ago
      @Slb I believe they have to respond but commitees hold no authority over the government. It is seen as more of an advisory thing  but a highly influencial one
      So no they can't force the government to do anything but explain itself but it will certainly influence a good few MPs votes
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 10 hours ago
    long letter sent to MP by email. I'll update you all on his response. I have also contacted the RNIB campaigns department to see what they are doing as well (not a lot it seems, which I fear is common throughout the 'charitable' sector)
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 11 hours ago
    oh dear seems like the ides of march no one wants to lose their comfy seats and pay 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    I hope B & W don't mind me sending this over to my MP, with my own individual thoughts, certainly around employment. Most employers do not have a clue how to interact with disabled colleagues, and frankly find us too much of a hassle, not least many of us are probably better educated than them, and certainly more assertive, which they consider to be aggression.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 12 hours ago
    Thank you Benefits and Work, and thank you James for your comment — and yes, no doubt they’ll respond with the same garbage rhetoric we’ve heard again and again.

    But where is the accountability for the suffering already caused — not just by those who were in power, but by those who are still choosing to carry these viscious disabling policies forward?

    How many more sleepless nights, hospital visits, mental health emergencies, and relapses in chronic illness are needed before someone takes responsibility?

    How many carers, families, and friends have had to bear the emotional toll, watching the people they love deteriorate under this  stress and fear?

    Given up hope of accountability from the DWP long ago — and now we’re left asking: does it even exist in government - it looks like Deborah Abraham's and her committee seem to be trying to lead the way to a kinder politics of the future. Will they be heard?

    God knows — I really hope something better comes from all of this: from the petitions, the letters, the raw courage of all of us campaigning together. 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 2 hours ago
      @Frances Yes Frances! Vulnerable? They’d better think again- we’re nothing if not determined. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 3 hours ago
      @CaroA @CaroA, I posted hours ago but it didn't come up. What I was saying was, whilst your concerns, so sensitively expressed, are totally understandable, and dreadful suffering has already come about as a result of this government's irresponsible tinkering, you should hold on to your last sentence.

      Something better has come about - we have raised the profile of the issues and brought it to the attention of the media and those in power who are willing to help us, and we've proved we can stick up for ourselves, be a force together, kick up a storm and, as I said, not go gentle.

      I posted a link to the Dylan Thomas poem I was referencing, because I thought you might appreciate it, if you hadn't seen it before.

      https://www.google.co.uk/url?q=https://poets.org/poem/do-not-go-gentle-good-night&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjl9OSZ1beNAxXCZ0EAHcwCAiwQFnoECAYQAg&usg=AOvVaw0zLt7JtkzN6wFE541-YHrK
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 hours ago
      @CaroA So agree. The levels of public hostility have been ratcheted up by the government in an attempt to sway public opinion against us.  I doubt that will change back any time soon.  We all have to live with that and cope with its daily effects. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 hours ago
    We're winning. Slowly but surely, we're winning. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 hours ago
    I didn't score 4 points on any PIP descriptors, but still got PIP. I only attended ONE in-person interview at the job centre. The work coach took one look at me and my multiple conditions, and said that she would not impose any work conditions on me whilst I wait for my medical assessment. Until then all other interviews were to be over the phone, including my medical. I was told due to my conditions they didn't want me attending the Job centre in person - I believe due to health and safety risks as amongst my many conditions I have balance issues which cause me to fall over, and along with osteoporosis makes me too risky to attend in person. If I did lose my PIP would I suddenly be deemed to not be at risk to attend appointments in person etc? Nobody would employ me as I doubt they would get insurance to cover the risk of me possibly falling over and breaking my hip etc. How many other people in the country also would also be deemed a health and safety risk, but didn't get 4 points for any PIP descriptors?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 hours ago
      @Clockaholic Absolutely loads of people would be in your situation. That’s why they must listen to us 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 hours ago
    07:23 Radio 4 Today - Not even the formidable Emma Barnett could move Debbie Abrahams much off script, but credit to the Work and Pensions Committee for their work so far. Given the committee comprises mainly Labour mps, could this be an additional rebel faction when it comes to the welfare green paper vote?
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 hours ago
    Thank you B&W for this important information. It is good if the government will listen to the committee and all the organisations have advised against the cuts, but we all know what Liz Kendall and Sir Stephen Timms will end up uttering! They will say the same that cutting benefits will create jobs and that people are languishing on these benefits and will have to get jobs to live richer and fuller lives inspite of their disabilities and illnesses! This has been their "mantra" and this is their defence to anyone criticizing their policies! 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 11 hours ago
      @James
      On the other hand, a Labour-dominated select committee calling for the cuts to be paused may well carry weight with Labour backbenchers and add to the already growing rebellion. 

      The government is now in a real hole: if they press ahead despite these dire warnings from the committee they may well exacerbate the rebellion and be in serious danger of losing the vote. On the other hand, if they pause the cuts then MPs will be able to see detailed impact assessments before the vote. Those assessments will almost certainly be damning - and that might be enough to persuade more of their own MPs to vote against the cuts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @James Along with the vacuous threats of the welfare system imploding and not being there for those who most need it now and into the future.  We must not forget that they are our saviour and that's why it's urgent and imperative that they do this
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 13 hours ago
      @James It's an increasingly feeble and fading mantra, though.