The DWP appears to be unable to organise the simplest of events when it comes to consulting about the Pathways To Work Green Paper, with its first virtual event becoming a deepening fiasco.

Last week we revealed that the blundering department had shared all the email addresses of the attendees, by listing them in the ‘To’ section of the joining email.

They then issued a non-apology email, blaming technical difficulties for having to cancel and then reschedule today’s Teams meeting.

This morning, when claimants attempted to join the consultation meeting, they were greeted by an error message and have so far heard nothing more from the department.

Ordinarily, each claimant would not have known whether they were the only one experiencing this error.

Happily, as the DWP had shared their email addresses they were able to communicate with each other.  At least a dozen who responded to enquiries said they had also received the same error message.  Nobody has said they were actually able to attend the meeting.

So whether it was a total failure or whether it went ahead with around half of it’s claimant participants missing we don’t know.

But we will let you know when we hear anything more.

Meanwhile, we understand that participants in the Manchester in-person consultation event on Wednesday 7 May, finally received details of the venue yesterday, on bank holiday Monday.

It’s almost as if the DWP don’t really want to consult with members of the public at all.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Do we know how many people were actually invited to all of these please ? 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I received the standard letter reply from Julie Minns MP which I can only summise I a tick box exercise for their own statistics. After a few days of pondering this, I decided to put together a response email to the standard letter many are receiving. Needless to say, there aren’t any standard letters ready to reply to it ………,,.

    Good evening Ms Minns

    Thank you for your ‘standard reply’ to which many disabled people are receiving across the country, so it seems.

    Whilst you comment on conservative rhetoric over 14 years etc, I find the compassion and empathy sadly lacking from, as you say ‘sharing my story.’

    My husband and I also asked your canvassers to contact us for a chat prior to election but we were told you would be too busy.

    Does it not concern you that someone can become disabled at the blink of an eye in such horrific circumstances? Can you actually say you thought about what happened to me in this town and the life fall out from this for my family and myself as individuals, prior to sending, which is being received as, rather a patronising response by all.

    It was disabled people/families who decided to change the rhetoric you mention, by voting for Labour, however, our voices do not seem to matter once those seats were warmed.

    After the elections around the country last week, I believe, along with many others, what goes up must come down.

    We as voters put yourselves as MP’s in those seats to support a positive change for ‘average people’ instead of the rich & richer, and those seats can change just as easily, as we have seen numerous times over the last few years.

    So whilst you may feel that you ticked a box by sending the standard reply, which has obvious been written to send out on mass, I fail to see the support that it has offered as an MP, who is supposed to provide support to their constituents.

    Whilst you say the Government wants to provide to those most in need (….), does that mean that people currently on higher level PIP to utilise the funds to support their ability in daily living of these disabilities as ‘people not in need’? As that seems to be what is being implied in the letter.

    I would love to still be in work full-time in a job I adored and loved to go to each day but that choice was taken away from me - I did not decide to get assaulted & lose use of upper limbs etc.

    So whilst it is implied that those most in need (….), only UC is quoted and any comments in relation to PIP seem to be skipped completely. Does that class just people on UC to be the ones in need? Or is the act of not mentioning PIP, a hopeful way of brushing the mass scale of this fall out, under the carpet by the Government?

    Do MP’s not realise (but I’m sure you all must, hence the standard letter preparation), that over 75% of chronically disabled people will lose the support of daily living if these ‘4 point on 1 question’ rules are sanctioned, which not only supports them to have some sort of life but gives some hope in their shattered lives.

    Yes there are people who can work & choose not to, however, people needing daily care to function did not choose to live this way. 

    I, for one worked from the age of 15 and have full NI stamp of 38 years, despite now not being well enough or able to work. I did not choose to be housebound and my family including my 8 year old son at the time, to become my carer. Do not only do I have to cope with the broken promises of when I would qualify for my state pension but now this along side that. 

    I must say, I am most disappointed and feel extremely disrespected and discriminated against as a constituent and a disabled person (forced to be) as does every other person who has received basically the same response from MP’s country wide. Does the Government feel a standard letter would placate people who are in fear of surviving?

    So, whilst I thank you for your tick box exercise reply. I, along with every other person whose lives are affected by chronic health conditions who rely on the much needed support of PIP - which we had to jump through inhumane hoops to be granted, which also has effects on the receipt of a blue badge to support people leaving their homes, (or has this been forgotten too), will, I’m sure, get into some very deep thinking and choose to use our tick boxes extremely wisely in the future.


    From: Julie Minns MP <Julie.minns.casework@parliament.uk>
    Date: 23 April 2025 at 15:44:28 BST
    To: 
    Subject: Response from Julie Minns MP


    Dear Tracey 

    Thank you for contacting me with your concerns about the proposed reforms to the disability benefits system. In particular, I would like to extend my great thanks for sharing your personal experience living with a disability and with the disability benefits system with me. I understand that this is an issue that is close to your heart, like for many of us, and has a real impact on your life and the lives of your husband and children.

    After 14 years of damaging Conservative rhetoric on benefits and cuts, it is understandable that people are fearful about changes to the benefits system. I would however like to reassure you that the reforms announced by the government will not result in any immediate changes to anyone’s benefits.

    I am however reviewing the proposed changes carefully. The benefits system is complex, and there will be individual cases where the changes require particular scrutiny.

    The Government is, however, committed to the founding principle of the welfare state - namely that it should be there for all of us when we need it, now and in the future. That it protects those most in need, and that it delivers equality and dignity for all. There will always be some people who cannot work, and I want to assure you that the government will protect them.

    The measures announced aim to protect those who are most in need. Existing Universal Credit claimants will have their health top-up held steady in cash terms while they benefit from the higher standard allowance. The Government is also looking at ways to ensure that those who will never be able to work are afforded confidence and dignity by never having to go through reassessments and proposing an additional Universal Credit premium to offer those people the support they need.

    However, the broken welfare system we inherited from the Conservatives is failing the very people it was designed to help and holding our country back. Many sick and disabled people across the country and Carlisle want to work, and they deserve the same choices and chances as everyone else to do so.

    I welcome the action being taken by the Government to both tackle the issues that prevent people from working, and support people into good jobs. We’re investing an additional £26 billion in the NHS to drive down waiting lists, making work pay with our landmark Employment Rights Bill, and introducing the biggest reforms to employment support in a generation, with our £240 million Get Britain Working Plan.

    The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions recently announced further steps, investing £1 billion into employment support. This is one of the largest ever investments in tailored support to help people transition into work. Evidence shows that work is good for mental and physical wellbeing and it is right that we do all we can to help people take up work.

    This will come alongside a package of reform to support people into jobs and make the broken system fairer and more sustainable. I’d like to highlight a few of these measures that I believe will make a significant difference to Carlisle, our country and people’s life chances.

    First, we are rebalancing Universal Credit payments. This means increasing the standard allowance above inflation for the first time ever, with a £775 cash increase per year by 2029/30 for existing and new claimants, while reducing the health top up for new claims from April 2026, alongside active support to help people back to health and work.

    Alongside this, we will remove barriers by ensuring that going back to work in and of itself will never lead to a reassessment. This ‘Right to Try’ will give people the confidence to take on job knowing that if it doesn’t work out, they won’t have to start from scratch.

    In addition, we are consulting on a new unemployment insurance that will help people quickly get back on track if they fall out of work, giving them a higher rate of benefit.

    I would like to reiterate my thanks for your contacting me with your concerns about these proposed changes to the disability benefits system, and for sharing your story with me.

    Please be assured that I am scrutinising the proposals carefully.

    Yours sincerely,

    Julie Minns
    Member of Parliament for Carlisle and North Cumbria
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 8 hours ago
      @Hollywoodmam
      An excellent, powerful reply to the tick-box rubbish.
      The big problem is: The people who, according to Julie Minns, the government will “ensure “ they support won’t include anyone who doesn’t meet the new 4-points -on -one -PIP- descriptor, no matter their disabilities or how unwell they are.
      And sadly no matter how much they depend on UC health and/or Pip/support from carers to simply exist from one day to the next.

      Who does Julie Minns understand/believe to be the “lucky” ones who will still be deemed “ill/ disabled enough” to be eligible for support? Does she and do all labour MPs actually understand the PiP points system well enough to even realise the sorts of sick & disabled people that are going to be thrown under a bus? Do the labour MPs who support the proposals all really get it and understand what they will actually be voting for?
      Does your MP think you will be one of the ones who is very likely to still be supported? Is that why she reassured you?Would she even know?

      Far from “ensuring” support for anyone who needs it, the complicated proposals to drastically cut entitlement to UC health and Pip benefits instead “ensure”, by their complexities, that a good proportion of the general public, and I believe at least some labour mps, do not fully understand that many, many severely ill and disabled will simply not be protected. Fewer still have any idea about the many details that are “hidden” or omitted in the Green Paper and the many questions that remain due to this.

      If you don’t have a decent knowledge of the complex, harsh disability/ incapacity assessments system or you don’t have a family member/close friend who has been through such, you really won’t have a clue and may believe the lies spouted by Starmer & co that support will always be there for those In need. It absolutely won’t be there for the majority in need of support and/or unable to work if these proposals go ahead. 

      Does Julie Minns not care less? I don’t know- perhaps she doesn’t. But the campaigns and powerful letters like yours and other excellent ones I’ve read on here are needed to educate these MPs to actually understand because I honestly think some of them don’t fully get what is really going to happen if these proposals go ahead and who it is going to affect, never mind the wider consequences to the NHS and many other vital overstretched services and to the country as a whole.

      Would it be worth you sending Julie Minns the breakdown list of the health conditions for which many will lose PiP and/or LCWRA/LCW entitlement under the cruel proposals so she can see it isn’t actually just “individual cases” she refers to that need to be scrutinised in relation to the proposals?
      I’m not quite sure how to phrase that but B and W put a list on a recent newsletter with percentages etc for various serious health conditions. 
      Or the questions re. Pip and pensioners that B and W Team posted the other day?

      It sounds like she would probably at least read it and maybe, just maybe she might even think more deeply and with a more open mind about the devastating consequences for many of her constituents like you, their carers and families, as well as the wider consequences if these inhumane “labour” proposals go ahead.

      It has made me so sad to think there really is no compassion from the top. As a society, we teach our children to grow up with compassion and care for others. It’s human decency. Yet these cruel reforms target the most vulnerable in our society.

      I do believe things may change though -your letter (and the letters others have sent to their MPs) give hope because, even if each one’s impact is minimal, it all adds up to win the cruel fight against the sick and disabled (including those yet to be so but who one day may be.) 

      I hope your MP will at the very least have your letter in her mind in the coming weeks.
       Will she keep her promise to scrutinise the proposals carefully?
      Does that mean she will truly listen to the charities and other campaign reports, as well as letters from her constituents to become better informed about the reality of the proposed benefit reforms? 

      Or does she just not care? 

      I hope she will reflect on your letter and truly ask herself, in all good conscience, can she really vote for these dangerous, inhumane proposals.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Hollywoodmam Awesome reply Tracey. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Hollywoodmam Tracey, such a powerful reply. So powerful I feel my blood boiling, as your letter brings into such sharp focus the cold, calculated, dishonest and self serving plans of these elected public ‘servants’
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Hollywoodmam Excellent reply to the MP 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Hollywoodmam Just read your reply to your MP. Well done for saying what you did.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I’m preparing for yet another forensic discrediting from the DWP. A government department against a chronically ill individual — like fighting a court case every other year. People often say that nothing is good enough, but in the reassessment para Olympics, nothing is bad enough. They lower the goalposts over and over again, expecting us to be contortionist limbo dancers to prove our ‘disworth.’

    There’s constant talk of fraud, as though we’re all suspected of gaming the system — a kind of state-sponsored gaslighting that forces disabled people to repeatedly prove their need for support. But who is the real fraud here?

    Findings in the news today from the New Economic Foundation (NEF) — a respected, independent think tank focused on social, economic, and environmental justice — have exposed the government’s justification for its sweeping disability benefit cuts as deeply misleading. Despite Labour’s claims that the system has become too lenient, with a 34% rise in claims for incapacity or disability benefits between 2020 and 2024, the NEF’s research suggests a very different picture.

    According to the NEF, the increase is not due to widespread fraud or relaxed criteria, but rather a rise in the number of people becoming disabled and experiencing financial hardship. This means that many disabled people who previously struggled without support are now seeking help they are fully entitled to — a basic human right, not an abuse of the system.

    The DWP insists these changes are about 'creating a sustainable welfare system,' but at what cost? When the most vulnerable are forced to repeatedly prove their worth through increasingly impossible assessments, it’s clear that the system itself is broken.

    SO WHO IS REALLY BEING FRAUDULENT HERE? IS IT THE DISABLED CLAIMANTS, SIMPLY TRYING TO SURVIVE, OR THE GOVERNMENT THAT SHIFTS THE CRITERIA AND NARRATIVES TO STRIP AWAY THEIR SUPPORT? A GOVERNMENT THAT APPEARS MORE INTERESTED IN COMPETING WITH OTHER POLITICAL PARTIES AND PROTECTING ITS OWN REPUTATION THAN IN GENUINELY SUPPORTING SICK AND DISABLED PEOPLE INTO WORK. 

    THIS SYSTEM HAS KILLED AND PERMANENTLY DISABLED SO MANY PEOPLE — THOSE WHO PERHAPS WOULD HAVE FUNCTIONED WITHOUT THE CHRONIC, DISABLING STRESS OF SUCH A BRUTAL SYSTEM. IT SHOULD BE HELD UP FOR CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER. 

    MAYBE IT’S TIME FOR A DIFFERENT CONVERSATION, ONE WHERE THE GOAL ISN’T JUST TO CUT COSTS BUT TO TRULY SUPPORT THOSE WHO NEED IT MOST.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    This is not particularly related to this post so apologise for that, but one thing I have not seen anything about is that most employers have medical questionnaires and/or medicals. So I don’t think they have taken into account that even if a job is found, the employer would look at the medical report and probably not employ candidates on that basis.
    They are rather blinkered if they think everyone who does not score a 4 in PIP will magically get through an employer’s medical 

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Cmjdexter Most employers think a stair lift and disabled loo is enough to fulfill their legal responsibilities. Truth is they don’t want disabled people. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Cmjdexter Agreed as you have to tell the truth so I know that many employers will not take in sick and disabled workers despite what this idiotic government says 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Cmjdexter This is true. Several of my jobs have required full medicals before employment was offered and when I had my heart attacks I took a down graded less stressful position which was from 5 days a week to 4 days a week until I could no longer do work. Large corporates will do full tests of heart, kidney, etc and drug tests to ensure that work like I did was also covered by their indemnity insurance. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Cmjdexter Well said.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I have just left a telephone message for my MP saying that I would never have voted for him or got others to vote for him if I had known what was going to happen.  Not just for myself but for the amount of people talking about seriously feeling suicidal and or thinking they are going to end up on the street. That I think he looks like a decent person who has worked hard but it needs people like him to go against this vote.  If he is this decent person then he needs to do this. 

    This is the number at the house or commons to ring and they will put you through to your MP it would be good if as many of us as possible can leave a message like this.

    020 7219 3000
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    And meanwhile the DWP is Speeding Up the Migration from ESA to Universal Credit. The last migration letters will be received in September. Currently 83 Thousand Letters are being sent out... Up from 60 Thousand.   https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/lifestyle/money/new-dwp-legacy-benefits-update-35138756
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @Sick and Tired Nooooooo!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Sick and Tired Indeed. It was supposed to be December. As I mentioned below, regardless of the human cost due to their avoidable errors & that some people will still struggle with the migration, presumably this contemptible organisation is hoping that many more vulnerable claimants drop out on top of the huge numbers of non-claimants already cited. Are some DWP bosses on bonuses to reduce claimant numbers? I don't know, but no surprise if that's so. They really are a despicable outfit, unworthy of any respect. The day I retire (if I make it) & no longer have to deal with this ilk will be a relief. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Seems like everything is going to plan...
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Starmer warned benefit cuts could be ‘as toxic’ as axing winter fuel allowance as 800,000 miss out

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    If you can stomach seeing Liz Kendall and Keir Starmer in the flesh (I struggled), ITV news was also talking today about Labour MPs who are opposed to benefits proposals. 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Trying again as one of the links was cut out: 

    Quite a lot of noise today about the welfare proposals:

    A welsh labour MP declared today he'd be voting against these proposals:

    Ex Runcorn MP blames Labour mistakes for election losses:
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c87p99jzrxjo

    Cuts leave voters doubting Labour's ability to deliver change:
    https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/may/05/labour-voters-change-winter-fuel-allowance
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    On a site called dynamic duo UK on YouTube,they have stated that the government might be having second thoughts about the disability cuts.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    No surprise. Probably more unwilling than "unable". The DWP now functions as more of a political entity, which was never their original purpose. Whatever they say is longer any more trustworthy than what we hear from this government & recent ones. It's all about saving money & meeting financial targets. Take the UC migration fiasco. After being postponed until 2028/29 by Tory Chancellor Hunt because the DWP were making so many mistakes & costing lives, we had Sunak's turnaround. Now Labour are fast-tracking the process regardless of how many people will still struggle with the UC migration, come unstuck & be much poorer. The DWP doing the government's bidding, come what may, regardless of the damage they do because some of their staff are not fully trained for the undertaking. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Ivan
      "Whatever they say is longer any more trustworthy than what we hear from this government & recent ones."

      This has always been the case with DWP. Bunch of truth twisters.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Another fiasco showing their true colours and underhanded tactics and lies:

    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Mick They never cease to disgust.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago

    Mike Amesbury, former MP for Runcorn said “But if they carry on making political mistakes, winter fuel’s an obvious one but coming down the line is the personal independence payments.”

    He told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme on Tuesday that more Labour backbenchers should speak out. He said: “You’re not being disloyal, but say, look, come on now, to the leadership. Just think again on this. If we’re serious about having two terms in the Labour government transforming this country for the better we’ve got to listen to the electorate, do the right thing.”

    In contrast, Wes Streeting isn’t listening and carries on about going further and faster. 

    Speaking to LBC, he said: “We’re under no illusion – and I think the voters have sent us a fundamental message ‘we voted for change with Labour last year – if you don’t deliver change, if we’re not feeling it, we’ll vote for change elsewhere’.

    “So we’ve got that message loud and clear. We take the results on the chin. We’re back in parliament today, picking ourselves up, dusting ourselves down, and with things like the GP announcement today showing the country we’ve got the message, when the prime minister said ‘go further and faster’, we’re on the case.





    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Gingin How can people vote to disenfranchise themselves of the safety net that PIP and Sickness benefits gives them when they grow old and infirm and sick. It's like asking Turkeys to vote for Christmas!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    And these are the very people we are to meant to trust. Well Quelle surprise,!! The circus is in town and the clowns are running the show. AGAIN!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    A light in the dark - shout out to this guy who spoke out against the cuts as soon as they were announced and is still the only Welsh Labour mp who has committed to voting against them. He might be one who will retain his seat for that, and the other good work he has been doing since ousting the tory incumbent in a conservative stronghold last year.

    https://www.google.co.uk/url?q=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cd0205xyrl7o&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwjq66Wdjo-NAxXCQ0EAHY9jHuEQ0PADegQICRAL&usg=AOvVaw1qv5QUcIypkyfg1uOIhtsN

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Dwp get the gold standard award for the persecution of the sick, disabled and the old, and are not associated with anything positive. I think they’ve even managed to become more of a joke under Timms and Kendall. Who of us thought that was even possible?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @(No) hope I'm spending my next PIP payment properly by buying a clown suit for Timms and Kendall.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    Of course they don't want to consult: they will already seen the overwhelming, negative response to the Hive proposals, and Labour are increasingly nervous about public opinion in general, although I was speaking to a woman who does agree with the Govt's proposals in relation to people with 'minor aliments' not working.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 2 days ago
    What a surprise, NOT!!

    This is a total shambles.