Claimants votes will count in Makerfield, where the number of personal independence payment (PIP) recipients is enough to influence the outcome of the most important byelection in recent history, according to the DWP’s own statistics. 

The DWP’s statxplore tool reveals that there are 8,225 PIP claimants aged 18 and over and 5,464  universal credit health element recipients in the constituency.

At the last election, Labour held the seat with a majority of 5,399 with 40,263 votes cast in all, out of a total electorate of 76,641 (52.55% turnout).

This means that PIP claimants alone make up over 10% of the Makerfield electorate.

The most recent poll in Makerfield put Labour ahead at 43% compared to Reform on 40%.  So, the number of PIP claimants is potentially considerably more than the difference in votes between the two main contenders.

Given so close a race, where might those disabled claimants who have their future financial welfare top of their list of priorities, place their vote?

Reform on benefits

Back at the beginning of April, Farage announced that Reform would soon provide details of “the biggest cuts to the benefits bill ever seen in the history of this country".  Since then he has claimed that Reform’s plans are so radical they will cause “riots” and “strikes”.

But the local elections have come and gone, the Makerfield byelection campaign is underway and Reform have still to give any details of their grand plan.

But Reform have already announced three changes that will affect current claimants if they get into power:

Stopping PIP for 80-90% of claimants with depression or anxiety.

A crackdown on Motability, with Lee Anderson jeering that he would bring back the blue three-wheeler.

Incentivising benefits assessors to fail claimants.

In this regard, it’s worth noting that in Makerfield:

2,940 PIP claimants have psychiatric disorders listed as the main condition for their claim and 986 of these have anxiety or mixed anxiety and depressive disorders as the basis of their award.

4,235 PIP claimants get the enhanced rate of the mobility component, making them eligible for the Motability scheme.

Even if there is considerable overlap between the two groups, they still make up  at least 5% of the Makerfield electorate, more than the difference between the two candidates according to current polls.

In a knife edge election, the votes of these claimants, whose welfare has been plainly threatened by Reform, could be crucial.

Labour on benefits

Readers don’t needed to be reminded of what many regard as the unforgiveable betrayal by Labour’s front bench when it comes to benefits.  Cuts to UC health for new claimants will plunge many into poverty.  And the attempt to slash PIP by introducing the 4-point rule would have devastated the lives of vast numbers of current claimants.

But Labour backbenchers and many others in the Labour movement fought back against the PIP  cuts.  And it would be fair to say that Andy Burnham was a strong voice urging MPs to vote against the government’s welfare reforms.

Now, however, claimants are waiting for the outcome of the Timms review, with a real possibility that Labour’s front bench are plotting another assault on PIP.  And there are many other likely  attacks waiting in the wings, including the abolition of the work capability assessment and the introduction of a new, time-limited, unemployment insurance contributory benefit.

Labour are not a party that many claimants would wish to give their vote to.

Least worst option

But it is fairly certain that there are only two parties with any hope of winning in Makerfield. At present the polls don’t put any other party even into double figures. Either Labour or Reform will take the seat.

If Labour take it, there is a strong possibility that Burnham will go on to be the next leader of the Labour Party and the next prime minister.  And there is then a possibility, though very far from a certainty given Burnham’s reputation for ever changing loyalties, that Labour’s new front bench will be less punitive towards disabled claimants.

If Reform take the seat, however, it is a cast iron certainty that it will be a disaster for disabled claimants.  The Labour party will be in disarray, with a fatally damaged leader and no obvious replacement, with the possible exception of Wes Streeting who has said he wants to cut welfare to pay for weapons.

Reform will receive a huge boost to their morale and their credibility. They will look more than ever like the party destined to win the next election, with all that entails for disabled people.

We know, that disabled claimant numbers in Makerfield mean that they can make a real difference to the outcome of this election.  And right now, unpalatable as it may seem, voting Labour may well be the only way to avert the disaster of a Reform victory.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 13 hours ago
    The worst long term situation is that we have an snap general election that reform win and we then have a situation of a 2year farage/trump overlap (not only would that be ‘game over’ for disabled claimants but also dystopian for all working and middle class citizens (esp if farage sells out the whole nhs so it’s basically privatised.

    Bottom line is that it’s not safe to have a general election till jan 2029 earliest and we can’t have another Gordon brown situation.

    In the short term we’d be better off under a weakened Starmer gov till at least late spring 2027 

    In an ideal world I’d want Burnham to win but not challenge for leadership till this time next year (wet his feet, let Starmer deal with the upcoming council reforms and backlash on welfare take 2)

    What is worrying me is the heavy rumours of Burnham plan to challenge Starmer for leadership almost straightaway and more worrying calling an early snap election pretty soon after so he can enact his own policy. Burnham is believing a lot of his own hype (that he’s labours version of the Messiah) and underestimating the damage starm has done to Labour. 

    Right now the next general election seems to be about sending a middle finger to the status quo so any party that’s never been in power has a huge advantage (the Lib Dem’s will be cursing ever going into coalition- their politics are moderate compared to the dystopian policies of reform and greens imo) - the newly obtained councils for reform and greens are good dry runs (if you can’t run a council well you have no chance of successfully running the country)

    Also reform are a lot less of a problem if you cut the head of the snake - a scandal may yet sink farage but time is needed - also reform support has reached its peak so it’s the worst time to have a snap election.

    Obviously if burnham doesn’t win I can see streeting challenging straight away (and too many Labour MPs want Starmer gone asap to bide their time) - if it’s Starmer vs streeting with Labour membership I think Starmer could win it but I can’t imagine the left not putting forward a candidate (my vote would be for miliband as he clearly doesn’t want to be leader so may be the safest bet compared to the other power hungry candidates for the job)

    I don’t agree with benefit&work argue of the lesser of evils as the last time that arguement was used Starmer got a huge majority which has been hugely damaging to the country.

    Honestly this by-election is like Russian roulette where only one gun is unloaded

    Reform is predictable but Burnham policies seem to change week to week making him ‘high risk, high reward’ but definitely a vanity project where it’s unclear who’s side Burnham is on and what social groups he ends up targeting to fund his policies.

    So any voters in the by-election area I can’t recommend who to vote for but only if a candidate pops up on your doorstep ask a truckload of questions
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 hours ago
      @D Back in April before the local elections Miliband was trying to position himself for a coronation to replace Starmer. And Miliband's friends have been accused of actively trying to destabilise and bring down Starmer. So I take the idea of him being a reluctant contender with a large pinch of salt.

      As for it would be best if Starmer remained leader until at least late spring 2027. And best if Starmer takes the backlash for a second bout of welfare reform. I think those who would be hit by the welfare reform are likely to want Labour to change direction before running them over not after. As they are likely to be more concerned with their own wellbeing than the future election chances of Labour. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Sorry cookie been in hospital had a anxiety attack in the heatwave and I was found unconscious I’m fine now yes I heard about dwp vans a bit like the old style tv license tricks ha ha Blackpool is fun in the summer but dead in the winter has a great zoo also I’m not scared of milburn and co bring it on I say 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Reform are saying they will cut taxes with savings from welfare.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I have to disagree with the thrust of the above article which puts forward the idea that people should vote Labour as that is the lesser of two evils. The Labour Party has totally abandoned any moral compass and the fury/hatred which large numbers of working class people feel towards Labour is testament to this.
    The many failures and the outright corruption of Starmer and his clique (freebiegate) have prepared the ground for Reform to surge in the last 2 years. What the people of the UK need, and what many of us activists in the labour movement are campaigning for, is for the unions to stop wasting their time propping up Labour which has betrayed the organised working class and set up a new working class party. 
    Burnham cannot be trusted as far as anyone could throw him.
    His record as Manchester mayor leaves alot to be desired. Manchester still suffers from very high levels of poverty and homelessness. Walk down from Picadilly station into the city centre and you will see lots of homeless people.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 hours ago
      @Steve As a lifelong trade unionist and socialist historian, I've written extensively about the history of the British labour movement, and former LP member I have always taken the position that you cannot trust any party in government. Working class people have to rely on their collective strength to get improvements in their lives. History reveals this to be true time and time again. 
      I have offered an alternative which is for the unions to break from Labour and set up a new working class party. In 1900 most of the unions were clinging to the coat tails of the Liberal Party. Anti trade laws and actions by Liberal governments led to a growing number of unions abandoning the Liberals to join the LRC (Labour Representation Committee) and then the Labour Party. I must add that socialist organisations such as the SDF and ILP were instrumental in helping set up the LRC in 1900. 
      Secondly, regardless of which party is in power disabled people have to rely on their own campaigning work in alliance with other groups, such as unions amongst others, to fight in defence of their rights. Relying on career politicians to defend your interests is a strategy of passivity and unlikely to work as history reveals time and again.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 15 hours ago
      @Steve Obviously vote Green, they're the only ones who want to do some good in the country. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @bronc As I mentioned below, so what is your solution Bronc? Vote Reform? You seem to be constantly shooting down labour in all your comments yet offer no alternatives. I will never vote Reform and thankfully many others won't either, people will eventually see through reform's constant attempts to scapegoat this countries woes by blaming the sick/disabled or migrants. I certainly will NEVER support Farage and his millionaire friends who only want to fill their own pockets while they point the finger at the most vulnerable people in society and blame us for all the countries issues. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @bronc Union members can opt out of having part of their payment go to a political party. It’s easy to do and quick. You don’t have to give reasons. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    It absolutely boggles my mind when I see sick and disabled people who survive on disability benefits actually come out defending and voicing support for Reform. I've seen a worrying number of sick/disabled people defending Reform online recently. 'Turkeys voting for thanksgiving' springs to mind. Farage and his multi-millionaire capitalist buddies view people like us as a burden on society, they deem us as nothing more than parasites who are taking up space/money. It baffles me why anyone would support Reform, let alone any sick/disabled people!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Jay They support Reform for one reason and one reason only, we all know what that is sadly. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Regardless of how your view labour or any other political party, voting Reform makes no sense whatsoever and is dangerous.  They are a party of hate mongering not only on racial issues but also against disabled and mentally ill people and they won't stop their. When people with these dreadful views get into power the they won't just stop there, if history teaches us anything we should all be worried and tactically vote to keep them out.  
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 7 hours ago
      @bronc Are you implying where going too have to pay for NHS treatment with it being privatised.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 hours ago
      @Thelux We have a Labour government which has made major cuts to benefits with plans for more in the pipeline, we have the sham consultation over PIP by Timms, Labour has imposed record numbers (over 600,000) of benefit sanctions which have led to the deaths of disabled claimants such as Tomara Jade Logon, the privatisation and destruction of the NHS continues apace under Labour. Meanwhile we have a Labour government criminalising dissent through its mass arrests of pro Palestinian activists which UN human rights rapporteurs have condemned. We have the massive pollution of our waterways by private water companies under a Labour government. 
      Is it any wonder millions of working class people are taken in by the lies of Reform?
       Shall I continue with the my description of the many failures of this Labour government?
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 10 hours ago
      @Moose As net immigration has plummeted and the number of asylum seekers is dropping, deportations of foreign criminals is up and Labour is considering removing benefits from non UK nationals. Reform is increasingly shifting it's focus to alarm clock Britain vs welfare Britain as it's selling point. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Mike. Reform only have one mandate and that is immigration. Everything else, if there is anything else, is an ill thought out add on.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Mike. To be honest I'm confused by all the blind hatred people have for labour, the mainstream media is constantly pushing negativity towards labour and sadly the masses are just eating it up.. I for one think that Labour has done a decent job so far! I feel more secure under a Labour government than I did during that whole Tory shambles!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Andy Burnham appears to change his views based on whatever direction he thinks the wind is blowing.

    He only joined the opposition to the PIP cuts after the size of the MP rebellion became obvious.

    And he has shifted from right to left to right to left so often you have to regularly check what direction his moral compass is pointing and what his principles based stances are on issues.

    He has already done a 180 degree policy shifts on Israel, public spending and borrowing, immigration, trans rights.

    Relying on him to protect the vulnerable from cuts is wishful thinking. After all he was a staunch Blarite (Blair wanted to reduce incapacity benefits to the same as unemployment benefit but was stopped by his own backbenchers, and wanted to abolish DLA and use the money to fund social care but was stopped by Brown). Then he was someone who claimed to care opposing Tory cuts. Then in 2015 when the Labour Party stance briefly changed to not opposing welfare cuts he followed the Labour Party line and abstained rather than voting against the second reading of the Tory welfare bill. A man of principle with a moral compass who can be relied upon to protect the vulnerable? I think not. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 hours ago
      @bronc So what is your solution Bronc, vote Reform? You seem to be constantly shooting down labour in all your comments yet offer no alternatives. I will never vote Reform and thankfully many others won't either, people will eventually see through reform's constant attempts to scapegoat this countries woes by blaming the sick/disabled or migrants. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 hours ago
      @bronc @bronc Agreed. It seems voters had that opinion in the recent council elections etc. Quite possibly that trend will continue with Makerfield - another opportunity for Labour supporters to express their discontent, which would immediately throw the Andy Burnham project into disarray. 

      However, he is a local boy, so that might carry him through. Then he has to win a leadership contest - another opportunity for things to unravel. If he wins, we're into that unknown. 

      There is no way of being certain what might be the lesser evil, so best not vote for any evil.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @John @John except the Greens are now reportedly going to put minimal resources into Makerfield, meaning that they don't really want people to vote Green at this byelection and they especially don't want to be blamed for splitting the left vote and letting Reform in. So, former Labour voters switching to Labour is unlikely to happen in large numbers.

      To be clear, I despise and absolutely distrust Labour, but on this occasion I think that Reform losing is the best outcome.  A loss here is likely to do Farage, who is hiding from the press instead of holding frequent press conferences because of the £5 million controversy, a lot of damage.  Their candidate is proving an embarrassment, there are signs of splits over immigration and Restore seem to be siphoning off votes from Reform in larger quantities than expected.  If Reform don't just lose, but lose badly in Makerfield, the Reform project may start to unravel.  And that would be a wonderful thing.

      And we can still vote for who we want at the next general election - not that I have a vote in Makerfield anyway.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Ben The reason Labour thinks it can do what it pleases is because they believe leftwing voters will vote Labour at the next general election regardless to stop Reform. Reinforcing that belief might not encourage Labour to change it's direction. Lossing to Reform due to former Labour voters switching to Green might.

      If I lived in the constituency I would only vote for Burnham if I had faith in the man. That he would replace Starmer and change Labour's welfare plans for the better. I don't. Burnham as far as I know has said nothing on the issue since launching his campaign. And even if he did could I have faith in someone who has made so many 180 degree shifts in what he claims to believe in. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @bronc Nottingham city council were bankrupt and have turned it round their also solid labour.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I'm a gonner if Reform win the next GE. I hope people come to their senses in time.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Aw Indeed, I myself will surely perish if Reform win the next GE and push forward with Farage's plan to decimate the benefit system and place strict conditionalities on the sick/disabled. We can't allow evil to triumph. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    So, essentially, hold your nose and vote Labour. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @denby @denby Refusing to vote Reform whilst rejecting the endorsement of a manipulative administration is not doing nothing. It's taking a principled stand.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @denby denby Choosing to vote for neither labour nor reform is not doing nothing. It's standing up to the manipulation and rejecting the principle that least bad is better.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Avie Well said I couldn't have put it better.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @denby Ooh denby Fantastic.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @Avie I sadly remind you Avie, that evil prospers when good [men/people] do nothing.

Free, Fortnightly PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

News, Coupons, Campaigns, Feedback.

Over 140,000 claimant and professional subscribers.

 
iContact