Hot on the heels of the Milburn review into young people are Not in Education, Employment or Training (NEET), the commons work and pensions committee (WPC) have launched their own inquiry into the same topic.  Benefits and Work is asking readers to contribute to this inquiry too.

Unlike the Milburn review, which many people will suspect has been set up to provide justification for preventing  disabled young people claiming additional benefits, the WPC review is an all-party one which is less likely to be intended to reach a particular conclusion.

The issue is important not just because young people with neurodiversity or mental health issues are particular targets of the Milburn review

There is a growing move to establish the principle that it is better for disabled young people, especially with these conditions, not to have access to limited capability for work-related activity (LCWRA) payments, because it will trap them into a life on benefits.  If this belief takes hold then it allows for the possibility that the cut-off age for saving young people from such a fate can be raised again and again.

It also feeds into the growing narrative that it is the fault of disabled people themselves that they are not in employment.  If young people can be encouraged into taking up employment or training by preventing them claiming benefits, then why not older people too?

So, we are asking readers to consider making a submission both to the Milburn review and the WPC inquiry. 

The WPC inquiry is not focused on disability in the same way as parts of the Milburn review are, but the committee do include “underinvestment in mental health” as one of the possible causes of high youth unemployment.

The committee has a list of questions and say that respondents can answer any of them – you don’t have to answer them all.

The very first question is “What factors lead to a young person not being in education, employment or training (NEET)? Are there some young people who are more likely to be NEET than others?”  This seems to lend itself to a submission about the additional barriers for disabled young people and the importance of not excluding them from access to LCWRA payments.

You can submit your evidence as a Word, ODT or RTF document using the WPC’s submissions portal.  The deadline for submissions is 16.00 on 12 February 2026.

You can read more about the inquiry here.

You can read the call for evidence here and press the “Start” button at the bottom of the page to give your details and upload your submission.

 

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 7 hours ago
    thanks for highlighting this, I will make a submission. I've got the region of my union to circulate my response to the Milburn review to members.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Reposting this from an older thread:

    Timothy · 4 hours ago
    Here's very interesting post that I've just seen come up on the internet (if I can post the link) ...
    https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/west-sussex-mp-challenges-claim-spending-is-spiralling-out-of-control/ar-AA1TRCX2?ocid=msedgntp&pc=U531&cvid=6960bddf592d4142940674cff85f2bd8&ei=7
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @s @s Oh my post was entirely cut! I was saying credit for the article to Timothy, who posted it on an earlier thread. You'll see I copied him in!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 22 hours ago
      @sara Thankyou Sara for the article . Illuminating is it not !! Thankyou again Sara !!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    I wouldn’t want to be under 22 now and disabled for a start there no full housing rate until 35 and as people and myself are finding out universal credit is a cruel unfair system that needs to be scrapped which Labour should have done but didn’t sadly the good days have gone now with dla incapacity benefit and esa all in the past 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 5 hours ago
      @James h Good luck James h. Push it until you get it. Think about applying for pip foo, if you don't already get it, in case the timing means you need it for lcwra.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 9 hours ago
      @Neil Cook @Neil Cook yes they do it’s different to how esa and the work activity group used to be that was every 4 months on uc lcw can be every 2 weeks it does depend on the work coach and your situation though I’ve done all this for 30 years so I kind of know what to say(im a bit of a pro now)but am hoping for lcwra this year im just in a queue now for a wca  and have been for 6 months so fingers crossed i get it and get left alone 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 12 hours ago
      @James h Do the Work Coaches apply pressure on lcw,sounds like they do.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 hours ago
      @Neil Cook @Neil Cook was you talking to me?im just waiting to see what happens with all the big changes coming first?I got enough going on at the minute being on lcw and dealing with all these dreadful work coaches and their lies it’s all too much for me 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 23 hours ago
      @James h You should be receiving Pip with your condition which you have stated before.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 1 days ago
    Instead of not letting them have access to LCWRA benefit why don't they let them have access to it for a limited time period, and in that time period provide them with the medical help and support they need to cope and function better.  These conditions need to be treated to enable young people to function in life.  All the government are interested in is saving money not young peoples welfare.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 1 days ago
      @misty Not all mental health conditions can be treated successfully. I've suffered with poor mental health my entire life, and nothing I've done has helped. I've been in therapy most of my life, taken multiple medications, done the whole exercise thing, and, as I said, nothing has worked.

      We really need to stop trying to redefine what illness and sickness are and just help people rather than punishing them for something that isn't actually their fault, or, as this government is good at, just trying to save money when they could hit their rich friends and sponsors for some extra tax and clear everything up.