× Members

Re:Coming Off ESA for foreseeable future & NI ?

  • James
  • Topic Author
11 years 7 months ago - 11 years 7 months ago #112064 by James
Yes I think I remember this they will pay your NI credits only.Only drawback is that in order to get there you still have to go through a year of WRAG without throwing in the towel and closing your claim and as you say you could still be subject to action.
I think id rather not have the credits.
Only recently I had to make 6 seperate phone calls to contact The local Job Centre.
The Advisor was on a day off.
Unreachable.
It took going through heavily engaged national phone lines with waits on hold of up to 15-20 minutes each one,
The stand in advisor I eventually got through to did not sound particularly sympathetic
And this is before Ive even done the first WRAG interview!
The suggestion of an over the phone consultation was rejected as far as I recall.
This was last week.
I succeeded in getting the Interview re scheduled
Till before Christmas.
I dont want a year of this so I will have to break the news (if I can get through as a courtesy)
that they'd better institute indefinite sanctions ASAP and do their worst.
I think its a price worth paying than having the traumatic experience
of trying to "find me work".
Last edit: 11 years 7 months ago by Gordon.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 7 months ago #112067 by Gordon
James

To be clear, sanctions can only be applied after there has been a failure to participate in Work Related Activity, they can only be applied by a Decision Maker, not the advisor, and only after the claimant has been asked to explain why they failed to participate.

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: James

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
11 years 7 months ago #112147 by slugsta
My thanks to Gordon for answering this query while I was away :) James, did that fully answer your question? If not, please let me know and I will try to explain what I meant.

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • James
  • Topic Author
11 years 7 months ago #112233 by James
FAO Mrs Hurtyback.In response yes that was all very helpful and helped clarify many issues.
Its a bit soon to know the position at the end of next year as there could be new rules
etc that current Govt has been hinting at but we will wait now to see how it goes.
Time is on the Claimants Side,The Govt and anyone and anything dependent on The Govt.
is in a bit of a hole.
Oh when I mentioned foodbanks I was thinking more they are in opposition to policy
as they get Claimants out of a mess and I do not think you have to be on Benefits to use them?
Whats I was saying was that this could put Benefit dependency out of business as Claimants could eat and no longer have to apply for Benefit consequently I dont think the Govt would like this as they lose control over the unemployed?
Thanks Mrs Hurtyback no need for further elaboration at this stage.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonlatetrainBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserChrisDavid
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.