- Posts: 1
- Forum
- Members forums
- ESA, PIP, UC and DLA Queries and Results
- Should I have been awarded f(ii) as my descriptor for 'getting around' for pip
× Members
Should I have been awarded f(ii) as my descriptor for 'getting around' for pip
- michael m
- Topic Author
- Offline
Less More
1 day 6 hours ago #309441 by michael m
Should I have been awarded f(ii) as my descriptor for 'getting around' for pip was created by michael m
Hello
Can anyone advise
I have been awarded pip for mobility at the enhanced rate and given descriptor 'e'
"can walk 1 to 20 metres but no more"
I believe I should have been awarded f(ii) on the following basis
I have a fnd condition which has impacted on my ability to walk, the following facts are as follows
Although i can walk upto 340 metres (then i have to continue in a powered wheelchair) I am unable to walk ANY of this distance within a reasonable time, nor repeatedly, whereas being given descriptor 'e' is stating i can walk the first 20 metres as defined, this not the case
As part of my pip claim evidence was provided by my doctor stating 'takes 5 minutes to walk 15 metres'
Although I have made it clear in my pip application that I can walk 340 metres at 30 metres per minute (still 'not within a reasonable time')
I am aware, of-course aware if i was awarded f(ii) this would have resulted in the same number of 'points' but I can assure you this is not about points, its is about getting a accurate reflection of my ability to mobilse and I believe f(ii) is more indicative of my ability than 'e'
thanks
Can anyone advise
I have been awarded pip for mobility at the enhanced rate and given descriptor 'e'
"can walk 1 to 20 metres but no more"
I believe I should have been awarded f(ii) on the following basis
I have a fnd condition which has impacted on my ability to walk, the following facts are as follows
Although i can walk upto 340 metres (then i have to continue in a powered wheelchair) I am unable to walk ANY of this distance within a reasonable time, nor repeatedly, whereas being given descriptor 'e' is stating i can walk the first 20 metres as defined, this not the case
As part of my pip claim evidence was provided by my doctor stating 'takes 5 minutes to walk 15 metres'
Although I have made it clear in my pip application that I can walk 340 metres at 30 metres per minute (still 'not within a reasonable time')
I am aware, of-course aware if i was awarded f(ii) this would have resulted in the same number of 'points' but I can assure you this is not about points, its is about getting a accurate reflection of my ability to mobilse and I believe f(ii) is more indicative of my ability than 'e'
thanks
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- latetrain
- Offline
Less More
- Posts: 9066
3 hours 19 minutes ago #309463 by latetrain
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Replied by latetrain on topic Should I have been awarded f(ii) as my descriptor for 'getting around' for pip
Hi michael m
From your post I do not believe you would have been awarded f(ii) cannot either aided or unaided move more than 1 meter, you say in your post you can walk 340 metres.
Gary
From your post I do not believe you would have been awarded f(ii) cannot either aided or unaided move more than 1 meter, you say in your post you can walk 340 metres.
Gary
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Moderators: Gordon, latetrain, BIS, Catherine, Chris, David, Keely