- Posts: 51284
pip mobility
- jan
- Topic Author
The upper tribunal appeal decision, CSPIP/109/2015, allows that where someone is so prone to anxiety they need prompting in order to undertake any journey, to avoid overwhelming psychological distress, they may qualify for one of the planning and following a journey PIP mobility components.
But there’s a snag when you use this case in your own appeals. Appeal tribunals are entitled to consider all related upper tribunal appeal decisions and there’s another decision which considers help to overcome anxiety as irrelevant to planning and following a journey. That upper tribunal appeal decision, UK/622/2015, says only help in navigating a journey counts.
- See more at: www.disabilityrightsuk.org/news/2015/jul...sthash.4g5QZJzV.dpuf
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
Thanks for making us aware of this, we have been looking at UK/622/2015 for about a week to see whether we need to update the PIP guide.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bill24chev
- Offline
- Posts: 167
iibelieve 109/2015 confirms what a number of FTT decisions have said that the Advice to Decision Makers is wrong and you don't need a prescribed Mental Health/Learning Disability/Cognitive Disorder to meet 11d and 11f
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Gordon
- Offline
- Posts: 51284
Bill24chev wrote: Although the two decisions seem at odds with each other I think 622/2015 implies that if you need assistance at the start of a journey 11d and 11f descriptors both apply. My reasoning being if you cant start the journey without assistance you can not carry out the journey.
iibelieve 109/2015 confirms what a number of FTT decisions have said that the Advice to Decision Makers is wrong and you don't need a prescribed Mental Health/Learning Disability/Cognitive Disorder to meet 11d and 11f
I am afraid I think you are wrong with your summation of UTT Decision 622/2015, the Judge supports the DWP view that the assistance required is for navigation purposes only, it does not support the view that the assistance is related to the problems that the claimant might have with starting the journey or completing it due to issues such as agoraphobia or social anxiety.
Gordon
Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Bill24chev
- Offline
- Posts: 167
I have looked at decision again and you are of course right.
bill
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.