× Members

65 week rule

More
10 years 10 months ago - 10 years 10 months ago #123209 by banger
Replied by banger on topic 65 week rule
Is there a time limit on ESA(CB)?
Last edit: 10 years 10 months ago by slugsta.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 10 months ago #123210 by slugsta
Replied by slugsta on topic 65 week rule

Tim wrote: Is there a time limit on ESA(CB)?


For those in the WRAG there is a limit of 365 days (this includes the assessment period for new claims), there is no such limit for those in the Support Group.

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: banger

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 10 months ago #123217 by micksville
Replied by micksville on topic 65 week rule

Gordon wrote: Tim

The "65 week rule" refers to a newspaper article in which a JC+ staff member is alleging that they have instructions to report vulnerable ESA claimants for benefit fraud when they have been in receipt of ESA for 65 weeks in an effort to force the claimants into work or off of ESA.

As you are apparently only receiving NI Credits this of no relevance to you as you are not required to attend WFIs at your local JC+ office.

If you become eligible for ESA(IR), I assume you have already checked whether you are or not, then WFIs, Work Related Activity and this "rule" would be relevant to you.

Gordon

Little confused re this Gordon. Though this 65 eek thing is merely a rumour as yet are you suggesting it refers to WRAG group only and those subject to wfi and work programme etc.surely if here were a universal fraud referral it would encompass all 65 week claimants not just WRAG. Like you said earlier though if its someone at dwp playing mind games then what better way

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 10 months ago #123220 by Gordon
Replied by Gordon on topic 65 week rule

micksville wrote: Little confused re this Gordon. Though this 65 eek thing is merely a rumour as yet are you suggesting it refers to WRAG group only and those subject to wfi and work programme etc.surely if here were a universal fraud referral it would encompass all 65 week claimants not just WRAG. Like you said earlier though if its someone at dwp playing mind games then what better way


Polly Toynbee refers to an "anonymous jobcentre manager", JC+ staff deal with ESA claimants subject to WFI and Work Related Activity, also she goes onto to talk about ESA(CB) claimants reaching the end of their year of payments, so I think it is a reasonable conclusion that any reference is in regard to members of the WRAG .

Gordon

Nothing on this board constitutes legal advice - always consult a professional about specific problems
The following user(s) said Thank You: micksville

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 10 months ago #123224 by micksville
Replied by micksville on topic 65 week rule
Impeccable insight as always Gordon. Thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: GordonGaryBISCatherineWendyKellygreekqueenpeterKatherineSuper UserChrisDavid
We use cookies

We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential for the operation of the site, while others help us to improve this site and the user experience (tracking cookies). You can decide for yourself whether you want to allow cookies or not. Please note that if you reject them, you may not be able to use all the functionalities of the site.