HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) have covered up the existence a bug that loses and destroys social security appeal evidence for years, the BBC has revealed. Judges and representatives were never informed of the issue, even though it has been known about for at least 5 years.

According to a leaked report the bug in case management software affects social security tribunal documents more than any others, but it also has an impact on family, divorce and employment cases amongst others.

The bug causes evidence such as medical records and contact details to be hidden and can cause them to be deleted or overwritten.

The affected software was introduced into HMCTS in 2018 to the “general horror” of IT staff because of its unreliability and long history of data loss.  But despite repeated warnings, senior staff sought to hide and deny the problem for fear of reputational damage.

A briefing to senior staff in 2004 initially said that the risk to the outcome of cases was high, with the possibility of an adverse affect on cases being “very likely”. 

However, after reviewing a sample of just three months worth of cases, HMCTS decided that the risk to all cases was low and “no further checks” were needed.

But, following this review, one employee raised a formal whistleblower complaint and the subsequent investigation in November 2024 found that there had been “large scale” data breaches which should have been addressed immediately, but HMCTS had taken several years to react in spite of many warnings from IT staff from 2019 onwards.

Benefits and Work is particularly concerned that, because the majority of social security appellants are unrepresented, the chances of missing evidence being highlighted and remedied is much less than it would be in say, a family court, where representation is the norm.

If you think you may have been affected by this issue, it would be worth trying to get advice from a law centre or advice agency about the possibility of having the decision in your case looked at again.

You can read the full article on the BBC website.

Comments

Write comments...
or post as a guest
People in conversation:
Loading comment... The comment will be refreshed after 00:00.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @HL
      "The impact of sanctions was life threatening for some participants"
      I agree with this statment in the article HL.
      After my daughter's first suicide attempt and she had been hospitalised.  Her benefits were stopped completely.  This drove her to a successful second attempt and when she lay under a train and killed herself.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 18 days ago
    I wrote to my MP Emma Foody about New style ESA LCWRA group and the new proposed Employment insurance . She is asking DWP about what will happen to people who may stand to lose this if they don’t qualify for UC. So she will send me the reply which I will share on here.
      I also was very honest about DWP including disabled people in the re view of PIP and how I found them defensive and quite ignorant about disabled people s issues. Anything I get I’ll share on here 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Helen Galloway Thanks Helen much appreciated look forward to hearing back about this.

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Nigel Farage should he be elected in 2029 has said he will make big welfare cuts.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 16 days ago
      @RookiesUncle There will also be a lot of non white rich people voting for him too as all the policies will benefit the rich!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 17 days ago
      @Matt Alot of white working people will vote for Reform.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @RookiesUncle That can be easily translated to he will make huge tax cuts for the very rich and him and his buddies!
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @RookiesUncle I would doubt it - first because I don't think he will be PM as I predict a very messy coalition Government; two, whoever is in Government will due their analysis of what the electorate want, and how they voted. What does need to happen is a very honest discussion of Britain's relative decline over the last half century, and what is going to be needed to raise productivity. It won't be popular. It'll mean going back to a six day working week and much longer hours, and less annual leave, similar to that in the United States, let alone East Asia.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Elsewhere I read that some nine million people are now claiming universal credit. The cost overall is enormous. Economic growth is anaemic and not likely to improve soon. The Chancellor is almost certainly going to raise taxes FOR EVERYONE, which will be extremely unpopular. Hence why the readership of much of the right wing media welcome articles from the likes of IDS. When recently reading Blue Murder about the tory governments of 2010-24, one of the striking disclosures was the concept of 'cakeism', whereby Johnson wanted both low taxes and high public spending. The electorate, I'm afraid, would prefer poor public services and more money rather than being prepared to pay for improved health, transport etc. As I've said elsewhere on B and W forums, what we are beginning to witness is the slow privatisation of the welfare state (and that includes the state pension and NHS)
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @John I agree you can't put most benefits into 1 benefit( universal credit) and not expect it to be used by everyone. It was to make it easier for the state, the more that migrated over from other benefits the numbers will rise, but the other benefits reduce.   It's idiotic not to expect numbers to rise it's like comparing Apple's and Grapes and Farage will sell everything of to Trump's lot.    Including all our personal data, the rich look out for themselves that's why inheritance tax would be gone. Sorry just my opinion
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Matt 9 million people are now claiming universal credit because of three reasons.
      1: For the poor it replaced lots of other DWP benefits.
      2: It replaced tax credits for workers.
      3: For the non poor with children and housing costs it can be claimed at surprisingly high incomes. Amazingly people earning in excess of £50,000 and even £100,000 can receive Universal Credit. And for couples where both work UC can be claimed towards childcare costs. It is not a benefit just for poor people and the low paid.

      Income at which people lose Universal Credit eligibility. Incomes assume their only deductions are NI and tax. Pension contributions also do not count as income for UC. So as most people pay towards a pension the figures are actually higher than below.

      Couple aged over 25, one working, one not working, with 2 children born before April 2017, no other elements and £500 eligible housing costs. £56,400 gross

      Couple aged over 25, one working, one not working, 2 children born before April 2017, no other elements and £1,000 eligible housing costs. £75,300 gross

      Couple aged over 25, one working, one not, with 3 children born before April 2017, one lower disabled child premium, one carer addition, and £600 eligible housing costs. £84,800 gross

      Couple, over 25, one working, one not, with 4 children born before April 2017, one higher disabled child premium, one carer addition, one Limited Capability for Work Related Activity element, £700 eligible housing costs. £137,900 gross

      Income figures taken from May 2025 housingsystems.co.uk news article.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 19 days ago
    Ids(Ian Duncan smith)writing in the sun newspaper today saying he would make the medical tougher for mental health and impose more sanctions and stop the fit notes although things are a bit uncertain now and in the near future at least don’t have him in charge anyway I had a uc 50 this week for universal credit reacessment for 2017 but my local job centre plus said their is very long waits for everybody so nothing will happen to it 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @James Liz Kendall is his prodigy and was trained by him and his institute of social injustice which was funded by the very right wing Bradley Foundation in the USA
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @James From the article - "First, tighten eligibility for benefits to people with more severe mental health conditions while reinvesting the savings in the support we know genuinely helps people to recover"
      Considering how many ppl killed themselves under his watch probably isn't the best judge of who has the most severe mental health conditions.
      Also when people say that they mean not anxiety and depression. Yes because no one has ever ended up dead with just those! I've had them my whole life and I'm a mess, covered in scars, a lifetime of meds that barely work and a enough former nhs therapists to fill a large room! 

  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 20 days ago
    Sorry I don’t know where the best place to post this, 

    Every household where the billpayer receives an eligible means-tested benefit will now be in line for the warm home discount of £150. The government is now issuing a call to eligible households to check they are named on their electricity bill, with suppliers set to rely on customers’ records as of Sunday 24 August.

    In England and Wales, this means households in receipt of Housing Benefit, Income-related Employment and Support Allowance, Income-based Jobseeker’s Allowance, Income Support, Pension Credit and Universal Credit will now be eligible.


    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Boo This makes no sense.
      Since 2022/23 in England and Wales it has been automatic (excluding some of those living in mobile home parks or residential parks) using DWP benefit claimant addresses, they do not need to be the person named on the household bill. Is this public announcement intended to draw attention to the government widening claimant eligibility for the sake of positive publicity? Because I doubt they have stopped automatically paying it based on DWP claimant addresses and now the claimant's name has to be on the bill. 
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    so convenient, the glitches never work FOR people....
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Ala That would be fixed day one once discovered it wouldn't make news headlines.
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    Bug? Sounds more like a feature to me. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @billkruse My laughter was in response to billkruse's comment. Hope that I have not offended anyone.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 20 days ago
      @billkruse ha ha ha!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 21 days ago
    another great IT solution from the government that is full of bugs, cost billions, end up with cost ove runs, and then turns on citizens ! If you take together all the IT systems the UK government has created the cost is most like to end up being over 30bn and they still don't work right!
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @HL I believe the offical answer was "la la la not listening!"
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    Well there must be a data protection offence in there somewhere? 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 18 days ago
      @Moose Yes I agree. but those don't get investigated unless in the newspapers like  the post office scandal/ infected blood etc. it's the only way they investigate to say they have ticked a box. then blame another government and pat themselves on the back..... all forgetting victims the post office people even had to start a choir to get it in the news and lots of them still not received a penny..... it's the likes of the company and investors who should be putting there hands on there pockets not letting those (victims) suffer on
  • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
    · 22 days ago
    Always listen to your IT folks, hiring them then ignoring them is utter recklessness. Though (if I may don my tinfoil hat) curious why it only deleted appellants evidence, not the DWP's. Very glad we index our submissions.
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 19 days ago
      @Marc Allison NEVER listen to the IT folks.

      Switch it off and back on again is the height of their ability.

      IT won't have picked up on this issue, it would have been the project team assigned to stress test the new IT system who will have raised the alarm on any anomalies. 
    • Thank you for your comment. Comments are moderated before being published.
      · 21 days ago
      @Marc Allison When I worked as an IT consultant a man in government said the following to me. "I don't understand it, we hire expensive consultants and then end up not listening to them!"

Free PIP, ESA & UC Updates!

Delivered Fortnightly

Over 110,000 claimants and professionals subscribe to the UK's leading source of benefits news.

 
iContact