Hi Gordon
Thanks for reply.
This is difficult to get one's head around.
I cant understand why that section is there in the Act if the adjudicator can ignore it and start from scratch and look at my first award which had no medical evidence to support it and the second decision which had all the specilist reports / doctors letter and all medical history on my issues removed it .
He or she had more information than the first DM !! Crazy system .....!! Thats wants sorting out at appeal. Its not natural justice in any form.
Its like going to court without any evidence for the prosecution and winning!! Then appealed.
Going to apeal with the full evidence and loosing!! How does that work !!
I must be dim !!
Thanks take care
Mel b