The claimant did not report significant functional problems with this activity in their questionnaire or at consultation, and there were no evidence to suggest otherwise.
If not ticked reason given below.
How I interpret this is that if not ticked then there is evidence to suggest that the claimant does have significant functional problems with this activity, am I right?
The way it reads is to suggest that if it is not ticked then the the claimant did report something or there was evidence and whatever the reason for not ticking is given below.
